Background : Canada has a strong historical legacy in facial reanimation, yet few comprehensive programs exist nationally. Facial reanimation requires specialized expertise, multidisciplinary care, and resource-intensive interventions, which naturally centralize services in high-volume centers. Conversely, timely assessment and longitudinal follow-up are essential, creating challenges in a geographically vast country with provincially siloed healthcare systems. This study aimed to characterize the availability, structure, and perceived barriers to facial reanimation care across Canadian academic centers. Methods : A 15-item cross-sectional survey was distributed to department heads or delegates from Canadian university-affiliated plastic surgery (N = 15) and otolaryngology departments (N = 12). The survey assessed available services, multidisciplinary resources, outcome tracking, and perceived barriers. Responses were collected anonymously using REDCap and analyzed descriptively. Results : Fifteen of 27 departments responded (55.6%), representing six provinces. Core interventions including static suspension, periocular procedures, and nerve transfers were widely available. Cross-facial nerve grafting (80%), regional muscle transfer (67%), and free muscle transfer (73%) were less consistently offered. Only 53% of departments performed surgical procedures for non-flaccid facial paralysis. Outcome evaluation relied primarily on clinician-graded scales and subjective patient reports, with limited use of validated patient-reported outcome measures and standardized photo/video documentation. Half of centers reported a formal multidisciplinary team, with variable access to neuromuscular retraining therapists and psychologists. Common barriers included limited awareness among referring physicians, restricted operating room time, and insufficient allied health resources. Conclusion: Canadian centers provide broad access to foundational facial reanimation interventions, but gaps remain in advanced procedures, multidisciplinary support, and standardized outcomes tracking. Respondents unanimously supported expanding facial reanimation services.
ManktelowRTTomatLRZukerRM, et al.Smile reconstruction in adults with free muscle transfer innervated by the masseter motor nerve: Effectiveness and cerebral adaptation. Plast Reconstr Surg.2006;118(4):885‐899. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000232195.20293.bd
2.
HarrisPATaylorRThielkeR, et al.Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377‐381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
3.
HarrisPATaylorRMinorBL, et al.The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
4.
DerakhshanAMillerMQMalkaR, et al.Releasing the smile: Depressor anguli Oris excision in the context of managing nonflaccid facial palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(2):261e‐269e. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000008807
5.
AzizzadehBFrisendaJL. Surgical management of postparalysis facial palsy and synkinesis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018;51(6):1169‐1178. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2018.07.012
6.
HohmanMHHadlockTA. Etiology, diagnosis, and management of facial palsy: 2000 patients at a facial nerve center. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(7):E283‐E293. doi:10.1002/lary.24542
7.
MartineauSGasconLSaltychevM, et al.French Translation and validation of the synkinesis assessment questionnaire. Can J Neurol Sci. 2021;48(3):425‐429. doi:10.1017/cjn.2020.208
8.
GasconLMartineauSSaltychevM, et al.French Canadian translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of facial clinimetric evaluation scale and facial disability Index questionnaires for patients with peripheral facial paralysis. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022;24(1):63‐65. doi:10.1089/fpsam.2020.0608
