The present study aims to examine, and to test the monitoring effect of institutional investment on, the relationship between insider ownership and real earnings management in Indian companies. The study examines the non-linear association between insider ownership and real earnings management using a sample of listed non-financial companies in the Indian market from 2011 to 2018. The study used pooled data OLS regression and Quantile regression. The findings reveal significant non-linear U-shaped relationship between insider ownership and real earnings management and that the large-size institutional investment makes such non-linear relationship insignificant. Contribution of the present study to the literature is two-fold. First, it proves the differential impact of the size of insider ownership on real earnings management. It indicates that firms having large-size insider ownership have greater scope for real earnings management, underscoring the need for the more scrutiny of reported earnings by the outsider shareholders. Second, it proves significant positive effect of the size of institutional investment in constraining the entrenchment by the insider owners. It signals that firms with large-size institutional investment have better quality of financial reporting and also contribute to efficient price discovery in the capital markets.
AjayR., & MadhumathiR. (2015). Institutional ownership and earnings management in India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 8(2), 119–136.
2.
AjitD., MalikS., & VermaV. K. (2013). Earnings management in India. SEBI DRG Study.
3.
AlbrechtW. D., & RichardsonF. M. (1990). Income smoothing by economy sector. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(5), 713–730.
4.
AndersonR. C., & ReebD. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.
5.
Ashbaugh-SkaifeH., CollinsD. W., & KinneyW. R.Jr., (2007). The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1–2), 166–192.
6.
AyersB. C., RamalingegowdaS., & YeungP. E. (2011). Hometown advantage: The effects of monitoring institution location on financial reporting discretion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 41–61.
7.
BadertscherB. A. (2011). Overvaluation and the choice of alternative earnings management mechanisms. Accounting Review, 86(5), 1491–1518. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10092
8.
BaeK.-H., StulzR. M., & TanH. (2008). Do local analysts know more? A cross-country study of the performance of local analysts and foreign analysts. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 581–606.
9.
BallR., & FosterG. (1982). Corporate financial reporting: A methodological review of empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research, 161–234.
10.
BalsamS., HawI.-M., & LilienS. B. (1995). Mandated accounting changes and managerial discretion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(1), 3–29.
11.
BartonJ., & SimkoP. J. (2002). The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint. The Accounting Review, 77(s1), 1–27.
12.
BerleA. A., & MeansG. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan.
13.
BhaumikS. K., & GregoriouA. (2010). ‘Family’ ownership, tunnelling and earnings management: A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(4), 705–730.
14.
BowenR. M., NoreenE. W., & LaceyJ. M. (1981). Determinants of the corporate decision to capitalize interest. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 151–179.
15.
BraamG., NandyM., WeitzelU., & LodhS. (2015). Accrual-based and real earnings management and political connections. The International Journal of Accounting, 50(2), 111–141.
16.
BusheeB. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review, 305–333.
17.
ChatterjeeR., & RakshitD. (2020). Association between earnings management and corporate governance mechanisms: A study based on select firms in India. Global Business Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919885545
18.
ChenX., HarfordJ., & LiK. (2007). Monitoring: Which institutions matter?Journal of Financial Economics, 86(2), 279–305.
19.
ClaessensS., DjankovS., & LangL. H. P. (2000a). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112.
20.
ClaessensS., DjankovS., & XuL. C. (2000b). East Asian corporations: Heroes or villains?World Bank Research Observer, 15(1).
21.
DaleyL. A., & VigelandR. L. (1983). The effects of debt covenants and political costs on the choice of accounting methods: The case of accounting for R&D costs. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 195–211.
22.
DeFondM. L., & ParkC. W. (1997). Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(2), 115–139.
23.
DemsetzH., & LehnK. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177.
24.
DenisD. K., & McConnellJ. J. (2003). International corporate governance. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126762
25.
DingY., ZhangH., & ZhangJ. (2007). Private vs state ownership and earnings management: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00556.x
26.
DoyleJ. T., GeW., & McVayS. (2007). Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 82(5), 1141–1170.
27.
EldenburgL. G., GunnyK. A., HeeK. W., & SoderstromN. (2011). Earnings management using real activities: Evidence from nonprofit hospitals. The Accounting Review, 86(5), 1605–1630.
28.
FaccioM., & LangL. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.
29.
FanJ. P. H., & WongT. J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00047-2
30.
GomesA. (2000). Going public without governance: Managerial reputation effects. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 615–646.
31.
GopalanR., & JayaramanS. (2012). Private control benefits and earnings management: Evidence from insider controlled firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(1), 117–157.
