This article investigates the impact of fiscal space in donor-countries on their official development aid (ODA) supply. It relies on the indicator of ‘De Facto Fiscal Space’ proposed by Aizenman and Jinjarak (The Fiscal Stimulus of 2009–10: Trade Openness, Fiscal Space and Exchange Rate Adjustment, NBER Working Paper 17427, 2011) and on a panel of 22 donor-countries over the period 1964–2015. The analysis considers four measures of ODA, including the total net aid transfers (NAT), ODA allocated to all sectors in the recipient-countries (ODAALLSECT), ODA allocated to the trade sector and ODA provided for the non-trade sector. The empirical results show that greater fiscal space in donor-countries influences positively donors’ NAT, their ODA allocated to all sectors as well as their ODA allocated to the non-trade sector in recipient-countries. At the same time, greater fiscal space in donor-countries does not influence ODA relating to the trade sector. Furthermore, the impact of fiscal space on ODA supply to the trade and non-trade sectors depends on donor-countries’ level of economic wealth.
AdedejiO.AhokpossiC.BattiatiC. & FaridM. (2016). A probabilistic approach to fiscal space and prudent debt level: Application to low-income developing countries (IMF Working Paper, WP/16/163). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
2.
AizenmanJ. & JinjarakY. (2010). De facto fiscal space and fiscal stimulus: Definition and assessment (NBER Working Paper No. 16539). Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
AizenmanJ. & JinjarakY. (2011). The fiscal stimulus of 2009–10: Trade openness, fiscal space and exchange rate adjustment (NBER Working Paper No. 17427). Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
AlesinaA. & DollarD. (2000). Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 33–63.
5.
BeenstockM. (1980). Political econometry of official development assistance. World Development, 8(2), 137–144.
6.
BertoliS.GiovanniA. C. & ManaresiF. (2008). Aid effort and its determinants: A comparison of the Italian performance with other OECD donors (Working Papers Series wp2008-11). Universita’ degli Studi di Firenze Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Firenze, Italy.
7.
BlanchardO.ChouraquiJ.-C.HagemannR. & SartorN. (1990). The sustainability of fiscal policy: New answers to an old questions. OECD Economic Studies, 15, 7–36.
8.
BohnH. (1998). The behavior of US public debt and deficits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 949–963.
9.
BohnH. (2008). The sustainability of fiscal policy in the United States. In NeckR. & SturmJ.-E. (Eds.), Sustainability of public debt (pp. 15–49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
BoschiniA. & OlofsgårdA. (2007). Foreign aid: An instrument for fighting communism?Journal of Development Studies, 43(4), 622–648.
11.
BotevJ.FournierJ. & MourouganeA. (2016). A re-assessment of fiscal space in OECD countries (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1352). Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/fec60e1b-en
12.
BrunJ.-F.ChambasG.CombesJ.-L.DulbeccoP.GastambideA.GuerineauS. & Rota GraziosiG. (2006). Fiscal space in developing countries (Concept Paper). New York, NY: UNDP, Bureau for Development Policy, Poverty Group.
13.
ChengH. W. J. & PitterleI. (2018). Towards a more comprehensive assessment of fiscal space (DESA Working Paper No.153, ST/ESA/2018/DWP/153). New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic & Social Affairs.
14.
DangH.-A.KnackS. & RogersH. (2013). International aid and financial crises in donor countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 32, 232–250. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268013000657
15.
Development Committee (2006). Fiscal policy for growth and development—An interim report. Paper presented at the Development Committee Meeting, Washington, DC.
16.
DreherA. & FuchsA. (2011). Does terror increase aid?Public Choice, 149(3–4), 337–363.
17.
DriscollJ. C. & KraayA. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.
18.
DudleyL. (1979). Foreign aid and the theory of alliances. Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(4), 564–571.
19.
EscolanoJ. (2010). A practical guide to public debt dynamics, fiscal sustain- ability, and cyclical adjustment of budgetary aggregates (Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2010/2). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
20.
