India’s agricultural price policy came under serious criticism in the past for its inefficiencies and the financial burden that it puts on the state exchequer. Using the household-level Situation Assessment Survey, published by the National Statistical Office (NSO), this study inspects the effectiveness, accessibility, and feasibility of price policy mechanisms in India. It is found that farmers’ income in India has been increasing at a slower rate and the share of income from crop cultivation has been declining over the years. However, farmers who have received the benefits of minimum support price (MSP) and procurement mechanism, reported having a better income as compared to farmers who sell to the local market right after harvest. Indian agriculture is dominated by small and marginal farmers operating on less than two hectares of land. They are more vulnerable to shocks, such as climate change, price crashes, and post-harvest loss. This study critically evaluates the operation of price policy with special reference to the landholding classes of the farmers. It finds that MSP played an important role in keeping the market prices high and ensuring a better return. However, the reach of MSP has been limited to a few crops and in selected states.
BeheraM., & AdabarK. (2018). Estimating farmers’ income from cultivation in India. In SanwanS. S. & DeepG. (Eds), Policy and technological options for doubling of farmers’ income (pp. 297). Centre for Research in Rural and Industrial Development.
2.
ChandR. (2003). Minimum support price in agriculture: Changing requirements. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(29), 3027–3028.
3.
ChandR. (2017). Doubling farmers’ income: Strategy and prospects. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(1), 1–23.
4.
ChandR., PrasannaP. L., & SinghA. (2011). Farm size and productivity: Understanding the strengths of smallholders and improving their livelihoods. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(26/27), 5–11.
5.
ChatterjeeS., & KrishnamurthyM. (2021). Farm laws versus field realities: Understanding India’s agricultural markets. Sikh Research Journal, 6(1), 88–107.
6.
ChatterjeeS., KrishnamurthyM., KapurD., & BoutonM. (2020). A study of the agricultural markets of Bihar, Odisha and Punjab: Final report. Center for the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania.
7.
DamodaranH. (2021, 30November). Explained: What meeting MSP demand would cost the government. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/what-meeting-msp-demand-would-cost-govt-farm-laws-7646398/
8.
DevS. M. (2012). Small farmers in India: Challenges and opportunities [Working Paper No. 14]. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
9.
DevS. M., & RaoN. C. (2010). Agricultural price policy, farm profitability and food security. Economic & Political Weekly, 45(26), 174–182.
10.
FanS., & Chan-KangC. (2005). Is small beautiful? Farm size, productivity, and poverty in Asian agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 32(1), 135–146.
11.
GauravS., & MishraS. (2011). Size-class and returns to cultivation in India: A cold case reopened [Working Paper No. 27&]. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
12.
GulatiA., & SainiS. (2021, 20December). From plate to plough: MSP for all crops is fiscally unfeasible, The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/crops-msp-farmers-income-support-money-transfer-7680783/
13.
GulatiA., & RoyR. (2019). Wooing the farmer. www.indiaseminar.com/2018/701/701_a_gulati_and_r_roy.htm.
14.
GulatiA., ChatterjeeT., & HussainS. (2018). Supporting Indian farmers: price support or direct income/investment support? [Working Paper No. 357]. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
15.
GulatiA., RoyR., & HussainS. (2017). Getting Punjab agriculture back on high growth path: Sources, drivers and policy lessons. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER).
16.
GuptaG. S. (1980). Agricultural prices policy and farm incomes. Economic & Political Weekly, 15(39), A123–A131.
17.
HaqueT., & JoshiP. K. (2018). Price deficiency payments and minimum support prices-a study of selected crops in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 53(20) 53–60.
18.
HodaA., & GulatiA.. (2013). India’s agricultural trade policy and sustainable development [Issue Paper No. 49]. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable, Development (ICTSD), Programme on Agricultural Trade and Sustainable Development.
19.
IpeB. J. & SatyasaiK. J. (2022). Nutri-cereals for a healthy economy. Rural Pulse, 39(June–July), 1–4.
20.
JunejaR., RoyR., & GulatiA. (2021). Indian Agriculture @ 75: Past achievements and future challenges. Indian Public Policy Review, 2(6), 1–18.
21.
MeetaR. (2008). Rejuvenating agriculture with the help of the small farmer. Economic & Political Weekly, 43(11), 17–21.
22.
Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare (MoAFW). (2017). Doubling farmers’ income [Report of the Committee constituted under Dr. Ashok Dalwai]. Government of India.
23.
MoAFW. (2020). Agricultural statistics at a glance. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of India.
24.
MohantyB. B., & LenkaP. K. (2019). Small farmers’ suicide in Odisha. Economic & Political Weekly, 54(22), 51–59.
25.
NarayanamoorthyA. (2013). Profitability in crops cultivation in India: Some evidence from cost of cultivation survey data. Indian Journal of Agriculture Economics, 68(1), 104–121.
26.
National Statistical Office (NSO). (2021). NSS report no. 587: Situation assessment of agricultural households and land and livestock holdings of households in rural India, 2019. Government of India.
27.
RaghavanM. (2008). Changing pattern of input use and cost of cultivation. Economic & Political Weekly, 43(26–27), 123–129.
28.
RoyP., & BhattacharyyaS. (2020). Doubling farmers’ income: Its necessity and possibilities in Indian context. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(9), 1639–1645.
29.
SarkarA. & DasA. (2014). Groundwater irrigation electricity–crop diversification nexus in Punjab: Trends, turning points and policy initiatives, Economic & Political Weekly, 49(52), 64–73.
30.
SekharC. S. C. (2021). Price or income support to farmers? Policy options and implications [Working Papers No. 420]. Institute of Economic Growth.
31.
SenA., & BhatiaM. S. (2004). State of the Indian farmer: A millennium study, Vol. 14: Cost of cultivation and farm income. Government of India, Academic Foundation.
32.
SendhilR., RamasundaramP., & BalajiS. J. (2017). Transforming Indian agriculture: Is doubling farmers’ income by 2022 in the realm of reality. Current Science, 113(5), 848–850.
33.
SinghP. (2021, 31December). Legal MSP: A right and a necessity. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/farmers-protest-legal-msp-7698761/
34.
SinghS. P., & BhogalS. (2021). MSP in a changing agricultural policy environment. Economic & Political Weekly, 41(07), 12–15.
35.
SrivastavaS. K., ChandR. & SinghJ. (2017). Changing crop production cost in India: Input prices, substitution and technological effects. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 30(Conference), 171–182.
36.
TerwayP. (2022). Production and distribution aspects of input subsidies in Indian agriculture: A case study of Jharkhand. [Doctoral dissertation, Centre for Studies of Regional Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi].
37.
ThapaG., & GaihaR. (2011, 24–25January). Smallholder farming in Asia and the Pacific: Challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the Conference on New Directions for Smallholder Agriculture, IFAD, Rome, Italy.
38.
TripathiA. K. (2012). Agricultural price policy, output, and farm profitability: Examining linkages during post-reform period in India. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 10(1), 91–111.
39.
VyasV. S. (2004). Agrarian distress: Strategies to protect vulnerable sections. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(52), 5576–5582.