32.
GhoshS. (2011). Firm ownership type, earnings management, and auditor relationships: Evidence from India. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(4), 350–369.
33.
GrahamJ. R., HarveyC. R., & RajgopalS. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1–3), 3–73.
34.
GunnyK. A. (2010). The relation between earnings management using real activities manipulation and future performance: Evidence from meeting earnings benchmarks. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 855–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01029.x
35.
HoskissonR. E., EdenL., LauC. M., & WrightM. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556394
JaiswallM., & BanerjeeA. (2012). Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate governance characteristics in the Indian context [Working paper series, no. 704]. Indian Institute of Management Calcutta.
38.
JiangF., MaY., & WangX. (2020). Multiple blockholders and earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101689.
39.
JohnsonW. B., & RamananR. (1988). Discretionary accounting changes from ‘successful efforts’ to ‘full cost’ methods: 1970–76. Accounting Review, 96–110.
40.
KeatingA. S., & ZimmermanJ. L. (1999). Depreciation-policy changes: Tax, earnings management, and investment opportunity incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(3), 359–389.
41.
KimI., MillerS., WanH., & WangB. (2016). Drivers behind the monitoring effectiveness of global institutional investors: Evidence from earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 24–46.
42.
KinneyW. R.Jr., & McDanielL. S. (1989). Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(1), 71–93.
43.
La PortaR., Lopez-de-SilanesF., & ShleiferA. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
44.
LabelleR. (1990). Bond covenants and changes in accounting policy: Canadian evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 6(2), 677–698.
45.
LeeB. B., & ChoiB. (2002). Company size, auditor type, and earnings management. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 3(1), 27–50.
46.
LeeC.-W. J., LiL. Y., & YueH. (2006). Performance, growth and earnings management. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2–3), 305–334.
47.
LeuzC., NandaD., & WysockiP. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527.
48.
LiL., FrancisB. B., & HasanI. (2011). A cross-country study of legal environment and real earnings management [Paper presentation]. CAAA Annual Conference, 13January.
49.
LiuC., ChungC. Y., SulH. K., & WangK. (2018). Does hometown advantage matter? The case of institutional blockholder monitoring on earnings management in Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2), 196–221.
50.
MalmquistD. H. (1990). Efficient contracting and the choice of accounting method in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1–3), 173–205.
51.
MangalaD. (2019). Do corporate governance characteristics constrain earnings management? The role of board, audit committee and ownership structure in Indian corporate sector. IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 18(4), 7–32.
52.
McConnellJ. J., & ServaesH. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C
53.
MecklingW. H., & JensenM. C. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1163/_q3_SIM_00374
54.
MorckR., ShleiferA., & VishnyR. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(C), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7
55.
MyersS. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175.
56.
PetroniK. R. (1992). Optimistic reporting in the property-casualty insurance industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(4), 485–508.
57.
La PortaR., Lopez-de-SilanesF., ShleiferA., & VishnyR. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
58.
RoychowdhuryS. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002
59.
SarkarJ., SarkarS., & SenK. (2008). Board of directors and opportunistic earnings management: Evidence from India. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(4), 517–551.
60.
SarkarJ., SarkarS., & SenK. (2013). Insider control, group affiliation and earnings management in emerging economies: Evidence from India. Pace University Accounting Research Paper No. 2013/02. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2197713
61.
ShleiferA., & VishnyR. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Part 1), 461–488.
62.
ShleiferA., & VishnyR. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.
63.
SiregarS. V., & UtamaS. (2008). Type of earnings management and the effect of ownership structure, firm size, and corporate-governance practices: Evidence from Indonesia. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(1), 1–27.
64.
StulzR. M. (1988). Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(January–March), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90039-6
65.
SunL., & RathS. (2010). Earnings management research: A review of contemporary research methods. Global Review of Accounting and Finance, 1(1), 121–135.
66.
SunQ., TongW. H. S., & TongJ. (2002). How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China’s privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(1–2), 1–27.
67.
TianL. (2001). Government shareholding and the value of China’s modern firms. Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.299936
68.
WangD. (2006). Founding family ownership and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 619–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00213.x
69.
XuX., & WangY. (1999). Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies. China Economic Review, 10(1), 75–98.
70.
YangC. Y., LaiH. N., & TanB. L. (2008). Managerial ownership structure and earnings management. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 6(1), 35–53.
71.
ZmijewskiM. E., & HagermanR. L. (1981). An income strategy approach to the positive theory of accounting standard setting/choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 129–149.
