The prevalence of abusive supervision in the organisations and severe consequences associated with it has compelled researchers to explore the various dynamics of this phenomenon. This study exemplifies the conditions under which subordinates respond to abusive behaviours of their supervisors. Based on the existing literature and theoretical lenses, we postulate the detrimental effects of abusive supervision combined with the perception of injustice and politics in an organisation on deviance behaviours of the subordinates. The proposed framework suggests abusive supervision triggers work incivility among subordinates via the creation of an unjust and politically charged work environment. Besides, we find work incivility to be contingent on the political skill; subordinates with high political skill do not resort to work incivility as a response to abusive supervision of managers, rather, they rely on their political skills to survive in a toxic work environment. The proposed framework is primarily based on two theoretical foundations—social exchange theory and uncertainty management theory.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
2.
AnderssonL. M.PearsonC. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/259136.pdf
3.
AquinoK.DouglasS. (2003). Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00517-4
4.
AryeeS.SunL. Y.ChenZ. X.DebrahY. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
5.
AshforthB. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700701
6.
AveyJ. B.WuK.HolleyE. (2015). The influence of abusive supervision and job embeddedness on citizenship and deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2192-x
7.
AvolioB. J.WalumbwaF. O.WeberT. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
8.
BanduraA.WaltersR. H. (1977). Social learning theory(1st ed.). Prentice Hall.
9.
BassB. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
10.
BennettR. J. (1998). Perceived powerlessness as a cause of employee deviance. - PsycNET. In GriffinR. W.O’Leary-KellyA.CollinsJ. M. (Eds.), Monographs in organizational behavior and industrial relations (pp. 221–239). Elsevier Science. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-06093-008
11.
BiesR. J.TrippT. M. (1996). Beyond distrust. ‘Getting even’ and the need for revenge. In KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 246–260). SAGE Publications.
12.
BlauP. M. (1964). Social exchange theory. Wiley.
13.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. SAGE Publications.
14.
BurtonJ. P.HooblerJ. M.ScheuerM. L. (2012). Supervisor workplace stress and abusive supervision: The buffering effect of exercise. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(3), 271–279.
15.
ChangC.-H.RosenC. C.LevyP. E. (2009). The relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employee attitudes, strain, and behavior: A meta-analytic examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 779–801. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670894
16.
Cohen-CharashY.SpectorP. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321. https://doi.org/10.1006/OBHD.2001.2958
17.
ColquittJ. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 386–399.
18.
ColquittJ. A. (2012). Organizational justice. In KozlowskiS. W. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 526–547). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952392.n262
19.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. O. L. H.NgK. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2001-06715-006
20.
CortinaL. M.MagleyV. J.WilliamsJ. H.LanghoutR. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64–80.
21.
DetertJ. R.BurrisE. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.55.1.212
22.
DionisiA. M.BarlingJ.DupréK. E. (2012). Revisiting the comparative outcomes of workplace aggression and sexual harassment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029883
23.
EvertonW. J.JoltonJ. A.MastrangeloP. M. (2007). Be nice and fair or else: Understanding reasons for employees’ deviant behaviors. Journal of Management Development, 26(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710710726035
24.
FerrisG. R.KacmarM. K. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18(1), 93–116.
25.
FerrisG. R.TreadwayD. C.PerrewéP. L.BrouerR. L.DouglasC.LuxS. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33(3), 290–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300813
26.
FisherA. (2005). How to prevent violence at work. Fortune, 151(4), 42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15729933
27.
FitnessJ. (2000). Anger in the workplace: An emotion script approach to anger episodes between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<147::AID-JOB35>3.0.CO;2-T
28.
FolgerR.CropanzanoR. S. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In GreenbergJeraldCropanzanoR. S. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford University Press.
29.
FoxS.SpectorP. E.MilesD. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1803
30.
