Religion is increasingly acknowledged as a driving force behind development processes; however, it has received little attention as a motivation for donors to give aid. The article analyses the stated motivations and hidden agendas behind the Hungarian government’s ‘Hungary Helps’ aid programme, aimed at supporting Christian communities in the Global South and reducing migration to Europe. The programme fits with the government’s rhetoric on religion and migration, however, the article reveals inconsistencies that suggest further motivations. While there is little evidence that there was domestic demand for such a programme, it has been used instrumentally to increase Hungary’s influence among Christian interest groups and their political allies in the USA.
AgerJ., Fiddian-QasmiyehE. and AgerA.2015: Local faith communities and the promotion of resilience in contexts of humanitarian crisis. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28(2): 202–22.
2.
AlesinaA. and DollarD.2000: Who gives foreign aid to whom and why?Journal of Economic Growth, 5: 33–63.
3.
AustinT.S., KingD.P., BergdollJ.. 2022: Defining and estimating the scope of U.S. faith-based international humanitarian aid organizations. Voluntas, 33(5): 970–89.
4.
AzbejT.2020: The situation of persecuted Christians and the Hungarian help in 2020. In UjháziL., KalóJ., PetruskaF., ., editors, Budapest report on Christian persecution 2020. Mondat, pp. 17–28.
5.
AzbejT., KóréA. and TóthB.T.2018: Actions taken by the Hungarian state in the protection of persecuted Christian communities. In UjháziL. and KalóJ., editors, Budapest report on Christian persecution 2018. Dialog-Campus.
6.
ÁdámZ. and BozókiA.2016: State and faith. Right-wing populism and nationalized religion in Hungary. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 2(1): 98–122.
7.
BanksN., HulmeD. and EdwardsM.2015: NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort?World Development, 66: 707–18.
8.
Bar-MaozM.2018: On religion and the politics of security: How religion’s involvement in domestic politics affects national securitymaking. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 16(2): 36–49.
9.
BarnaI. and KoltaiJ.A.2019: Attitude changes towards immigrants in the turbulent years of the “Migrant Crisis” and anti-immigrant campaign in Hungary. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 5(1): 48–70.
10.
BayerL.2019: Trump-Orbán bromance takes off. Politico. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/trump-orban-bromance-takes-off/
11.
BermeoS.B.2017: Aid allocation and targeted development in an increasingly connected world. International Organization, 71(4): 735–66.
12.
BerthélemyJ., BeuranM. and MaurelM.2009: Aid and migration: Substitutes or complements?World Development, 37(10): 1589–99.
13.
BlackmanA.2018: Religion and foreign aid. Politics and Religion, 11(3): 522–52.
14.
BompaniB.2019: Religion and development: Tracing the trajectories of an evolving sub-discipline. Progress in Development Studies, 19(3): 171–85.
15.
BorgerJ. and WalkerS.2019: Trump lauds Hungary’s nationalist PM Orbán for ‘tremendous job’. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/13/trump-latest-viktor-orban-hungary-prime-minister-white-house (accessed 15052020).
16.
BrownL.2021: Aiding persecuted Christians a major focus of Hungary’s aid program, official says. National Catholic Register. Available at: https://www.ncregister.com/interview/aiding-persecuted-christians-a-major-focus-of-hungary-s-aid-program-official-says (accessed 29092022).
17.
BuzogányA.2017: Illiberal democracy in Hungary: Authoritarian diffusion or domestic causation?Democratization, 24(7): 1307–25.
18.
CastillejoC.2016: The European Union Trust Fund for Africa: A glimpse of the future for EU development cooperation. DIE Discussion Paper, 22/2016.
19.
ClemensM.A. and PostelH.M.2018: Deterring emigration with foreign aid: An overview of evidence from low-income countries. Population and Development Review, 44(4): 667–93.
20.
ClistP. and RestelliG.2021: Development aid and international migration to Italy: Does aid reduce irregular flows?The World Economy, 44: 1281–1311.
21.
DietrichS. and WrightJ.2015: Foreign aid allocation tactics and democratic change in Africa. The Journal of Politics, 77(1): 216–34.
22.
DullS.2015: Orbán: A menekültválsággal vége a liberális blablának. Index.hu. Available at: https://index.hu/belfold/2015/09/16/orban_a_menekultvalsaggal_vege_a_liberalis_blablanak/ (accessed 29092022).
23.
