A core soft-robotics challenge for underwater locomotion is reconciling soft actuation’s compliance with the control tractability and robustness of rigid structures. We present SpineWave, a biomimetic robotic fish that adopts a compliant design within a hybrid soft–rigid architecture: rigid, additively manufactured vertebrae embed opposing magnets that provide passive magnetic compliance, enabling soft-like undulatory bending and impact tolerance while retaining a pressure-tolerant, analytically tractable backbone. Rather than manual tuning, we optimize a low-parameter central-pattern-generator (CPG) controller via hardware-in-the-loop efficient global optimization (EGO). The EGO-tuned gaits deliver a 38% increase in cruising speed and a 35% reduction in turning radius relative to pre-optimization baselines, and achieve 29% energy savings when exploiting vortex wakes, while maintaining stable body-wave propagation across modular morphologies. To our knowledge, SpineWave is the first fish robot to realize soft-like compliance and field robustness using an entirely rigid, magnetically coupled exoskeleton–endoskeleton. This combination of passive magnetic compliance and data-driven CPG optimization advances soft-robotic locomotion and offers a pressure-tolerant, modular platform for long-duration environmental monitoring and exploration.
SinghH, MaksymT, WilkinsonJ, et al.Inexpensive, small AUVs for studying ice-covered polar environments. Sci Robot, 2017; 2(7):eaan4809; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aan4809
2.
MasmitjaI, NavarroJ, GomarizS, et al.Mobile robotic platforms for the acoustic tracking of deep-sea demersal fishery resources. Sci Robot, 2020; 5(48):eabc3701; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abc3701
3.
NeiraJ, SequeirosC, HuamaniR, et al.Review on unmanned underwater robotics, structure designs, materials, sensors, actuators, and navigation control. J Rob, 2021; 2021(1):1–26; doi: 10.1155/2021/5542920
4.
HeY, WangDB, AliZA. A review of different designs and control models of remotely operated underwater vehicle. Meas Control, 2020; 53(9–10):1561–1570; doi: 10.1177/0020294020952483
5.
FishFE. Advantages of aquatic animals as models for bio-inspired drones over present AUV technology. Bioinspir Biomim, 2020; 15(2):e025001; doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/ab5a34
6.
SchmicklT, RomanoD. Robots and animals teaming up in the wild to tackle ecosystem challenges. Sci Robot, 2024; 9(96):eado5566; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.ado5566
7.
MasmitjaI, MartinM, O’ReillyT, et al.Dynamic robotic tracking of underwater targets using reinforcement learning. Sci Robot, 2023; 8(80):eade7811; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.ade7811
8.
LiL, WangS, ZhangY, et al.Aerial-aquatic robots capable of crossing the air-water boundary and hitchhiking on surfaces. Sci Robot, 2022; 7(66):eabm6695; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abm6695
9.
JiY, WeiY, LiuJ, et al.Design and realization of a novel hybrid-drive robotic fish for aquaculture water quality monitoring. J Bionic Eng, 2023; 20(2):543–557; doi: 10.1007/s42235-022-00282-1
10.
RomanoD, StefaniniC. Unveiling social distancing mechanisms via a fish-robot hybrid interaction. Biol Cybern, 2021; 115(6):565–573; doi: 10.1007/s00422-021-00867-9
11.
Molina-MolinaJC, SalhaouiM, Guerrero-GonzálezA, et al.Autonomous marine robot based on AI recognition for permanent surveillance in marine protected areas. Sensors (Basel), 2021; 21(8):2664; doi: 10.3390/s21082664
12.
LangerhansB, ReznickD. Ecology and evolution of swimming performance in fishes: Predicting evolution with biomechanics. In: Fish Locomotion: An Eco—Ethological Perspective; CRC Press; 2009.
13.
SfakiotakisM, LaneDM, DaviesJBC. Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion. IEEE J Oceanic Eng, 1999; 24(2):237–252; doi: 10.1109/48.757275
14.
LiWK, ChenH, CuiWC, et al.Multi-objective evolutionary design of central pattern generator network for biomimetic robotic fish. Complex Intell Syst, 2023; 9(2):1707–1727; doi: 10.1007/s40747-022-00883-7
15.
StruebigK, BayatB, EckertP, et al.Design and development of the efficient anguilliform swimming robot— MAR. Bioinspir Biomim, 2020; 15(3):e035001; doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/ab6be0
16.
KodatiP, HinkleJ, WinnA, et al.Microautonomous robotic ostraciiform (MARCO): Hydrodynamics, design, and fabrication. IEEE Trans Robot, 2008; 24(1):105–117; doi: 10.1109/TRO.2008.915446
17.
