The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been well reported in populations with chronic pain in the literature. However, in neuropathic pain (NP), results remain contrasting, with previous studies showing small effect sizes and some factors that may influence the efficacy of tDCS.
Objective
To evaluate the effects of tDCS on pain intensity, disability, and psychological aspects in individuals with chronic NP, and to determine the predictive effect of characteristics of individuals, study design, and intervention parameters.
Design and Setting
Systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, in July 2025. Controlled clinical trials involving individuals with chronic NP treated with tDCS were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Meta-regression was performed to investigate potential moderators of the treatment effect.
Results
Eighteen studies were included with a pooled sample of 482 individuals. Moderate level of evidence indicated that tDCS was superior to sham for improving pain (SMD = −0.47; 95% CI: −0.75; −0.19), and low level of evidence indicated that tDCS was not superior to sham in improving disability, anxiety, and depression. Meta-regression analyses demonstrated that duration of pain is negatively correlated with effect size. In addition, stimulation target, randomization, and study design significantly contributed to variability.
Conclusion
Moderate level of evidence indicated that tDCS may have beneficial effects on pain intensity. Symptom duration, tDCS application site, and methodological quality are moderators of tDCS effects. Future studies are required to enhance the quality of evidence.
InoueSTaguchiTYamashitaT, et al.The prevalence and impact of chronic neuropathic pain on daily and social life: a nationwide study in a Japanese population. Eur J Pain2017; 21: 727–737.
2.
MbrahAKNunesAPHumeAL, et al.Prevalence and treatment of neuropathic pain diagnoses among U.S. nursing home residents. Pain2022; 163: 1370–1377.
3.
BaskozosGHébertHLPascalMMV, et al.Epidemiology of neuropathic pain: an analysis of prevalence and associated factors in UK Biobank. Pain Rep2023; 8: e1066.
4.
van HeckeOAustinSKKhanRA, et al.Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Pain2014; 155: 654–662.
5.
CollocaLLudmanTBouhassiraD, et al.Neuropathic pain. Nat Rev Dis Primers2017; 3: 17002.
FinnerupNBAttalNHaroutounianS, et al.Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol2015; 14: 162–173.
8.
JensenTSBaronRHaanpääM, et al.A new definition of neuropathic pain. Pain2011; 152: 2204–2205.
9.
ZaghiSHeineNFregniF. Brain stimulation for the treatment of pain: a review of costs, clinical effects, and mechanisms of treatment for three different central neuromodulatory approaches. J Pain Manag2009; 2: 339–352.
10.
NitscheMAPaulusW. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol2000; 527: 633–639.
11.
NitscheMACohenLGWassermannEM, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul2008; 1: 206–223.
12.
StaggCJNitscheMA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist2011; 17: 37–53.
13.
Garcia-LarreaLPeyronR. Motor cortex stimulation for neuropathic pain: from phenomenology to mechanisms. Neuroimage2007; 37: S71–S79.
14.
PolaníaRPaulusWAntalA, et al.Introducing graph theory to track for neuroplastic alterations in the resting human brain: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. Neuroimage2011; 54: 2287–2296.
15.
CruccuGTruiniA. A review of neuropathic pain: from guidelines to clinical practice. Pain Ther2017; 6: 35–42.
16.
O’ConnellNEWandBMMarstonL, et al.Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. In: O’ConnellNE (ed). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2010. Epub ahead of print 8 September 2010. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub2.
17.
LefaucheurJ-PAntalAAyacheSS, et al.Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol2017; 128: 56–92.
18.
FregniFEl-HagrassyMMPacheco-BarriosK, et al.Evidence-based guidelines and secondary meta-analysis for the use of transcranial direct current stimulation in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol2021; 24: 256–313.
19.
GaoCZhuQGaoZ, et al.Can noninvasive brain stimulation improve pain and depressive symptoms in patients with neuropathic pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manag2022; 64: e203–e215.
20.
