This contribution offers a critical evaluation of the lived experience and ideas cultivated for rural industrialization as a residual path in India, to draw lessons for peoples’ democracies today and their strategies on rural industrialization. The discourse on rural industrialization began under the influence of India’s freedom movement. The forces of national liberation articulated an agenda of emancipation to unite working people across the country. The outcomes of the decolonization of knowledge production were well manifested in the way the forces of national liberation generated their own distinct heuristics of industrial and technological upgrading, with the potential to positively influence the trajectories of development of peasants, artisans, and rural laborer’s as a productive force.
AbrahamV. (2023). The slow emergence of rural non-farm sector employment in India: Shift or diversification?The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 66, 661–685.
2.
AbrolD. (1997, February). Technological transformation of rural areas. 60th Anniversary of AIKS.
3.
AbrolD. (2002a, August). Engaging globalization through local economy innovation. Viewpoints on Globalization, organized by Centre for International Development, Harvard, University.
4.
AbrolD. (2002b, March7–8). The question of who-whom in social design of agricultural R&D and technology implementation. National Workshop on Agricultural Policy and R&D, CASA and NISTADS, INSA.
5.
AbrolD. (2003a, April7–8). Design of innovation intensive environments in dual economies: Lessons from the Indian experience of S&T for weaker sections. International Conference on Knowledge and Economic and Social Change: New Challenges for Economic and Social Studies, organized by ASEAT and IIR, CRIC, Manchester. Retrieved from www.les1.man.ac.uk/cric2003/conf/pdfs/abrol.pdf
6.
AbrolD. (2003b). People’s technology initiatives: Embedding technology in community based production systems. In HallA. J., YoganandB., SulaimanR. V., & ClarkN. G. (Eds.), Post-harvest innovations in innovation: Reflections on partnership and learning (pp. 45–61). DFID & ICRISAT.
7.
AbrolD. (2004). Lessons from the design of innovation systems for rural industrial clusters in India. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 12(2), 67–98.
8.
AbrolD. (2008). Indo-US collaboration in agricultural research. In PrasadA. (Ed.), Environment development and society in contemporary India: A reader (pp. 125–48). Macmillan Publications.
9.
AbrolD. (2011a, August). Alternate framework of governance of Indian higher education. Seminar.
10.
AbrolD. (2011b). Peoples’ science interventions and the challenge of rural technological transformation: Lessons from India. In RazaG., RenF., KhanH. J., & HeW. (Eds.), Constructing culture of science: Communication of science in India and China (pp. 179–209). CSIR-NISCAIR.
11.
AbrolD. (2013). People’s science movements, practice and challenge of mobilization of ‘Science for People’. In ParmeshwaranM. P. (Ed.), Science for social revolution? A reader (pp. 80–98). Kerala Shastra Sahitya Parishad.
12.
AbrolD. (2014). Pro-poor innovation-making, knowledge production and technology implementation for rural areas: Lessons from the Indian experience. In RamaniS. V. (Ed.), Innovation in India: Combining economic growth with inclusive development (pp. 338–379). Cambridge University Press.
13.
AbrolD. (2017). Technological alternatives for future India. In KothariA., & JoyK. J. (Eds.), Alternative futures: India unshackled (pp. 390–410). Authors Up Front.
14.
AbrolD. (2023). Agroecology and agrarian transitions: Current debate in India. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 12(2), 161–186.
15.
AbrolD., & BhuratiaO. P. (1997, March). Feasibility study for the establishment of multi-sectoral network system of group enterprises in Karsog, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh. National Institute of Science, Technology and Development, Studies (NISTADS), submitted to DST.
16.
AbrolD., & GairolaR. (1997, March). Feasibility study for the establishment of multi-sectoral network system of group enterprises in Chamoli, Uttar Pradesh. National Institute of Science, Technology and Development, Studies (NISTADS), submitted to DST.
17.
AbrolD., & MeshramB. (1997, February). Feasibility study for the establishment of multi-sectoral network system of group enterprises in Pithora, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh. National Institute of Science, Technology and Development, Studies (NISTADS), submitted to DST.
18.
AbrolD., & MishraD. (1997, October). Panchayat Development report: A guide book. National Institute of Science, Technology and Development, Studies (NISTADS). Prepared as a training aid.
19.
AbrolD., & PulamteL. (1998, March). Evaluation of CSIR rural technologies, National Institute of Science, Technology and Development, Studies (NISTADS). Prepared for Council of Scientific and Industrial, Research (CSIR).
20.
AbrolD., & PulamteL. (2007). The challenge before Indian agricultural universities: Impact and relevance of the Kothari Commission’s vision and strategy. In PrakashV., & BiswalK. (Eds.), Perspectives on education and development: Revisiting Education Commission and after (pp. 653–699). Shipra Publications.