GansterD. C.FusilierM. R. (1989). Control in the workplace. In International review of industrial and organizational psychology (4th ed., pp. 235–280). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daniel_Ganster/publication/308312760_Control_in_the_workplace/links/54e2337c0cf2c3e7d2d31001/Control-in-the-workplace.pdf
31.
GreenbaumR. L.MawritzM. B.MayerD. M.PriesemuthM. (2013). To act out, to withdraw, or to constructively resist? Employee reactions to supervisor abuse of customers and the moderating role of employee moral identity. Human Relations, 66(7), 925–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713482992
32.
GreenbergJ. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208
33.
GreenbergJ. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In CropanzanoR. S. (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Erlbaum.
34.
GreenbergJ. (2011). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306437
35.
GreenbergJ. S.CropanzanoR. S. (Eds.). (2001). Advances in organizational justice. Stanford University Press.
36.
GriffinR. W.O’Leary-KellyA. M. (2004). An introduction to the dark side. The Dark Side of Organizational Behavior, April, 1–19.
37.
GriffithsT. N. (1986). The power of relationships. The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 36(291), 476. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml
38.
Harrell-CookG.FerrisG. R.DulebohnJ. H. (1999). Political behaviors as moderators of the perceptions of organizational politics – Work outcomes relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1093::AID-JOB945>3.0.CO;2-#
39.
HochwarterW. A.FerrisG. R.GavinM. B.PerrewéP. L.HallA. T.FrinkD. D. (2007). Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability—Job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OBHDP.2006.09.003
40.
HooblerJ. M.HuJ. (2013). A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.005
41.
HurrellJ. J.NelsonD. L.SimmonsB. L. (1998). Measuring job stressors and strains: where we have been, where we are, and where we need to go. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 368–389. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1998-12418-006
42.
KacmarK. M.AndrewsM. C.HarrisK. J.TepperB. J. (2013). Ethical leadership and subordinate outcomes: The mediating role of organizational politics and the moderating role of political skill. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1373-8
43.
KhattakM. N.ZolinR.MuhammadN. (2020). The combined effect of perceived organizational injustice and perceived politics on deviant behaviors. International Journal of Conflict Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-12-2019-0220
44.
KiewitzC.RestubogS. L. D.ZagenczykT. J.ScottK. D.GarciaP. R. J. M.TangR. L. (2012). Sins of the parents: Self-control as a buffer between supervisors’ previous experience of family undermining and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervision. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.005
45.
KolodinskyR. W.HochwarterW. A.FerrisG. R. (2004). Nonlinearity in the relationship between political skill and work outcomes: Convergent evidence from three studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2003.08.002
46.
LamL. W.XuA. J. (2019). Power imbalance and employee silence: The role of abusive leadership, power distance orientation, and perceived organisational politics. Applied Psychology, 68(3), 513–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12170
47.
LeeS.YunS.SrivastavaA. (2013). Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea. Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.002
48.
LianH.BrownD. J.FerrisD. L.LiangL. H.KeepingL. M.MorrisonR. (2014). Abusive supervision and retaliation: A self-control framework. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0977
49.
LianH.FerrisD. L.MorrisonR.BrownD. J. (2014). Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035498
50.
LimS.CortinaL. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.483
51.
LimV. K. G.TeoT. S. H. (2009). Mind your E-manners: Impact of cyber incivility on employees’ work attitude and behavior. Information & Management, 46(8), 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2009.06.006
52.
LindE. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In GreenbergJ.CropanzanoR. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56–88). Stanford University Press.
53.
LindE. A.van den BosK. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 181–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24006-X
54.
LiuD.LiaoH.LoiR. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1187–1212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0400
55.
MackeyJ. D.FriederR. E.BreesJ. R.MartinkoM. J. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940–1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573997
56.
MargolisJ. D.MolinskyA. (2008). Navigating the bind of necessary evils: Psychological engagement and the production of interpersonally sensitive behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 847–872. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20159545.pdf
57.
MartinR. J.HineD. W. (2005). Development and validation of the uncivil workplace behavior questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.477
58.
