The existing corporate governance literature focuses on a principal–agent model or a principal–principal model which demonstrate two-way conflicts. This study seeks to understand the emergence of a three-way principal–agent–principal conflict between the controlling/promoter shareholder, the professional manager and the minority shareholders in emerging market family-controlled firms which are professionalizing their management. Using the case study method, this article proves that in the listed emerging market firms, the professional manager gets empowered under a specific internal governance structure as the institutions of external governance become effective. This leads to a three-way principal–agent–principal conflict between the controlling/promoter shareholder, the professional manager and the minority shareholders. A principal–agent–principal model in the emerging markets changes the very basics of corporate governance framework and opens up new research avenues in the field of corporate governance. The evolvement of the three-way conflict might call for unique regulations to deal with corporate governance problems in the emerging markets.
AmihudY., & LevB. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. The Bell Journal of Economics, 12(2), 605–616.
2.
AgrawalA., & MandelkerG. (1987). Managerial incentives and corporate investment and financing decisions. The Journal of Finance, 42(4), 823–837.
3.
ArakaliH. (2017). Infosys names Ravi Venkatesan co-chairman in a move to repair relations with founder Murthy. Forbes India, 13 April. Retrieved 30September2018, from http://www.forbesindia.com/Article/Special/Infosys-Names-Ravi-Venkatesan-Cochairman-In-A-Move-To-Repair-Relations-With-Founder-Murthy/46671/1
4.
BabuV. (2017). System failure at Infosys: Inside account of the corporate battle and why it matters to IT sector. India Today, 25 August. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20170904-infosys-narayana-murthy-vishal-sikka-bengaluru-1031096-2017-08-25
5.
BalasubramanianB. N. (2014). Strengthening corporate governance in India: A review of legislative and regulatory initiatives in 2013–2014. IIM Bangalore. Retrieved 27February2019, from https://www.iimb.ac.in/sites/default/files/inline-files/WP%20No.%20447%20%28Revised%29_0.pdf
6.
BangN. P., RayS., & RamachandranK. (2017). Family business 1990–2015: The emerging landscape. Hyderabad: Thomas Schmidheiny Centre for Family Enterprise, Indian School of Business.
7.
BarneyM. (Ed.). (2010). Leadership@ Infosys. New Delhi: Penguin India.
8.
Basu RoyP. (2016a). Has Infosys turned the corner?Livemint, 21 October. Retrieved 22February2019, from http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/ydBzES9YMzyGRWHImqWm9J/Has-Infosys-turned-the-corner.html
9.
Basu RoyP. (2016b). The Infosys turnaround: Hype or reality?Livemint, 18 July. Retrieved 22February2019, from http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/psyxoJt9ZNIe0d9dhccnyK/The-Infosys-turnaround-hype-or-reality.html
10.
BebchukL. A., & FriedJ. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71–92.
11.
BerleA. A., & MeansG. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
12.
BlanchardO. J., Lopez-deSilanes. F., & Shleifer. A. (1994). What do firms do with cash windfalls?Journal of Financial Economics, 36(3), 337–360.
13.
Business Standard (2017). Murthy vs Sikka: Infosys is facing a clash of cultures. 13 February. Retrieved 22February2019, from http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/murthy-vs-sikka-infosys-is-facing-a-clash-of-cultures-117021200716_1.html
14.
ChakrabartiR., MegginsonW., & YadavP. K. (2008). Corporate governance in India. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 20(1), 59–72.
15.
ChittoorR., & DasR. (2007). Professionalization of management and succession performance—A vital linkage. Family Business Review, 20(1), 65–79.
16.
DailyC. M., & DaltonD. R. (1992). Financial performance of founder-managed versus professionally managed small corporations. Journal of Small Business Management, 30(2), 25–34
17.
DharwadkarR., GeorgeG., & BrandesP. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 650–669.
18.
FaccioM., LangL. H., & YoungL. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91(1), 54–78.
19.
GaneshV. (2016a). Infosys may have buried its rules for CEO-to-worker pay ratio. Business Line, 25 May. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/infosys-may-have-buried-its-rules-for-ceotoworker-pay-ratio/article8646359.ece
20.
GaneshV. (2016b). Is Infosys set for a turnaround?Business Line, 22 February. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/is-infosys-set-for-a-turnaround/article8268192.ece
21.
Gómez-MejíaL. R., HaynesK. T., Núñez-NickelM., JacobsonK. J., & Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
22.
Gómez-MejíaL. R., HaynesK. T., Núñez-NickelM., JacobsonK. J., & Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
23.
GoyalS. (2017). Decoding Infosys: Why Narayana Murthy and Vishal Sikka were not made for each other. Firstpost, 1 September. Retrieved 22February2019, from http://www.firstpost.com/business/decoding-infosys-why-narayana-murthy-and-vishal-sikka-were-not-made-for-each-other-3997751.html
24.
GuptaL. C. (1998). What ails the Indian capital market?Economic & Political Weekly, 33(29/30), 1961–1966.
25.
India Today Tech (2017). Vishal Sikka vs N Murthy: What is this big fight inside Infosys?India Today, 10 February. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/features/story/vishal-sikka-vs-n-murthy-what-is-this-big-fight-inside-infosys-960052-2017-02-10
26.
JensenM. C., & MecklingW. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
27.
JiangY., & PengM. W. (2011). Principal–principal conflicts during crisis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), 683–695.
28.
KhannaT., & PalepuK. G. (2004). Globalization and convergence in corporate governance: Evidence from Infosys and the Indian software industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 484–507.
