Do Firm- and Board-specific Characteristics Corroborate Underpricing? A Study on the Indian IPOs

Abstract

The present research article is an attempt to add something new and revalidate the influence of already existing corporate governance dimensions related to the board of directors on listing-day performance of the Indian initial public offering (IPO) firms measured through underpricing. Like other emerging market economies, firms in the Indian economy are also characterized by concentrated ownership held by an owner or a promoter in the context of the Indian corporate environment. In the backdrop of this concentrated complex ownership structure, the present study analyses the influence of the board of directors on underpricing when the appointment of such directors is largely an affair handled by such owners, whom they are given the task to monitor. The sample consists of 471 IPO firms which went public during the time period from January 2003 to December 2017. Results obtained from the regression analysis show that the board size and board committees act as information signals for Indian IPO firms having a significant and negative relation with listing-day initial excess returns. Other board-related dimensions of governance do not have significant influence on underpricing. Overall board variables have a very miniscule contribution in explaining the underpricing in Indian IPO firms.

Keywords

Corporate governance IPO underpricing emerging market economy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

R. B.

, & Ferreira

(2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.

Agarwal

, Liu

, & Rhee

S. G.

(2008). Investor demand for IPOs and aftermarket performance: Evidence from the Hong Kong stock market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(2), 176–190.

Allen

, & Faulhaber

G. R.

(1989). Signalling by underpricing in the IPO market. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), 303–323.

Arthurs

J. D.

, Hoskisson

R. E.

, Busenitz

L. W.

, & Johnson

R. A.

(2008). Managerial agents watching other agents: Multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 277–294.

Arthurs

J. D.

, Busenitz

L. W.

, Hoskisson

R. E.

, & Johnson

R. A.

(2009). Signaling and initial public offerings: The use and impact of the lockup period. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 360–372.

Baluja

, & Singh

(2016). The survival analysis of initial public offerings in India. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 13(1), 23–41.

Banerji

, Mahtani

, Sealy

, & Vinnicombe

(2010). Standard Chartered Bank: Women on corporate boards in India 2010. Hong Kong: Community Business.

Bathula

(2008). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation). Auckland University of Technology, Auckland.

Baysinger

B. D.

, & Butler

H. N.

(1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1(1), 101–124.

10.

Beatty

R. P.

(1989). Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial public offerings. Accounting Review, 693–709.

11.

Beatty

R. P.

, & Ritter

J. R.

(1986). Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 213–232.

12.

Bédard

, Coulombe

, & Courteau

(2008). Audit committee, underpricing of IPOs, and accuracy of management earnings forecasts. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(6), 519–535.

13.

Boone

A. L.

, Field

L. C.

, Karpoff

J. M.

, & Raheja

C. G.

(2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66–101.

14.

BSE S&P BSE sensex. Retrieved from https://www.bseindia.com/markets/Derivatives/DeriReports/FAQs.aspx

15.

Carter

, & Manaster

(1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1045–1067.

16.

Certo

S. T.

(2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.

17.

Certo

S. T.

, Daily

C. M.

, & Dalton

D. R.

(2001). Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(2), 33–50.

18.

Chahine

(2004). Corporate governance and firm value for small and medium sized IPOs. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 143–159.

19.

Chahine

, & Filatotchev

(2008). The effects of information disclosure and board independence on IPO discount. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(2), 219–241.

20.

Chahine

, & Tohmé

N. S.

(2009). Is CEO duality always negative? An exploration of CEO duality and ownership structure in the Arab IPO context. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 123–141.

21.

Chen

, & Yang

(2013). An empirical study of China’s second board. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(2), 35.

22.

Chhabra

, Kiran

, & Sah

A. N.

(2017). Information asymmetry leads to underpricing: validation through SEM for Indian IPOs. Program, 51(2), 116–131.

23.

Claessens

, Djankov

, & Lang

L. H.

(2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112.

24.

Daily

C. M.

, Certo

S. T.

, & Dalton

D. R.

(2005). Investment bankers and IPO pricing: Does prospectus information matter? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 93–111.

25.

