The rise in remote work arrangements has accelerated interest in the design of employee workspaces across geographic locations. The rapid expansion of workspaces beyond organizational structures highlights the need for developing a person-centric perspective on work design that takes into account how workers perceive and craft their physical work environment and utilize new technologies, so that strategies for ensuring worker well-being and desired worker outcomes may be developed. The goal of this symposium is to introduce an interdisciplinary approach to this person-centric perspective that draws upon foundational concepts in psychology and architecture, and to delineate a future research agenda with practical implications for organizations and workers in the workplace of the future.
AllenT. D.JohnsonR. C.KiburzK. M.ShockleyK. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
2.
AllenT. D.MerloK.LawrenceR. C.SlutskyJ.GrayC. E. (2021). Boundary management and work-nonwork balance while working from home. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 70(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12300
3.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E.FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 25, 472–491. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3363315
4.
BafnaS. (2003). Space Syntax: A Brief Introduction to Its Logic and Analytical Techniques. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238863
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
BarkerR. G. (1968). Ecological psychology; concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford University Press.
8.
BardramJ. E.BossenC. (2005). Mobility work: The spatial dimension of collaboration at a hospital. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, 14(2), 131–160.
9.
BarreroJ.M.BloomN.DavisS. J. (2021) Why Working From Home Will Stick. University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2020-174, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3741644
10.
ChoudharyR.BafnaS.HeoY.HendrichA.ChowM. (2010). A predictive model for computing the influence of space layouts on nurses’ movement in hospital units. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 3(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401490903174280
DaltonR. C.HölscherC.TurnerA. (2012). Understanding Space: The Nascent Synthesis of Cognition and the Syntax of Spatial Morphologies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3901ge
13.
DouglasM. (1986). How institutions think (1st ed). Syracuse University Press.
14.
HazanO.ZilberT. B. (2019). How Do Institutions Take Root at the Individual Level? In HaackP.SiewekeJ.WesselL. (Eds.), Microfoundations of Institutions (Vol. 65A, pp. 153–176). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2019000065A016
15.
HillierB.PennA.HansonJ.GrajewskiT.XuJ. (1993). Natural movement: Or configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
16.
KreinerG. E. (2006). Consequences of Work-Home Segmentation or Integration: A Person-Environment Fit Perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.386
17.
ParkerS. K.MorgesonF.JohnsG. (2017). One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000106
PeponisJ.BafnaS.BajajR.BrombergJ.CongdonC.RashidM.WarmelsS.ZhangY.ZimringC. (2007). Designing Space to Support Knowledge Work. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 815–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297216
20.
PeponisJ.WinemanJ. (2002). Spatial Structure of Environment and Behavior. In BechtelR. B.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 271-291). J. Wiley & Sons.
21.
RachlinH. (1995). The Value of Temporal Patterns in Behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(6), 188–192.
ShaoY.FangY.WangM.ChangC.WangL. (2021). Making daily decisions to work from home or to work in the office: The impacts of daily work- and COVID-related stressors on next-day work location. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(6), 825-838. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000929
24.
SpenceC. (2020). Senses of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 5(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
25.
SteadmanP. (2014). Building Types and Built Forms. Matador.
26.
VoydanoffP. (2005). Consequences of boundary-spanning demands and resources for work- to-family conflict and perceived stress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 491–503.
27.
WickerA. W. (2002). Ecological Psychology: Historical Contexts, Current Conception, Prospective Directions. In BechtelR. B.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 114–126). J. Wiley & Sons.
