While the importance of supervisors’ communication for the successful implementation of organisational change is often emphasised, evidence regarding the actual dimensions of change communication and the reaction of change recipients is scarce. As communication is highly context and culture specific, this study included participants from Germany and India. To meet these research aims, we conducted focus group discussions (FGD) with overall 50 graduate students with work experiences from Germany and India. We identified key dimensions of informative, empathic and participatory change communication that are of high importance for change recipients. The German and Indian participants had similar expectations regarding the informative and empathic dimensions of change communication. However, interestingly, their assessment of the actual participation differed substantially, with consequences for their emotional responses. The findings emphasise the crucial role of supervisors’ communication for employees’ emotions in times of change. Supervisors thereby need to consider the diverse dimensions of their communication and stimulate employees’ expectations regarding information, empathy and participation with different communicative activities and approaches. This study provides important insights into organisational change communication by analysing its key dimensions, linking it to employees’ emotions and considering the cultural context.
AlasR. & ReesC. J. (2006). Work-related attitudes, values and radical change in post-socialist contexts: A comparative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 181–189.
2.
AllenJ.JimmiesonN. L.BordiaP. & IrmerB. E. (2007). Uncertainty during organizational change: Managing perceptions through communication. Journal of Change Management, 7(2), 187–210.
3.
BergerC. R. & CalabreseR. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112.
4.
BordiaP.HuntE.PaulsenN.TourishD. & DiFonzoN. (2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: Is it all about control?European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), 345–365.
5.
BrashersD. E. (2002). Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 258–271.
6.
Capgemini Consulting (2015). SuperkräfteoderSuperteam? Wie Führungskräfte ihre Welt wirklich verändernkönnen.: Change Management Studie 2015. Retrieved from https://www.de.capgemini-consulting.com/resource-file-access/resource/pdf/change-management-studie-2015_4.pdf
7.
ChhokarJ. S.BrodbeckF. C. & HouseR. J. (2007). Culture and leadership across the world. The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies (Lea’s Organization and Management Series). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
CorbinJ. M. & StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
9.
DicksonM.BeShearsR. S. & GuptaV. (2004). The impact of societal culture and industry on organizational culture: Theoretical explanations. In HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W. & GuptaV. (Eds), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 4–93). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
DorfmanP. W.HangesP. J. & BrodbeckF. C. (2004). Leadership and cultural variation: The identification of culturally endorsed leadership profiles. In HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W. & GuptaV. (Eds), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 669–719). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
DozY. (2011). Qualitative research for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(S5), 582–590.
12.
FeredayJ. & Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.
13.
GersickC. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10–36.
14.
GioiaD. A. & ChittipeddiK. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.
15.
GrovesK. S. (2006). Leader emotional expressivity, visionary leadership, and organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(7), 566–583.
16.
GuptaV. & PerepuI. (2010). Sony corporation—Future tense? (Reference no. 410-029-1, pp. 1–20). Hyderabad: IBS Center for Management Research (ECCH).
17.
HedmanE. & ValoM. (2015). Communication challenges facing management teams. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(8), 1012–1024.
18.
HelpapS. (2016). The impact of power distance orientation on recipients reactions to participatory versus programmatic change communication. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(1), 5–34.
19.
HempelP. S. & MartinsonsM. G. (2009). Developing international organizational change theory using cases from China. Human Relations, 62(4), 459–499.
20.
HillN. S.SeoM.-G.KangJ. H. & TaylorM. S. (2012). Building employee commitment to change across organizational levels: The influence of hierarchical distance and direct managers’ transformational leadership. Organization Sciences, 23(3), 758–777.
21.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W. & GuptaV. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
JohanssonC. & HeideM. (2008). Speaking of change: Three communication approaches in studies of organizational change. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(3), 288–305.
23.
JonesE.WatsonB.GardnerJ. & GalloisC. (2004). Organizational communication: Challenges for the new century. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 722–750.
24.
KirkmanB. L.ChenG.FarhJ.-L.ChenZ. X. & LoweK. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744–764.
25.
KirschC.ChelliahJ. & ParryW. (2012). The impact of cross-cultural dynamics on change management. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 166–195.
26.
KrippendorffK. (2013). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Los Angeles and London, UK: SAGE.
27.
KruegerR. A. & CaseyM. A. (2014). Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
28.
LamS.ChenX.-P. & SchaubroeckJ. (2002). Participative decision making and employee performance in different cultures: The moderating effects of allocentrism/idiocentrism and efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 905–914.
29.
LewisL. K. (1999). Disseminating information and soliciting input during planned organizational change: Implementers’ targets, sources, and channels for communicating. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 43–75.
30.
LewisL. K. (2000). Communicating change: Four cases of quality programs. Journal of Business Communication, 37(2), 128–155.
31.
LewisL. K.SchmisseurA. M.StephensK. K. & WeirK. E. (2006). Advice on communicating during organizational change: The content of popular press books. Journal of Business Communication, 43(2), 113–137.
32.
LindE. A. & van den BosK. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 181–223.
33.
MilesM. B. & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
MillerV. D.JohnsonJ. R. & GrauJ. (1994). Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22(1), 59–80.
35.
MorganD. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual review of Sociology, 22(1), 129–152.
36.
PatersonJ. M. & CaryJ. (2002). Organizational justice, change anxiety, and acceptance of downsizing: Preliminary tests of an AET-based model. Motivation and Emotion, 26(1), 83–103.
37.
PettigrewA. M.WoodmanR. W. & CameronK. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697–713.
38.
PyeA. (2005). Leadership and organizing: Sensemaking in action. Leadership, 1(1), 31–49.
39.
ReesC. J. & JohariH. (2010). Senior managers’ perceptions of the HRM function during times of strategic organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(5), 517–536.
40.
RussT. L. (2008). Communicating change: A review and critical analysis of programmatic and participatory implementation approaches. Journal of Change Management, 8(3–4), 199–211.
41.
ShinJ.TaylorM. S. & SeoM. G. (2012). Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees’ attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 727–748.
42.
TannerG. & OttoK. (2016). Superior–subordinate communication during organizational change: Under which conditions does high-quality communication become important?The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(19), 2183–2201.
43.
van VuurenM. & ElvingW. J. L. (2008). Communication, sense making and change as a chord of three strands. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(3), 349–359.
44.
WanbergC. R. & BanasJ. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 132–142.
45.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
46.
YinR. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
