This research provides a state-level systemic explanation for antigovernment insurgencies. We posit that state international income position influences antigovernment movements, which effect, however, hinges on the level of trade openness. By analyzing 157 states from 1990 through 2018, it is found that for a state having an unclosed market, its internationally relative income level is negatively associated with mass antigovernment protests. This study implies that trade liberalization may exert a context-specific impact on domestic political insurgency, which helps understand why trade liberalization seems to be a reason for mass anti-government movements in some contexts while enhancing a regime in other cases.
CranmerSJDesmaraisBACampbellBW (1991) The contagion of democracy through international networks.Social Networks61: 87–98.
9.
CrosbyF (1976) A model of egoistical relative deprivation.Psychological Review83(2): 85–113.
10.
DavisJA (1959) A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation.Sociometry22(4): 280–296.
11.
DobbinFSimmonsBGarrettG (2007) The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?Annual Review of Sociology33(1): 449–472.
12.
DodsonK (2015) Globalization and protest expansion.Social Problems62(1): 15–39.
13.
DoobLW (1948) Public Opinion and Propaganda. Hamden, Conn: Archon Books.
14.
EichengreenBJ (2018) The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
EllulJ (1966) Propaganda. New York, NY: Knopf.
16.
FerreeMMMillerFD (1985) Mobilization and meaning: Toward an integration of social psychological and resource perspectives on social movements.Sociological Inquiry55(1): 38–61.
17.
FestingerL (1954) A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations7(2): 117–140.
18.
FinkelSERuleJ (1986) Relative deprivation and related psychological theories of civil violence: A critical review.Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change9: 47–69.
19.
FinseraasH (2009) Income inequality and demand for redistribution: A multilevel analysis of European public opinion.Scandinavian Political Studies32(1): 94–119.
20.
GartrellCD (2002) The embeddedness of social comparison. In: WalkerISmithHJ (eds) Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–184.
21.
GrassoMTGiugniM (2016) Protest participation and economic crisis: The conditioning role of political opportunities.European Journal of Political Research55(4): 663–680.
22.
GrossmanGMHelpmanE (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
GurneyJNTierneyKJ (1982) Relative deprivation and social movements: A critical look at twenty years of theory and research.The Sociological Quarterly23(1): 33–47.
24.
GurrTR (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
Hansen MA and Ford NM (2023) Placing the 2020 Belarusian protests in historical context: political attitudes and participation during Lukashenko's presidency. Nationalities Papers 51(4): 838–854.
26.
HelliwellJF (1994) Empirical linkages between democracy and economic growth.British Journal of Political Science24(2): 225–248.
27.
HetheringtonMJ (1998) The political relevance of political trust.American Political Science Review92(4): 791–808.
28.
HoogheMMarienS (2013) A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe.European Societies15(1): 131–152.
29.
InglehartRHaerpferCMorenoA, et al. (2014) World Values Survey: All Rounds Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
30.
JenkinsJCKlandermansB (1995) The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
JoJ-IChoiHJ (2019) Enigmas of grievances about inequality: Effects of attitudes toward inequality and government redistribution on protest participation.International Area Studies Review22(4): 348–368.
32.
KaaseM (1999) Interpersonal trust, political trust and non-institutionalised political participation in Western Europe.West European Politics22(3): 1–21.
33.
KarakayaS (2018) Globalization and contentious politics: A comparative analysis of nonviolent and violent campaigns.Conflict Management and Peace Science35(4): 315–335.
34.
KatsanidouAEderC (2018) Vote, party, or protest: The influence of confidence in political institutions on various modes of political participation in Europe.Comparative European Politics16: 290–309.
35.
Lehman-WilzigSUngarM (1985) The economic and political determinants of public protest frequency and magnitude: The Israeli experience.International Review of Modern Sociology15(1): 63–80.
36.
LipsetSM (1959) Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.American Political Science Review53(1): 69–105.
37.
MarkMMFolgerR (1984) Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework.Review of Personality & Social Psychology55: 192–218.
38.
MarshallMGJaggersKGurrTR (2017) Polity IV Project, Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2017—Dataset User’s Manual.
39.
MartinJ (1982) The fairness of earnings differentials: An experimental study of the perceptions of blue-collar workers.The Journal of Human Resources17(1): 110–122.
40.
McCombsME (2004) Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity.
41.
MeltzerAHRichardSF (1981) A rational theory of the size of government.Journal of Political Economy89(5): 914–927.
42.
MillerMK (2016) Democracy by example? Why democracy spreads when the world’s democracies prosper.Comparative Politics49(1): 83–116.
43.
MilnerHV (1999) The political economy of international trade.Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 91–114.
44.
MuellerJ (1970) Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson.American Political Science Review64(1): 18–34.
45.
OlsonJMRoeseNJ (2002) Relative deprivation and counterfactual thinking. In: WalkerISmithHJ (eds) Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 265–287.
46.
PalmtagTRommelTWalterS (2020) International trade and public protest: Evidence from Russian regions.International Studies Quarterly64(4): 939–955.
47.
Pemstein D, Marquardt KL, Tzelgov E, et al. (2021) The V-Dem measurement model: latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data (6th ed.). The Variety of Democracy Institute working paper.
48.
PiazzaJA (2017) The determinants of domestic right-wing terrorism in the USA: Economic grievance, societal change and political resentment.Conflict Management and Peace Science34(1): 52–80.
49.
PrzeworskiAAlvarezRMAlvarezME, et al. (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
RichardsDMorganTCWilsonRK, et al. (1993) Good times, bad times, and the diversionary use of force: A tale of some not-so-free agents.Journal of Conflict Resolution37: 504–535.
51.
RogowskiR (1987) Political cleavages and changing exposure to trade.American Political Science Review81(4): 1121–1137.
52.
RossML (1999) The political economy of the resource curse.World Politics51(2): 297–322.
53.
Silva JMCS, Tenreyro S and Windmeijer F (2015) Testing competing models for non-negative data with many zeros. Journal of Econometric Methods 4(1): 29–46.
54.
Simmons BA, Dobbin F and Garrett G (2006) Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization 60(4): 781–810.
55.
SmelserNJ (2011) Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press.
Spencer JW (2003) Firms' knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: Empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal 24(3): 217–233.
58.
StarrH (1991) Democratic dominoes: Diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system.Journal of Conflict Resolution35(2): 356–381.
59.
The PRS Group (2018) International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) Researcher’s Datasets. SC, Mount Pleasant: The PRS Group.
ToblerWR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region.Economic Geography46: 234–240.
62.
WalkerISmithHJ (2002) Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
WalkerIPettigrewTF (1984) Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique.British Journal of Social Psychology23(4): 301–310.
64.
WalkerLMannL (1987) Unemployment, relative deprivation, and social protest.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin13(2): 275–283.
65.
WoodJV (1989) Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes.Psychological Bulletin106(2): 231–248.
66.
YagciAH (2017) The great recession, inequality and occupy protests around the world. Government and Opposition52(4): 640–670.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