ZhangS, QianY, LiaoP, et al.Design and control of an agile robotic fish with integrative biomimetic mechanisms. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2016; 21(4):1846–1857; doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2016.2555703
18.
MarcheseAD, OnalCD, RusD. Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robot, 2014; 1(1):75–87; doi: 10.1089/soro.2013.0009
19.
NguyenDQ, HoVA. Anguilliform swimming performance of an eel-inspired soft robot. Soft Robot, 2022; 9(3):425–439; doi: 10.1089/soro.2020.0093
20.
LiG, ChenX, ZhouF, et al.Self-powered soft robot in the Mariana Trench. Nature, 2021; 591(7848):66–71; doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03153-z
21.
KatzschmannRK, DelPretoJ, MacCurdyR, et al.Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish. Sci Robot, 2018; 3(16):eaar3449; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar3449
22.
WangT, JooH-J, SongS, et al.A versatile jellyfish-like robotic platform for effective underwater propulsion and manipulation. Sci Adv, 2023; 9(15):eadg0292; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg0292
23.
RossiC, ColoradoJ, CoralW, et al.Bending continuous structures with SMAs: A novel robotic fish design. Bioinspir Biomim, 2011; 6(4):e045005; doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/6/4/045005
24.
ShintakeJ, CacuccioloV, SheaH, et al.Soft biomimetic fish robot made of dielectric elastomer actuators. Soft Robot, 2018; 5(4):466–474; doi: 10.1089/soro.2017.0062
25.
ManducaG, SantaeraG, MiragliaM, et al.A bioinspired control strategy ensures maneuverability and adaptability for dynamic environments in an underactuated robotic fish. J Intell Rob Syst, 2024; 110(2):69; doi: 10.1007/s10846-024-02080-9
26.
ChaoX, HameedI, Navarro-AlarconD, et al.Performance-oriented understanding and design of a robotic tadpole: Lower energy cost, higher speed. J Field Rob, 2025; 42(3):607–624; doi: 10.1002/rob.22452
27.
MoY, SuW, HongZ, et al.Finite-time line-of-sight guidance-based path-following control for a wire-driven robot fish. Biomimetics (Basel), 2024; 9(9):556; doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9090556
28.
StefaniniC, OrofinoS, ManfrediL, et al.A novel autonomous, bioinspired swimming robot developed by neuroscientists and bioengineers. Bioinspir Biomim, 2012; 7(2):e025001; doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/7/2/025001
29.
VermaS, NovatiG, KoumoutsakosP. Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2018; 115(23):5849–5854; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800923115
30.
HongZ, WangQ, ZhongY. Parameters optimization of body wave control method for multi-joint robotic fish based on deep reinforcement learning. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO); IEEE; 2022; pp. 604–609; doi: 10.1109/ROBIO55434.2022.10011700
31.
LinY-H, SiddallR, SchwabF, et al.Modeling and control of a soft robotic fish with integrated soft sensing. Adv Intell Syst, 2023; 5(4):2000244; doi: 10.1002/aisy.202000244
32.
IjspeertAJ. Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: A review. Neural Netw, 2008; 21(4):642–653; doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.014
33.
YuJ, WangM, SuZ, et al.Dynamic modeling of a CPG-governed multijoint robotic fish. Adv Robotics, 2013; 27(4):275–285; doi: 10.1080/01691864.2013.755279
34.
SchmidtA, FeldottoB, GumpertT, et al.Adapting highly-dynamic compliant movements to changing environments: A benchmark comparison of reflex- vs. Front Neurorobot, 2021; 15:15; doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.762431
35.
PasandiV, SadeghianH, KeshmiriM, et al.An integrated programmable CPG with bounded output. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2022; 67(9):4658–4673; doi: 10.1109/TAC.2022.3166715
36.
HoweSP, DuffAR, AstleyHC. Comparing the turn performance of different motor control schemes in multilink fish-inspired robots. Bioinspir Biomim, 2021; 16(3):e036010; doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/abe7cc
37.
BreierJA, JakubaMV, SaitoMA, et al.Revealing ocean-scale biochemical structure with a deep-diving vertical profiling autonomous vehicle. Sci Robot, 2020; 5(48):eabc7104; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abc7104
38.
YoergerDR, GovindarajanAF, HowlandJC, et al.A hybrid underwater robot for multidisciplinary investigation of the ocean twilight zone. Sci Robot, 2021; 6(55):eabe1901; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abe1901
39.
TolkoffSW. Robotics and Power Measurements of the RoboTuna. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1999.
40.
