A Method of Characterizing Street Crossing Behavior for Pedestrian and Driver Perspectives

Abstract

Signalized traffic intersections are variable decision-making environments where safety is paramount. Safe decision outcomes require road users to consider the interaction of many environmental factors including their proximity to an intersection, the changing states of traffic lights, and whether they are walking or driving. Individuals often encounter traffic intersections as both drivers and pedestrians, so understanding how crossing decisions differ between perspectives can help support the development of targeted traffic policies for these road users. Our study leverages a simulated traffic intersection to evaluate an individual’s crossing decisions from both driver and pedestrian perspectives at various light change distances. Each participant views a series of pre-recorded videos of the traffic intersection from first-person driver and pedestrian perspectives. Presenting both perspectives to the same participant sample allows us to characterize the differences in their decision outcomes as they assume the role of driver and pedestrian.

Keywords

signalized intersection yellow light decision making street crossing pedestrians drivers road safety behavior traffic simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernhoft

I. M.

Carstensen

(2008). Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender. Transportation Research Part F-traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2007.08.004

Blais

A-R.

Weber

E. U.

. 2006. “A Domain-specific Risk-taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations.” Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33-47.

Dey

Martens

Eggen

Terken

(2019). Pedestrian road-crossing willingness as a function of vehicle automation, external appearance, and driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.027

Geruschat

D. R.

Hassan

S. E.

(2005). Driver Behavior in Yielding to Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at Roundabouts. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99(5), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x0509900504

Havard

Willis

(2012). Effects of installing a marked crosswalk on road crossing behaviour and perceptions of the environment. Transportation Research Part F-traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.12.007

Joshi

M. S.

Senior

Smith

G. P.

(2001). A diary study of the risk perceptions of road users. Health, Risk & Society, 3(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570120079877

Michigan Pedestrian Law Guide 2020

Pedestrian And Crosswalk Laws In All 50 States

Oxley

J. A.

Ihsen

Fildes

B. N.

Charlton

J. L.

Day

R. H.

(2005b). Crossing roads safely: An experimental study of age differences in gap selection by pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(5), 962–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.017

10.

Razmi Rad

Homem De Almeida Correia

Hagenzieker

. (2020). Pedestrians’ road crossing behaviour in front of automated vehicles: Results from a pedestrian simulation experiment using agent-based modelling. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 69, 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.014

11.

Sun

Zhuang

Zhao

Zhang

(2015). The estimation of vehicle speed and stopping distance by pedestrians crossing streets in a naturalistic traffic environment. Transportation Research Part F-traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 30, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.02.002

12.

Svensson

Å.

Hydén

. (2006). Estimating the severity of safety related behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(2), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.009

13.

U.S. Census Bureau. “Census Bureau Regions and Divisions with State FIPS Codes.” https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf