‘Fiat and Forbearance’: The Challenge of Capturing Plurality and Diversity in Environmental Governance

Abstract

A close reading of India’s Constitution indicates that the ideals of pluralism and diversity underpin our basic approach to environmental issues. All the same, the past record of environmental governance in the country suggests that the twin ideals have not been adequately captured through appropriate policies and programmes. Part of the reason for this situation has been the predominant use of command and control instruments for realizing environmental goals. This article argues that the future of environmental governance in India lies in pursuing the principles of pluralism and diversity through balanced approaches to issues. This would imply having an open mind towards ‘command and control’ and ‘market based instruments’, pursuing economic and social development within the ambit of environmental policies, conserving the diversity of landscapes and nurturing a network of public spheres that can create plural viewpoints on environmental issues. In the light of the current environmental scenario in the country, where local commons and global commons fight for space, it is argued that an enlightened ‘fiat and forbearance regime’ that balances the ‘global’ with the ‘local’ offers the best hope for promoting plurality and diversity in environmental governance. The article unfolds the architecture of an enlightened fiat and forbearance regime for India in its local, regional, national and global dimensions. It is argued that a multi-level, multi-stakeholder governance system, if backed by certain enabling principles, can help India realize the paradigm of ‘enlightened fiat and forbearance regime’ in the realm of environment.

Keywords

Plurality diversity fiat and forbearance multi-level governance public sphere

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

(2009). Can we afford the future? The economics of a warming world. London and New York: Zed Books.

Bourdieu

(2005). The social structures of the economy, Translated by Turner

Chris

. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Damodaran

(1992). Local self-governments and geometry of biodiversity conservation: Roots of the incompatibility. Economic and Political Weekly, February 22.

Damodaran

(2010). Encircling the seamless. India, climate change and global commons. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Damodaran

Roe

(1998). Theorising to explain and triangulating to explain away? The art and non-art of multi-method policy research. Economic and Political Weekly, January 10.

Drucker

P. F.

(2010). Saving the crusade: The high cost of our environmental future. Toward the next economics and other essays. Harvard Business Press.

Feenberg

(2005). Heidegger and Marcuse: The catastrophe and redemption of history. Routledge.

Fukuyama

(2006). Bernard-Henri Levy in conversation with Francis Fukuyama. The American Interest, Spring, 1(3), 101–109.

Galston

W. A.

(2007). An old debate renewed: The politics of the public interest. Doedalus Fall, pp. 13–19.

10.

Habermas

(1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (in German Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaf). UK: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Kula

(1998). History of environmental economic thought, Routledge Studies in the History of Economics, Routledge.

12.

Lawson

(2011). Five myths and a menace. Standpoint, January/February, Issue 29, 36–41.

13.

Miliband

(1969). The state in capitalist society. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson.

14.

Nadkarni

M. V.

(2010). Approach to knowledge—Contribution of Bhagavadgita and its relevance to holistic social science research. Journal of Social and Economic Development, January–June, 12(1).

15.

Negri

(2007). Political Descartes, reason, ideology and the Bourgeois Project. New York: Verso Books.

16.

Ostrom

(1998). ‘The institutional analysis and development approach’, designing institutions for environmental and resource management. In Edna

Tusak Loehman

D. Marc

Kilgour

(Eds.), Designing institutions for environmental and resource management (pp. 68–90). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

17.

Paavola

(2002). ‘Rethinking the choice and performance of environmental policies’, economics, ethics and environmental policy—Contested choices. In Bromley

D.W.

Paavola

(Eds.), Economics, ethics, and environmental policy: Contested choices (pp. 87–102). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

18.

Pattberg

P. Æ

Stripple

(2008). Beyond the public and private divide: Remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. International Environmental Agreements, 8, 367–388.

19.

Randall

(2002). Benefit-cost considerations should be decisive when there is nothing more important at stake, economics, ethics and environmental policy. In Bromley

D.W.

Paavola

(Eds.), Economics, ethics, and environmental policy: Contested choices (pp. 53–68). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

20.

Rorty

A. O.

(1992). The advantages of moral diversity. In Frankel

Miller

F.D.

Jr. Paul

(Eds.), The good life and the human good. New York: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Rudolph

S. H.

Rudolph

L. I.

(2009). The coffee house and the ashram revisited: How Gandhi democratized Habermas’ public sphere, post modern Gandhi and other essays. Delhi: Oxford India Paperbacks.

22.

Samuelson

P. A.

(1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.

23.

Schama

(2004). Landscapes & memory. Great Britain: Harper Perennial.

24.

Schlager

Blomquist

(1998). Heterogeneity and common pool resource management. In Edna

Tusak L.

D. Marc

(Eds.), Designing institutions for environmental and resource management (pp. 101–112). UK: Edward Elgar.

25.

Sen

(1973). Behavior and the concept of preference. Economica, 40, 241–259.

26.

Taleb

N. N.

(2005). Fat tails, asymmetric knowledge, and decision making—Essay in honor of Benoit Mandelbrot’s 80th birthday. Retrieved from http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/epistemologyfattails.pdf

27.

Taleb

N. N.

(2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Penguin.

28.

Thompson

Ellis

Wildavsky

(1990). Cultural theory. Boulder, San Francisco and Oxford: Westview Press.

29.

Thoreau

H. D.

(1993). Life without principle. In Civil disobedience and other essays. New York: Dover Publications Inc.

30.

Walsh

P. R.

(2011). Creating a ‘values’ chain for sustainable development in developing nations: Where Maslow meets Porter. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 13, 789–805.

31.

Williams

(1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

32.

Williamson

O. E.

(1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269–296.

33.

Williamson

O. E.

(1994). Visible and invisible governance. American Economic Review, 84(2), 323–326.

34.

Wittman

(2011). Reconnecting agriculture and the environment: Food sovereignty and the agrarian basis of ecological citizenship. In Wittman

Hannah

Desmarais

Annette Aurelie

Wiebe

Nettie

(Eds.), Food sovereignty, reconnecting food, nature and community (pp. 91–105). Fahamu Books and Pambazuka Press.