ClaphamRJ, HuH. iSplash-I: High performance swimming motion of a carangiform robotic fish with full-body coordination. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); IEEE; 2014; pp. 322–327; doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6906629
41.
SalazarR, FuentesV, AbdelkefiA. Classification of biological and bioinspired aquatic systems: A review. Ocean Engineering, 2018; 148:75–114; doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.012
42.
LiaoX, ZhouC, ZouQ, et al.Dynamic modeling and performance analysis for a wire-driven elastic robotic fish. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2022; 7(4):11174–11181; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3197911
43.
LuB, ZhouC, WangJ, et al.Toward swimming speed optimization of a multi-flexible robotic fish with low cost of transport. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng, 2024; 21(3):2804–2815; doi: 10.1109/TASE.2023.3269775
44.
SvendsenMBS, DomeniciP, MarrasS, et al.Maximum swimming speeds of sailfish and three other large marine predatory fish species based on muscle contraction time and stride length: A myth revisited. Biol Open, 2016; 5(10):1415–1419; doi: 10.1242/bio.019919
45.
WebbPW. The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout salmo gairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. J Exp Biol, 1976; 65(1):157–177; doi: 10.1242/jeb.65.1.157
46.
GreenA, HonkanenHM, RamsdenP, et al.Evidence of long-distance coastal sea migration of Atlantic salmon, salmo salar, smolts from northwest England (river Derwent). Anim Biotelem, 2022; 10(1):3; doi: 10.1186/s40317-022-00274-2
47.
PangerangUK, LawelleSA, FekriL, et al.Diversity of eel (glass eel) based on morphometric measurements in the Konaweha River, southeast Sulawesi. Atlantis Press; 2022; pp. 495–501; doi: 10.2991/absr.k.220309.095
48.
DavenportJ. How and why do flying fish fly? Rev Fish Biol Fisheries, 1994; 4(2):184–214; doi: 10.1007/BF00044128
49.
van den BergSC, ScharffRBN, RusákZ, et al.OpenFish: Biomimetic design of a soft robotic fish for high speed locomotion. HardwareX, 2022; 12:e00320; doi: 10.1016/j.ohx.2022.e00320
50.
WangZ, WangL, WangT, et al.Research and experiments on electromagnetic-driven multi-joint bionic fish. Robotica, 2022; 40(3):720–746; doi: 10.1017/S0263574721000771
51.
XiaQ, LiH, SongN, et al.Research on flexible collapsible fluid-driven bionic robotic fish. Ocean Eng, 2023; 276:114203; doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114203
52.
RomanoD, WahiA, MiragliaM, et al.Development of a novel underactuated robotic fish with magnetic transmission system. Machines (Basel), 2022; 10(9):755; doi: 10.3390/machines10090755
53.
WangR, ZhangC, ZhangY, et al.Fast-swimming soft robotic fish actuated by bionic muscle. Soft Robot, 2024; 11(5):845–856; doi: 10.1089/soro.2023.0163
54.
ZhongQ, ZhuJ, FishFE, et al.Tunable stiffness enables fast and efficient swimming in fish-like robots. Sci Robot, 2021; 6(57):eabe4088; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abe4088
55.
IjspeertAJ, CrespiA, RyczkoD, et al.From swimming to walking with a salamander robot driven by a spinal cord model. Science, 2007; 315(5817):1416–1420; doi: 10.1126/science.1138353
56.
ChenH, LiW, CuiW, et al.A pointwise ensemble of surrogates with adaptive function and heuristic formulation. Struct Multidisc Optim, 2022; 65(4):113; doi: 10.1007/s00158-022-03202-3
57.
EspinosaC, EstebanMÁ, CuestaA, et al.Microplastics in aquatic environments and their toxicological implications for fish. Toxicology, 2016; doi: 10.5772/64815In:
58.
GalbuseraF, BassaniT, GalbuseraF, et al.The spine: A strong, stable, and flexible structure with biomimetics potential. Biomimetics, 2019; 4(3):60; doi: 10.3390/biomimetics4030060
59.
WangM, DongH, LiX, et al.Control and optimization of a bionic robotic fish through a combination of CPG model and PSO. Neurocomputing (Amst), 2019; 337:144–152; doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.062
60.
DonleyJM, SepulvedaCA, KonstantinidisP, et al.Convergent evolution in mechanical design of lamnid sharks and tunas. Nature, 2004; 429(6987):61–65; doi: 10.1038/nature02435
61.
SpiertsILY, LeeuwenJLV. Kinematics and muscle dynamics of C- and S-starts of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). J Exp Biol, 1999; 202(Pt 4):393–406; doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.4.393
62.
