This article investigates how the depth of open innovation (OI) practices influences marketing performance in the small and medium scale enterprises (SME) sector. We adopted the quantitative survey approach, and we sampled and elicited data from 72 senior staff from the UK’s SMEs sector using a survey questionnaire. Thereafter, the collected primary data were analysed using SPSS version 21. Findings show that (a) the depth of OI has a curvilinear relationship with radical and incremental product performance (PP) and (b) radical innovation has a moderating influence on the depth of OI and marketing performance of SME products. Hence, the implementation OI strategies would support radical PP of SMEs. Recommendations are made for SMEs’ policymakers to adopt and maintain a deeper relationship with chosen innovation partners in the SMEs product improvement process for the purpose of realising mutually supportive innovations, especially in radically transforming PP.
AhlstromD. (2010). Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 11–24.
2.
BianchiM.CavaliereA., ChiaroniD., FrattiniF., & ChiesaV.(2011). Organisational modes for open innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22–33. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002
3.
BøllingtoftA., & UlhøiJ.P. (2005). The networked business incubator—Leveraging entrepreneurial agency?Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290.
4.
BruqueS., & MoyanoJ. (2007). Organisational determinants of information technology adoption and implementation in SMEs: The case of family and cooperative firms. Technovation, 27(5), 241–253.
5.
BullingerH.J., AuernhammerK., & GomeringerA. (2004). Managing innovation networks in the knowledge-driven economy. International Journal of Production Research, 42(17), 3337–3353.
6.
ChesbroughH. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7.
ChesbroughH. (2006). Open business models. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8.
ChesbroughH. (2012). Open innovation. Research Technology Management, 55(4), 20–27.
9.
ChesbroughH., & BogersM. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In ChesbroughH., VanhaverbekeW., & WestJ. (Eds), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 56–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
ChristensenJ.F., OlesenM.H., & KjærJ.S. (2005). The industrial dynamics of open innovation—Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy, 34(10), 1533–1549.
11.
CohenW.M., & LevinthalD.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
12.
DahlanderL., & GannD.M. (2010). How open is innovation?Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709.
13.
DahlanderL., & PiezunkaH. (2014). Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention. Research Policy, 43(5), 812–827.
14.
Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS). (2014). What we do? Retrieved 13February2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-business-innovation-skills/about
15.
DiezJ.R. (2000). Innovative networks in manufacturing: Some empirical evidence from the metropolitan area of Barcelona. Technovation, 20(3), 139–150.
16.
DuJ., LetenB., & VanhaverbekeW. (2014). Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 828–840.
17.
EnkelE., GassmannO., & ChesbroughH. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.
18.
ErzurumluS. (2010). Collaborative product development with competitors to stimulate downstream innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 573–602. Retrieved from http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919610002787
19.
European Commission (EC). (2005). User guide to the SME Definition. In SpithovenA., VanhaverbekeW. and RoijakkersN. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537–562.
20.
European Commission (EC). (2015). Enhancing SMEinnovation capacity by providing better innovation support (Sub call of: H2020-INNOSUP-2014–2015). Retrieved 12February2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/open-innovation-20-related-calls-2015
21.
FaemsD., De VisserM., AndriesP., & Van LooyB. (2010). Technology alliance portfolios and financial performance: Value-enhancing and cost-increasing effects of open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 785–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1540–5885.2010.00752
22.
FaemsD., Van LooyB., & DebackereK. (2005). Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 238–250.
23.
FellerJ., FinneganP., HayesJ., & O’ReillyP. (2009). Institutionalizing information asymmetry: governance structures for open innovation. Information Technology & People, 22 (4), 297–3.
24.
FellerJ., ParhankangasA., & SmedsR. (2007). Process learning in alliances developing radical versus incremental innovations: Evidence from the telecommunications industry. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 175–191.
25.
FreelM.S., & HarrisonR.T. (2006). Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: Evidence from Northern Britain. Regional Studies, 40(4), 289–305. doi: 10.1080/00343400600725095
26.
GarrigaH., von KroghG., & SpaethS. (2013). How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(9), 1134–1144.
GassmannO. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: Towards an agenda. R&D Management. Retrieved 18February2016, from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=20924108&site=ehost-live
29.
