Abstract
This study explored urban environments in terms of psychological restorativeness. The aim was to expand the frequently used but conceptually limited dichotomy of natural vs. urban settings by adding a distinction between serene and busy urban environments. In an online study, 381 participants were exposed to natural, calm urban, or busy urban environments. Perceived restorativeness of the environment was evaluated using the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS), in which we explored new compatibility items. Results revealed the hypothesized hierarchical order in which nature was perceived as most restorative, followed by a calm urban environment, whereas a busy urban environment showed the least restorative qualities. Moreover, factor analysis identified a six-factor structure in the PRS, highlighting that the alternative compatibility factor contained comfort and identity facets. Moving research on restorativeness beyond the conventional nature-centric perspective, together this suggests that next to natural environments, serene urban environments may offer easily accessible restorative opportunities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
