The study of social differentiation in the countryside is often dominated by the deployment of classical analytical frameworks. This article quantitatively explores social differentiation at the sub-national level (Chiredzi and Zvimba districts in Zimbabwe), through the use of the trimodal agrarian structure (TMAS) framework. It addresses the question of whether variables outlined in TMAS (land sizes, labor, and credit) stimulate social differentiation patterns across various settlement models, which emerged after Zimbabwe’s land reform program. If so, what groups or clusters emerge and what are the differentials at the local level? Through statistical factor and cluster analysis, this article reveals that the TMAS variables do explain social differentiation even at the sub-national level. Land sizes, access to capital, and ownership of cattle are key factors in explaining this differentiation. Beyond the variables presented by the TMAS, we argue that agroecological zones and crop type are also instrumental in shaping social differentiation. From the evidence presented, it is difficult to visualize inter-cluster mobility because of various reasons, which include state-based tenure.
BernsteinH. (1977). Notes on capital and peasantry. Review of African Political Economy, 4(10): 60–73. doi: 10.1080/03056247708703339.
2.
BernsteinH. (2010). Class dynamics of agrarian change. Fernwood.
3.
BrycesonD. F. (2000). Peasant theories and smallholder policies, past and present. In BrycesonD., KayC., & MooijJ. (Eds.), Disappearing peasantries? (pp. 1–36). Practical Action Publishing.
4.
ByresT. J. (1996). Capitalism from above and capitalism from below: An essay in comparative political economy. Macmillan.
5.
ChambatiW. (2011). Restructuring of agrarian labour relations after fast track land reform in Zimbabwe. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(5): 1047–1068. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.632088.
6.
ChambatiW. (2013). Changing agrarian labour relations after land reform in Zimbabwe. In MoyoS. & ChambatiW. (Eds.), Land and agrarian reform in Zimbabwe: Beyond white settler capitalism. CODESRIA.
7.
ChambatiW. (2017). Changing forms of wage labour in Zimbabwe’s new agrarian structure. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 1–34. doi: 10.1177/2277976017721346.
8.
ChambatiW., MazwiF., & MberiS. (2018). Agrarian accumulation and peasant resistance in Africa. In GumedeV. (Ed.), Inclusive development in Africa: Transformations of global relations (pp. 104–134). CODESRIA.
9.
ChayanovA. V. (1966). The theory of peasant economy (ThornerD., KerblayB., & SmithR. E. F., Eds.). Richard Irwin for the American Economic Association.
10.
ChimedzaR. (1994). Rural financial markets. In RukuniM. & EicherC. K. (Eds.), Zimbabwe’s agricultural revolution (pp. 335–347). University of Zimbabwe Publications.
11.
CousinsB., WeinerD. & AminN. (1992). Social differentiation in the communal lands of Zimbabwe agrarian reform and social relations of production. Review of African Political Economy, 19(53): 5–24. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03056249208703936?needAccess=true&instName=University+of+Oxford
12.
EllisF. (1998). Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(1), 1–38. doi: 10.1080/00220 389808422553.
13.
FergusonD. F. (1976, January). Rural/urban relations and peasant radicalism: A preliminary statement. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 18(1), 106–118.
14.
GibbonP., & NeocosmosN. (1985). Some problems in the political economy of African socialism. In BernsteinH. & CampbellB. (Eds.), Contradictions of accumulation in Africa: Studies in economy and state. Sage.
15.
GukurumeS., & MushukuA. (2012). Surviving on the margins: Experiences of cane cutters working at Triangle sugar estate in Chiredzi, Masvingo. International Journal of Politics and Good Governance, 3(3): 976–1195.
16.
IBM-SPSS-V25 (2018, June2). IMB SPSS 25 Tutorial. Retrieved from IBM SPSS version 25 support: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLVMB_25.0.0/statistics_spsstut_project_ddita/statistics_spsstut_project_ddita-gentopic1.html?view=embed
17.
JhaP., YerosP., & ChambatiW. (2020). The quest for epistemic sovereignty in the South: A tribute to Sam Moyo. In JhaP., YerosP., & ChambatiW. (Eds.), Rethinking the social sciences with Sam Moyo (pp. 98–113). Tulika Books, New Delhi.
18.
KausktyJ. H. (1988). The agrarian question. Pluto Press.
19.
LeninV. I. (1964). The development of capitalism in Russia. Progress Publishers.
20.
LeninV. I. (1971) Selections from the development of capitalism in Russia. In ChristmanH. M. (Ed.), Essential works of Lenin (pp. 11–52). Bantam.
21.
MamdaniM. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press.
22.