Darmadi

, & Gunawan

(2013). Underpricing, board structure, and ownership: An empirical examination of Indonesian IPO firms. Managerial Finance, 39(2), 181–200.

26.

Fama

E. F.

(1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.

27.

Fich

E. M.

, & Shivdasani

(2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724.

28.

Gouldey

B. K.

(2006). Uncertain demand, heterogeneous expectations, and unintentional IPO underpricing. Financial Review, 41(1), 33–54.

29.

Guenther

D. A.

, & Willenborg

(1999). Capital gains tax rates and the cost of capital for small business: evidence from the IPO market. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), 385–408.

30.

Guest

P. M.

(2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404.

31.

Hamdan

(2018). Board interlocking and firm performance: The role of foreign ownership in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 14(3), 266–281.

32.

Hanafi

M. M.

, & Setiawan

(2018). Ownership concentration, institutional ownership, and IPO underpricing: Evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Governance and Financial Intermediation, 1(1), 3–17.

33.

Handa

(2014). Corporate governance and underpricing of initial public offerings in India (Doctoral thesis). Department of Commerce and Business Management, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar.

34.

Harford

, Mansi

S. A.

, & Maxwell

W. F.

(2008). Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the US. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(3), 535–555.

35.

, & Wan

(2013). IPO lockups, founder power, and executive compensation. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 9(4), 314–331.

36.

Hearn

(2011). The impact of corporate governance measures on the performance of West African IPO firms. Emerging Markets Review, 12(2), 130–151.

37.

Hearn

(2012). The contrasting effects of board composition and structure on IPO firm underpricing in a developing context. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21(C), 33–44.

38.

Hillman

A. J.

, & Dalziel

(2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.

39.

Hora

(2017). Are independent directors really ‘independent’ in Indian companies dominated by promoters? Retrieved from http://www.livelaw.in/independent-directors-really-independent-indian-companies-dominated-promoters/

40.

Howton

S. D.

, Howton

S. W.

, & Olson

G. T.

(2001). Board ownership and IPO returns. Journal of Economics and Finance, 25(1), 100–114.

41.

Ibbotson

R. G.

, Sindelar

J. L.

, & Ritter

J. R.

(1988). Initial public offerings. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1(2), 37–45.

42.

Jackling

, & Johl

(2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509.

43.

Jain

B. A.

, & Kini

(1994). The post-issue operating performance of IPO firms. The journal of finance, 49(5), 1699–1726.

44.

Johl

S. K.

, Kaur

, & Cooper

B. J.

(2015). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed firms. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(2), 239–243.

45.

Kang

, Cheng

, & Gray

S. J.

(2007). Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 194–207.

46.

Klein

(1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. The Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 275–304.

47.

Kota

(2018). Independent director: An oxymoron. Retrieved from www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/oped/independent-director-an-oxymoron.html

48.

Krishnamurti

, Thong

T. Y.

, & Vishwanath

S. R.

(2009). Does certification work in emerging markets? Evidence from the Indian IPO market. In Proceedings of the 2009 JCF Conference on Emerging Market Corporate Finance.

49.

La Porta

, Lopez-De-Silanes

, & Shleifer

(1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.

50.

La Porta

, Lopez-de-Silanes

, Shleifer

, & Vishny

(2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 3–27.

51.

, & Roberts

(2018). Does mandated independence improve firm performance? Evidence from New Zealand. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(1), 92–109.

52.

Lin

C. P.

, & Chuang

C. M.

(2011). Principal-principal conflicts and IPO pricing in an emerging economy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(6), 585–600.

53.

Loughran

, Ritter

J. R.

, & Rydqvist

(1994). Initial public offerings: International insights. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2(2–3), 165–199.

54.

Lowry

, Officer

M. S.

, & Schwert

G. W.

(2010). The variability of IPO initial returns. The Journal of Finance, 65(2), 425–465.

55.

Megginson

W. L.

, & Weiss

K. A.

(1991). Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 46(3), 879–903.

56.

Mishra

, & Kapil

(2017). Effect of ownership structure and board structure on firm value: evidence from India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(4), 700–726.

57.

