This study explores the multifaceted calculus behind engagement in protests using data from 45 countries in the World Values Survey Wave 6 (2010–2014), employing a hierarchical linear model. It expands the current scholarship on protest politics by investigating how individual subjective assessment and evaluation of income inequality, and redistributive preferences influence participation in protests. We found that protest is a powerful outlet used by highly educated citizens with strong grievances about economic inequality, and labor union networks, especially in advanced industrialized countries. The empirical analysis further reveals that the salience of redistributive preferences may effectively filter individual responses and become channeled into action in protests in a broader sample. Moreover, we show that the impact of grievances about inequality on protest becomes significant when government social spending is increased and the level of inequality is high. Conversely, conventional macro-level indicators on their own, such as the Gini coefficient of income disparity and social spending, did not explain variance in protest participation. Findings suggest that more systematic research is necessary to detect the precise mechanisms at play that link grievances about inequality and the exponential expansion of protest politics.
AlesinaACozziGMantovanN (2012) The evolution of ideology, fairness and redistribution. Economic Journal122(565): 1244–1261.
2.
AndersonCJSingerM (2008) The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies41(4–5): 564–599.
3.
AzamJP (2001) The redistributive state and conflicts in Africa. Journal of Peace Research38(4): 429–444.
4.
BeckTGeorgeCGroffA, et al. (2001) New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review15(1): 165–176.
5.
BellingerPTArceM (2011) Protest and democracy in Latin America’s market era. Political Research Quarterly64(3): 688–704.
6.
BenabouROkE (2001) Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The Poum hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics116(2): 447–487.
7.
BensonMRochonT (2004) Interpersonal trust and the magnitude of protest: A micro and macro level approach. Comparative Political Studies37(4): 435–457.
BradyHEVerbaSSchlozmanKL (1995) Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review89(2): 271–294.
10.
CarenNRajAGRibasV (2011) A social movement generation: Cohort and period trends in protest attendance and petition signing. American Sociological Review76(1):125–151.
11.
CastilloJCPalaciosDAlfredoJ, et al. (2015) Inequality, distributive justice and political participation: An analysis of the case of Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research34(4): 486–502.
12.
CorcoranKPettinicchioDYoungJ (2015) Perceptions of structural injustice and efficacy: Participation in low/moderate/high-cost forms of collective action. Sociological Inquiry85(3): 429–461.
13.
DaltonRSickleAWeldonS (2009) The individual–institutional nexus of protest behavior. British Journal of Political Science40(1): 51–73.
14.
DiGraziaJ (2014) Individual protest participation in the United States: Conventional and unconventional activism. Social Science Quarterly95(1): 111–131.
15.
DodsonK (2015) Globalization and protest expansion. Social Problems62(1): 15–39.
16.
DubrowJKSlomczynskiKMTomescu-DubrowI (2008) Effects of democracy and inequality on soft political protest in Europe: Exploring the European social survey data. International Journal of Sociology38(3): 36–51.
17.
EvansA (2018) Politicizing inequality: The power of ideas. World Development110(C): 360–372
18.
GrassoMTGiugniM (2016) Protest participation and economic crisis: The conditioning role of political opportunities. European Journal of Political Research55(4): 663–680.
19.
GrassoMTYoxonBKarampampasS, et al. (2017) Relative deprivation and inequalities in social and political activism. Acta Politica. Epub ahead of print 13 December 2017. DOI: 10.1057/s41269-017-0072-y.
20.
GurrTR (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
HillesundS (2015) A dangerous discrepancy: Testing the micro-dynamics of horizontal inequality on Palestinian support for armed resistance. Journal of Peace Research52(1): 76–90.
22.
InglehartRWelzelC (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
JenkinsCJacobsDAgnoneJ (2003) Political opportunities and African–American protest, 1948–1997. American Journal of Sociology109(2): 277–303.
24.
JerrimJMacmillanL (2015) Income inequality, intergenerational mobility, and the Great Gatsby Curve: Is education the key?Social Forces94(2): 505–533.
25.
JoJ (2016) Weapons of the dissatisfied? Perceptions of socioeconomic inequality, redistributive preference, and political protest: Evidence from South Korea. International Area Studies Review19(4): 285–300.
KernAMarienSHoogheM (2015) Economic crisis and levels of political participation in Europe (2002–2010): The role of resources and grievances. West European Politics38(3): 465–490.
28.
KitscheltH (1986) Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science16(1): 57–85.
29.
KlandermansBVan StekelenburgJVan der ToornJ (2008) Embeddedness and identity: How immigrants turn grievances into action. American Sociological Review73(6): 992–1012.
30.
KuhnA (2011) In the eye of the beholder: Subjective inequality measures and individuals’ assessment of market justice. European Journal of Political Economy27(4): 625–641.
31.
LevitskySRobertsKM (2011) The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32.
LichbachMI (1989) An evaluation of “does economic inequality breed political conflict?”World Politics41(4): 431–470.
33.
McCallLKenworthyL (2009) Americans’ social policy preferences in the era of rising inequality. Perspectives on Politics7(3): 459–484.
34.
MeyerDS (2004) Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology30: 125–145.
35.
MarshallMGJaggersK (2011) Polity IV country report 2010. Available at: www.systemicpeace.org/ (accessed 16 November 2017).
36.
MoeneKOWallersteinM (2001) Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. American Political Science Review95(4): 859–874.
37.
MuellerL (2010) Protest Participation in Africa. Berkeley: University of California.
38.
NorrisP (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
NorrisPWalgraveSVan AelstP (2006) Does protest signify disaffection? Demonstrators in a Postindustrial Democracy. In: TorcalMMonteroJR (eds) Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.279–307.
40.
OliverJE (1999) The effects of metropolitan economic segregation on local civic participation. American Journal of Political Science43(1): 186–212.
41.
OrtizIBurkeSBerradaM, et al. (2013) World Protests 2006–2013. New York: Columbia University and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
42.
PettigrewT (2016) In pursuit of three theories: Authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology67(1): 1–21.
43.
PontussonJRuedaD (2010) The politics of inequality: Voter mobilization and left parties in advanced industrial states. Comparative Political Studies43(6): 675–705.
44.
QuarantaM (2016) Protesting in “hard times”: Evidence from a comparative analysis of Europe, 2000–2014. Current Sociology64(5): 736–756.
45.
SchussmanASouleSA (2005) Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces84(2): 1083–1108.
46.
ShariffAFWiwadDAkninLB (2016) Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: Cross-national and experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science11(3): 373–380.
47.
SoltF (2009) Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly90(2): 231–242.
48.
SoltF (2015) Economic Inequality and Nonviolent Protest. Social Science Quarterly96(5): 1314–1327.
49.
SteeleL (2015) Income inequality, equal opportunity and attitudes about redistribution. Social Science Quarterly96(2): 444–464.
50.
StockemerDScruggsL (2012) Income inequality, development, and electoral turnout—new evidence on a burgeoning debate. Electoral Studies31(4): 764–773.
51.
TarrowS (1994) Power in Movement. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
52.
TaylorDMFathaliMMoghaddamIG, et al. (1987) Disadvantaged group response to perceived inequality: From passive acceptance to collective action. The Journal of Social Psychology127(3): 259–272
53.
WalgraveSVerhulstJ (2011) Selection and response bias in protest surveys. Mobilization: An International Quarterly16(2): 203–222.
54.
WelzelCDeutschF (2012) Emancipative values and nonviolent protest: The importance of “ecological” effects. British Journal of Political Science42(2): 465–479.
55.
World Values Survey Association (2014) World Values Survey. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Available at: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp (accessed 3 March 2017).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
