Overhead industrial work frequently causes shoulder work-related musculoskeletal disorders. These tasks require not only localized muscle activation but also integrated central nervous system regulation for motor control. Although soft exoskeletons have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing peripheral musculoskeletal load, their impact on central nervous system regulation remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical benefits and corticomuscular coupling of a soft exoskeleton during industrial tasks. Fifteen healthy males performed standardized screwing and lifting tasks under exoskeleton-assisted and unassisted conditions. Multimodal physiological signals were acquired through: surface electromyography for muscle activation, functional near-infrared spectroscopy for cortex hemodynamics and ratings of perceived exertion for subjective perception. Corticomuscular coupling was analyzed based on hemodynamic and electromyographic metrics. The anterior deltoid activity decreased by 25.0% during lifting, while biceps brachii effort in screwing tasks was reduced by 46.1% and ratings of perceived exertion were mitigated during the early phase of screwing operations. Concurrently, wearing the exoskeleton during lifting significantly lowered cortical activation compared with the screwing tasks. The exoskeleton task-specifically enhanced corticomuscular coupling within sensorimotor pathways during precision screwing task, while reducing dorsolateral prefrontal pathways during lifting. Therefore, this study demonstrates that the soft shoulder exoskeleton has the potential to simultaneously provide biomechanical support and corticomuscular coupling adaptation, thereby enhancing motor control and mitigating work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
JiaN, ZhangH, LingR, et al.Epidemiological data of work-related musculoskeletal disorders - China, 2018–2020. China CDC Wkly2021;3(18):383–389; doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.104
3.
Statistics B. Census of fatal occupational injuries. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Washington, DC; 2016.
4.
KokJ, De VroonhofP, SnijdersJ, et al.Work-related MSDs: Prevalence, costs and demographics in the EU (European Risk Observatory Executive summary). Publications Office of the European Union; 2019.
5.
LiangJ, JiaN, ZhangF, et al.Shoulder work-related musculoskeletal disorders and related factors of workers in 15 industries of China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2022;23(1):952; doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05917-2
6.
GreggiC, ViscontiVV, AlbaneseM, et al.Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med2024;13(13):3964; doi: 10.3390/jcm13133964
7.
GumasingMJJ, PrasetyoYT, JaurigueJ, et al.The effects of biomechanical risk factors on musculoskeletal disorders among baggers in the supermarket industry. Work2023;75(1):315–324; doi: 10.3233/WOR-220073
8.
HalesTR, BernardBP. Epidemiology of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Orthop Clin North Am1996;27(4):679–709; doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)32117-9
9.
ScottSH. Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Nat Rev Neurosci2004;5(7):532–546; doi: 10.1038/nrn1427
10.
PanB, HuangZ, WuJ, et al.Primitive muscle synergies reflect different modes of coordination in upper limb motions. Med Biol Eng Comput2021;59(10):2153–2163; doi: 10.1007/s11517-021-02429-4
11.
ZuYM, LuoLN, ChenXP, et al.Characteristics of corticomuscular coupling during wheelchair Tai Chi in patients with spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil2023;20(1):79; doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01203-x
12.
RatkeEJ, LarsonDJ, HolmesMWR, et al.Adaptations to fatigue during a repetitive multiplanar lifting task. Appl Ergon2025;129:104587; doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104587
13.
GetoAK, DabaC, DesyeB, et al.Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder and its associated factors among weavers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open2025;15(8):e093124; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093124
14.
JariA, Niazmand-AghdamN, MazhinSA, et al.Effectiveness of training program in manual material handling: A health promotion approach. J Educ Health Promot2022;11:81; doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_492_21
15.
ScheerSJ, MitalA. Ergonomics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997;78(3 Suppl):S36–S45; doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90406-8
16.
de WaalA, KillianA, GagelaA, et al.Therapeutic approaches for the prevention of upper limb repetitive strain injuries in work-related computer use: A scoping review. J Occup Rehabil2025;35(2):234–267; doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10204-z
17.
de LoozeMP, BoschT, KrauseF, et al.Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics2016;59(5):671–681; doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988
18.
TheurelJ, DesbrossesK, RouxT, et al.Physiological consequences of using an upper limb exoskeleton during manual handling tasks. Appl Ergon2018;67:211–217; doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.008
19.
Van EerdD, MunhallC, IrvinE, et al.Effectiveness of workplace interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders and symptoms: An update of the evidence. Occup Environ Med2016;73(1):62–70; doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-102992
20.
ASTM International. Standard Terminology for Exoskeletons and Exosuits (ASTM F3323-21). ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA; 2021.
21.
