Me-time refers to the time spent on rejuvenation, self-development and self-actualization, apart from an individual’s work and family roles. Now individuals are realizing the importance of taking me-time for better well-being. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the same. This study adopts an interpretivist paradigm using a qualitative research approach to understand the relevance and significance of me-time, and to identify the related constructs. Primary data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with 28 working professionals across demographics in northern India. Content and thematic analysis of the data reveal that most respondents were taking me-time without realizing it and that the lockdown period helped them realize how important it is. The themes that emerged included me-time, psychological well-being, psychological distress, work–life conflict and job performance. The results helped in the development of a conceptual framework for further exploration. It is one of the early studies that contributes to the existing literature by focusing on the third dimension of work–life balance, that is, me-time. This study provides implications for organizations to develop policies that encourage employees to indulge in me-time.
AdkinsC. L., & PremeauxS. F. (2019). A cybernetic model of work–life balance through time. Human Resource Management Review, 29(4), 100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.001
2.
AgrawalA., PandeyA., & KumarP. (2024). A case study of a post-acquisition organizational healing intervention: Enablers and outcomes. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 13(1), 98–116.
3.
AlverinaY., HanamiY., & AbidinF. A. (2024). “Working is my me time”: Exploring the perception of me time among working mothers. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 11(2), 264–283.
4.
AshforthB. E., KreinerG. E., & FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3363315
5.
BhattacharyyaR. (2024). Nearly 78% employees in India experience job burnout, says UKG study. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/hr-policies-trends/nearly-78-employees-in-india-experience-job-burnout-says-ukg-study/articleshow/108826598.cms?from=mdr
6.
BiswasW., & ChakrabortyD. (2023). ‘As You Sow So You Reap’: A multi-case study on reshaping workforce well-being through positive sustainability at construction firms. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 12(3), 333–351.
7.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage Publications.
8.
CalechmanS. (2018, February5). “Me time” sounds good, but when exactly?Harvard Health Blog. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/me-time-sounds-good-but-when-exactly-2018020513212
9.
ChangY., ChienC., & ShenL.-F. (2023). Teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic: A leader-member exchange perspective. Evidence-based HRM, 11(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-10-2021-0220
10.
DemeroutiE. (2012). The spillover and crossover of resources among partners: The role of work–self and family–self facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 184–195.
11.
DeyN., MishraR., FongS. J., SantoshK. C., TanS., & CrespoR. G. (2020). COVID-19: Psychological and psychosocial impact, fear, and passion. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428088
12.
EdmoreM., & HoudiniF. (2024). A qualitative diagnosis of factors influencing presumptive tax collection in Zimbabwe. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 13(2), 166–186.
13.
EloS., & KyngäsH. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
14.
FeredayJ., & Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80–92.
15.
FisherG. G., BulgerC. A., & SmithC. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016737
16.
GraneheimU. H., & LundmanB. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.
GrisslichP., ProskeA., & KörndleH. (2012). What role does time for oneself play in work–life balance?Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 20, 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a000076
19.
HamiltonA. B., & FinleyE. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112516.
20.
JaharuddinN. S., & ZainolL. N. (2019). The impact of work–life balance on job engagement and turnover intention. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 13(1), 7.
21.
KaushikN., AllanV., Latimer-CheungA., KochJ., & SweetS. N. (2023). Exploring the leisure time physical activity (LTPA) experiences of women with a physical disability in India. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(5), 714–728.
22.
KelliherC., RichardsonJ., & BoiarintsevaG. (2019). All of work? All of life? Reconceptualising work-life balance for the 21st century. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12215
23.
KimY. G., ChungY. K., & WooE. (2023). Gig workers’ quality of life (QoL) and psychological well-being in service delivery platform. Sustainability, 15(11), 8679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118679
24.
KnechtM., WieseB. S., & FreundA. M. (2016). Going beyond work and family: A longitudinal study on the role of leisure in the work–life interplay. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(7), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2098
25.
LewisS. (2022). What is “me time”? An exploratory investigation into the qualitative characteristics of me time for parents of preschoolers [Undergraduate thesis]. University of Canterbury. http://doi.org/10.26021/12869
26.
LiuC., KaranikaK., & HoggM. K. (2024). Self-gifting and temporal selves: Insights from first-time older motherhood. Psychology & Marketing, 41, 1934–1943.
