We discuss two case studies that illustrate the application of conspicuity measures to evaluate two near miss events. Conspicuity distance measurements in both cases suggest that the hazards were not noticed during the user’s normal activities. Near miss events can suggest the presence of hazardous situations. Near miss events also illustrate forensic analysis that may generalize to cases with more serious injuries.
ASTM Standard F1637-13, 2018, “Standard Pract ice for Safe Walking Surfaces,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, DOI: 10.1520/F1637-13, www.astm.org.
2.
BarrettR. S.MillsP. M.BeggR. K. (2010). A systematic review of the effect of ageing and falls history on minimum foot clearance characteristics during level walking. Gait & Posture, 32(4), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.010
3.
FoulshamT.WalkerE.KingstoneA. (2011). The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision research, 51(17), 1920-1931.
4.
FotiosS.ChealC. (2008). Obstacle detection: A pilot study investigating the effects of lamp type, illuminance and age. Lighting Research & Technology, 41(4), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153509102343
5.
HydeA. S.BakkenG. M.CohenH. H.AbeleJ. R.LaRueC. A. (2002). Falls and related injuries: slips, trips, missteps, and their consequences (2nd. ed.). Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges Pub. Co.
6.
JonesS.KirchsteigerC.BjerkeW. (1999). The importance of near miss reporting to further improve safety performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the process industries, 12(1), 59-67.
7.
MarshallP.HirmasA.SingerM. (2018). Heinrich's pyramid and occupational safety: a statistical validation methodology. Safety science, 101, 180-189.
8.
MostS. B.SimonsD. J.SchollB. J.JimenezR.CliffordE.ChabrisC. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological science, 12(1), 9-17.
9.
PoratheT.StrandL. (2011). Which sign is more visible? measuring the visibility of traffic signs through the conspicuity index method. European Transport Research Review, 3(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-011-0050-9
10.
WertheimA. H. (2010). Visual conspicuity: A new simple standard, its reliability, validity and applicability. Ergonomics, 53(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903483705
11.
WogalterM. (2020). Forensic human factors and ergonomics analysis of a trip and fall event in a parking lot. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 21:3, 347-368, DOI: 10.1080/1463922X.2019.1706124