DullS.2017: Magyar állampolgár lett két szír egyházi vezeto˝. Index.hu. Available at: https://index.hu/belfold/2017/09/21/magyar_allampolgar_lett_ket_szir_egyhazi_vezeto/ (accessed 11052023).
24.
EnyediZ.2016: Paternalist populism and illiberal elitism in central Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 21(1): 9–25.
25.
EstevesJ.2017: Pope Francis: Catholic politicians should be guided by the church’s moral and social teachings. America Magazine. Available at: https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2017/08/29/pope-francis-catholic-politicians-should-be-guided-churchs-moral-and-social (accessed 08052023).
26.
FariaN.2019: Viktor Orbán foi a Fátima para encontro de líderes políticos e religiosos ultraconservadores. Publico. Available at: https://www.publico.pt/2019/08/24/sociedade/noticia/encontro-fatima-junta-viktor-orban-assessor-trump-1884330 (accessed 11052023).
27.
FeischmidtM.2020: Memory-politics and neonationalism: Trianon as mythomoteur. Nationalities Papers, 48(1): 130–43.
28.
FeketeL.2016: Hungary: Power, punishment and the ‘Christian-National Idea’. Race & Class, 57(4): 39–53.
29.
FerrisE.2011: Faith and humanitarianism: It’s complicated. Journal of Refugee Studies, 24(3): 606–25.
30.
GamsoJ. and YuldashevF.2018: Targeted foreign aid and international migration: Is development-promotion an effective immigration policy?International Studies Quarterly, 62(4): 809–20.
31.
GreenL.2020: Hungary leading the way in helping persecuted Christians. Fox News. Available at: https://www.foxnews.com/faith-values/hungary-leading-way-helping-persecuted-christians (accessed 29092022).
32.
HackeneschC., HöglM., ÖhlerH., . 2022: ‘Populist Radical Right Parties’ impact on European foreign aid spending. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60: 1391–1415.
33.
HaynesJ.2020a: Right-wing populism and religion in Europe and the USA. Religions, 11(10): 490.
34.
HaynesJ.2020b: Trump and the politics of international religious freedom. Religions, 11(8): 385.
35.
HegedüsD.2020: Orbán has put all his eggs in Trump’s basket, but would be pragmatic with Biden. German Marshall Fund. Available at: https://www.gmfus.org/news/orban-has-put-all-his-eggs-trumps-basket-would-be-pragmatic-biden (accessed 29092022).
36.
HH-EEM. 2017: Budapest-jelentés a keresztényüldözésről 2017. Migrációkutató Intézet.
37.
HoefflerA. and OutramV.2011: Need, merit, or self-interest—What determines the allocation of aid?Review of Development Economics, 15: 237–50.
38.
Hungarian Interchurch Aid. n.d.: Strengthened humanitarian cooperation with Hungary Helps. Available at https://segelyszervezet.hu/en/news/strengthened-humanitarian-cooperation-with-hungary-helps/ (accessed 11052023).
39.
Hungarian Charity Service of the Order of Malta. 2021: Szolgálat a járvány idején. A Magyar Máltai Szeretetszolgálat Tevékenysége 2020-ban. Available at: https://maltai.hu/assets/uploads/files/bba24-2020_mmsz_web.pdf (accessed 11052021).
40.
Hungarian Spectrum. 2019: International Conference on Christian Persecution in Budapest. Available at https://hungarianspectrum.org/2019/11/29/international-conference-on-christian-persecution-in-budapest/ (accessed 11052023).
41.
Hungarian Spectrum. 2021: Viktor Orbán and Pope Francis. Available at https://hungarianspectrum.org/2021/09/01/viktor-orban-and-pope-francis/ (accessed 11052023).
42.
Hungary Helps Agency. 2020: Activity Report 2017-2019. Available at https://hungaryhelps.gov.hu/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/HungaryHelps_activity_report_2017-2019_EN.pdf (accessed 11052023).
43.
Hungary Helps Agency. 2023: Közérdeku˝ adatok. Available at https://hungaryhelps.gov.hu/kozerdeku-adatok/ (accessed 18052023),
44.
HuntJ.2019: Persecution of Christians review: Foreign Secretary’s speech following the final report. Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/persecution-of-christians-review-foreign-secretarys-speech-following-the-final-report (accessed 13082020).
45.
ICLN. 2021: Persecution of Christians. Available at: https://icln.at/resources/secularization-and-the-persecution-of-christians/ (accessed 21102022).
46.
IgoeM.2019: To direct more funding to Christians, USAID looks to Hungary. Devex.com. Available at https://www.devex.com/news/to-direct-more-funding-to-christians-usaid-looks-to-hungary-96055 (accessed 23062020).
