This study examines whether emerging market firms use global linkages as a substitute to the location in geographical clusters to promote the speed of foreign market entry. Drawing from economic geography, we find a slower speed of foreign market entry by firms located outside geographical clusters in the home country as compared to firms inside clusters. This relationship is further moderated by the firm’s cognitive proximity in the foreign markets (measured as a firm’s extent of informal global linkages). Cognitive proximity increases the transfer of tacit knowledge and weakens the negative impact of firm cluster absence on the speed of foreign entry. We test the proposed hypotheses using the cox proportional hazard model based on a longitudinal sample of 602 Indian firms in the information technology industry (IT) from 2000 to 2019.
AngeliF., GrandiA., & GrimaldiR. (2014). Directions and paths of knowledge flows through labour mobility: A social capital perspective. Regional Studies, 48(11), 1896–1917.
3.
AntonelliC. (2000). Collective knowledge communication and innovation: The evidence of technological districts. Regional Studies, 34(6), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050085657
4.
ArnoldD. J., & QuelchJ. A. (1998). New strategies in emerging markets. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 7–20.
5.
AroraA., ArunachalamV. S., AsundiJ., & FernandesR. (2001). The Indian software services industry. Research Policy, 30(8), 1267–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00148-7
6.
AudretschD. B., & FeldmanM. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.
7.
BallandP.-A., BoschmaR., & FrenkenK. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920.
8.
BecchettiL., & RossiS. P. (2000). The positive effect of industrial district on the export performance of Italian firms. Review of Industrial Organization, 16(1), 53–68.
9.
BékésG. (2004). Location of manufacturing FDI in Hungary: How important are business-to-business relationships?Central European University.
10.
Belso-MartínezJ. A. (2006). Why are some Spanish manufacturing firms internationalizing rapidly? The role of business and institutional international networks. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620600565409
11.
BlomströmM., & KokkoA. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3), 247–277.
12.
BlomstromM., & KokkoA. (2003). From natural resources to high-tech production: The evolution of industrial competitiveness in Sweden and Finland (Discussion Paper). CEPR.
13.
BoltonM. K. (1993). Imitation versus innovation: Lessons to be learned from the Japanese. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(93)90069-D
14.
BoschmaR. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
15.
BoschmaR., ErikssonR., & LindgrenU. (2009). How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 169–190.
16.
BracheJ., & FelzenszteinC. (2019). Geographical co-location on Chilean SME’s export performance. Journal of Business Research, 105, 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.044
17.
BromfieldT., & BarnardH. (2010). The evolution of the intellectual property management strategy of an emerging multinational: Learning the purpose of patenting and scientific publications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(1), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2025493
18.
BrownJ. S., & DuguidP. (2000). Mysteries of the region: Knowledge dynamics in Silicon Valley. In LeeC.-M., MillerW. F., HancockM. G., & RowenH. S. (Eds.), The Silicon Valley edge (pp. 16–45). Stanford University Press.
19.
BursteinA. T., & Monge-NaranjoA. (2009). Foreign know-how, firm control, and the income of developing countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 149–195. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.149
20.
CaninaL., EnzC. A., & HarrisonJ. S. (2005). Agglomeration effects and strategic orientations: Evidence from the US lodging industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 565–581.
21.
CasillasJ. C., & AcedoF. J. (2013). Speed in the internationalization process of the firm: Speed in internationalization process. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00331.x
22.
ChenL.-C. (2009). Learning through informal local and global linkages: The case of Taiwan’s machine tool industry. Research Policy, 38(3), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.008
23.
ChettyS., JohansonM., & Martín MartínO. (2014). Speed of internationalization: Conceptualization, measurement and validation. Journal of World Business, 49(4), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.12.014
24.
CiravegnaL., KuivalainenO., KunduS. K., & LopezL. E. (2018). The antecedents of early internationalization: A configurational perspective. International Business Review, 27(6), 1200–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.05.002
25.
CoeN. M., DickenP., & HessM. (2008). Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 271–295.
26.
CohenW. M., & LevinthalD. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
27.
ColovicA., & LamotteO. (2014). The role of formal industry clusters in the internationalization of new ventures. European Business Review, 26(5), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-02-2013-0027
28.
CookG. A. S., PanditN. R., LööfH., & JohanssonB. (2012). Geographic clustering and outward foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 21(6), 1112–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.12.004
29.