27.
LoonM., Otaye-EbedeL., & StewartJ. (2019). The paradox of employee psychological well-being practices: An integrative literature review and new directions for research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(1), 156–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1479877
28.
MaharaniA., & TamaraD. (2024). The occupational stress and work–life balance on turnover intentions with job satisfaction as mediating. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 2369.
29.
MingoI., & MontecolleS. (2013). Subjective and objective aspects of free time: The Italian case. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9429-8
30.
MishraS., & DeyA. K. (2022). Understanding and identifying ‘themes’ in qualitative case study research. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(3), 187–192.
31.
NangpiireC., SilvaJ., & AlvesH. (2022). Customer engagement and value co-creation/destruction: The internal fostering and hindering factors and actors in the tourist/hotel experience. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 173–188.
32.
NelsonM. M., & AgarwalB. (2023). The rigmarole of negotiating double binds: A qualitative study of Indian women academics’ work-from-home routines in COVID-19 times. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 12(3), 372–389.
33.
NicklinJ. M., SeguinK., & FlahertyS. (2019). Positive work–life outcomes: Exploring self-compassion and balance. European Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 3(6), 1–13.
34.
Ortiz-BonninS., BlahopoulouJ., García-BuadesM. E., & Montanez-JuanM. (2023). Work–life balance satisfaction in crisis times: From luxury to necessity—The role of organization’s responses during COVID-19 lockdown. Personnel Review, 52, 1033–1050. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2021-0484
35.
PindekS., ShenW., & AndelS. (2023). Finally, some “me time”: A new theoretical perspective on the benefits of commuting. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(1), 44–66.
36.
PradhanR. K., JenaL. K., & KumariI. G. (2016). Effect of work–life balance on organizational citizenship behaviour: Role of organizational commitment. Global Business Review, 17(3), 15S–29S. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0972150916631071
37.
RansomeP. (2007). Conceptualizing boundaries between ‘life’ and ‘work’. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601167425
38.
RobertsE. (2008). Time and work–life balance: The roles of ‘temporal customization’ and ‘life temporality’. Gender, Work and Organization, 15, 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00412.x
39.
RoyP., NairD., & YadavR. (2024). Burgeoning of co-living and co-working space for the Indian millennial— A quiver or a hunt for novel strategies!Journal of Indian Business Research, 16(1), 134–153.
40.
Ruiz-MartínezR., KuschelK., & PastorI. (2023). Craftswomen entrepreneurs in flow: No boundaries between business and leisure. Community, Work & Family, 26(4), 391–410.
41.
SaundersM., LewisP., & ThornhillA. (2016). Research methods for business students. Pearson Education Limited.
42.
SingeS. M., CairnsA. H., & EasonC. M. (2023). Perceptions of self-care and work–life balance among secondary school athletic trainers. International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training, 28(6), 308–314.
43.
SrivastavaP., SehgalT., JainR., KaurP., & Luukela-TandonA. (2024). Knowledge management during emergency remote teaching: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the transition experiences of faculty members. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(11), 78–105.
44.
VoydanoffP. (2006). Work, family, and community: Exploring interconnections. Erlbaum.
45.
VyasA., & ShrivastavaD. (2017). Factors affecting work life balance—A review. Pacific Business Review International, 9(7), 194–200.
46.
WarrenT. (2021). Work–life balance and gig work: ‘Where are we now’ and ‘where to next’ with the work–life balance agenda?Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(4), 522–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856211007161
47.
WeeksK. (2009). “Hours for what we will”: Work, family, and the movement for shorter hours. Feminist Studies, 35(1), 101–127.
48.
WieseC. W., KuykendallL., & TayL. (2018). Get active? A meta-analysis of leisure-time physical activity and subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1374436
49.
WilliamsM., & MoserT. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–55.
50.
YerkesM. A., RoetersA., & BaxterJ. (2018). Gender differences in the quality of leisure: A cross-national comparison. Community, Work & Family, 23(4), 367–384.
51.
ŽižekS. Š., TrevenS., & ČančerV. (2015). Employees in Slovenia and their psychological well-being based on Ryff’s model of psychological well-being. Social Indicators Research, 121, 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0645-3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