SchmalzT, SchändlingerJ, SchulerM, et al.Biomechanical and metabolic effectiveness of an industrial exoskeleton for overhead work. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019;16(23):4792; doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234792
22.
KongYK, KimJH, ShimHH, et al.Efficacy of passive upper-limb exoskeletons in reducing musculoskeleta l load associated with overhead tasks. Appl Ergon2023;109:103965; doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103965
23.
van der HaveA, RossiniM, Rodriguez-GuerreroC, et al.The Exo4Work shoulder exoskeleton effectively reduces muscle and joint loading during simulated occupational tasks above shoulder height. Appl Ergon2022;103:103800; doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103800
24.
BrunnerA, van SluijsR, LuderT, et al.Effect of passive shoulder exoskeleton support during working with arm s over shoulder level. Wearable Technol2023;4:e26; doi: 10.1017/wtc.2023.21
25.
PinhoJP, Forner-CorderoA. Shoulder muscle activity and perceived comfort of industry workers using a commercial upper limb exoskeleton for simulated tasks. Appl Ergon2022;101:103718; doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103718
26.
MauriceP, CamernikJ, GorjanD, et al.Objective and subjective effects of a passive exoskeleton on overhead work. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2020;28(1):152–164; doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2945368
27.
De BockS, RossiniM, LefeberD, et al.An occupational shoulder exoskeleton reduces muscle activity and fatigue during overhead work. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2022;69(10):3008–3020; doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3159094
28.
LafitteMN, AndreaCS, KadoneH, et al.Cerebral correlates of robot-assisted upper limb motion driven by motor intention in healthy individuals: An fNIRS study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2025;33:2322–2334; doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3578796
29.
LottiN, MissiroliF, GalofaroE, et al.Soft robotics to enhance upper limb endurance in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Soft Robot2024;11(2):338–346; doi: 10.1089/soro.2023.0024
30.
NishimuraM, KobayashiS, KuninakaT, et al.Rehabilitation with hybrid assistive limb improves upper limb paralysis in patients with cerebral Hemorrhage by repairing axonal injury of the corticospinal tract. J Neural Eng2025;22(2); doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/adbe3c
31.
TangC, ZhouT, ZhangY, et al.Bilateral upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation improves upper limb motor function in stroke patients: A study based on quantitative EEG. Eur J Med Res2023;28(1):603; doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01565-x
32.
SweattJD. Neural plasticity and behaviour—Sixty years of conceptual advances. J Neurochem2016;139 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):179–199; doi: 10.1111/jnc.13580
33.
DingS, Anaya-ReyesF, NarayanA, et al.A lightweight shoulder exoskeleton with a series elastic actuator for assisting overhead work. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2024;29(2):1030–1040; doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2023.3330755
34.
TsuzukiD, DanI. Spatial registration for functional near-infrared spectroscopy: From channel position on the scalp to cortical location in individual and group analyses. Neuroimage2014;85 Pt 1(Pt 1):92–103; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.025
35.
ShanM, WangS, XieH, et al.Intelligent motion pattern classification: An in-depth analysis of seated balance in spinal cord injury patients during 16-form wheelchair Tai Chi. Biomed Signal Process Control2025;102:107351; doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107351
36.
FerrariM, QuaresimaV. A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. Neuroimage2012;63(2):921–935; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.049
37.
WuF, LiuY, JiangH, et al.Integrated EEG–fNIRS for characterizing cortical responses and neurovascular coupling in automated and discrete gait tasks. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2025;33:3805–3814; doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3610690
38.
TerryK, GriffinL. How computational technique and spike train properties affect coherence detection. J Neurosci Methods2008;168(1):212–223; doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.09.014
39.
XiXG, MaCB, YuanCM, et al.Enhanced EEG-EMG coherence analysis based on hand movements. Biomed Signal Proces2020;56:101727; doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101727
40.
OconAJ, KulesaJ, ClarkeD, et al.Increased phase synchronization and decreased cerebral autoregulation during fainting in the young. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol2009;297(6):H2084–H2095; doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00705.2009
41.
RamonC, HolmesMD. Stochastic behavior of phase synchronization index and cross-frequency couplings in epileptogenic zones during interictal periods measured with scalp dEEG. Front Neurol2013;4:57; doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00057
42.
De VriesA, De LoozeMJJE. The effect of arm support exoskeletons in realistic work activities: A review study. J Ergon2019;9(4):1–9; doi: 10.35248/2165-7556.19.9.255
43.
TiseniL, XiloyannisM, ChiaradiaD, et al.On the edge between soft and rigid: An assistive shoulder exoskeleton with hyper-redundant kinematics. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot2019;2019:618–624; doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779546
44.