CoombsJ. E., MudambiR., & DeedsD. L. (2006). An examination of the investments in US biotechnology firms by foreign and domestic corporate partners. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 405–428.
30.
CovielloN. E., & MunroH. J. (1995). Growing the entrepreneurial firm. European Journal of Marketing, 29(7), 49–61.
31.
CoxD. R. (1992). Regression models and life-tables. Breakthroughs in statistics. Springer.
32.
CriacoG., NaldiL., & ZahraS. A. (2021). Founders’ prior shared international experience, time to first foreign market entry, and new venture performance. Journal of Management, 48(8), 2349–2381.
33.
DahlM. S., & PedersenC. Ø. R. (2004). Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: Myth or reality?Research Policy, 33(10), 1673–1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.10.004
34.
DavenportS. (2005). Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition. Research Policy, 34(5), 683–701.
35.
DöringT., & SchnellenbachJ. (2006). What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature. Regional Studies, 40(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600632739
36.
DunningJ. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor?Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 45–66.
37.
DunningJ. H. (2009). Location and the multinational enterprise: John Dunning’s thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 Decade Award. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.75
38.
DunningJ. H., & LundanS. M. (2008). Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(4), 573–593.
39.
DzhumashevR., MishraV., & SmythR. (2016). Exporting, R&D investment and firm survival in the Indian IT sector. Journal of Asian Economics, 42, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2015.10.002
40.
ElangoB., & PattnaikC. (2007). Building capabilities for international operations through networks: A study of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400280
41.
EthirajS. K., KaleP., KrishnanM. S., & SinghJ. V. (2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 25–45.
42.
FeldmanM. (2003). The locational dynamics of the US biotech industry: Knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis. Industry and Innovation, 10(3), 311–329.
43.
FelzenszteinC., DeansK. R., & DanaL.-P. (2019). Small firms in regional clusters: Local networks and internationalization in the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(2), 496–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12388
44.
FernhaberS. A., GilbertB. A., & McDougallP. P. (2008). International entrepreneurship and geographic location: An empirical examination of new venture internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(2), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400342
45.
FigueiredoO., GuimaraesP., & WoodwardD. (2002). Home-field advantage: Location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(2), 341–361.
46.
FismanR., HealG., & NairV. B. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good (Preliminar Draft). https://www.academia.edu/4355348/Preliminary_Draft_Comments_Welcome_CORPORATE_SOCIAL_RESPONSIBILITY_DOING_WELL_BY_DOING_GOOD
47.
FoltaT. B., CooperA. C., & BaikY. (2006). Geographic cluster size and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 217–242.
48.
GertlerM. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75–99.
49.
GertlerM. S., & LevitteY. M. (2005). Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and Innovation, 12(4), 487–507.
50.
GilbertB. A., McDougallP. P., & AudretschD. B. (2008). Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.04.003
51.
GiulianiE. (2011). Role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters: Evidence from Chile. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1329–1348.
52.
GiulianiE., & BellM. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34(1), 47–68.
53.
GötzM., JankowskaB., & GłówkaC. (2014). How to investigate Polish clusters’ attractiveness for inward FDI? Addressing ambiguity problem. International Journal of Management and Economics, 43(1), 74–93.
54.
HennartJ.-F., MajocchiA., & HagenB. (2021). What’s so special about born globals, their entrepreneurs or their business model?Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00427-0
55.
Hervas-OliverJ.-L., BelussiF., SeditaS. R., CaloffiA., & Gonzalez-AlcaideG. (2020). Approaching multinationals in clusters from different perspectives: An integration of literatures. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 30(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-07-2019-0071
56.
HilmerssonM., SchweizerR., & ChettyS. (2022). The relationship between timing, speed, and performance in foreign market network entry. Management International Review, 62, 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00470-5
57.
HittM. A., TihanyiL., MillerT., & ConnellyB. (2006). International diversification: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 32(6), 831–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306293575
58.
HovhannisyanN., & KellerW. (2015). International business travel: An engine of innovation?Journal of Economic Growth, 20(1), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-014-9107-7
59.
HumphreyJ., & SchmitzH. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027.
60.
JainN. K., CeloS., & KumarV. (2019a). Internationalization speed, resources and performance: Evidence from Indian software industry. Journal of Business Research, 95, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.09.019
61.
JainN. K., PangarkarN., YuanL., & KumarV. (2019b). Rapid internationalization of emerging market firms—The role of geographic diversity and added cultural distance. International Business Review, 28(6), 101590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101590
62.
