This article is part 2 of a two-part series focused on aging-in-place. Aging-in-place is a term that has been increasingly used over the past 40 years to describe the process of remaining in one’s home. In attempt to advance the discussion on the future of aging-in-place, this feature series provides an overview of the grand challenges to aging-in-place with an emphasis on human factors and ergonomics considerations. Part 2 will discuss a variety of ways to conceptualize “place” and describe the need for integrated technology within the home and beyond.
BeerJ. M.FiskA. D.RogersW. A. (2014). Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3(2), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.2.Beer
3.
BigonnesseC.ChaudhuryH. (2020). The Landscape of “aging in place” in gerontology literature: Emergence, theoretical perspectives, and influencing factors. Journal of Aging and Environment, 34(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2019.1638875.
4.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
CaineK.HananiaR. (2013). Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 20(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001023
7.
CarnemollaP. (2018). Ageing in place and the internet of things–how smart home technologies, the built environment and caregiving intersect. Visualization in Engineering, 6(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-018-0066-5
CzajaS. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.RogersW. A. (2019). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
10.
FaussetC. B.KellyA. J.RogersW. A.FiskA. D. (2011). Challenges to aging in place: Understanding home maintenance difficulties. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 25(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2011.571105
11.
FiskA. D.RogersW. A.CharnessN.CzajaS. J.SharitJ. (2009). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
GellN. M.RosenbergD. E.DemirisG.LaCroixA. Z.PatelK. V. (2015). Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt166
KwasnyM. N.CaineK. E.RogersW. A.FiskA. D. (2008). Privacy and Technology: Folk Definitions and Perspectives. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2008, 3291–3296. https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358846
16.
LawtonM. P. (1982). Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people (pp. 33–59). Springer.
MitznerT. L.BoronJ. B.FaussetC. B.AdamsA. E.CharnessN.CzajaS. J.DijkstraK.FiskA. D.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020
20.
MooreK. D. (2014). An ecological framework of place: Situating environmental gerontology within a life course perspective. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 79(3), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.79.3.a
21.
MynattE. D.MelenhorstA. S.FiskA. D.RogersW. A. (2004). Aware technologies for aging in place: Understanding user needs and attitudes. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(2), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/mprv.2004.1316816
NewmanM. G.ZainalN. H. (2020). The value of maintaining social connections for mental health in older people. The Lancet Public Health, 5(1), e12–e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30253-1
24.
OttoniC. A.Sims-GouldJ.WintersM.HeijnenM.McKayH. A. (2016). Benches become like porches”: Built and social environment influences on older adults’ experiences of mobility and well-being. Social Science & Medicine, 169, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.044
25.
ParasuramanR.SheridanT. B.WickensC. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354
26.
RogersW. A.FiskA. D. (2010). Toward a psychological science of advanced technology design for older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(6), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq065
27.
ScharlachA. E. (2017). Aging in context: Individual and environmental pathways to aging-friendly communities—The 2015 Matthew A. Pollack Award Lecture. The Gerontologist, 57(4), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx017
28.
StojkoskaB. L. R.TrivodalievK. V. (2017). A review of Internet of Things for smart home: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(3), 1454–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.006
29.
StoryM. F. (2001). Principles of universal design. In OstroffE.PreiserW. (eds.), Universal Design Handbook. MacGraw Hill.
30.
WahlH.-W.IwarssonS.OswaldF. (2012). Aging well and the environment: Toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr154
31.
WeilJ.SmithE. (2016). Revaluating aging in place: From traditional definitions to the continuum of care. Working With Older People, 20(4), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-08-2016-0020
32.
WilesJ. L.LeibingA.GubermanN.ReeveJ.AllenR. E. S. (2012). The meaning of “aging-in-place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098