KimYG, XiloyannisM, AccotoD, et al.Development of a soft exosuit for industrial applications. In: BIOROB 2018 - 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE; 2018; pp. 324–329, doi: 10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487907
45.
DingS, NarayanA, ReyesFA, et al.Design and control of a novel active shoulder exoskeleton for overhead work assistance. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2024;29(6):4768–4777; doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2024.3388095
46.
GeorgarakisAM, XiloyannisM, WolfP, et al.A textile exomuscle that assists the shoulder during functional movements for everyday life. Nat Mach Intell2022;4(6):574–582; doi: 10.1038/s42256-022-00495-3
47.
WalterT, StutzigN, SiebertT. Active exoskeleton reduces erector spinae muscle activity during lifting. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2023;11:1143926; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143926
48.
BostanAC, DumRP, StrickPL. Cerebellar networks with the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia. Trends Cogn Sci2013;17(5):241–254; doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.003
49.
GraftonST, HamiltonAF. Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum Mov Sci2007;26(4):590–616; doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.009
50.
KawamotoH, SankaiYJAR. Power assist method based on phase sequence and muscle force condition for HAL. Adv Robot2005;19(7):717–734; doi: 10.1163/1568553054455103
51.
PooladvandS, HasanzadehS. Neurophysiological evaluation of workers’ decision dynamics under time pressure and increased mental demand. Autom Constr2022;141:104437; doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104437
52.
GemmerichR, MüllerO, SchallerA. The application of fNIRS in studies on occupational workload: A systematic review. Front Public Health2025;13:1560605; doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1560605
53.
MillerEK, CohenJD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci2001;24:167–202; doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
54.
PetersenSE, PosnerMI. The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annu Rev Neurosci2012;35:73–89; doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525
55.
HerzogM, KrafftFC, FiedlerJ, et al.The central nervous system adjusts muscle synergy structure and tightly controls rollator-supported transitions between sitting and standing. J Neuroeng Rehabil2025;22(1):96; doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01622-y
56.
MacDonaldAW, 3rd, CohenJD, StengerVA, et al.Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science2000;288(5472):1835–1838; doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835
57.
LiuJ, ShengY, LiuH. Corticomuscular coherence and its applications: A review. Front Hum Neurosci2019;13:100; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00100
58.
HoshiE, TanjiJ. Distinctions between dorsal and ventral premotor areas: Anatomical con nectivity and functional properties. Curr Opin Neurobiol2007;17(2):234–242; doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.02.003
59.
TianJ, WeiB, YangC, et al.Effects of muscle synergy during overhead work with a passive shoulder exoskeleton: A case study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2025;72(10):3007–3018; doi: 10.1109/TBME.2025.3560627
60.
AfzalT, ZhuF, TsengSC, et al.Evaluation of muscle synergy during exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with multiple sclerosis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2022;69(10):3265–3274; doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3166705
61.
JiangN, WangD, JiX, et al.Effect analysis of wearing an lumbar exoskeleton on coordinated activities of the low back muscles using sEMG topographic maps. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2024;32:259–270; doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3349189
62.
MenonV, D’EspositoM. The role of PFC networks in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology2022;47(1):90–103; doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01152-w
63.
SmucnyJ, DienelSJ, LewisDA, et al.Mechanisms underlying dorsolateral prefrontal cortex contributions to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology2022;47(1):292–308; doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01089-0
64.
KnightRT, StainesWR, SwickD, et al.Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks. Acta Psychol (Amst)1999;101(2–3):159–178; doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00004-9
65.
GaoYJ, SunJY, LiCH, et al.Neuro-biomechanical coupling in exoskeleton assisted walking for stroke patients demonstrates adaptive compensation. Biocybern Biomed Eng2026;46(1):19–32; doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2025.11.007
66.
GraziL, TrigiliE, FioreM, et al.Passive shoulder occupational exoskeleton reduces shoulder muscle coactivation in repetitive arm movements. Sci Rep2024;14(1):27843; doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78090-2
67.
GraziL, TrigiliE, ProfaceG, et al.Design and experimental evaluation of a semi-passive upper-limb exoske leton for workers with motorized tuning of assistance. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2020;28(10):2276–2285; doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3014408
68.
WangHM, LeDKL, LinWC. Evaluation of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton applied to assist farming activities in fruit orchards. Appl Sci2021;11(2):757; doi: 10.3390/app11020757
69.
McFarlandTC, McDonaldAC, WhittakerRL, et al.Level of exoskeleton support influences shoulder elevation, external rotation and forearm pronation during simulated work tasks in females. Appl Ergon2022;98:103591; doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103591