JohansonJ., & VahlneJ.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.
63.
KaragozogluN., & LindellM. (1998). Internationalization of small and medium-sized technology-based firms: An exploratory study. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 44.
64.
KerrW. R. (2008). Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3), 518–537.
65.
KhannaT., & PalepuK. (2000). The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 268–285.
66.
KhannaT., & RivkinJ. W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74.
67.
KumarV., SinghD., PurkayasthaA., PopliM., & GaurA. (2020). Springboard internationalization by emerging market firms: Speed of first cross-border acquisition. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00266-0
68.
LiW. H., GuoB., & De SistoM. (2021). Untangling the commonalities and differences between domestic cross-regional experience and international experience in shaping speed of internationalization. Journal of International Management, 27(2), 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100852
69.
LiL., QianG., & QianZ. (2012). Early internationalization and performance of small high-tech ‘born-globals.’International Marketing Review, 29(5), 536–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331211260377
70.
LiL., QianG., & QianZ. (2015). Speed of internationalization: Mutual effects of individual- and company-level antecedents: How can ‘Born globals’ internationalize fast?Global Strategy Journal, 5(4), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1103
71.
LibaersD., & MeyerM. (2011). Highly innovative small technology firms, industrial clusters and firm internationalization. Research Policy, 40(10), 1426–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.005
72.
LorentzenA. (2008). Knowledge networks in local and global space. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(6), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620802462124
73.
LoveJ. H., & MansuryM. A. (2007). External linkages, R&D and innovation performance in US business services. Industry and Innovation, 14(5), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701711380
74.
LoveJ. H., RoperS., & Hewitt-DundasN. (2010). Service innovation, embeddedness and business performance: Evidence from Northern Ireland. Regional Studies, 44(8), 983–1004.
75.
LuoY., & TungR. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275
76.
MadhokA., & KeyhaniM. (2012). Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 26–40.
77.
MajocchiA., & PresuttiM. (2009). Industrial clusters, entrepreneurial culture and the social environment: The effects on FDI distribution. International Business Review, 18(1), 76–88.
78.
MakhijaM. V. (2004). The value of restructuring in emerging economies: The case of the Czech Republic. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.378
79.
ManningS., RicartJ. E., Rosatti RiqueM. S., & LewinA. Y. (2010). From blind spots to hotspots: How knowledge services clusters develop and attract foreign investment. Journal of International Management, 16(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.007
80.
MarshallA., & MarshallM. P. (1920). The economics of industry. Macmillan.
81.
MartinR., & SunleyP. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437.
82.
MaskellP. (2001). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 921–943.
83.
MaskellP., BatheltH., & MalmbergA. (2006). Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310600852332
84.
MaskellP., & MalmbergA. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167–185.
85.
MishinaY., PollockT. G., & PoracJ. F. (2004). Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1179–1197. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.424
86.
MohrA., & BatsakisG. (2014). Intangible assets, international experience and the internationalisation speed of retailers. International Marketing Review, 31(6), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2013-0186
87.
MudambiR., & SwiftT. (2012). Multinational enterprises and the geographical clustering of innovation. Industry and Innovation, 19(1), 1–21.
88.
MukundhanK. V. (2013). Organizational responses to institutional changes—A review and an extension. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 2(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975213496509
89.
MurmannJ. P., OzdemirS. Z., & SardanaD. (2015). The role of home country demand in the internationalization of new ventures. Research Policy, 44(6), 1207–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.002
90.
MusteenM., FrancisJ., & DattaD. K. (2010). The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance: A study of Czech SMEs. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.12.003
91.
NachumL. (2003). Liability of foreignness in global competition? Financial service affiliates in the city of London. Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1187–1208.
92.
NachumL. (2004). Geographic and industrial diversification of developing country firms. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 273–294.
93.
NadviK., & HalderG. (2005). Local clusters in global value chains: Exploring dynamic linkages between Germany and Pakistan. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17(5), 339–363.
94.
O’FarrellP. N., ZhengJ., & WoodP. A. (1996). Internationalization of business services: An interregional analysis. Regional Studies, 30(2), 101–118.
95.
OviattB. M., & McDougallP. P. (2005). Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00097.x
96.
PanditN. R., CookG. A., BeaverstockJ. V., & GhauriP. N. (2008). An empirical study of service sector clustering and multinational enterprises. Journal of Services Research, 8(S1), S23+.