JonesDR, SchonlauM, WelchWJ. Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions. J Global Optim, 1998; 13(4):455–492; doi: 10.1023/A:1008306431147
63.
LiaoJC. A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2007; 362(1487):1973–1993; doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2082
64.
HinchSG, CookeSJ, FarrellAP, et al.Dead fish swimming: A review of research on the early migration and high premature mortality in adult Fraser river sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka. J Fish Biol, 2012; 81(2):576–599; doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03360.x
65.
BogueR. Underwater robots: A review of technologies and applications. IR, 2015; 42(3):186–191; doi: 10.1108/IR-01-2015-0010
66.
WangT, RenZ, HuW, et al.Effect of body stiffness distribution on larval fish–like efficient undulatory swimming. Sci Adv, 2021; 7(19):eabf7364; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf7364
PuH, YuanS, PengY, et al.Multi-layer electromagnetic spring with tunable negative stiffness for semi-active vibration isolation. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2019; 121:942–960; doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.028
69.
KurumayaS, PhillipsBT, BeckerKP, et al.A modular soft robotic wrist for underwater manipulation. Soft Robot, 2018; 5(4):399–409; doi: 10.1089/soro.2017.0097
70.
ZhangQM, LiH, PohM, et al.An all-organic composite actuator material with a high dielectric constant. Nature, 2002; 419(6904):284–287; doi: 10.1038/nature01021
71.
CyganDF, McNallanMJ. Corrosion of NdFeB permanent magnets in humid environments at temperatures up to 150°C. J Magn Magn Mater, 1995; 139(1–2):131–138; doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(95)90037-3
72.
LongJHJR, HaleME, MchenryMJ, et al.Functions of fish skin: Flexural stiffness and steady swimming of longnose gar lepisosteus osseus. J Exp Biol, 1996; 199(Pt 10):2139–2151; doi: 10.1242/jeb.199.10.2139
73.
ZhangY, ZhaoW, MaS, et al.Modulus adaptive lubricating prototype inspired by instant muscle hardening mechanism of catfish skin. Nat Commun, 2022; 13(1):377; doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28038-9
74.
OeffnerJ, LauderGV. The hydrodynamic function of shark skin and two biomimetic applications. J Exp Biol, 2012; 215(Pt 5):785–795; doi: 10.1242/jeb.063040
75.
EngelmannJ, HankeW, MogdansJ, et al.Hydrodynamic stimuli and the fish lateral line. Nature, 2000; 408(6808):51–52; doi: 10.1038/35040706
76.
LiuQ, ChenJ, LiY, et al.High-performance strain sensors with fish-scale-like graphene-sensing layers for full-range detection of human motions. ACS Nano, 2016; 10(8):7901–7906; doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b03813
77.
WangW, JiangY, ZhongD, et al.Neuromorphic sensorimotor loop embodied by monolithically integrated, low-voltage, soft e-skin. Science, 2023; 380(6646):735–742; doi: 10.1126/science.ade0086
78.
PohlmannK, AtemaJ, BreithauptT. The importance of the lateral line in nocturnal predation of piscivorous catfish. J Exp Biol, 2004; 207(Pt 17):2971–2978; doi: 10.1242/jeb.01129
79.
CoombsS. Smart skins: Information processing by lateral line flow sensors. Auton Robot, 2001; 11(3):255–261; doi: 10.1023/A:1012491007495
80.
BealDN, HoverFS, TriantafyllouMS, et al.Passive propulsion in vortex wakes. J Fluid Mech, 2006; 549:385–402; doi: 10.1017/S0022112005007925
LeiB, KirkTQ, BhattacharyaA, et al.Bayesian optimization with adaptive surrogate models for automated experimental design. Npj Comput Mater, 2021; 7(1):1–12; doi: 10.1038/s41524-021-00662-x
83.
LiuH, OngY-S, ShenX, et al.When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPs. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2020; 31(11):4405–4423; doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2957109
84.
LiuJ, ZhaoY, LeiF, et al.Net-HDMR metamodeling method for high-dimensional problems. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2023; 145(9); doi: 10.1115/1.4062669
85.
PooleB, LahiriS, RaghuM, et al.Exponential expressivity in deep neural networks through transient chaos. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc.; 2016.
86.
IbarzJ, TanJ, FinnC, et al.How to train your robot with deep reinforcement learning: Lessons we have learned. Int J Rob Res, 2021; 40(4–5):698–721; doi: 10.1177/0278364920987859
87.
KiranBR, SobhI, TalpaertV, et al.Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving: A Survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 2022; 23(6):4909–4926; doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3054625
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
