Older adults are one of the fastest-growing segments of the world population. However, many of the communities in which older adults live lack the infrastructure, resources, and services needed to support their diverse needs. Assistive technologies, such as socially assistive robots, present unique opportunities to support individuals with everyday activities and remain connected to the community. To understand the potential of socially assistive robots, we deployed a mixed methods exploratory study that evaluated perceptions of older adults toward socially assistive robots for home use. Furthermore, we engaged the older adults in a participatory design exercise to explore design considerations for applying socially assistive robots. Our findings provide meaningful insights for the implementation and design of socially assistive robots for home use by older adults.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
3.
BrennanR. L.PredigerD. J. (1981). Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, andalternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100307
4.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
5.
de JagerC. A.BudgeM. M.ClarkeR. (2003). Utility of TICS-M for the assessment of cognitive function in older adults. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 18(4), 318–324.
6.
DeutschI.ErelH.PazM.HoffmanG.ZuckermanO. (2019). Home robotic devices for older adults: Opportunities and concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.002
7.
DonovanN. J.BlazerD. (2020). Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Review and Commentary of a National Academies Report. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(12), 1233–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2020.08.005
8.
GetsonC.NejatG. (2021). Socially Assistive Robots Helping Older Adults through the Pandemic and Life after COVID-19. Robotics, 10(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10030106
9.
HarrisP. A.TaylorR.MinorB. L.ElliottV.FernandezM.O’NealL.McLeodL.DelacquaG.DelacquaF.KirbyJ.DudaS. N., & REDCap Consortium (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of biomedical informatics, 95, 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
10.
KasperJ. D.WolffJ. L.SkehanM. (2019). Care Arrangements of Older Adults: What They Prefer, What They Have, and Implications for Quality of Life. The Gerontologist, 59(5), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny127
ParasuramanA.ColbyC. L. (2014). An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59-74. https://doi:10.1177/1094670514539730
13.
PinoMBoulayMJouenFRigaudA-S (2015) “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7:141.doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141
14.
RemillardE. T.GriffithsP. C.MitznerT. L.SanfordJ. A.JonesB. D.RogersW. A. (2020). The TechSAge Minimum Battery: A multidimensional and holistic assessment of individuals aging with long-term disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 13(3), 100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100884
15.
RobinsonFNejatG.An analysis of design recommendations for socially assistive robot helpers for effective human-robot interactions in senior care. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering. 2022;9. https://doi:10.1177/20556683221101389
16.
RogersW. A.RamadhaniW. A.HarrisM. T. (2020). Defining Aging in Place: The Intersectionality of Space, Person, and Time. Innovation in Aging, 4(4), igaa036. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa036
17.
RoqueN. A.BootW. R. (2016). A New Tool for Assessing Mobile Device Proficiency in Older Adults: The Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 37(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464816642582
18.
SmarrC. A.MitznerT. L.BeerJ. M.PrakashA.ChenT. L.KempC. C.RogersW. A. (2014). Domestic robots for older adults: Attitudes, preferences, and potential. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2), 229–247.
19.
VenkateshV.ThongJ. Y. L.XuX. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
20.
WangY.HuberM.PapudesiV.CookD. (n.d.). User-guided reinforcement learning of robot assistive tasks for an intelligent environment. Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453), 424–429. https://doi:10.1109/iros.2003.1250666
21.
WilesJ.LeibingA.GubermanN.ReeveJ.AllenR. (2011). The Meaning of “Aging in Place” to Older People. 52(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098