MamdaniM. (1987). Extreme but not exceptional: Towards an analysis of the agrarian question in Uganda. Journal of Peasant Studies, 14(2): 191–225.
23.
MartinielloG. (2016). Don’t stop the mill: South African capital and agrarian change in Tanzania. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 1, 633–652. doi: 10.1080/23802014.2016.1243017.
24.
MartinielloG. (2017). Bitter sugarification: Agro-extractivism, outgrower schemes and social differentiation in Busoga, Uganda. The 5th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies, October 13–16, 2017, RANEPA, Moscow, Russia.
25.
MazwiF. (2019). Changing patterns of agricultural financing following the fast-track land resettlement programme: An interrogation of contract farming in sugar and tobacco in Zimbabwe, University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN). Unpublished PhD Thesis.
26.
MazwiF. (2020). Sugar production dynamics in Zimbabwe: An analysis of contract farming at Hippo Valley. Review of African Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2020.1832022
27.
MazwiF., & MuchetuR. (2015). Outgrower sugarcane production post-Fast Track Land Reform Programme in Zimbabwe. Ubuntu: Journal of Conflict Transformation, 4(2), 17–48.
28.
MazwiF., & MudimuG. T. (2019). Why are Zimbabwe’s land reforms being reversed. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(35). https://www.epw.in/engage/article/why-are-zimbabwes-land-reforms-being-reversed
29.
MazwiF., ChemuraA., MudimuG. T., & ChambatiW. (2019). Political economy of command agriculture in Zimbabwe: A state-led contract farming model. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 8(1–2), 232–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277976019856742
30.
MlamboA. S., & PangetiE. S. (1996). The political economy of the sugar industry in Zimbabwe 1920–90. University of Zimbabwe Publications.
31.
MoyoS. (1995). The land question in Zimbabwe. SAPES Books.
32.
MoyoS. (2000). Land reform under structural adjustment in Zimbabwe: Land use change in the Mashonaland Province. Nordiska Afrika Institutet.
33.
MoyoS. (2008). African land questions, agrarian transitions and the state: Contradictions of neoliberal land reforms. CODESRIA.
34.
MoyoS. (2011). Land concentration and accumulation after the redistributive land reform in Zimbabwe. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(128), 257–276.
35.
MoyoS. (2013). Land reform and redistribution in Zimbabwe since 1980. In MoyoS. & ChambatiW. (Eds.), Land and agrarian reform in Zimbabwe: Beyond white-settler capitalism (pp. 29–78). CODESRIA.
36.
MoyoS. (2014). State of family farming in sub-Saharan Africa: Its contribution to the rural development, food security and nutrition. Global dialogue on family farming. FAO.
37.
MoyoS. (2016). Southern African potentials to address land-based conflicts. In MoyoS. & MineY. (Eds.), What colonialism ignored: African potentials for resolving conflicts in Southern Africa (pp. 37–66). Langaa RPCIG.
38.
MoyoS. & ChambatiW. (2013). Introduction: Roots of the fast track land reform. In MoyoS. & ChambatiW. (Eds.), Land and agrarian reform in Zimbabwe: Beyond white settler capitalism. CODESRIA.
39.
MoyoS., & NyoniN. (2013). Changing agrarian relations after redistributive land reform in Zimbabwe. In MoyoS. and ChambatiW. (Eds.), Land and agrarian reform in Zimbabwe: Beyond white settler capitalism (pp. 195-250). CODESRIA.
40.
MoyoS., & YerosP. (Eds.). (2005). Reclaiming the land: The resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Zed Books.
41.
MoyoS., & YerosP. (2007). The radicalised state: Zimbabwe’s interrupted revolution. Review of African Political Economy, 37–41. doi: 10.1080/ 03056240701340431.
42.
MoyoS., & YerosP. (2013). The Zimbabwe Model: Radicalisation, reform and resistance. In MoyoS. & ChambatiW. (Eds.), Land and agrarian reform in Zimbabwe: Beyond white settler capitalism. CODESRIA.
43.
MoyoS., ChambatiW. P., & YerosP. (2019). Land and natural resources in Zimbabwe: Scramble and resistance. In MoyoS., JhaP., & YerosP. (Eds.), Reclaiming Africa: Scramble and resistance in the 21st century (pp. 225–253). Springer Press.
44.
MoyoS., ChambatiW., MurisaT., SizibaD., DangwaC., MujeyiK., & NyoniN. (2009). Fast track land reform baseline survey in Zimbabwe: Trends and tendencies, 2005/06. AIAS Monograph.
45.
