How feasible and practical is it to introduce the Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project (EPHect) standard surgical form into clinical practice?

Abstract

Background:

The Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project has been set up to facilitate and advance global endometriosis research.

Aim:

To test the feasibility and practicality of using the Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project standard surgical form in routine clinical practice.

Materials and methods:

Standard surgical form was filled out using a web-based application for 225 consecutive women who underwent surgery for suspected or known endometriosis.

Results:

Median age was 37 years. Half (49.8%) of the women had a previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis. Endometriosis was found in 91.5% of patients in this cohort. Median operative time was 101 min. Operative photographs substantially assisted completion of the standard surgical form post-operatively. The median time required to fill out the questionnaire was 8 min (range, 2–17 min). This was mostly dependent on the severity and distribution of endometriosis lesions. The standard surgical form is very comprehensive and has the advantage of including both the American Society of Reproductive Medicine classification and the Endometriosis Fertility Index; however, characterisation of deep endometriosis is insufficient for some women. In addition, some sections such as the descriptive endometriosis table (section IX) remain subjective.

Conclusion:

Using the Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project standard surgical form to collect research data is feasible, especially when using an electronic database entry tool. It is also practically manageable, although the time taken is more than originally estimated by the Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project standard surgical form authors. Even though some sections of the standard surgical form may be subjective, it is comprehensive and we would recommend its adoption into routine clinical practice for endometriosis research.

Keywords

Endometriosis standardisation phenotyping surgery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Janssen

Rijkers

Hoppenbrouwers

et al . Prevalence of endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy in adolescents with dysmenorrhea or chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19(5): 570–582.

Vigano

Parazzini

Somigliana

et al . Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18(2): 177–200.

Johnson

World Endometriosis Society Montpellier Consortium. Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2013; 28(6): 1552–1568.

De Graaff

D’Hooghe

Dunselman

et al . The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey. Hum Reprod 2013; 28(10): 2677–2685.

Nnoaham

Hummelshoj

Webster

et al . Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril 2011; 96(2): 366–373e8.

Simoens

Dunselman

Dirksen

et al . The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Hum Reprod 2012; 27(5): 1292–1299.

Casper

RF.

Introduction: new tools for enhancing collaborative endometriosis research. Fertil Steril 2014; 102(5): 1211–1212.

Nezhat

Endometriosis: ancient disease, ancient treatments. Fertil Steril 2012; 98(6 Suppl): S1–S62.

Becker

Laufer

Stratton

et al . World endometriosis research foundation endometriosis phenome and biobanking harmonisation project: I. Surgical phenotype data collection in endometriosis research. Fertil Steril 2014; 102(5): 1213–1222.

10.

Johnson

Hummelshoj

Adamson

et al . World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2017; 32(2): 315–324.

11.

Nezhat

Abed

et al . Strong association between endometriosis and symptomatic leiomyomas. JSLS 2016; 20(3): e2016.00053

12.

Vanhie

Meuleman

Tomassetti

et al . Consensus on recording deep endometriosis Surgery: the CORDES statement. Hum Reprod 2016; 31(11): 2660.

13.

Miller

Johnson

NP.

EPHect – the Endometriosis Phenome (and Biobanking) Harmonisation Project – may be very helpful for clinicians and the women they are treating. F1000Res 2017; 6: 14.