Duarte‐MoreiraRJShirahigeLRodriguez‐PrietoIE, et al.Evidence‐based umbrella review of non‐invasive neuromodulation in chronic neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain; 29(2): e4786. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4786, Epub ahead of print 21 February 2025.
21.
KimYJKuJKimHJ, et al.Randomized, sham controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Ann Rehabil Med2013; 37: 766–776.
22.
BologniniNSpandriVFerraroF, et al.Immediate and sustained effects of 5-Day transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex in phantom limb pain. J Pain2015; 16: 657–665.
23.
LuedtkeKRushtonAWrightC, et al.Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation preceding cognitive behavioural management for chronic low back pain: Sham controlled double blinded randomised controlled trial. BMJ2015; 350: h1640.
24.
WrigleyPJGustinSMMcIndoeLN, et al.Longstanding neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury is refractory to transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized controlled trial. Pain2013; 154: 2178–2184.
25.
WiethoffSHamadaMRothwellJC. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul2014; 7: 468–475.
26.
López-AlonsoVCheeranBRío-RodríguezD, et al.Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul2014; 7: 372–380.
27.
DavidMCMMde MoraesAAda CostaML, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation in the modulation of neuropathic pain: a systematic review. Neurol Res2018; 40: 557–565.
28.
TeixeiraPEPAlawdahLAlhassanHAA, et al.The analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with Physical Therapy on Common Musculoskeletal Conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Princ Pract Clin Res2020; 6: 23–26.
29.
AlwardatMPisaniAEtoomM, et al.Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for chronic low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neural Transm2020; 127: 1257–1270.
30.
LloydDMWittkopfPGArendsenLJ, et al.Is Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain2020; 21: 1085–1100.
31.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021; 372: n71.
32.
TreedeR-DRiefWBarkeA, et al.Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain2019; 160: 19–27.
33.
HigginsJPGreenS (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley, 2008. Epub ahead of print 26 September 2008. DOI: 10.1002/9780470712184.
34.
GuyattGOxmanADAklEA, et al.GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 383–394.
35.
Dos SantosMFLoveTMMartikainenIK, et al.Immediate effects of tDCS on the μ-Opioid System of a chronic pain patient. Front Psychiatr; 3: 93. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00093, Epub ahead of print 2012.
36.
BalshemHHelfandMSchünemannHJ, et al.GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 401–406.
37.
AndradeC. Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry2020; 81: 20f13681. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.20f13681, Epub ahead of print 22.
38.
EggerMSmithGDSchneiderM, et al.Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ1997; 315: 629–634.
39.
SolerMDKumruHPelayoR, et al.Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Brain2010; 133: 2565–2577.
40.
ThibautACarvalhoSMorseLR, et al.Delayed pain decrease following M1 tDCS in spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Neurosci Lett2017; 658: 19–26.
41.
YehN-CYangY-RHuangS-F, et al.Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation followed by exercise on neuropathic pain in chronic spinal cord injury: a double-blinded randomized controlled pilot trial. Spinal Cord2021; 59: 684–692.
42.
FregniFBoggioPSLimaMC, et al.A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain2006; 122: 197–209.
43.
MoriFCodecàCKusayanagiH, et al.Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Pain2010; 11: 436–442.
44.
YoungJZoghiMKhanF, et al.The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis: randomized controlled trial. Pain Med2020; 21: 3451–3457.
45.
GunduzMEPacheco-BarriosKBoninPC, et al.Effects of combined and alone transcranial motor cortex stimulation and mirror therapy in phantom limb pain: a randomized factorial trial. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair2021; 35: 704–716.
46.
BaeS-HKimG-DKimK-Y. Analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on central post-stroke pain. Tohoku J Exp Med2014; 234: 189–195.
47.
FerreiraCMde CarvalhoCDGomesR, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation and mirror therapy for neuropathic pain after brachial plexus avulsion: a randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study. Front Neurol; 11: 568261. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.568261, Epub ahead of print 11 December 2020.
48.
de BonifácioAEDMartinsWKNde CarvalhoCD, et al.Effects of rTMS and tDCS on neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot study. Sci Rep2022; 12: 1440.
