Abstract
Purpose.
To compare the midterm outcome in 12 women who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (RDC) and in 12 controls who underwent THA for osteoarthritis.
Methods.
Records of 12 women aged 50 to 80 (mean, 72.3) years who underwent THA for RDC after a mean of 9 (range, 4–11) months since symptom onset were reviewed. They were compared with 12 age-and sex-matched controls who underwent THA for primary or secondary osteoarthritis. Acetabular bone deficiency of the 12 RDC patients was classified as type I (n=7), type II (n=4), or type III (n=1). Type I was treated with cementless THA, and types II and III were treated with THA with a cemented acetabular component. The femoral component was cementless. Pre- and post-operative Harris Hip Score was assessed. Radiographs of the hip were evaluated for implant migration, osteolysis, and periprosthetic radiolucency in the acetabulum and proximal femur.
Results.
The 12 women who underwent THA for RDC and the 12 controls who underwent THA for osteoarthritis were comparable in terms of pre-, intra-, and post-operative parameters. After a mean follow-up of 9.3 years, the mean Harris Hip Score improved from 38.3 to 81.1 in RDC patients and from 43.6 to 84.2 in controls (p=0.13). One RDC patient had dislocation but did not require revision surgery. One RDC patient developed a radiolucent line <2 mm in zones 1 and 7 of the femoral component, but no migration occurred. No patient had progression of bony destruction, loosening, osteolysis, migration, or radiolucency of the acetabular component.
Conclusion.
Despite the rapid destruction of the acetabulum and femoral head in RDC patients, cemented or cementless THA achieved a good midterm outcome comparable to that for patients with primary or secondary osteoarthritis.