97.
PedersenT., & ShaverJ. M. (2011). Internationalization revisited: The big step hypothesis. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4), 263–274.
98.
PellegrinoJ. M., & McNaughtonR. B. (2017). Beyond learning by experience: The use of alternative learning processes by incrementally and rapidly internationalizing SMEs. International Business Review, 26(4), 614–627.
99.
PorterM. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition (Vol. 76). Harvard Business Review.
100.
PorterM. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.
101.
PowellK. S. (2019). Competition at home and foreign market entry timing. Multinational Business Review, 27(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-10-2017-0070
102.
PrashanthamS., & YoungS. (2011). Post-entry speed of international new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00360.x
103.
RamamurtiR. (2012). What is really different about emerging market multinationals?Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 41–47.
104.
RamosE., AcedoF. J., & GonzalezM. R. (2011). Internationalisation speed and technological patterns: A panel data study on Spanish SMEs. Technovation, 31(10–11), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.008
105.
RayP. K., KathuriaV., & KumarV. (2020). Slippery space and sticky places: Evidence from the Indian IT industry. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1718545
106.
RayS., & RayP. K. (2021). Innovation strategy of latecomer firms under tight appropriability regimes: The Indian pharmaceuticals industry. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100820
107.
RayP. K., RayS., & KumarV. (2017). Internationalization of latecomer firms from emerging economies—The role of resultant and autonomous learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(4), 851–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9527-y
108.
RugmanA. M., & VerbekeA. (2008). A regional solution to the strategy and structure of multinationals. European Management Journal, 26(5), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.004
109.
SaxenaN. K., & DasS. (2022). Competitive pressure and the moderating role of the knowledge network on internationalization intent of Indian state-owned enterprises. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 11(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779752211015529
110.
SaxenianA. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Nature, 372(6508), 737.
111.
SimonH. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
112.
SinghJ. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770.
113.
StallkampM., PinkhamB. C., SchotterA. P. J., & BuchelO. (2018). Core or periphery? The effects of country-of-origin agglomerations on the within-country expansion of MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(8), 942–966. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0060-x
114.
SturgeonT., Van BiesebroeckJ., & GereffiG. (2008). Value chains, networks and clusters: Reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 297–321.
115.
SuireR., & VicenteJ. (2009). Why do some places succeed when others decline? A social interaction model of cluster viability. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(3), 381–404.
116.
SurduI., MellahiK., GlaisterK. W., & NardellaG. (2018). Why wait? Organizational learning, institutional quality and the speed of foreign market re-entry after initial entry and exit. Journal of World Business, 53(6), 911–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.07.008
117.
UpadhyayulaR. S., DhandapaniK., & KarnaA. (2017). The role of cluster presence and quality certification in internationalization and performance of offshore service providers. Journal of International Management, 23(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.11.004
118.
VernonR. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1880689
119.
WangC. C., & WuA. (2016). Geographical FDI knowledge spillover and innovation of indigenous firms in China. International Business Review, 25(4), 895–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.12.004
120.
WangY., YaoX., & LiK. (2022). Imitation and rapid internationalization of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 57(6), 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101364
121.
WickhamJ., & VecchiA. (2008). Local firms and global reach: Business air travel and the Irish software cluster. European Planning Studies, 16(5), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802049315
122.
WrightM., FilatotchevI., HoskissonR. E., & PengM. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom*. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00487.x
123.
YadavS. (2022, forthcoming). . Foreign entry timing, time since first entry, and internationalisation speed of exporting SMEs: When does manager domestic experience matter?. European Journal of International Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2022.10050885
124.
YavanN. (2010). The location choice of foreign direct investment within Turkey: An empirical analysis. European Planning Studies, 18(10), 1675–1705.
125.
ZaheerA., & GeorgeV. P. (2004). Reach out or reach within? Performance implications of alliances and location in biotechnology. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25(6–7), 437–452.
126.
ZaheerS., LaminA., & SubramaniM. (2009). Cluster capabilities or ethnic ties? Location choice by foreign and domestic entrants in the services offshoring industry in India. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 944–968. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.91
127.
ZahoorN., & Al-TabbaaO. (2021). Post-entry internationalization speed of SMEs: The role of relational mechanisms and foreign market knowledge. International Business Review, 30(1), 101761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101761
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