49.
AttalNAyacheSSCiampi De AndradeD, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation in neuropathic pain due to radiculopathy. Pain2016; 157: 1224–1231.
50.
LagueuxÉBernierMBourgaultP, et al.The effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation as an add-on modality to graded motor imagery for treatment of complex regional pain syndrome. Clin J Pain2018; 34: 145–154.
51.
AyacheSSPalmUChalahMA, et al.Prefrontal tDCS decreases pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. Front Neurosci; 10: 147. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00147, Epub ahead of print 8 April 2016.
52.
LewisGNRiceDAKlugerM, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb neuropathic pain: a double‐blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain2018; 22: 1312–1320.
53.
O’NeillFSaccoPBowdenE, et al.Patient-delivered tDCS on chronic neuropathic pain in prior responders to TMS (a randomized controlled pilot study). J Pain Res2018; 11: 3117–3128.
54.
IsEEAksuSKaramurselS, et al.Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic pain and neurogenic claudication related to lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurol Sci2024; 45: 769–782.
55.
KimYJKuJKimHJ, et al.Randomized, sham controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Ann Rehabil Med2013; 37: 766–776.
56.
AntalATerneyDKühnlS, et al.Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition. J Pain Symptom Manag2010; 39: 890–903.
57.
WenY-RShiJHuZ-Y, et al.Is transcranial direct current stimulation beneficial for treating pain, depression, and anxiety symptoms in patients with chronic pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Mol Neurosci; 15: 1056966. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.1056966, Epub ahead of print 1 December 2022.
58.
MehtaSMcIntyreAGuyS, et al.Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Spinal Cord2015; 53: 780–785.
59.
ZhangK-LYuanHWuF-F, et al.Analgesic effect of noninvasive brain stimulation for neuropathic pain patients: a systematic review. Pain Ther2021; 10: 315–332.
60.
XiongH-YZhengJ-JWangX-Q. Non-invasive brain stimulation for chronic pain: state of the art and future directions. Front Mol Neurosci; 15: 888716. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.888716, Epub ahead of print 26 May 2022.
61.
WoodsAJAntalABiksonM, et al.A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol2016; 127: 1031–1048.
62.
PintoCBTeixeira CostaBDuarteD, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation as a therapeutic tool for chronic pain. J ECT2018; 34: e36–e50.
63.
NgernyamNJensenMP. Transcranial direct current stimulation in neuropathic pain. J Pain Relief2013; s3: 001. DOI: 10.4172/2167-0846.S3-001, Epub ahead of print 2014.
64.
DixonMLThiruchselvamRToddR, et al.Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: an integrative review. Psychol Bull2017; 143: 1033–1081.
65.
PaganoRLFonoffETDaleCS, et al.Motor cortex stimulation inhibits thalamic sensory neurons and enhances activity of PAG neurons: possible pathways for antinociception. Pain2012; 153: 2359–2369.
66.
BrunoniARFerrucciRBortolomasiM, et al.Interactions between transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and pharmacological interventions in the Major Depressive Episode: findings from a naturalistic study. Eur Psychiatry2013; 28: 356–361.
67.
KorownykCSMontgomeryLYoungJ, et al.PEER simplified chronic pain guideline. Can Fam Physician2022; 68: 179–190.
68.
NijsJKosekEChiarottoA, et al.Nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic low back pain? The low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium’s international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations. Lancet Rheumatol2024; 6: e178–e188.
69.
ZorteaMRamalhoLAlvesRL, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation to improve the dysfunction of descending pain modulatory system related to opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: an integrative review of neurobiology and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci2019; 13: 1218.
70.
KnotkovaHHamaniCSivanesanE, et al.Neuromodulation for chronic pain. Lancet2021; 397(10289): 2111–2124.
71.
Pacheco-BarriosKCardenas-RojasAThibautA, et al.Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions. Expet Rev Med Dev2020; 17(9): 879–898.
