The purpose of the paper is to investigate whether women directors impact the risk and return of Indian banks. This study employs panel data models for a sample of 29 Indian banks that form part of the National Stock Exchange 500 index for the period 2009–2016. This paper concludes that women directors influence the accounting returns (measured through Return on Assets) of Indian banks. However, it was found that women directors did not affect the risks (measured through Equity Beta and gross NPA to Total Assets) of the sample banks. This paper contributes to the literature and practitioners in several ways. To the best of the knowledge of the authors, no study has examined the impact of women directors on the risk and return of banks operating in India. Hence, the findings of this article have substantial implications both to academia and practitioners.
AbdullahS.N., IsmailK.N.I.K., & NachumL. (2016). Does having women on boards create value? The impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2352
2.
AdamsR.B., & FerreiraD. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
3.
AdlerR.D. (2001). Women in the executive suite correlate to high profits. Harvard Business Review79, 1–8.
4.
AndersonB.S., & EshimaY. (2013). The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.10.001
5.
AndresP. & de ValleladoE. (2008). Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 2570–2580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.05.008
6.
ArmstrongC.S., CoreJ.E., & GuayW.R. (2014). Do independent directors cause improvements in firm transparency?Journal of Financial Economy, 113(3), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.05.009
7.
ArayssiM., DahM., & JiziM. (2016). Women on boards, sustainability reporting and firm performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3), 376–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2015-0055
BawaJ. K., GoyalV., MitraS. K., & BasuS. (2019). An analysis of NPAs of Indian banks: Using a comprehensive framework of 31 financial ratios. IIMB Management Review, 31(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.08.004.
10.
BertayA. C., Demirgüç-KuntA., & HuizingaH. (2013). Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4), 532–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2013.02.002.
11.
BaltagiB. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley.
12.
BarrosC.P., BoubakerS., & HamrouniA. (2013). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in France. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29, 561–578. https:/doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2010.3
13.
BennouriM., ChtiouiT., NagatiH., & NekhiliM. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters?Journal of Banking and Finance, 88, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.010
14.
BokpinG. A. (2013). Ownership structure, corporate governance and bank efficiency: An empirical analysis of panel data from the banking industry in Ghana. Corporate Governance, 13(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2010-0041
15.
ByronK. & PostC. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12165
16.
CaiazzaS., CotugnoM., FiordelisiF., & StefanelliV. (2018). The spillover effect of enforcement actions on bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 91, 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.04.008
17.
CampbellK., & Mínguez-VeraA. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
18.
CarterD.A., SimkinsB.J., & SimpsonW.G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38, 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034
19.
ChouH.I., ChungH., & YinX. (2013). Attendance of board meetings and company performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 4157–4171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.028
20.
ClarkeT. (1998). Research on corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 6, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00081
21.
DongY., GirardoneC., & KuoJ.M. (2017). Governance, efficiency and risk taking in Chinese banking. British Accounting Review, 49(2), 211–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.001
22.
DhalS. and MisraB. (2014) ‘Pro-Cyclical Management of Banks’ Non Performing Loans by the Indian Public Sector Banks Pro-Cyclical Management of Banks’ Non -Performing Loans by the Indian Public Sector Banks’. RBI Occasional Papers, March.
23.
FauziF., BasyithA., & HoP. L. (2017). Women on boardroom: Does it create risk?Cogent Economics and Finance, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1325117
24.
FrancoeurC., LabelleR., & Sinclair-DesgagneB. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 83–95. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-007-9482-5
25.
García-MecaE., García-SánchezI.M., & Martínez-FerreroJ. (2015). Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: An international analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 53, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.002
26.
HsiaoC. (1985). Benefits and limitations of panel data. Econometric Reviews, 4(1), 121–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938508800078
27.
Jane LenardM., YuB., Anne YorkE., & WuS. (2014). Impact of board gender diversity on firm risk. Managerial Finance, 40, 787–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2013-0164
28.
JiziM.I., SalamaA., DixonR., & StratlingR. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2
29.
JohlS.K., KaurS., & CooperB.J. (2015). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed firms. Journal of Economy, Business and Management3(2), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.7763/JOEBM.2015.V3.187
30.
JohnsonL. (2007). Having the fiduciary duty talk: Model advice for corporate officers (and other senior agents). Business Lawyer, 63(1), 147–161. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40688440
31.
KılıçM., & KuzeyC. (2016). The effect of board gender diversity on firm performance: evidence from Turkey. Gender in Management, 31(7), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-10-2015-0088
32.
LaevenL., & LevineR. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.003
33.
LiuY., WeiZ., & XieF. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China?Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016
34.
LoukilN., & YousfiO. (2016). Does gender diversity on corporate boards increase risk-taking?Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1326
35.
LowD.C.M., RobertsH., & WhitingR.H. (2015). Board gender diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 35(Part A), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.02.008
36.
MartinA.D., NishikawaT., & WilliamsM.A. (2009). CEO gender: Effects on valuation and risk. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting48(3), 23–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23075251
37.
McGuinnessP. B., LamK. C. K., & VieitoJ. P. (2015). Gender and other major board characteristics in China: Explaining corporate dividend policy and governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 989–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9443-y
38.
McKnightP.J., & WeirC. (2009). Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2007.09.008
39.
MooreB. J. (1989). The endogeneity of credit money. Review of Political Economy, 1(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538258900000005
40.
NiţoiM., ClichiciD., & Moagăr-PoladianS. (2019). The effects of prudential policies on bank leverage and insolvency risk in Central and Eastern Europe. Economic Modelling, 81, 148–160. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301656104
41.
PathanS., & FaffR. (2013). Does board structure in banks really affect their performance?Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 1573–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.016
42.
PandeR., & FordD. (2012). Gender quotas and female leadership: A review. World Development Report 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/15213757(20010316)113:6<10113::AIDANGE10113>3.3.CO;2-V
43.
Reguera-AlvaradoN., de FuentesP., & LaffargaJ. (2017). Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2735-9
44.
RawlinR., SharanS.M., & LakshmipathyP.B. (2012). Modeling the NPA of a large Indian public sector bank as a function of total assets. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(5), 78–90. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Modeling+the+NPA+of+a+Large+India
45.
RhodeD., & PackelA. K. (2012). Diversity on corporate boards: How much difference does difference make?SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1685615
46.
SahayR., CihakM., N’DiayeP., BarajasA., KyobeA., MitraS., MooiY. N., & YousefiS. R. (2017). Banking on women leaders: A case for more? (IMF Working Paper WP/17/199). International Monetary Fund.
47.
Schwartz-ZivM. (2013). Does the gender of directors matter?SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2257867
48.
SilaV., GonzalezA., & HagendorffJ. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk?Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003
49.
SkałaD., & WeillL. (2018). Does CEO gender matter for bank risk?Economic Systems, 42(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.08.005
SternG. H., & FeldmanR. J., (2004). Too big to fail: The hazards of bank bailouts. Brookings Institution Press.
52.
TerjesenS., CoutoE.B., & FranciscoP.M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(3), 447–483.
53.
TremblayM., CôtéJ., & BalkinD. B. (2003). Explaining sales pay strategy using agency, transaction cost and resource dependence theories. Journal of Management Studies, 40(7), 1651–1682.
54.
ZahraS.A., & PearceJ.A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208