47.
IPSOS. 2023: Global Religion 2023. Religious Beliefs Across the World. A 26-country Global Advisor Survey. Available at https://www.ipsos.com/en/two-global-religious-divides-geographic-and-generational (accessed 27052023).
48.
JamesR.2011: Handle with care: Engaging with faith-based organisations in development. Development in Practice, 21(1): 109–17.
49.
KraftK. and SmithJ.2018: Between international donors and local faith communities: Intermediaries in humanitarian assistance to Syrian refugees in Jordan and Lebanon. Disasters, 43(1): 24–45.
50.
KraftK. and WilkinsonO.J., editors. 2020: International development and local faith actors. Ideological and cultural encounters. Routledge.
51.
LamourC.2022: Orbán Urbi et Orbi: Christianity as a nodal point of radical-right populism. Politics and Religion, 15(2): 317–43.
52.
LanatiM. and ThieleR.2018: The impact of foreign aid on migration revisited. World Development, 111: 59–74.
53.
LancasterC.2006: Foreign aid. Diplomacy, development, domestic politics. Chicago University Press.
54.
LehoczkiB.2022: Semi-periphery regionalisms in a changing world order: The case of Mercosur and Visegrad group. Third World Quarterly, 43(4): 779–96.
55.
LumsdaineD.H.1993: Moral vision in international politics: The foreign aid regime, 1949–1989. Princeton University Press.
56.
LutzP.2019: Variation in policy success: Radical right populism and migration policy. West European Politics, 42(3): 517–44.
57.
MargolisM.2020: Who wants to make America great again? Understanding evangelical support for Donald trump. Politics and Religion, 13(1): 89–118.
58.
Máté-TóthA. and BalassaB.2022. A traumatizált társadalmi tudat dimenziói. Adatok a sebzett kollektív identitás elméletéhez. Szociológiai Szemle, 32(2): 57–77.
59.
McAlisterM.2019: American evangelicals, the changing global religious environment, and foreign policy activism. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 17(2): 1–12.
60.
MFAT. 2017a: The protection of Christians must be reinforced. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Available at. https://2015-2019.kormany.hu/en/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-and-trade/news/the-protection-of-christians-must-be-reinforced (accessed 11052023).
61.
MFAT. 2017b: Christian communities are in terrible danger in the Middle East. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Available at https://2015-2019.kormany.hu/en/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-and-trade/news/christian-communities-are-in-terrible-danger-in-the-middle-east (accessed 11052023)
62.
MoynS.2017: Christian human rights. University of Pennsylvania Press.
63.
MrázA.S.2020: Domestic reactions to the Hungarian government’s international aid policy. In UjháziL., editor, Budapest report on Christian persecution 2020. Mondat, 37–44.
64.
NaguibN. and OkkenhaugI.M.2008: Interpreting welfare and relief in the middle east. Brill.
65.
OECD. 2020: Development cooperation profiles. Hungary. Available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/a80b014d-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/a80b014d-en (accessed 16122020)
66.
OECD. 2023: Development cooperation peer reviews: Hungary 2023. Available at https://www.oecd.org/dac/peer-reviews/oecd-development-co-operation-peer-reviews-hungary-2023-ec7d67f1-en.htm (accessed 16042023)
67.
OliviéI. and PérezA., editors. 2020: Aid power and politics. Routledge.
68.
OpršalZ., HarmácˇekJ., VítováP., . 2021: Polish and Czech foreign aid: A ‘mélange’of geopolitical and developmental objectives. Journal of International Relations and Development, 24: 279–305.
69.
OzzanoL.2021: Religion, cleavages, and right-wing populist parties: The Italian case. In HaynesJ., editor, A Quarter Century of the “Clash of Civilizations”. Routledge, 65–77.
70.
ÖhlmannP., AdeboyeO., Asamoah-GyaduK., . 2022: A new journal for a new space: Introducing religion & development. Religion and Development, 1(1): 1–24.
71.
PanyiS.2015: Rejtélyes a befogadott kopt családok ügye. Index.hu. Available at: https://index.hu/belfold/2015/09/11/kereszteny_csaladok_befogadas/ (accessed 29092022).
72.
Pew. 2018: How do European countries differ in religious commitment?Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/12/05/how-do-european-countries-differ-in-religious-commitment/ (accessed 08052023).
73.
Pew. 2019: A closer look at how religious restrictions have risen around the world. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewforum.org/2019/07/15/a-closer-look-at-how-religious-restrictions-have-risen-around-the-world/ (accessed 29092022).
