The article analyses the tweets of Rahul Gandhi, President of the Indian National Congress (INC), the largest opposition party in India. The analysis covers his tweets over a period of around 6 months from the date he took over as the President of the INC. The study determines the main themes underlying his tweets, the frequency of words and phrases appearing in the text of the tweets and the sentiments conveyed through his Twitter communication. Also, as a special subset, a comparison of Gandhi’s tweets campaigning for elections to the legislative assembly of Karnataka, which were held during the sample period, has been made with those of his political rival, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is the most followed Indian on Twitter, and the relative strengths and weaknesses of Gandhi’s Twitter campaign in comparison with those of Modi have been brought out. Overall, the study highlights the effective use of Twitter as a political communication tool and how its data can be harnessed using different ways.
AhmedS., & SkoricM. M. (2014, January). My name is Khan: The use of Twitter in the campaign for 2013 Pakistan General Election. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 2242–2251). Waikoloa, HI, USA: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.282
2.
AhmedS., JaidkaK., & ChoJ. (2016). The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter: A comparison of campaign strategies of political parties. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), 1071–1087.
3.
ArunK., SrinageshA., & RameshM. (2017). Twitter sentiment analysis on demonetization tweets in India using R language. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, 9(6), 119.
4.
ColettoM., LuccheseC., OrlandoS., & PeregoR. (2015). Electoral predictions with Twitter: A machine-learning approach. In 6th Italian Information Retrieval Workshop, 25–26 May 2015, Cagliari, Italy.
5.
ConoverM. D., GonçalvesB., FlamminiA., & MenczerF. (2012). Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data Science, 1(1), 6.
6.
EvansH. K., CordovaV., & SipoleS. (2014). Twitter style: An analysis of how house candidates used Twitter in their 2012 campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 454–462.
7.
Gayo-AvelloD. (2013). A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 649–679.
8.
GoA., BhayaniR., & HuangL. (2009). Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. In CS224N Project Report (Vol. 1(2)), Stanford.
9.
GhiassiM., SkinnerJ., & ZimbraD. (2013). Twitter brand sentiment analysis: A hybrid system using n-gram analysis and dynamic artificial neural network. Expert Systems with applications, 40(16), 6266–6282.
10.
Gulf News (2017, November25). Retrieved from https://gulfnews.com/opinion/op-eds/rahul-gandhi-in-a-new-avatar–finally-1.2130343
11.
GunningR. (1952). The technique of clear writing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
12.
HallidayM. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written, language (Language education). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Indian Express (2017, November4). Retrieved from https://indianexpress.com/article/india/rahul-gandhi-has-a-new-avatar-and-its-leading-the-congress-campaign-in-gujarat-and-himachal-4918709/
14.
JhaS., & YeC. (2016). The impact of demographic variables on perception of importance and continued usage of Facebook in the US. Global Business Review, 17(1), 1–15.
15.
JohanssonV. (2008). Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing. Lund: Lund University, Department of Linguistics and Phonetics.
16.
JungherrA., (2013, October). Tweets and votes, a special relationship: The 2009 federal election in Germany. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Politics, Elections and Data (pp. 5–14). NY, USA: ACM.
17.
KalampokisE., KaramanouA., TambourisE., & TarabanisK. A. (2017). On predicting election results using Twitter and linked open data: The case of the UK 2010 election. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 23(3), 280–303.
18.
KotlerP., & LevyS. J. (1969). Broadening the concept of marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 33(1), 10–15.
19.
KouloumpisE., WilsonT., & MooreJ. D. (2011). Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg!. ICWSM, 11(538–541), 164.
20.
KulkarniV. (2018). Is it the message or the medium? Relational management during crisis through Blogs, Facebook and corporate websites. Global Business Review. doi: 10.1177/0972150918761986
21.
KumarA., DhamijaS., & DhamijaA. (2016a). Political marketing: The horizon of present era politics. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 13(4), 46–53.
22.
KumarA., DhamijaS., & DhamijaA. (2016b). The changing paradigm of modern-day politics: A case of political branding and its Indian connect. NMIMS Management Review, June, 77–87.
23.
LiuB. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis lectures on human language technologies, 5(1), 1–167.
24.
MalgeR. U., & DeshpandeV. K. (2017). International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, 5(3), 1268–1272.
25.
McGregorS. C., MourãoR. R., & MolyneuxL. (2017). Twitter as a tool for and object of political and electoral activity: Considering electoral context and variance among actors. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(2), 154–167.
26.
MiragliottaN. (2012). Politicians, Twitter and the limits of the virtual political public sphere. Social Alternatives, 31(2), 6.