MuchetuR. G. (2018, June). Agricultural land-delivery systems in Zimbabwe: A review of four decades of Sam Moyo’s work on agricultural land markets and their constraints. Kyoto University: African Studies Monographs, 57(Supplementary Issue), 65–94. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/67118
46.
MudimuG. T., TingZ., & NalwimbaN. (2020a). Land leasing in a post land reform context: Insights from Zimbabwe. Geojournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10219-y
47.
NaiduS., & OssomeL. (2016). Social reproduction and the agrarian question of women’s labour in India. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 5(1), 50–76.
48.
NeocosmosM. (1986). Marx’s third class: Capitalist landed property and capitalist development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 13(3), 5–44. doi: 10.1080/03066158608438299.
49.
NeocosmosM. (1990). Agrarian history and nationalist politics in Southern Africa: Notes towards a critique of conventional wisdom. Eastern African Social Science Review, 6(2/1) and 7(1), June1990 and January1991.
50.
NeocosmosM. (1993). The agrarian question in Southern Africa and “accumulation from below”: Economics and politics in the struggle for democracy. Nordic Africa Institute Research Report 93. Uppsala.
51.
NyambaraP. (2003). Rural landlords, rural tenants and the sharecropping complex in Gokwe, north-western Zimbabwe, 1980s–2002. In RothM. & GoneseF. (Eds.), Delivering land and securing rural livelihoods: Post-independence land reform and resettlement in Zimbabwe (pp. 3–15). Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe.
52.
PatnaikP. (2001). Imperialism and the diffusion of development, Asnari memorial lecture, March 15, Jamia Milia Islamia University, Delhi. Social Scientist, 29(3/4), 3–18.
53.
OyaC. (2007). Stories of rural accumulation in Africa: Trajectories and transitions among rural capitalists in Senegal. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(4): 453–493.
54.
SargesonS. (2016). The demise of China’s peasantry as a class. Asia-Pacific Journal Japan Focus, 14(13(1)), 1–23.
55.
SachikonyeL. (1989). The state and agribusiness in Zimbabwe: Plantations and contract farming. Leeds Southern Agrarian Studies 13. African Studies Unit, Leeds University.
56.
SchultzT. W. (1964). Transforming traditional agriculture. Yale University Press.
57.
ScoonesI., MavedzengeB., & MurimbarimbaF. (2017). Sugar, people and politics in Zimbabwe’s Lowveld. Journal of Southern African Studies, 43(3), 567–584.
58.
ScoonesI., MavedzengeB., MurimbarimbaF., & SukumeC. (2016). Tobacco, contract farming, and agrarian change in Zimbabwe. Journal of Agrarian Change, 18(1), 22–42.
59.
ScoonesI., MarongweN., MavedzengeB., MurimbarimbaF., MaheneheneJ., & SukumeC. (2010). Zimbabwe’s land reform: A summary of findings. Institute of Development Studies.
60.
ShivjiI. G. (1992). The roots of an agrarian crisis in Tanzania: A theoretical perspective. University of Dar es Salaam.
61.
SulleE. (2016). Social differentiation and the politics of land: Sugarcane outgrowing in Kilombero, Tanzania. Journal of Southern African Studies. doi: 10.1080/03057070.2016.1215171.
62.
TsikataD. (2015). The social relations of agrarian change (IIED Working Paper). International Institute for Environment and Development.
63.
TsikataD. (2016). Gender, land tenure and agrarian production systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 5(1), 1–19.
64.
UteteC. (2003). Report of the Presidential Land Review Committee, under the chairmanship of Dr Charles M.B. Utete, Vol. 1 and 2: Main report to His Excellency the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe. Presidential Land Review Committee (PLRC). Government Printers.
65.
VincentV., & ThomasR. G. (1960). An agro-ecological survey of Southern Rhodesia part I. Agro-ecological survey. Government Printers.
66.
WeirS. (1999). The effects of education on farmer productivity in rural Ethiopia (Working Paper no. 99–7. Centre for the Study of African Economies.
67.
WFP (World Food Programme) (2016). Zvimba district risk profile. WFP.
68.
YanH., & ChenY. (2016). Land reform in Zimbabwe, class dynamics and delayed Bandung: An interview with Sam Moyo. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 17(1), 128–139.
69.
YerosP. (2002). The political economy of civilisation: Peasant-workers in Zimbabwe and the neo-colonial world. PhD Thesis, University of London.
70.
ZimStat (Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency) (2012). Census 2012: National Report. ZimStat. http://www.zimstat.co.zw/sites/default/files/img/publications/Population/National_Report.pdf.
71.
ZukaS. P. (2013). Butterfly land policy reform initiatives in Southern Africa: Any promise from Malawi’s new land act. Research Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Management, 2(6), 154–163.
