This article investigates the moderating role of board independence in the relationship between debt financing and performance of emerging market firms. We have used an empirical model in which the firm’s accounting profitability is a dependent variable and the independent variables are debt financing, board independence, the interaction variable made of debt financing and board independence as well as various control variables. Our analysis is based on a panel data set of 300 listed firms in Vietnam between 2013 and 2017. Our study finds that debt financing has a significantly negative effect and that board independence reduces the adverse impact of debt financing on accounting profitability. Our results are consistent across different estimation models and methods.
BaronMRKennyAD (1986) The moderator – mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
3.
BearSERahmanNPostC (2010) The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics97(2): 207–221.
4.
BeasleyM (1996) An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review71: 443–465.
5.
BellAJonesK (2015) Explaining fixed effects: random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods3(1): 133–153.
6.
BergerAdi PattiEB (2006) Debt financing and firm performance: a new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance30(4): 1065–1102.
7.
BigerNNguyenNVHoangQX (2007) Chapter 15 the determinants of debt financing: evidence from Vietnam. In: Asia-Pacific Financial Markets: Integration, Innovation and Challenge, pp. 307–326.
8.
CavacoSChalleECrifoP, et al. (2016). Board independence and operating performance: analysis on (French) company and individual data. Applied Economics48(52): 5093–5105.
9.
ClaessensSYurtogluBB (2013) Corporate governance in emerging markets: a survey. Emerging Markets Review15: 1–33.
10.
CuongNT (2014) Threshold effect of debt financing on firm value: evidence from seafood processing enterprises in the South Central region of Vietnam. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies3(3): 14–28.
11.
DarkoJAribiZAAribiZA, et al. (2016) Corporate governance: the impact of director and board structure, ownership structure and corporate control on the performance of listed companies on the Ghana stock exchange. Corporate Governance16(2): 259–277.
12.
DavydovD (2016) Debt structure and corporate performance in emerging markets. Research in International Business and Finance38: 299–311.
13.
DenisDK (2001) Twenty-five years of corporate governance research and counting. Review of Financial Economics10(3): 191–212.
14.
DharwadkarRGeorgeGBrandesP (2000) Privatization in emerging economies: an agency theory perspective. The Academy of Management Review25(3): 650–669.
15.
DonaldsonLDavisJH (1991) Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management16(1): 49–64.
16.
DucVHThuyPBG (2013) Corporate governance and firm’s performance: empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economic Development218: 62–77.
17.
EbaidIE (2009) The impact of debt financing choice on firm performance: empirical evidence from Egypt. The Journal of Risk Finance10(5): 477–487.
18.
García-RamosRGarcía-OlallaM (2011) Board characteristics and firm performance in public founder- and nonfounder-led family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy2(4): 220–231.
19.
GulatiFWestphalJD (1999) Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly44(3): 473–506.
20.
HaunschildPBeckmanC (1998) When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly43: 815–844.
21.
HausmanJA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica46: 1251–1271.
22.
HoskissonREEdenLLauCM, et al. (2000) Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal43: 249–267.
23.
HullRMDawarV (2014) Agency theory, debt financing and firm performance: some Indian evidence. Managerial Finance40: 1190–1206.
24.
IturriagaFJLCrisóstomoVL (2010) Do leverage, dividend payout, and ownership concentration influence firms’ value creation? An analysis of Brazilian firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade46(3): 80–94.
JensenMCMecklingWH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics3: 305–360.
27.
JermiasJ (2008) The relative influence of competitive intensity and business strategy on the relationship between financial leverage and performance. British Accounting Review40: 71–86.
28.
JoHHarjotoMA (2012) The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics106(1): 53–72.
29.
KhanAG (2012) The relationship of debt financing decisions with firm performance: a study of the engineering sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting2(1): 245–262.
30.
KimEH (1978) A mean-variance theory of optimal debt financing and corporate debt capacity. The Journal of Finance33(1): 45–63.
31.
KochharR (1996) Explaining firm debt financing: the role of agency theory vs. transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal17: 713–728.
32.
KrausALitzenbergerRH (1973) A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. The Journal of Finance28(4): 911–922.
33.
LeTVO’BrienJP (2010) Can two wrongs make a right? State ownership and debt in a transition economy. Journal of Management Studies47(7): 1297–1316.
34.
MansfieldERHelmsBP (1982) Detecting multicollinearity. The American Statistician36(3): 158–160.
35.
MargaritisDPsillakiM (2010) Debt financing, equity ownership and firm performance. Journal of Banking and Finance34(3): 621–632.
36.
MizruchiMStearnsL (1994) A longitudinal study of borrowing by large American corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly39: 118–140.
37.
ModiglianiFMillerM (1963) Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. American Economic Review53: 433–443.
38.
MuraR (2007) Firm performance: do non-executive directors have minds of their own? Evidence from UK panel data. Financial Management36(3): 81–112.
39.
MyersSC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics9: 147–176.
40.
MyersSC (1984) The debt financing puzzle. Journal of Finance39: 575–592.
41.
MyersSC (2001) Debt financing. Journal of Economic Perspectives15: 81–102.
42.
NguyenTDKRamachandranN (2006) Debt financing in small and medium-sized enterprises: the case of Vietnam. ASEAN Economic Bulletin23(2): 192–211.
43.
NguyenTTMEvansELuM (2017) Independent directors, ownership concentration and firm performance in listed companies: evidence from Vietnam. Pacific Accounting Review29(2): 204–226.
44.
O’BrienJ (2003) The debt financing implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management Journal24(5): 415–431.
45.
PengMW (2004) Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal25(5): 453–471.
46.
PfefferJSalancikGR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
47.
PorterME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
48.
RashidADe ZoysaALodhS, et al. (2010) Board composition and firm performance: evidence from Bangladesh. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal4(1): 76–96.
49.
SalimMYadavR (2012) Debt financing and firm performance: evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences65: 156–166.
50.
SamiHWangJZhouH (2011) Corporate governance and operating performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation20(2): 106–114.
51.
SarkarJSarkarS (2008) Debts and corporate governance in emerging economies. Economics of Transition16(2): 293–334.
52.
TianJLauCM (2001) Board composition, leadership structure, and performance in Chinese shareholding companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management18: 245–263.
53.
TitmanSWesselsR (1988) The determinants of debt financing choice. The Journal of Finance43(1): 1–19.
54.
VoDHNguyenTM (2014) The impact of corporate governance on firm performance: empirical study in Vietnam. International Journal of Economics and Finance6(6): 1–13.
55.
VoXV (2017) Determinants of debt financing in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance40: 105–113.
56.
VoXVEllisC (2017) An empirical investigation of debt financing and firm value in Vietnam. Finance Research Letters22: 90–94.
57.
WestphalJDGulatiRShortellSM (1997) Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly42(2): 366–394.
58.
WilliamsonOE (1967) Hierarchical control and optimum firm size. Journal of Political Economy53(2): 123–138.
59.
WooldridgeJM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT press.
YoungMNPengMWAhlstromD, et al. (2008) Corporate governance in emerging economies: a review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies45(1): 196–220.
62.
ZeitunRTianG (2007) Debt financing and corporate performance: evidence from Jordan. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal1: 40–53.