MartinkoM. J.SikoraD.HarveyP. (2012). The relationships between attribution styles, LMX, and perceptions of abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 19(4), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811435791
59.
MattaF. K.SabeyT. B.ScottB. A.LinS. H.KoopmanJ. (2020). Not all fairness is created equal: A study of employee attributions of supervisor justice motives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000440
60.
MawritzM. B.DustS. B.ResickC. J. (2014). Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035863
61.
MeislerG.DroryA.Vigoda-GadotE. (2019). Perceived organizational politics and counterproductive work behavior: The mediating role of hostility. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2017-0392
62.
MitchellM. S.AmbroseM. L. (2012). Employees’ behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1148–1170. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029452
63.
NandkeolyarA. K.ShafferJ. A.LiA.EkkiralaS.BaggerJ. (2014). Surviving an abusive supervisor: The joint roles of conscientiousness and coping strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034262
64.
NeumanJ. H.BaronR. A. (2005). Aggression in the workplace: A social-psychological perspective. Counterproductive Work Behavior: Investigations of Actors and Targets, 7, 13–40.
65.
NevesP. (2014). Taking it out on survivors: Submissive employees, downsizing, and abusive supervision. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(3), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12061
66.
PearsonC. M.AnderssonL. M.PorathC. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 123–137.
67.
PerrewéP. L.FerrisG. R.FrinkD. D.AnthonyW. P. (2000). Political skill: An antidote for workplace stressors. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.4468071
68.
PorathC. L.ErezA. (2007). Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1181–1197. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159919
69.
RaffertyA. E.RestubogS. L. D.JimmiesonN. L. (2010). Losing sleep: Examining the cascading effects of supervisors’ experience of injustice on subordinates’ psychological health. Work and Stress, 24(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678371003715135
70.
RestubogS. L. D.ScottK. L.ZagenczykT. J. (2011). When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021593
71.
RiceD. B.TaylorR.ForresterJ. K. (2020). The unwelcoming experience of abusive supervision and the impact of leader characteristics: turning employees into poor organizational citizens and future quitters. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(4), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1737521
72.
SkarlickiD. P.FolgerR. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0021-9010.82.3.434
73.
SpectorP. E.FoxS.DomagalskiT. (2006). Emotions, violence, and counterproductive work behaviour. In KellowayE. K.BarlingJ.HurrellJ. J. (Eds.), Handbook of workplace violence (pp. 29–46). SAGE Publications. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cdc5/c58f7f7ddb58881f3a78155d1a3ce8795634.pdf
74.
SuttonR. I.KahnR. L. (1987). Prediction, understanding, and control as antidotes to organizational stress. In LorschJ. W. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 272–285). Prentice Hall.
75.
TepperB. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
76.
TepperB. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
77.
TepperB. J. (2016). Preface. In AshkanasyN.BennettR.MartinkoM. (Eds.), Understanding the high performance workplace: The line between motivation and abuse(pp. xvi–xviii). Routledge.
78.
TepperB. J.DuffyM. K.HenleC. A.LambertL. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00725.x
79.
TepperB. J.DuffyM. K.ShawJ. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 974–983.
80.
TepperB. J.MossS. E.DuffyM. K. (2011). Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263085
81.
TepperB.SimonL.ParkH. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539
82.
ThauS.BennettR. J.MitchellM. S.MarrsM. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OBHDP.2008.06.003
83.
van den BosK.LindE. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80003-X
84.
van KnippenbergD.HoggM. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1
85.
WhitmanM. V.HalbeslebenJ. R. B.Holmes IVO. (2009). Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 839–862. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1852
86.
YuklG. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Prentice Hall. http://files.liderancaecoaching.webnode.com/200000015-31f5732fb3/media-F7B-97-randd-leaders-business-yukl.pdf
87.
ZhangJ.LiuJ. (2018). Is abusive supervision an absolute devil? Literature review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3), 719–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9551-y
88.
ZhangY.LiaoZ. (2015). Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 959–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9425-0
