Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The ability to consider other people's perspectives is an important competence in societies. The competence to extend this perspective to unknown individuals or even to abstracted, generalized people has been neglected in developmental research. For the latter aspect, we propose the term Concept of Generalized Other Minds (CoGOM). Two developmental models are conceivable: (a) a sequential model in which a CoGOM develops additively from increasing complexity in a person's Theory of Mind (ToM) and (b) a Y model with a diverging developmental pathway, starting from basic ToM competencies as a common root. In three studies are presented, in which several tasks measured five- to ten-year-old children's abilities to consider generalized others’ perspectives. ToM and perspective-taking were correlated across studies, but ToM and a linguistic indicator of CoGOM (pronoun) were not. These findings may offer preliminary evidence that the development of a CoGOM follows the Y model.

Keywords

theory of mind concept of generalized other minds perspective-taking cognitive development news

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apperly

I. A.

Butterfill

S. A.

(2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116(4), 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016923

Baillargeon

Scott

R. M.

(2010). False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006

Baron-Cohen

Wheelwright

Hill

Raste

Plumb

(2001). The ‘Reading the mind in the eyes’ test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715

Brooks

Meltzoff

A. N.

(2002). The importance of eyes: How infants interpret adult looking behavior. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 958–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.958

Butterfill

S. A.

Apperly

I. A.

(2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind and Language, 28(5), 606–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12036

Carey

(2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.

Carr

Slade

Yuill

Sullivan

Ruffman

(2018). Minding the children: A longitudinal study of mental state talk, theory of mind, and behavioural adjustment from the age of 3 to 10. Social Development, 27(4), 826–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12315

Derksen

D. G.

Hunsche

M. C.

Giroux

M. E.

Connolly

D. A.

Bernstein

D. M.

(2018). A systematic review of theory of mind’s precursors and functions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000325

Dudenredaktion (Hrsg. (1998). Duden. Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. [Grammar oft the contemporary German language] 6., neu bearb. Dudenverlag.

10.

Durkin

(1995). Developmental social psychology. Blackwell.

11.

Gopnik

Wellman

H. M.

(1994). The theory theory. In Hirschfeld

L. A.

Gelman

S. A.

(Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 257–293). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752902.011 .

12.

Gordon

(1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind and Language, 1(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1986.tb00324.x

13.

Happé

F. G. E.

(1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093

14.

Harari

Shamay-Tsoory

S. G.

Ravid

Levkovitz

(2010). Double dissociation between cognitive and affective empathy in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 175(3), 277–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.03.002

15.

Henning

Daum

Ascherleben

(2009). Frühkindliche Handlungswahrnehmung und theory of mind. Vom Verständnis zielgerichteter Handlungen zum Verständnis mentalistisch gesteuerter Handlungen. [early action perception and theory of mind: From an understanding of goal-directed action to a mentalistic understanding of human action]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, [German Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology], 41(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.41.4.233

16.

Henning

Hofer

Aschersleben

(2012). Erweiterte ,theory-of-mind‘-Skala für 3- bis 11-jährige Kinder. [Extended theory-of-mind-scale]. Universität des Saarlandes.

17.

Higgins

E. T.

(2016). Shared-reality development in childhood. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 466–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635595

18.

Kachel

Hardecker

D. J. K.

Bohn

(2021). Young children’s developing ability to integrate gestural and emotional cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 201(1), 104984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104984

19.

Kern

Moll

(2017). On the transformative character of collective intentionality and the uniqueness of the human. Philosophical Psychology, 30(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2017.1295648

20.

Kloo

Osterhaus

Kristen-Antonow

Sodian

(2022). The impact of theory of mind and executive function on math and Reading abilities: A longitudinal study. Infant and Child Development, 31(6), e2356. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2356

21.

Kölbl

(2012). Wie entwickelt sich Gesellschaft? Ein Versuch zur Kartierung des Forschungsfeldes und Überlegungen zu pädagogischen Anschlüssen. [How does society develop? An attempt to outline an area of research and its educational links]. Journal für Psychologie, 20(2), 1–29.

22.

Kölbl

(2014). Wie entwickelt sich das Gesellschaftsverständnis? [How does the understanding of society develop?]. In Kölbl

Mey (Hrsg.)

(Eds.), Gesellschaftsverständnis. Entwicklungspsychologische Perspektiven [Understanding society. Perspectives from developmental posychology] (pp. 17–41). Psychosozial-Verlag.

23.

Kristen

Thoermer

Hofer

Aschersleben

Sodian

(2006). Skalierung von “theory of mind“-aufgaben. [theory-of-mind-scale]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, [German Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology], 38(4), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.38.4.186

24.

Kulke

von Duhn

Schneider

Rakoczy

(2018). Is implicit theory of mind a real and robust phenomenon? Results from a systematic replication study. Psychological Science, 29(6), 888–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617747090

25.

Little

Nettle

(2006). Higher-order theory of mind and social competence in school-age children. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4(3-4), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1556/jcep.4.2006.3-4.3

26.

Mead

G. H.

(1934/2015). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicagor Press.

27.

Moll

(2023). What we do and do not know about joint attention. Topoi, 43(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09961-y

28.

Moll

Stekeler-Weithofer

(2022). Ontogenetic steps of understanding beliefs: From practical to theoretical. Philosophical Psychology, 37(5), 1115–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2073211

29.

Musholt

(2018). The personal and the subpersonal in the theory of mind debate. Phenom Cogn Sci, 17(2), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9504-4

30.