Mitchell Van der Zahn

J. W.

, Singh

, & Singh

(2008). Association between independent audit committee members’ human-resource features and underpricing: The case of Singapore IPOs from 1997–2006. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 12(3), 179–212.

58.

Mnif

(2009, May). Board of directors and the pricing of initial public offerings (IPOs): Does the existence of a properly structured board matter? Evidence from France. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00459257/

59.

Moreno-Gómez

, & Calleja-Blanco

(2018). The relationship between women’s presence in corporate positions and firm performance: The case of Colombia. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 83–100.

60.

Nafid

(2014) An historical analysis of IPO underpricing in India (Doctoral thesis). Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.

61.

Pagano

, Panetta

, & Zingales

(1998). Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 27–64.

62.

Peasnell

K. V.

, Pope

P. F.

, & Young

(2005). Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7–8), 1311–1346.

63.

Reutzel

C. R.

, & Belsito

C. A.

(2015). Female directors and IPO underpricing in the US. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 27–44.

64.

Rock

(1986). Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 187–212.

65.

Roosenboom

, & Schramade

(2006). The price of power: Valuing the controlling position of owner–managers in French IPO firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 270–295.

66.

Sahoo

(2017). Do anchor investors create value for initial public offerings? An empirical investigation. IIMB Management Review, 29(4), 259–275.

67.

Santos

R. L.

, Da Silveira

A. D. M.

, & Barros

L. A.

(2012). Board interlocking in Brazil: Directors’ participation in multiple companies and its effect on firm value and profitability. Latin American Business Review, 13(1), 1–28.

68.

Shah

(1995). The Indian IPO market: Empirical facts (pp. 1–29). Retrieved 12 July 2018, from http://www.underpricing.de

69.

Shleifer

, & Vishny

R. W.

(1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.

70.

Singh

(2011). PwC compensates Satyam investors: But not Indian ones. Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/pwc-compensates-satyam-investors-but-not-indian-ones/story-GEYPcZiujQEfC0Z8gATeUJ.html

71.

Singh

, & Kumar

(2012). Short run and long run dynamics of initial public offerings: Evidence from India. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 1(1), 87–113.

72.

Singh

J. V.

, Tucker

D. J.

, & House

R. J.

(1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193.

73.

Spence

A. M.

(1974). Market signaling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes (Vol. 143). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

74.

Sriram

(2018). Board characteristics and firm performance: A study of S&P BSE Sensex in India. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(3), 336–349.

75.

, & Fleisher

B. M.

(1999). An empirical investigation of underpricing in Chinese IPOs. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 7(2), 173–202.

76.

Thorsell

, & Isaksson

(2014). Director experience and the performance of IPOs: Evidence from Sweden. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 8(1), 3–24.

77.

Upadhyay

, & Laskar

(2017). MCA, regulatory bodies express dissent on Uday Kotak panel proposals. Retrieved from https://www.livemint.com/Companies/gKoGH2kWxLwRdKFI11s1nL/MCA-regulatory-bodies-express-dissent-on-Uday-Kotak-panel-p.html

78.

Vardhini

(2017). All you wanted to know about independent directors. Retrieved from https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/all-you-wanted-to-know-about-independent-directors/article9909818.ece

79.

Vong

A. P.

(2006). Rate of subscription and after-market volatility in Hong Kong IPOs. Applied Financial Economics, 16(16), 1217–1224.

80.

Walker

(2008). Family control, underwriter prestige, and IPO underpricing: A cross country analysis. Multinational Business Review, 16(2), 1–42.

81.

Weisbach

M. S.

(1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1–2), 431–460.

82.

Welch

(1989). Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 44(2), 421–449.

83.

Z. J.

, Wang

, & Long

(2017). The impact of director’s heterogeneity on IPO underpricing. Chinese Management Studies, 11(2), 230–247.

84.

Yermack

(1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.

85.

Young

M. N.

, Peng

M. W.

, Ahlstrom

, Bruton

G. D.

, & Jiang

(2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220.

86.

Zimmerman

M. A.

(2008). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on the capital raised through an initial public offering. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 391–414.