This study explores the relationship between public expenditure (PE) and gross domestic product (GDP) to verify whether the Wagner’s hypothesis holds good in the Indian context. We cover the period from 1970 to 2013 and use econometric tools like Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model (ARDL) test to check the long-run and causal relationship among the variables. The results of the bounds test suggest that there exists cointegration between PE and GDP, but we found weak evidence for Wagner’s hypothesis as well.
AbizadehS., & GrayJ. (1985). Wagner’s law: A pooled time series, cross section comparison. National Tax Journal, 38(2), 209–218.
2.
AfzalMd., & AbbasQ. (2010). Wagner’s law in Pakistan: Another look. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 2(1), 12–19.
3.
AsseeryA. A., LawD., & PerdikisN. (1999). Wagner’s law and public expenditure in Iraq: A test using disaggregated data. Applied Economics Letters, 6(1), 39–44.
4.
BanerjeeA., DoladoJ., & MestreR. (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267–283.
5.
BhatiaH. L. (2011). Public finance (26th Edition). New Delhi: Vikas Publishing.
6.
ChangT., LiuW., & CaudillS. B. (2004). A re-examination of Wagner’s law for ten countries based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniques. Applied Financial Economics, 14(8), 577–589.
7.
ChletsosM., & KolliasC. (1997). Testing Wagner’s law using disaggregated public expenditure data in the case of Greece: 1958–93. Applied Economics, 29(3), 371–377.
8.
ChowY. F., CotsomitisJ. A., & KwanA. C. (2002). Multivariate cointegration and causality tests of Wagner’s hypothesis: Evidence from the UK. Applied Economics, 34(13), 1671–1677.
9.
CotsomitisJ. A., HarnhirunS., & KwanA. C. (1996). Co-integration analysis and the long-run validity of Wagner’s hypothesis: Evidence from the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Economic Development, 21(2), 1–10.
10.
DadaM. A., & AdewaleO. A. (2013). Is Wagner’s law a myth or a reality? Empirical evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 1(1), 123–137.
11.
DemirbasS. (1999). Cointegration analysis—causality testing and Wagner’s law: The case of Turkey, 1950–1990 (Volume 93). Volume 99 of Discussion papers in economics. Leicester, UK: University of Leicester, Department of Economics.
12.
DilrukshiniW. A. (2009). Public expenditure and economic growth in Sri Lanka: Cointegration analysis and causality testing. Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Staff Studies, 34(1–2), 51–68.
13.
EngleR. F., & GrangerC. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(2), 251–276.
14.
JohansenS. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2), 231–254.
15.
JohansenS., & JuseliusK. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
16.
KhanA. H. (1990). Wagner’s law and the developing economy: A time series evidence from Pakistan. Indian Economic Journal, 38(1), 115–123.
17.
KhundrakpamJ. K. (2003). Public sector spending and economic growth in India. RBI Occasional Papers, 22(1, 2, & 3), 1–17.
18.
KumarS., WebberD. J., & FargherS. (2012). Wagner’s law revisited: Cointegration and causality tests for New Zealand. Applied Economics, 44(5), 607–616.
19.
MohsinMd., BhatK. S., & KamaiahB. (1992). Causality between public expenditure and national income in India. Asian Economic Review, 34(2), 375–390.
20.
MohsinMd., SrideviS., & KamaiahB. (1995). Wagner’s law in developing countries: Evidence from time series analysis,Artha Vijnana, No. 3, 231–250.
21.
NarayanP. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990.
22.
OdhiamboN. (2009). Energy consumption and economic growth nexus in Tanzania: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Energy Policy, 37(2), 617–622.
23.
OdhiamboN. (2010). Energy consumption, prices and economic growth in three SSA countries: A comparative study. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2463–2469.
24.
OktayerA., & OktayerN. (2013). Testing Wagner’s law for Turkey: Evidence from a trivariate cuasality analysis. Prague Economic Papers, No. 2, 284–301.
25.
PahlavaniM., AbedD., & PourshabiF. (2011). Investigating the Keynesian hypothesis and Wagner’s law on the size of government and economic growth in Iran. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(13), 170–175.
26.
PesaranM. H., ShinY., & SmithR. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
27.
RamR. (1987). Wagner’s hypothesis in time series and cross section perspective: Evidence from ‘real’ data for 115 countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(2), 194–204.
28.
RanjanR., & ChintuA. K. (2013). An application of Wagner’s law in the Indian economy: 1970–71 to 2010–11. Knowledge Horizons— Economics, 5(4), 138–144.
29.
RayS., & RayI. A. (2012). On the relationship between government’s developmental expenditure and economic growth in India: A cointegration analysis. Advances in Applied Economics and Finance, 1(2), 86–94.
30.
ShahbazM., & RahmanM. M. (2010). Foreign capital inflows–growth nexus and role of domestic financial sector: An ARDL co-integration approach for Pakistan. Journal of Economic Research, 15(3), 207–231.
31.
SinghB., & SahniB. S. (1984). Causality between public expenditure and national income. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(4), 630–643.
32.
VermaS., & AroraR. (2010). Does the Indian economy support Wagner’s law? An econometric analysis. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 3(5), 77–91.