74.
PhilpottD. and ShahT.S., editors. 2019: Under Ceasar’s sword: How Christians respond to persecution. Cambridge University Press.
75.
PMO. 2019: American-Hungarian cooperation agreement concluded on the protection of persecuted Christians. Prime Minister’s Office. Available at https://2015-2019.kormany.hu/en/prime-minister-s-office/news/american-hungarian-cooperation-agreement-concluded-on-the-protection-of-persecuted-christians
76.
PMO. 2020: State secretariat for the aid of persecuted Christians and for the Hungary helps program. Prime Minister’s Office. Available at https://2015-2019.kormany.hu/en/prime-minister-s-office/state-secretariat-for-the-aid-of-persecuted-christians-and-for-the-hungary-helps-program (accessed 16112020).
77.
ProdromouE.H. and SymeonidesN.2016: Orthodox Christianity and humanitarianism: Introduction to thought and practice, past and present. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 14(1): 1–8.
78.
RFI. nd: Relentless Religious Persecution in Russia. Religious Freedom Institute. Available at: https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/relentless-religious-persecution-in-russia/ (accessed 20102022).
79.
RomaniukS.2021: Under siege: Counterterrorism and civil society in Hungary. Lexington Books.
80.
RoyO.2016: ‘Beyond Populism’. In MazoukiN., McDonnellD. and RoyO., editors, Saving the people: How populists hijack religion. Hurst and Company, 185–201.
81.
SalekL.2016: Faith inspiration in a secular world: An Islamic perspective on humanitarian principles. International Review of the Red Cross, 97(897/898): 345–70.
82.
SundqvistJ.2016: The need for contextual analysis on the role of religion in the Swedish development cooperation. In OdénR. editor, For better for worse: The role of religion in development cooperation. Swedish Mission Council, 51–60.
83.
Szent-IványiB. and KugielP.2020: The Challenge from within: EU development cooperation and the rise of Illiberalism in Hungary and Poland. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 16(2): 120–38.
84.
TarrósyI. and VörösZ.2020: Hungary’s pragmatic foreign policy in a post-American world. Politics in Central Europe, 16(s1): 113–34.
85.
ThérienJ. and NoëlA.2000: Political parties and foreign aid. American Political Science Review, 94(1): 151–62.
86.
ThorleifssonC.2017: Disposable Strangers: Far-right securitisation of forced migration in Hungary. Social Anthropology, 25(3): 318–34.
87.
TingleyD.2010: Donors and domestic politics: political influences on foreign aid effort. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50(1): 40–49.
88.
ToomeyM.2018: History, nationalism and democracy: Myth and narrative in Viktor Orbán’s ‘Illiberal Hungary’. New Perspectives, 26(1): 87–108.
89.
Trianon100.hu. 2020: Trianon a hazai közvélemény szemében. Available at: http://trianon100.hu/attachment/0003/2255_trianon_lakossagi_survey_elemzes_final_honlapra.pdf (accessed 02092023).
90.
UjháziL., KalóJ., and PetruskaF. editors. 2019: Budapest report on Christian persecution 2019. Hátter.
91.
van der VeenA.M.2011: Ideas, interests and foreign aid. Cambridge University Press.
92.
Vatican Radio. 2016: Hungary’s Orbán tells Pope Francis of pledge to tackle persecution of Christians. Available at: http://www.archivioradiovaticana.va/storico/2016/08/30/hungarys_orb%C3%A1n_tells_pope_francis_of_pledge_to_tackle_persecution_of/en-1254659 (accessed 08052023).
93.
VogelK.L. and NovakB.2021: Hungary’s leader fights criticism in U.S. via vast influence campaign. New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/04/us/politics/hungary-orban-lobbying.html (accessed 29092022).
94.
Interview-1a: two officials, Prime Minister’s Office, SSAPCHHP, Budapest, 12/03/2020.
95.
Interview-1b: follow-up with official from 1a, Prime Minister’s Office, SSAPCHHP, phone, 26/11/2020.
96.
Interview-2a: former MFAT diplomat, phone, 30/11/2020.
97.
Interview-2b: former MFAT diplomat (same as 2a), Budapest, 11/04/2023.
98.
Interview-3: official, MFAT, Department of International Development Cooperation, Budapest, 11/11/ 2020.
99.
Interview-4: three officials, MFAT, Department for Coordinating the Hungary Helps Programme, Budapest, 29/03/2023.
