A Potential Case of Change Blindness in an Officer-Involved Shooting

Abstract

The perceptual phenomenon of change blindness has been widely researched in the scientific literature, mostly in laboratory studies. This case study reviews the fatal shooting of a woman who suddenly backed her car in the general direction of law enforcement officers as other officers were attempting to extract her from the car. The deputy who eventually fired at the woman initially had his TASER drawn; when he perceived the car reversing toward officers, he tried to holster his TASER before drawing and firing his handgun. By the time the deputy fired, the woman had stopped reversing and was driving the car forward (i.e., not toward officers). Even after viewing police in-car-camera video, the deputy was adamant that he perceived the car as still moving backward when he fired. The facts are compared to the characteristics of change blindness and other human factors potentially at play.

Keywords

Change Blindness Perceptual Failure Reaction Time

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attwood

J. E.

Kennard

Harris

Humphreys

Antoniades

C. A.

(2018). A comparison of change blindness in real-world and on-screen viewing of museum artefacts. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00151

Blake

Bartel

(2018). Holster and handgun: Does equipment effect response time? Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 18(2), 39–46.

Campbell

Roelofs

Davey

Straker

(2012). Response time, pistol fire position variability, and pistol draw success rates for hip and thigh holsters. Human Factors, 55(2), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812453466

Chabris

C. F.

Weinberger

Fontaine

Simons

D. J.

(2011). You do not talk about Fight Club if you do not notice Fight Club: Inattentional blindness for a simulated real-world assault. i-Perception, 2(2), 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0436

Driskell

J. E.

Salas

(1996). Stress and human performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ehinger

K. A.

Allen

Wolfe

J. M.

(2016). Change blindness for cast shadows in natural scenes: Even informative shadow changes are missed. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(4), 978–987. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1054-7

Epstein

Westlake

B. G.

(2019). Determination of vehicle speed from recorded video using reverse projection photogrammetry and file metadata. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64(5), 1523–1529. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14053

Green

Allen

M. J.

Abrams

B. S.

Weintraub

Odom

J. V.

(2008). Forensic vision with application to highway safety (3rd ed.). Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, Inc.

Grimes

(1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In Akins

(Ed.), Perception (pp. 89–110). Oxford University Press.

10.

Hontz

T. A.

(1999). Justifying the deadly force response. Police Quarterly, 2(4), 462–476.

11.

Jaeger

C. B.

Levin

D. T.

Porter

(2017). Justice is (change) blind: Applying research on visual metacognition in legal settings. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000107

12.

Jensen

M. S.

Yao

Street

W. N.

Simons

D. J.

(2011). Change blindness and inattentional blindness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(5), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.130

13.

Land

M. F.

Hayhoe

(2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Research, 41(25–26), 3559–3565. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00102-x

14.

Levin

D. T.

Simons

D. J.

(1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 501–506. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03214339

15.

Lewinski

W. J.

Dysterheft

J. L.

Bushey

J. M.

Hicks

N. D.

(2015). An examination of police officer mental chronometry: “I swear…I don’t know how I shot him in the back.” Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 15(1), 1–15.

16.

Murphy

(2018). Perceptual load affects change blindness in a real-world interaction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(5), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3441

17.

Novy

(2012). Cognitive distortions during law enforcement shooting. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 54(1–2), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03379584

18.

O’Regan

J. K.

Deubel

Clark

J. J.

Rensink

R. A.

(2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7(1–3), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800394766

19.

Rensink

R. A.

O’Regan

J. K.

Clark

J. J.

(1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x

20.

San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department, CAD Response Report, No. MP170570194.

21.

Schmidt

R. A.

(2003). Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(4), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609106

22.

Simons

D. J.

Franconeri

S. L.

Reimer

R. L.

(2000). Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption. Perception, 29(10), 1143–1154. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3104

23.

Simons

D. J.

Levin

D. T.

(1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 644–649. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208840

24.

Simons

D. J.

Rensink

R. A.

(2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.006

25.

Simons

D. J.

Schlosser

M. D.

(2017). Inattentional blindness for a gun during a simulated police vehicle stop. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0074-3

26.

Smart

S. M.

Berry

M. A.

Rodriguez

D. N.

(2014). Skilled observation and change blindness: A comparison of law enforcement and student samples. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 590–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3021

27.

Smith

T. J.

Lamont

Henderson

J. M

. (2012). The penny drops: Change blindness at fixation. Perception, 41(4), 489–492. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7092

28.

Schneider

Shiffrin

R. M.

(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1

29.

State of California v. Justin Wall , Superior Court, County of San Joaquin, No. STK-CR-FE-2018-0008639. Defense Exhibit 1 – L3 BMPs 29.97 NTSC.

30.

State of California v. Justin Wall , Superior Court, County of San Joaquin, No. STK-CR-FE-2018-0008639. People’s Exhibit 1 – Unit 44 ICC Video.

31.

State of California v. Justin Wall , Superior Court, County of San Joaquin, No. STK-CR-FE-2018-0008639. Testimony of: Richard Francis (November 18, 2021). Taylor Knight (November 18, 2021). Michael Victorino (November 18, 2021). Dr. Susan Parson (November 30, 2021). Fernando Gomez (November 30, 2021). Maria Mazarigos (December 1, 2021). Christopher Sanford (December 1, 2021). Justin Wall (December 1, 2021). Jeffrey Martin (December 1 & 2, 2021).

32.

Taylor

P. L.

Sipe

Bartel

(2021). Lost in transition: The effects of transitioning between firearms and electronic control devices (ECDs) on perception-response times (RTs). The Police Journal, 96(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258x211044135

33.

Tobin

E. J.

Fackler

M. L.

(1997). Officer reaction-response times in firing a handgun. Wound Ballistic Review, 3(1), 6–9.

34.

Tobin

E. J.

Fackler

M. L.

(2001). Officer decision time in firing a handgun. Wound Ballistic Review, 5(2), 8–10.

35.

Vachon

Vallières

B. R.

Jones

D. M.

Tremblay

(2012). Nonexplicit change detection in complex dynamic settings. Human Factors, 54(6), 996–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812443066

36.

Vickers

J. N.

(2007). Perception, cognition, and decision training: The quiet eye in action. Human Kinetics.

37.

Wickens

C. D.

McCarley

J. S.

(2008). Applied Attention Theory. Taylor & Francis.

38.

Yao

Wood

Simons

D. J.

(2019). As if by magic: An abrupt change in motion direction induces change blindness. Psychological Science, 30(3), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618822969