This study empirically examines the growth of return, volatility shocks, market efficiency and investors’ sentiment on prime ministers during their administration as a prime minister. Thus, various volatility forecasting measures are applied. It is observed that BSE return does not follow a random walk and inefficient during their tenures as a prime minister. ARCH measure confirms about volatility clustering. According to the EGARCH measure leverage effect does not exist, but the presence of this effect based on TARCH during the tenure of few prime ministers. Finally, the investors are trustful to those prime ministers who are elected from the Indian National Congress according to the growth of return.
AmeurH. B., & SenanedschJ. (2014). Socially responsible investments: An international empirical study of time-varying risk premiums. Journal of Applied Business Research, 30(5), 1513–1524.
2.
BaillieT. R., & MikkelsenO. H. (1996). Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Economics, 74(1), 3–30.
3.
BlackF. (1976). Studies of stock price volatility changes. Proceedings of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economical Statistics Section, 177–181.
BollerslevT. (1986b). A conditional heteroscedasticity time series model for speculative prices and rates of returns. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 542–547.
6.
BollerslevT., ChouR. Y., & KronerK. F. (1992). ARCH modelling in finance. Journal of Econometrics, 52, 5–59.
7.
BoxG. E. P., & JenkinsM. G. (1970). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day.
8.
BrandtW. M., & JonesS. C. (2006). Volatility forecasting with range-based EGARCH models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24(4), 470–486.
9.
ChristieA. A. (1982). The stochastic behaviour of common stock variances: Value, leverage and interest rate effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 407–432.
10.
ChouR. Y. (1998). Volatility persistence and stock valuations: Some empirical evidence using GARCH. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 3, 279–294.
11.
ChenY. W., & LianK. K. (2005). A comparison of forecasting models for ASEAN equity markets. Sunway Academic Journal, 2, 1–12.
12.
EngleR. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987–1008.
13.
EngleR. F., & BollerslevT. (1986). Modelling the persistence of conditional variances. Econometric Reviews, 5, 1–50.
14.
EngleR. F., LilienD. M., & RobinsR. P. (1987). Estimating time varying risk premia in the term structure: The ARCH-M model. Econometrica, 55, 391–407.
15.
EngleR. F., & NgV. K. (1993). Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. Journal of Finance, 48, 1022–1082.
16.
EngleR. F. Focardi, & FabozziF. J. (2007). ARCH/GARCH models in applied financial econometrics. JWPR026-Fabozzi c114-NP (pp. 1–14).
17.
FamaE. F. (1965a). The bahaviour of stock market prices. Journal of Business, 38, 34–105.
18.
FamaE. F. (1965b). Tomorrow on the New York stock exchange. Journal of Business, 38, 285–299.
19.
GodfreyM., GrangerC. W. J., & MorgensternO. (1964). The random walk hypothesis of stock market behaviour. Kyklos, 17, 1–30.
20.
GlostenL. R., JagannathanR., & RunkleD. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the national excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance, 48, 1779–1801.
21.
GazdaV., & VyrostT. (2003). Application of GARCH models in forecasting the volatility of the Slovak share index (SAX). BIATEC, XI, 17–20.
22.
GoudarziH., & RamamarayananC. S. (2011). Modelling asymmetric volatility in the Indian stock market. International Journal of Management, 6(3), 221–231.
23.
KwiatkowskiD., & ShinY. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?Journal of Economics, 154(1/3), 159–178.
24.
LoA. W., & MacKinlayA. C. (1987). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. Review of Financial Studies, 1, 41–66.
25.
LonginM. F. (1997). The threshold effect in expected volatility: A model based on asymmetric information. The Review of Financial Studies, 10(3), 837–869.
26.
MandelbrotB. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business, 36, 394–419.
27.
NelsonD. B. (1990). Stationarity and persistence in the GARCH(1,1) model. Econometric Theory, 59, 318–334.
28.
NelsonD. B. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59, 347–370.
29.
PhillipsP. C. B., & PerronP. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 335–346.
30.
PoonH. S., & TaylorJ. S. (1992). Stock returns and volatility: An empirical study of the UK stock market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 16(1), 37–59.
31.
PoonS. H., & GrangerC. (2003). Forecasting volatility in financial markets: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(2), 478–539.
32.
SchwertW. G. (1989). Why does stock market volatility change over time?The Journal of Finance, 44(5), 1115–1153.
33.
ZakoianJ. M. (1994). Threshold heteroscedasticity models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, 931–944.