Orvell

Kross

Gelman

S. A.

(2017). How “you” makes meaning. Science, 355(6331), 1299–1302. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaj2014

31.

Osterhaus

Bosacki

S. L.

(2022). Looking for the lighthouse: A systematic review of advanced theory-of-mind tests beyond preschool. Developmental Review, 64(1), 101021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2022.101021

32.

Osterhaus

Koerber

Sodian

(2016). Scaling of advanced theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 87(6), 1971–1991. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12566

33.

Perner

Roessler

(2010). Teleology and causal understanding in children’s theory of mind. In Aguilar

J. H.

Buckareff

A. A.

(Eds.), Causing human actions: New perspectives on the causal theory of action (pp. 199–228). Bradford Book. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014564.003.0103

34.

Perner

Roessler

(2012). From infants’ to children’s appreciation of belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(10), 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.004

35.

Piaget

(1954). The construction of reality in the child. Routledge.

36.

Preiser

(2014). Politische Sozialisation als komplexes Systemgeschehen. Kommentar zu Andrea Kleeberg-Niepage. [political socialization as a complex systemic process. Commentary on Andrea Kleeberg-Niepage]. In Kölbl

Mey (Hrsg.)

(Eds.), Gesellschaftsverständnis. Entwicklungspsychologische Perspektiven [understanding society. Perspectives from developmental posychology] (pp. 165–170). Psychosozial-Verlag.

37.

Premack

Woodruff

(1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512

38.

Rakoczy

(2017). Theory of mind. In Hopkins

Geangu

Linkenauger

(Eds.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of child development (pp. 507–514). Cambridge University Press.

39.

Rakoczy

(2022). Foundations of theory of mind and its development in early childhood. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(4), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752902.011

40.

Rakoczy

Schmidt

M. F. H.

(2013). The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12010

41.

Rogoff

(2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.

42.

Rosch

(1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192

43.

Ross

S. N.

(2008). Postformal (mis)communications. World Futures, 64(5-7), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604020802303952

44.

Sandhagen

(2009). Ist ein Loch im Schuldach eine Nachricht? [Is a whole in the roof news?] talk presented at the 19. Meeting oft he Division „Developmental Psychology“ oft the DGPs, September 14th to 16th 2009, Hildesheim, Germany.

45.

Sandhagen

(2021). Perspective taking: Pronouns may give a hint of a change between theory of mind and concept of generalized other minds. Relations between false belief-tasks and perspective taking-tasks in children aged 5-10 years. Poster, aps 2021 virtual convention. Association for Psychological Science, online, May 26-27, 2021.

46.

Sandhagen

Greve

(2014). Gesellschaftsverständnis erforschen – zu einer Entwicklungsaufgabe der Entwicklungspsychologie [investigating the understandig of society – A developmental task for developmental psychology]. In Kölbl

Mey (Hrsg.)

(Eds.), Gesellschaftsverständnis. Entwicklungspsychologische Perspektiven [understanding society. Perspectives from developmental psychology] (pp. 189–198). Psychosozial-Verlag.

47.

Schaffer

H. R.

(1996). Social Development. Blackwell.

48.

Schmidt

M. F. H.

Rakoczy

(2023). Children’s acquisition and application of norms. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 5(1), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120621-034731

49.

Selman

R. L.

(1981). The development of interpersonal competence: The role of understanding in conduct. Developmental Review, 1(4), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90034-4

50.

Selman

R. L.

Byrne

D. F.

(1974). A structural-developmental analysis of levels of role taking in middle childhood. Child Development, 45(3), 803–806. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127850

51.

Sodian

Thoermer

(2006). Theory of mind. In Schneider

Sodian (Hrsg.)

(Eds.), Kognitive entwicklung [cognitive development] (pp. 495–608). Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, C, V, Bd. 2. Hogrefe.

52.

Stålne

(2025). Towards a general theory of perspective taking: A transdisciplinary endeavor. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 16(3), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.22545/2025/00272

53.

Sullivan

Zaitchik

Tager-Flusberg

(1994). Preschoolers can attribute second-order beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.3.395

54.

Tomasello

(2014). A natural history of human thinking. Harvard University Press.

55.

Tomasello

(2019). Becoming human. A theory of ontogeny. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

56.

Tomasello

Vaish

(2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812

57.

Träuble

Marinović

Pauen

(2010). Early theory of mind competencies: Do infants understand others’ beliefs? Infancy, 15(4), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00025.x

58.

Valsiner

(2000). Culture and human development. Sage.

59.

Valsiner

(2012). Culture in psychology: A renewed encounter of inquisitive minds. In Valsiner

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 3–24). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.001.0001

60.

Warneken

Hepach

(Eds.), 2018). Early development of prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20(2), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.001

61.

Wellman

H. M.

(2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford University Press.

62.

Wellman

H. M.

Cross

Watson

(2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00304

63.

Wellman

H. M.

Liu

(2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x

64.

Wimmer

Perner

(1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5

65.

Zifonun

(2000). „Man lebt nur einmal.” Morphosyntax und Semantik des Pronomens man. [“you only live once.” Morphosyntax and Semantics of the Pronoun man Deutsche Sprache, [German Language], 28(3), 232–253.

66.

Zifonun

(2001). Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich: „Das Pronomen”. Teil I: Überblick der Personalpronomen. [Grammar of German in European Comparison: „The Pronoun”. Part I: Overview of Personal Pronouns]. Institut für Deutsche Sprache.

Understanding “Society” is More Than Summing up the Folks I Know: Individual Development of a Concept of Generalized Other Minds

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References