Fabric-based soft gloves, due to their safety, light weight, and compliance, exhibit promising potential in assisting individuals with hand impairments. However, most existing soft gloves focus solely on finger flexion and extension, with limited consideration for thumb assistance. This restricts their effectiveness in tasks requiring extensive workspace and dexterous manipulation. In this work, we present a new class of fabric-based soft glove with 15 degrees of freedom (DOFs), including finger flexion/extension, thumb abduction/adduction, thumb opposition/reposition, and finger abduction. The high-DOF fabric-based soft glove integrates bidirectional fabric-based pneumatic actuators (FPAs) for finger flexion/extension, X-crossing pneumatic artificial muscles (X-PAMs) for thumb assistance, and Y-shaped bladed FPAs for finger abduction. To enhance the thumb tip workspace, we optimize the X-PAM positioning by modeling thumb kinematics from an anatomical perspective. The experimental results show that the optimized passive workspace of the thumb, assisted by the glove, encompasses approximately 70% of its active workspace. Through our mirror control system, we further demonstrate the glove’s capability to perform complex gestures and versatile grasping tasks with various object geometries, sizes (0.1–11.5 cm), and masses (1.7–500.0 g). The glove supports both power and precision grasps, as well as fine manipulations.
FeixT, RomeroJ, SchmiedmayerH-B, et al.The GRASP taxonomy of human grasp types. IEEE Trans Human-Mach Syst, 2016; 46(1):66–77; doi: 10.1109/THMS.2015.2470657
2.
ChuC-Y, PattersonRM. Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: A narrative review. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2018; 15(1):9; doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0350-6
3.
GopalA, HsuW-Y, AllenDD, et al.Remote assessments of hand function in neurological disorders: Systematic review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol, 2022; 9(1):e33157; doi: 10.2196/33157
4.
ChenY, TanX, YanD, et al.A composite fabric-based soft rehabilitation glove with soft joint for dementia in Parkinson’s disease. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med, 2020; 8:1400110; doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2020.2981926
5.
LaiJ, SongA, WangJ, et al.A novel soft glove utilizing honeycomb pneumatic actuators (HPAs) for assisting activities of daily living. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2023; 31:3223–3233; doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3302612
6.
KimDH, LeeY, ParkH-S. Bioinspired high-degrees of freedom soft robotic glove for restoring versatile and comfortable manipulation. Soft Robot, 2022; 9(4):734–744; doi: 10.1089/soro.2020.0167
7.
TranP, JeongS, LyuF, et al.FLEXotendon glove-III: Voice-controlled soft robotic hand exoskeleton with novel fabrication method and admittance grasping control. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2022; 27(5):3920–3931; doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2022.3148032
8.
Sandoval-GonzalezO, Jacinto-VillegasJ, Herrera-AguilarI, et al.Design and development of a hand exoskeleton robot for active and passive rehabilitation. Int J Adv Robot Syst, 2016; 13(2):66; doi: 10.5772/62404
9.
TrioloER, BuShaBF. Design and experimental testing of a force-augmenting exoskeleton for the human hand. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2022; 19(1):23; doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-00997-6
10.
XuW, GuoY, BravoC, et al.Design, control, and experimental evaluation of a novel robotic glove system for patients with brachial plexus injuries. IEEE Trans Robot, 2023; 39(2):1637–1652; doi: 10.1109/TRO.2022.3220973
11.
XiloyannisM, AliceaR, GeorgarakisA-M, et al.Soft robotic suits: State of the art, core technologies and open challenges. IEEE Trans Robot, 2022; 38(3):1343–1362; doi: 10.1109/TRO.2021.3084466
12.
BillardA, KragicD. Trends and challenges in robot manipulation. Science, 2019; 364(6446):eaat8414; doi: 10.1126/science.aat8414
13.
LeeY, ParkH-S. Design optimization of a soft robotic rehabilitation glove based on finger workspace analysis. Biomimetics (Basel), 2024; 9(3):172; doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9030172
14.
TranP, ElliottD, HerrinK, et al.Towards comprehensive evaluation of the FLEXotendon glove-III: A case series evaluation in pediatric clinical cases and able-bodied adults. Biomed Eng Lett, 2023; 13(3):485–494; doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00280-0
15.
PolygerinosP, GallowayKC, SavageE, et al.Soft robotic glove for hand rehabilitation and task specific training. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) IEEE: Seattle, WA, USA; 2015; pp. 2913–2919; doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139597
16.
WangY, KokubuS, ZhouZ, et al.Designing soft pneumatic actuators for thumb movements. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2021; 6(4):8450–8457; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3105799
17.
MaK, JiangZ, GaoS, et al.Design and analysis of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for wearable hand rehabilitation device. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2022; 7(3):6115–6122; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3167063
18.
LiuH, WuC, LinS, et al.From skin movement to wearable robotics: The case of robotic gloves. Soft Robot, 2024; 11(5):755–766; doi: 10.1089/soro.2023.0115soro.2023.0115;
19.
CappelloL, GallowayKC, SananS, et al.Exploiting textile mechanical anisotropy for fabric-based pneumatic actuators. Soft Robot, 2018; 5(5):662–674; doi: 10.1089/soro.2017.0076
20.