European Commission (EC) (2007). Public finances in the EMU 2007 (European Economy, No. 3). Brussels: European Commission.
21.
FainiR. (2006). Foreign aid and fiscal policy (CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5721). London, UK: CEPR.
22.
FleckR. K. & KilbyC. (2010). Changing aid regimes? U. S. foreign aid from the cold war to the war on terror. Journal of Development Economics, 91(2), 185–197.
23.
FournierJ. M. & FallF. (2015). Limits to government debt sustainability (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1229). Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrxv0fctk7j-en
24.
FrotE. (2009). Aid and the financial crisis: Shall we expect development aid to fall? Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics, Stockholm School of Economics. Retrieved from http://www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1402788
25.
FuchsA.DreherA. & NunnenhampP. (2014). Determinants of donor generosity: A survey of the aid budget literature. World Development, 56, 172–199.
26.
GhoshA. R.KimJ. I.MendozaE. G.OstryJ. D. & QureshiM. S. (2013). Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. Economic Journal, 123(566), 4–30. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ecoj.12010
27.
GnangnonS. K. (2013). The consequences of fiscal episodes in OECD DAC countries for aid supply. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 53(3), 302–313.
28.
HellerP. (2005). Understanding fiscal space (IMF Policy Discussion Paper No. PDP/05/4). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
29.
HeronT. (2008). Aid for trade: Towards a new development assistance paradigm for small states? (IPEG Papers in Global Political Economy No.37). Newcastle, UK: IPEG.
30.
HjertholmP. & WhiteH. (2000). Foreign aid in historical perspective: Background and trends. In TarpF. (Ed.), Foreign aid and development: Lessons learnt and directions for the future (pp. 80–102). London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
HoechleD. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312.
32.
JonesS. (2015). Aid supplies over time: Addressing heterogeneity, trends, and dynamics. World Development, 69, 31–43.
33.
LundsgaardeE.BreunigC. & PrakashA. (2007). Trade versus aid: Donor generosity in an era of globalization. Policy Sciences, 40(2), 157–179.
34.
MarioM. (2013). Budgeting for fiscal space and government performance beyond the great recession. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(2), 9–47.
35.
MosleyP. (1985). The political economy of foreign aid: A model of the market for a public good. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 373–393.
36.
NerlichC. & ReuterW. (2013). The design of national fiscal frameworks and their budgetary impact (ECB Working Paper Series No.1588, pp. 1–30). Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank.
37.
OstryJ.GhoshA. R.KimJ. I. & QureshiM. (2010). Fiscal space (IMF Staff Position Note SPN/10/11). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
38.
OstryJ.AtishD.GhoshR. & EspinozaR. (2015). When should public debt be reduced (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. 15/10). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
39.
ParkS. (2012). Quantifying impact of aging population on fiscal space (IMF Working Paper No. 12/164). Washington, DC: Fiscal Affairs Department, IMF.
40.
RoundJ. I. & OdedokunM. (2003). Aid effort and its determinants (WIDER Discussion Paper 2003/03). Helsinki: United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research.
41.
RoundJ. I. & OdedokunM. (2004). Aid effort and its determinants. International Review of Economics and Finance, 13(3), 293–309.
42.
RoyR.HeutyA. & LetouzéE. (2006). Fiscal space for public investment: Towards a human development approach. Paper prepared for the G24-Meeting in Singapore, September 2006, UNDP, New York.
43.
RoyR.HeutyA. & LetouzéE. (2007). Fiscal space for what? Analytical issues from a human development perspective. Paper prepared for the G20-Workshop on Fiscal Policy, June–July 2007, UNDP, New York.
44.
SaxegaardM. (2014). Safe debt and uncertainty in emerging markets: An application to South Africa (IMF Working Paper No. 14/231). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
45.
SchickA. (2009). Budgeting for fiscal space. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgetingandpublicexpenditures/45361746.pdf
46.
TingleyD. (2010). Donors and domestic politics: Political influences on foreign aid effort. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50(1), 40–49.
47.
WildavskyA. (1964). The politics of the budgetary process. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