GibbA.A. (1997). Small firms’ training and competitiveness. Building upon the small business as a learning organisation. International Small Business Journal, 15(3), 13–29.
30.
HallL.A., & Bagchi-SenS. (2007). An analysis of firm-level innovation strategies in the US biotechnology industry. Technovation, 27(1/2), 4–14.
31.
KatilaR., & AhujaG. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.
32.
KimD.Y., KumarV., & KumarU. (2012). Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 295–315.
33.
KoschatzkyK. (2001). Networks in innovation re-search and innovation policy—An introduction. In KoschatzkyK., Kulicke, M.M., & ZenkerA. (Eds), Innovation networks: Concepts and challenges in the European perspective (p. 102). Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.
34.
LaursenK., & SalterA. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?Research Policy, 33(8), 1201–1215.
35.
LaursenK., & SalterA. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among manufacturing U.K. firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
36.
LaursenK., & SalterA. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878.
37.
LeeS., ParkG., YoonB. and ParkJ. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300.
38.
LettlC. (2007). User involvement competence for radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1/2), 53–75.
39.
LettlC., HienerthC., and GemuendenH.E. (2008). Exploring How Lead Users Develop Radical Innovation: Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2), 219–233.
40.
LichtenthalerU., & ErnstH. (2007). External technology commercialization in large firms: Results of a quantitative benchmarking study. R&D Management, 37(5), 383–397.
41.
MiottiL., & SachwaldF. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499.
42.
NarulaR. (2004). Collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation. Technovation, 24(2), 153–161.
43.
NietoM.J., & SantamariaL. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6/7), 367–377.
44.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2005). SBS Expert Meeting towards better structural business and SME Statistics: A qualitative definition of SME. In SpithovenA., VanhaverbekeW. and RoijakkersN. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537–562.
45.
PfeiferJ., & SalancikG.R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46.
RauchA., WiklundJ., LumpkinG.T., and FreseM. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787. doi: 10.1111/j.1540–6520.2009.00308
47.
RiggsW., & von HippelE. (1994). Incentives to innovate and the sources of innovation: The case of scientific instruments. Research Policy, 23(4), 459–469.
48.
SethiR., & SethiA. (2009). Can quality-oriented firms develop innovative new products?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 206–221.
49.
SongX.M., & ParryM.E. (1999). Challenges of managing the development of breakthrough products in Japan. Journal of Operations Management, 17(6), 665–688.
50.
SpithovenA., VanhaverbekeW., & RoijakkersN. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537–562.
TödtlingF., LehnerP., & KaufmannA. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions?Technovation, 29(1), 59–71.
53.
TomlinsonP.R., & FaiF.M. (2013). The nature of SME co-operation and innovation: A multi-scalar and multi-dimensional analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 316–326.
54.
TrottP., & HartmannD.A.P. (2009). Why ‘open innovation’ is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 715–736.
55.
Van de VrandeV., De JongJ.P.J., VanhaverbekeW., & De RochemontM. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6/7), 423–437. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
56.
VanhaverbekeW., DuystersG., & NoorderhavenN. (2002). External technology sourcing through alliances or acquisitions: An analysis of the application-specific integrated circuits industry. Organization Science, 13(6), 714–733.
57.
VanhaverbekeW., Van de VrandeV., & ChesbroughH. (2008). Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(4), 251–258.
58.
Von HippelE. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.
59.
VossG.B., SirdeshmukhD., & VossZ.G. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 147–164.
60.
WangC.H., ChenK.Y., & ChenS.C. (2012). Total quality management, market orientation and hotel performance: The moderating effects of external environmental factors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 119–129.
61.
WestJ. (2014). Open innovation: A 2014 research agenda. Retrieved 15June2016, from http://blog.openinnovation.net/2015/03/themes-for-practice-of-open-innovation.html
62.
WestJ., & GallagherS. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319–331.
63.
Yun-HwaC., & Kuang-PengH. (2010). Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows. R&D Management, 40(3), 292–299.
64.
ZangJ., ZhangC., YangP., & LiY. (2014). How open search strategies align with firms’ radical and incremental innovation: Evidence from China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(7), 781–795.
65.
ZengS.X., XieX.M., & TamC.M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194.