29.
KrishnaV. (2017). The real story behind the Infosys severance drama. YourStory, 10 February. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://yourstory.com/2017/02/the-infosys-severance-drama/
30.
KrishnanR. (2017). Murthy scores over Seshasayee in Infosys making Ravi Venkatesan co-chairman. Business Standard, 14 April. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/murthy-scores-over-seshasayee-in-infosys-making-ravi-venkatesan-co-chairman-117041300261_1.html
31.
KumarN., & SinghJ. P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: Some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(1), 88–98.
32.
La PortaR., Lopez-de-SilanesF., ShleiferA., & VishnyR. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
33.
LiuY., AhlstromD., & YehK. S. (2006). The separation of ownership and management in Taiwan’s public companies: An empirical study. International Business Review, 15(4), 415–35.
34.
MahalingamT. V., MendoncaJ., BalasubramanyamK. R., & TalgeriK. (2017). Infosys’ $200 million Israeli software company Panaya is in the eye of the storm. The Economic Times, 13 February. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/ites/infys-200-m-israeli-software-panaya-the-eye-of-the-storm/articleshow/57116308.cms
35.
MishraB. R. (2016). Proxy firms question Infy’s severance package to ex-CFO. Smartinvestor.in, 31 May. Retrieved 30September2019, from https://smartinvestor.business-standard.com/pf/features-387045-featuresdet-Proxy_firms_question_Infys_severance_package_to_ex_CFO.htm#.XDhgjVwzbIU
36.
MorckR., WolfenzonD., & YeungB. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 655–720.
37.
NachaneD. M., GhoshS., & RayP. (2005). Bank nominee directors and corporate performance: micro-evidence for India. Economic & Political Weekly, 40(12), 1216–1223.
38.
NirmalR. (2016). What has changed for Infosys with Vishal Sikka?Business Line, 23 May. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/what-has-changed-for-infosys-with-vishal-sikka/article8637373.ece
39.
PantM., & PattanayakM. (2007). Insider ownership and firm value: Evidence from Indian corporate sector. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(16), 1459–1467.
40.
PramanikA., & KrishnanR. (2017). Narayana Murthy asks Infosys to make Panaya report public; co says no. Business Standard, 4 August. Retrieved 22February2019, from http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/narayana-murthy-asks-infosys-to-make-panaya-report-public-firm-says-no-117080301600_1.html
41.
ReedA. M. (2002). Corporate governance reforms in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(3), 249–268.
42.
SarkarJ. (2009). Board independence & corporate governance in India: Recent trends & challenges ahead. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(4), 576–592.
43.
SarkarJ., & SarkarS., (2012). Corporate governance in India. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
44.
SoodV. (2015). Infosys to refrain from hiring SAP executives for now. Livemint, 17 September. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://www.livemint.com/Companies/nGAvB5k2qs5gmEtTwu9eEP/Infosys-to-refrain-from-hiring-SAP-executives-for-now.html
45.
SoodV. (2016a). Are Infosys founders not happy with Vishal Sikka?Livemint, 7 April. Retrieved 22February2019, from http://www.livemint.com/Companies/NZOTuzB2LnxHHpk6oGgqvM/Are-Infosys-founders-not-happy-with-Vishal-Sikka.html
46.
SoodV. (2016b). DN Prahlad’s appointment to Infosys board makes some shareholders uneasy. Livemint, 18October. Retrieved 22February2019, https://www.livemint.com/Companies/8if1KgkjV4k0bVLaO6NhWN/DN-Prahlads-appointment-to-Infosys-board-makes-some-shareho.html
47.
SoodV. (2016c). Infosys IT infra chief Samson David resigns in setback to Vishal Sikka. Livemint, 14 July. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://www.livemint.com/Companies/jhMuFCbzyMsAai11UXMZMN/Infosys-IT-infra-chief-Samson-David-resigns-in-setback-to-Vi.html
48.
SoodV. (2017a). Infosys founders at odds with chairman Seshasayee R.. Livemint, 10February. Retrieved 22February2019 from https://www.livemint.com/Companies/DGV9eL4IgiTygRxBy636WM/Infosys-founders-at-odds-with-chairman-R-Seshasayee.html
49.
SoodV. (2017b). Rajiv Bansal walked out of Infosys board meet on Panaya acquisition. Hindustan Times, 20 February. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/rajiv-bansal-walked-out-of-infosys-board-meet-on-panaya-acquisition/story-1GPyUFAk3IGhboFSHJwk5J.html
50.
SubramanianS. (2016a). A comparison of corporate governance practices in state-owned enterprises and their private sector peers in India. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 5(2), 200–216.
51.
SubramanianS. (2016b). Proxy advisory industry in India. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(2), 371–378
52.
SubramanianS. (2017). Proxy advisory voting recommendations in India–An exploratory study. Journal of Indian Business Research, 9(1), 283–303.
53.
The Economic Times (2017). Panaya: How one Infosys acquisition kicked off the big storm. 18 August. Retrieved 22February2019, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/ites/panaya-how-one-infosys-acquisition-kicked-off-the-big-storm/articleshow/60120594.cms
54.
VarmaJ. R. (1997). Corporate governance in India: Disciplining the dominant shareholder. IIMB Management Review, 9(4), 5–18.
55.
YoungM. N., AhlstromD., & BrutonG. D. (2004). The globalization of corporate governance in East Asia: The transnational solution. Management International Review, 44(2, Special Issue), 31–50.
56.
YoungM. N., PengM. W., AhlstromD., BrutonG. D., & JiangY. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220.
