This study explores how Indian women academics navigated the responsibilities of home, care and paid academic work during the COVID-19 pandemic through the intersectional lens of gendered family role identity and work–home boundary theory. Using a qualitative interpretivist approach and thematic analysis, 30 women academics were interviewed on their work-from-home experiences. The findings show that women struggled to negotiate the increased work–family conflict due to reinforced gendered family role expectations and increasing invasion of work into home space. The study reveals the double bind whereby women are caught wanting to excel both at work and home. Flexible work options may not help Indian working women to achieve work–family balance due to the continued devaluing of care work and the subservient social status of women within the Indian family structure. Despite educational upliftment and financial independence, gender remains at the bottom of the intersectionality of various types of inequalities that affect Indian women academics.
AhmedS. F., & CarrimN. M. H. (2016). Indian husbands’ support of their wives’ upward mobility in corporate South Africa: Wives’ perspectives. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 42(1), 1354–1367. 10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1354
2.
BailynL., & FletcherJ. (2003). The equity imperative: Reaching effectiveness through the dual agenda. CGO insights [Briefing Note no. 18].
3.
BartleyS. J., BlantonP. W., & GilliardJ. L. (2005). Husbands and wives in dual-earner marriages: Decision-making, gender role attitudes, division of household labor, and equity. Marriage and Family Review, 37(4), 69–94. 10.1300/J002v37n04_05
4.
BaruaP., WaldropA., & HaukanesH. (2017). From benevolent maternalism to the market logic: Exploring discursive boundary making in domestic work relations in India. Critical Asian Studies, 49(4), 481–500. 10.1080/14672715.2017.1362320
5.
BhatnagarD., & RajadhyakshaU. (2001). Attitudes towards work and family roles and their implications for career growth of women: A report from India. Sex Roles, 45(7/8), 549–565. 10.1023/A:1014814931671
6.
BianchiS. M., & MilkieM. A. (2010). Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 705–725. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00726.x
7.
BittmanM. (2000). Now it’s 2000: Trends in doing and being in the new millennium. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(3), 108–117. 10.1080/14427591.2000.9686473
8.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
9.
CarrimN. M. H. (2012). ‘Who am I?’ South African Indian women managers’ struggle for identity: Escaping the ubiquitous cage [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Pretoria.
10.
CarrimN. M. H. (2015). Stepping out of the fish tank: Ethnic identity work of Indian parents. Journal of Family Issues, 37(16), 2368–2392.
11.
CarrimN. M. H., & NkomoS. M. (2016). Wedding intersectionality theory and identity work in organizations: South African Indian women negotiating managerial identity. Gender, Work and Organization, 23(3), 261–277. 10.1111/gwao.12121
12.
ChallengerJ. (2002). Blurring the line between home and work. Futurist, 36(6), 10–11.
13.
ClarkS. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. 10.1177/0018726700536001
14.
ColtraneS. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208–1233. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x
15.
CraigL. (2006). Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children. Gender and Society, 20(2), 259–281. 10.1177/0891243205285212
16.
CurrieJ., & EvelineJ. (2011). E-technology and work/life balance for academics with young children. Higher Education, 62, 533–550. 10.1007/s10734-010-9404-9
17.
De MarneffeD. (2004). Maternal desire: On children, love and the inner life. Little, Brown and Company.
18.
DickeyS. (2000). Permeable homes: Domestic service, household space, and the vulnerability of class Boundaries in Urban India. American Ethnologist, 27(2), 462–489. 10.1525/ae.2000.27.2.462
19.
DuttaD. (2019). Mobile phones as interactive technologies mediating gendered work-life conflict: A qualitative study on women in STEM. Sex Roles, 8, 659–672. 10.1007/s11199-019-01088-y
20.
EdleyP. P. (2001). Technology, employed mothers, and corporate colonization of the lifeworld: A gendered paradox of work and family balance. Women and Language, 24(2), 27–35.
21.
EdwardsP., & WacjmanJ. (2005). The politics of working life. Oxford University Press.
22.
EzzedeenS. R., & RitcheyK. G. (2008). The man behind the woman: A qualitative study of the spousal support received and valued by executive women. Journal of Family Issues, 29(9), 1107–1135. 10.1177/0192513X08315363
23.
GreenhausJ. H., & ParasuramanS. (1999). Research on work, family and gender: Current status and future directions. In PowellG. N. (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 391–412). Sage Publications.
24.
GuptaS. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 399–417. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00373.x
25.
HallS. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In RutherfordJ. (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture and difference (pp. 224–237). Lawrence Wishart.
26.
HertzR. (1989). Dual-career corporate couples: Shaping marriages through work. In RismanB. J. & SchwartzP. (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach (pp. 193–204). Belmont.
27.
HookJ. L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries: 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 639–660. 10.1177/000312240607100406
28.
HochschildA. R. (1997). The second shift (2nd ed). Avon Books.
29.
ImpettE. A., GableS. L., & PeplauL. A. (2005). Giving up and giving in: The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 327–344. 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.327
30.
JaiswalA., GuptaS., & PrasannaS. (2022). Theorizing employee stress, well-being, resilience and boundary management in the context of forced work from home during COVID-19. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(3), 187–192.
31.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
32.
KreinerG. E., HollensbeE. C., & SheepM. L. (2006). Where is the ‘me’ among the ‘we’? Identity work and the search for optimal balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1031–1057. 10.5465/amj.2006.22798186
33.
