The study examines how environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores impact the operational, financial and market performance of firms indexed in the Nifty 100 index for short and long observation periods. Return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE) and Tobin’s Q are employed as proxies to evaluate the firms’ performance. The longitudinal research design draws upon secondary data from Bloomberg for ESG scores and Prowess for Interactive Querying for performance indicators. It employs panel regression analysis, and the results indicate a significant difference in the short and long observation periods. ESG adversely affects firms’ operational and financial performance over an extended observation period and has insignificant effects over a short observation period. Conversely, it reports a statistically significant positive impact on market performance in short and long observation periods. It concludes by recognizing its limitations, discussing policy implications and sketching a roadmap for future research.
ArellanoM. (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford University Press.
2.
AtanR., AlamM. M., SaidJ., & ZamriM. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality, 29(2), 182–194.
3.
BalabanisG., PhillipsH. C., & LyallJ. (1998). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: Are they linked?European Business Review, 98(1), 25–44.
4.
BaldiniM., MasoL. D., LiberatoreG., MazziF., & TerzaniS. (2018). Role of country-and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3139-1
5.
BehlA., KumariP. R., MakhijaH., & SharmaD. (2022). Exploring the relationship of ESG score and firm value using cross-lagged panel analyses: Case of the Indian energy sector. Annals of Operations Research, 313(1), 231–256.
6.
BodhanwalaS., & BodhanwalaR. (2018). Does corporate sustainability impact firm profitability? Evidence from India. Management Decision, 56(8), 1734–1747.
7.
BoulhagaM., BouriA., ElamerA. A., & IbrahimB. A. (2022). Environmental, social and governance ratings and firm performance: The moderating role of internal control quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 134–145.
8.
BuallayA. (2021). Sustainability reporting and agriculture industries’ performance: Worldwide evidence. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 12(5), 769–790.
9.
BuallayA., & Al MarriM. (2022). Sustainability disclosure and its impact on telecommunication and information technology sectors’ performance: Worldwide evidence. International Journal of Emergency Services, 11(3), 379–395.
ChelawatH., & TrivediI. V. (2016). The business value of ESG performance: The Indian context. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 5(1), 195–210.
12.
DeeganC. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures—a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.
DowlingJ., & PfefferJ. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.
15.
DuanY., YangF., & XiongL. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and firm value: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 15(17), 12858.
16.
Duque-GrisalesE., & Aguilera-CaracuelJ. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334.
17.
EasleyD., & O’haraM. (2004). Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1553–1583.
18.
El KhouryR., NasrallahN., HarbE., & HussaineyK. (2022). Exploring the performance of responsible companies in G20 during the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131693
19.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
20.
FriedmanM. (1970, September13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 122–126.
21.
GammeltoftP., PradhanJ. P., & GoldsteinA. (2010). Emerging multinationals: Home and host country determinants and outcomes. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 5(3/4), 254–265.
22.
GarciaA. S., & OrsatoR. J. (2020). Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3261–3272.
23.
GholamiA., SandsJ., & RahmanH. U. (2022). Environmental, social and governance disclosure and value generation: Is the financial industry different?Sustainability, 14(5), 2647.
24.
GiannopoulosG., Kihle FagernesR. V., ElmarzoukyM., & Afzal HossainK. A. B. M. (2022). The ESG disclosure and the financial performance of Norwegian listed firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(6), 237.
25.
GillanS. L., KochA., & StarksL. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
26.
HalbritterG., & DorfleitnerG. (2015). The wages of social responsibility—where are they? A critical review of ESG investing. Review of Financial Economics, 26(1), 25–35.
27.
HasanI., SinghS., & KashiramkaS. (2021). Does corporate social responsibility disclosure impact firm performance? An industry-wise analysis of Indian firms. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(8), 10141–10181.
28.
HassanY., & RoychowdhuryS. (2019). Nexus between sustainability management and financial performance-study on manufacturing firms from global emerging market. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 5(3), 206–219.
29.
HörischJ., FreemanR. E., & SchalteggerS. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 328–346.
30.
HuberB. M., ComstockM., PolkD., & WardwellL. L. P. (2017). ESG reports and ratings: What they are, why they matter. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation.
31.