CappelloL, MeyerJT, GallowayKC, et al.Assisting hand function after spinal cord injury with a fabric-based soft robotic glove. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2018; 15(1):59; doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0391-x
21.
ProiettiT, NuckolsK, GrupperJ, et al.Combining soft robotics and telerehabilitation for improving motor function after stroke. Wearable Technol, 2024; 5:e1; doi: 10.1017/wtc.2023.26
22.
GeL, ChenF, WangD, et al.Design, modeling, and evaluation of fabric-based pneumatic actuators for soft wearable assistive gloves. Soft Robot, 2020; 7(5):583–596; doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0105
23.
FengM, YangD, GuG. High-force fabric-based pneumatic actuators with asymmetric chambers and interference-reinforced structure for soft wearable assistive gloves. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2021; 6(2):3105–3111; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3062588
24.
CorreiaC, NuckolsK, WagnerD, et al.Improving grasp function after spinal cord injury with a soft robotic glove. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2020; 28(6):1407–1415.
25.
SuulkerC, SkachS, AlthoeferK. Soft robotic fabric actuator with elastic bands for high force and bending performance in hand exoskeletons. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2022; 7(4):10621–10627; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3194883
26.
JonesLA, LedermanSJ. Human Hand Function. Oxford University Press; 2007.
27.
NapierJR. STUDIES OF THE HANDS OF LIVING PRIMATES. Proc Zool Soc Lond, 1960; 134(4):647–657; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1960.tb05606.x
28.
LandsmeerJMF. Power grip and precision handling. Ann Rheum Dis, 1962; 21(2):164–170; doi: 10.1136/ard.21.2.164
29.
SasakiD, NoritsuguT, TakaiwaM, et al.Wearable power assist device for hand grasping using pneumatic artificial rubber muscle. In: RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759). IEEE: Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan; 2004; pp. 655–660; doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374840
30.
LiM, ZhuoY, HeB, et al.A 3D-printed soft hand exoskeleton with finger abduction assistance. In: 2019 16th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR) IEEE: Jeju, Korea (South); 2019; pp. 319–322; doi: 10.1109/URAI.2019.8768611
31.
YapHK, KhinPM, KohTH, et al.A fully fabric-based bidirectional soft robotic glove for assistance and rehabilitation of hand impaired patients. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2017; 2(3):1383–1390; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2017.2669366
32.
YapH, SebastianF, WiedemanC, et al.Design and characterization of low-cost fabric-based flat pneumatic actuators for soft assistive glove application. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot, 2017; 2017:1465–1470; doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009454In:
33.
LimDY-L, LaiH-S, YeowRC-H. A bidirectional fabric-based soft robotic glove for hand function assistance in patients with chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2023; 20(1):120; doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01250-4
34.
WangY, KokubuS, HuangS, et al.Towards an extensive thumb assist: A comparison between whole-finger and modular types of soft pneumatic actuators. Appl Sci, 2022; 12(8):3735; doi: 10.3390/app12083735
35.
ShiotaK, KokubuS, TarvainenTVJ, et al.Enhanced Kapandji test evaluation of a soft robotic thumb rehabilitation device by developing a fiber-reinforced elastomer-actuator based 5-digit assist system. Robot Auton Syst, 2019; 111:20–30; doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2018.09.007
36.
FengM, SunJ, YangD, et al.Characterization and modeling of fabric-based pneumatic actuators with asymmetric chambers for soft gloves. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2024; 9(11):10589–10596.
FengM, YangD, SunJ, et al.A pilot study on fabric-based pneumatic soft gloves for assisting patients with severe brachial plexus injury. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2025; 72(11):3174–3185; doi: 10.1109/TBME.2025.3563348
39.
LiuM-J, XiongC-H, HuD. Assessing the manipulative potentials of monkeys, apes and humans from hand proportions: Implications for hand evolution. n.d.
40.
BoyerDM, YapuncichGS, ChesterSGB, et al.Hands of early primates. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2013; 152 (Suppl 57):33–78; doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22392
41.
SchuenkeM, SchulteE, SchumacherU, et al.General Anatomy and Musculoskeletal System (THIEME Atlas of Anatomy). 2010.
42.
DenavitJ, HartenbergRS. A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. J Appl Mech, 1955; 22(2):215–221; doi: 10.1115/1.4011045
43.
RoseMD. Kinematics of the trapezium-1st metacarpal joint in extant anthropoids and Miocene hominoids. J Hum Evol, 1992; 22(4–5):255–266; doi: 10.1016/0047-2484(92)90058-H
44.
Surgeons AA of O. Joint Motion: Method of Measuring and Recording. Churchill Livingstone; 1965.
45.
CotugnoG, AlthoeferK, NanayakkaraT. The role of the thumb: Study of finger motion in grasping and reachability space in human and robotic hands. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Syst, 2017; 47(7):1061–1070; doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2016.2531679
46.
KuoL-C, ChiuH-Y, ChangC-W, et al.Functional workspace for precision manipulation between thumb and fingers in normal hands. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2009; 19(5):829–839; doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.07.008
47.
LyleRC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res, 1981; 4(4):483–492; doi: 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001
48.
YangY, FermullerC, LiY, et al.Grasp type revisited: A modern perspective on a classical feature for vision. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE: Boston, MA, USA; 2015; pp. 400–408; doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298637
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