LauringJ., & SelmerJ. (2010). The supportive expatriate spouse: An ethnographic study of spouse involvement in expatriate careers. International Business Review, 19(1), 59–69. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.09.006
34.
LuneH., & BergB. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson.
35.
LukeN., XuH., & ThampiB. V. (2014). Husbands’ participation in housework and child care in India. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 76(3), 620–637. 10.1111/jomf.12108
36.
MarcinkusW. C., Whelan-BerryK. S., & GordonJ. R. (2007). The relationship of social support to the work-family balance and work outcomes of midlife women. Women in Management Review, 22(2), 86–111. 10.1108/09649420710732060
37.
MishraS., & DeyA. K. (2022). Understanding and identifying ‘themes’ in qualitative case study research. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(3), 187–192. 10.1177/22779779221134659
38.
MonteroP. (2004). Two perspectives on how to work from anywhere. Journal for Quality and Participation, 27(3), 25–28.
39.
MorfM. (1989). The work life dichotomy. Quorum Books.
40.
NabaviA., & ShahryariM. (2012). Linkage between worksite support with work role expectation, role ambiguity and its effects on work-family conflict. Canadian Social Science, 8(4), 112–119.
41.
NarayanA., & BhardwajG. (2005). Dual-career nuclear families in India: Attitudes and social support. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(1), 79–93. 10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1354
42.
NeethaN. (2003). Migration, social networking and employment: A study of domestic workers in Delhi. NLI Research Study Series, 37/2002. V V Giri National Labour Institute.
NeethaN. (2009). Contours of domestic service: Characteristics, work relations and regulation. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 52(3), 489–506.
45.
PalriwalaR., & NeethaN. (2010). Care arrangements and bargains: Anganwadi and paid domestic workers in India. International Labour Review, 149(4), 511–527. 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2010.00101.x
46.
PatelC. J., GovenderV., ParukZ., & RamgoonS. (2006). Working mothers: Family-work conflict, job performance and family/work variables. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 32(2), 39–45. 10.4102/sajip.v32i2.238
47.
PrattM. G. (2009). From the Editors: For the Lack of a Boilerplate: Tips on Writing Up (and Reviewing) Qualitative Research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862. 10.5465/amj.2009.44632557
48.
RaghuramP. (2001). Caste and gender in the organisation of paid domestic work in India. Work, Employment and Society, 15(3), 607–617. 10.1177/09500170122119011
49.
RajadhyakshaU., & SmitaS. (2004). Tracing a timeline for work and family research in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(17) April24 Issue, 1674–1680.
50.
RajadhyakshaU., & VelgachS. (2009). Gender, gender-role ideology and work-family conflict in India, Retrieved, 5–9August, from https://www.workfamilyconflict.ca/cms/documents/38/GRI_paper-AOM2009.pdf. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting. University of Chicago.
51.
RayR., & QayumS. (2009). Cultures of servitude: Modernity, domesticity and class in India. Oxford University Press.
52.
RoyP. K. (2003). Family diversity in India: Patterns, practices and ethos. Gyan Book Company.
53.
SayerL. C. (2005). Gender, time, and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work, and free time. Social Forces, 84(1), 285–303. 10.1353/sof.2005.0126
54.
SchneiderD. (2011). Market earnings and household work: New tests of gender performance theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4), 845–860. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00851.x
55.
ShanmugamM. M. (2017). Impact of parenthood on women’s careers in the IT sector—A study in the Indian context. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 32(5), 352–368. 10.1108/GM-11-2016-0177
56.
ShanmugamM. M., & AgarwalB. (2019). Support perceptions, flexible work options and career outcomes: A study of working women at the threshold of motherhood in India. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 34(4), 254–286. 10.1108/GM-12-2018-0157
57.
SheltonB. A., & JohnD. (1993). Ethnicity, race, and difference: A comparison of White, Black, and Hispanic men’s household labour time. In HoodJ. C. (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 131–150). Sage Publications.
58.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
59.
SturgesJ., & GuestD. (2004). Working to live or living to work? Work/life balance early in the career. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(4), 5–20. 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00130.x
60.
ThébaudS. (2010). Masculinity, bargaining, and breadwinning: Understanding men’s housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender and Society, 24(3), 330–354. 10.1177/0891243210369105
61.
The News Minute. (2020). Salaries for Homemakers, Computers in Every TN Home, Kamal Haasan’s MNM Promises. https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/salaries-homemakers-computers-every-tn-home-kamal-haasans-mnm-promises-140054
62.
The Indian Express. (2021). What is Kerala’s smart kitchen project?https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-what-is-keralas-smart-kitchen-project-7345625/
63.
TrontoJ. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
64.
TzanakouC. (2017). Dual career couples in academia, international mobility and dual career services in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2–3), 298–312. 10.1177/1474904116683185
65.
ValkR., & SrinivasanV. (2011). Work–family balance of Indian women software professionals: A qualitative study. IIMB Management Review, 23(1), 39–50. 10.1016/j.iimb.2010.10.010
66.
WhiteM., HillS., McGovernP., MillsC., & SmeatonD. (2003). High-performance management practices, working hours and work-life balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), 175–195. 10.1111/1467-8543.00268
67.
YottY., & WöhrmannA. M. (2022). Spillover and crossover effects of working time demands on work–life balance satisfaction among dual-earner couples: The mediating role of work–life conflict. Current Psychology, 42(2), 1–17. 10.1007/s12144-022-03850-0