JhaM. K., & RangarajanK. (2020). Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1–30.
32.
JuniusD., AdisurjoA., RijantoY. A., & AdelinaY. E. (2020). The impact of ESG performance to firm performance and market value. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 5(1), 21–41.
33.
JyotiG., & KhannaA. (2021). Does sustainability performance impact financial performance? Evidence from Indian service sector firms. Sustainable Development, 29(6), 1086–1095.
34.
KaoF. C. (2023). How do ESG activities affect corporate performance?Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(7), 4099–4116.
35.
KhandelwalV., SharmaP., & ChotiaV. (2023). ESG disclosure and firm performance: An asset-pricing approach. Risks, 11(6), 112.
36.
KimJ., ChoE., OkaforC. E., & ChoiD. (2022). Does environmental, social, and governance drive the sustainability of multinational corporation’s subsidiaries? Evidence from Korea. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 899936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899936
37.
KimS., & LiZ. (2021). Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, 13(7), 3746.
38.
LindblomC. K. (1994). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference.
39.
LiY., GongM., ZhangX. Y., & KohL. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 60–75.
40.
LokuwadugeC. S. D. S., & HeenetigalaK. (2017). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure for a sustainable development: An Australian study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 438–450.
41.
ManitaR., BrunaM. G., DangR., & HouantiL. H. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: Evidence from the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 206–224.
42.
NekhiliM., BoukadhabaA., & NagatiH. (2021). The ESG–financial performance relationship: Does the type of employee board representation matter?Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(2), 134–161.
43.
NguyenD. T., HoangT. G., & TranH. G. (2022). Help or hurt? The impact of ESG on firm performance in S&P 500 non-financial firms. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(2), 91–102.
44.
Peinado-VaraE. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21(3), 61–69.
45.
PorterM. E., & KramerM. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.
46.
PorterM. E., & KramerM. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
47.
PrakashP. (2022, June12). Explained | Why is India ranked at the bottom of the 2022 Environmental Performance Index?The Hindu. Retrieved October03, 2024, from https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/explained-why-is-india-ranked-at-the-bottom-of-the-2022-environmental-performance-index/article65511480.ece
48.
PuG. (2023). A non-linear assessment of ESG and firm performance relationship: Evidence from China. Economic Research, 36(1), 2113336.
49.
QureshiM. A., KirkerudS., TheresaK., & AhsanT. (2020). The impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: The moderating role of industry sensitivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1199–1214.
50.
QuW., & ZhangJ. (2023). Environmental, social, and corporate, governance (ESG), life cycle, and firm performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 15(18), 14011.
51.
RuanL., & LiuH. (2021). Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(2), 1–16.
52.
SachinN., & RajeshR. (2022). An empirical study of supply chain sustainability with financial performances of Indian firms. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(5), 6577–6601.
53.
SarkisJ., Gonzalez-TorreP., & Adenso-DiazB. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176.
54.
ShaikhI. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practice and firm performance: international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218–237.
55.
SharmaD., BhattacharyaS., & ThukralS. (2019). Resource-based view on corporate sustainable financial reporting and firm performance: Evidences from emerging Indian economy. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 13(4), 323–344.
56.
ShobhwaniK., & LodhaS. (2023). Impact of ESG risk scores on firm performance: An empirical analysis of NSE-100 companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 19(1), 7–18.
57.
Sinha RayR., & GoelS. (2022). Impact of ESG score on financial performance of Indian firms: Static and dynamic panel regression analyses. Applied Economics, 55(15), 1742–1755.
58.
SisayeS. (2021). The influence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on the development of voluntary sustainability accounting reporting rules. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 1(1), 5–23.
59.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
60.
TingI. W. K., AzizanN. A., BhaskaranR. K., & SukumaranS. K. (2019). Corporate social performance and firm performance: Comparative study among developed and emerging market firms. Sustainability, 12(1), 26.
61.
WhelanT., AtzU., Van HoltT., & ClarkC. (2021). ESG and financial performance: Uncovering the relationship by aggregating evidence from 1,000 plus studies published between 2015–2020. NYU STERN Center for Sustainable Business.
62.
WicksA. C., FreemanR. E., & ParmarB. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.
63.
WrightP., & FerrisS. P. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 77–83.