27.
NiffeneggerP. B. (1989). Strategies for success from the political marketers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(1), 45–61.
28.
O’ConnorB., BalasubramanyanR., RoutledgeB. R., & SmithN. A. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. ICWSM, 11(122–129), 1–2.
29.
O’LearyD. E. (2015). Twitter mining for discovery, prediction and causality: Applications and methodologies. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 22(3), 227–247.
30.
PalJ., & BozarthL. (2018). Is Tweeting in Indian languages helping politicians widen their reach?Economic & Political Weekly, 53(25).
31.
PalJ., ChandraP., & VydiswaranV. V. (2016). Twitter and the rebranding of Narendra Modi. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(8), 52–60.
32.
PalJ., ChandraP., ChirumamillaP., KameswaranV., GonawelaA., ThawaniU., & DasguptaP. (2017). Innuendo as Outreach:@ narendramodi and the use of political irony on Twitter. International Journal of Communication (19328036), 11, 4197–4218.
33.
RaniS., & SinghJ. (2017). Sentiment analysis of Tweets using support vector machine. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Applications, 5(10), 83–91.
34.
RathoreA. K., TuliN., & IlavarasanP. V. (2016). Pro-business or common citizen? An analysis of an Indian woman CEO’s tweets. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social, Networking (IJVCSN), 8(1), 19–29.
35.
RazzaqM. A., QamarA. M., & BilalH. S. M. (2014, August). Prediction and analysis of Pakistan election 2013 based on sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 700–703). IEEE Press.
36.
Reuters (2018, March26). Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-dataprotection-politics/indias-bjp-congress-trade-barbs-over-data-privacy-idUSKBN1H21JD
37.
SafiullahM., PathakP., SinghS., & AnshulA. (2017). Social media as an upcoming tool for political marketing effectiveness. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(1), 10–15.
38.
SalunkheP., SurnarA., & SonawaneS. (2017). A review: Prediction of election using Twitter sentiment analysis. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), 6(5).
39.
SangE. T. K., & BosJ. (2012, April). Predicting the 2011 Dutch senate election results with Twitter. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 53–60). Association for Computational Linguistics.
40.
ShamaA. (1973). Applications of the marketing concept to candidate marketing. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the Association for Consumer Research (pp. 793–801).
41.
SinghA. K., GuptaD. K., & SinghR. M. (2017). Sentiment analysis of Twitter user data on Punjab Legislative Assembly Election, 2017. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 9(9), 60.
42.
SinhaS. (2018). Fragile hegemony: Modi, social media and competitive electoral populism in India. International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 4158–4180.
43.
Socialblade (2019). Retrieved from https://socialblade.com/twitter/top/100/followers
44.
Society (2018, February). Retrieved from http://societymag.co.in/article/cover-story/the-reincarnation-of-rahul-gandhi/12096
45.
SongZ., & XiaJ. C. (2016). Spatial and temporal sentiment analysis of Twitter data. In CapineriC., HaklayM., HuangH., AntoniouV., KettunenJ., OstermannF., & PurvesR., (eds.), European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information (pp. 205–221). London: Ubiquity Press.
46.
SureshK., & RamakrishnanC. (2015). Twittering public sentiments: A predictive analysis of pre-poll twitter popularity of Prime ministerial candidates for the indian elections 2014. Media Watch, 6(2), 238–254.
47.
Times of India (2017, September24). Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/rahul-gandhi-adds-1-million-twitter-followers-in-last-2-months/articleshow/60812170.cms
48.
TumasjanA., SprengerT. O., SandnerP. G., & WelpeI. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. ICWSM, 10(1), 178–185.
49.
UpadhyayaM., & UpadhyayaR. (2012). Political branding in India: Believing a candidate in the age of uncertainty. ELK Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Retail Management, 3(1).
50.
UreJ. (1971). Lexical density and register differentiation. In PerrenG., & TrimT. (eds.), Applications of Linguistics (pp. 443–452). London: Cambridge University Press.
51.
UsherwoodS., & WrightK. A. (2017). Sticks and stones: Comparing Twitter campaigning strategies in the European Union referendum. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), 371–388.
52.
ZhangL., GhoshR., DekhilM., HsuM., & LiuB. (2011). Combining lexicon based and learning-based methods for Twitter sentiment analysis. In HP Laboratories, Technical Report HPL-2011, 89.
53.
ZhouX., TaoX., YongJ., & YangZ. (2013, June). Sentiment analysis on tweets for social events. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 2013 IEEE 17th International Conference on (pp. 557–562). Canada: IEEE.
