Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective: Siblings of youth with cancer face increased psychosocial risk. The psychosocial standards of care in pediatric oncology recommend siblings be involved in cancer treatment (i.e., visit patients during hospitalizations, receive developmentally appropriate information about cancer) to promote adjustment to cancer. However, siblings are frequently absent from treatment settings, and it is unclear how families determine siblings’ level of involvement in cancer treatment. This qualitative study aimed to characterize family decision-making regarding siblings’ involvement in cancer treatment. Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 16 families (n = 22 siblings; n = 16 parents) of youth with cancer, querying siblings’ involvement in cancer treatment, families’ decision-making processes, and siblings’ levels of satisfaction with involvement. Data were transcribed, cleaned, systematically coded, and analyzed with Applied Thematic Analysis. Results: Parents often decided on sibling involvement based on competing considerations: the best interests of the child with cancer, sibling routines, logistics, and systemic barriers (e.g., scarcity of hospital-based supports). Siblings want to be included in decision-making processes regarding their involvement, which they describe helps them feel included and important. Conclusions: Providers can take active roles in facilitating communication within the family about siblings’ needs and treatment involvement preferences. Potential avenues for improvement include hospital-based sibling supports and healthcare providers’ relationships with families.

Implications for Impact Statement

Siblings describe that inclusion in family decisions regarding siblings’ involvement in cancer treatment contributes to positive treatment experiences. Providers can actively facilitate family-wide communication by advocating for sibling psychosocial needs.

Keywords

childhood cancer psychosocial functioning siblings decision-making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderfer

M. A.

Long

K. A.

Lown

E. A.

Marsland

A. L.

Ostrowski

N. L.

Hock

J. M.

Ewing

L. J.

(2009). Psychosocial adjustment of siblings of children with cancer: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 19(8), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1638

Alderfer

M. A.

Stanley

Conroy

Long

K. A.

Fairclough

D. L.

Kazak

A. E.

Noll

R. B.

(2014). The social functioning of siblings of children with cancer: A multi-informant investigation. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu079

Ayoub

Udo

Årestedt

Kreicbergs

Lövgren

(2024). The family talk intervention in pediatric oncology: Potential effects reported by parents. Children, 11(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11010095

Borrescio-Higa

Valdés

(2022). The psychosocial burden of families with childhood blood cancer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010599

Brosnan

Davis

K. A.

Mazzenga

Oberoi

A. R.

Sharkey

C. M.

Buchbinder

Alderfer

M. A.

Long

K. A.

(2021). Psychosocial care providers’ perspectives: Barriers to implementing services for siblings of children with cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 69(2), Article e29418. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.29418

Davis

K. A.

Brosnan

Mazzenga

Buchbinder

Alderfer

M. A.

Sharkey

Long

K. A.

(2022). Inconsistent, uncoordinated, and reactive: The current state of sibling psychosocial care. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 70(2), Article e30103. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.30103

Franklin

Patterson

Allison

K. R.

Rosso-Buckton

Walczak

(2018). An invisible patient: Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on caring for adolescents and young adults who have a sibling with cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care, 27(6), Article e12970. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12970

Gerhardt

C. A.

Lehmann

Long

K. A.

Alderfer

M. A.

(2015). Supporting siblings as a standard of care in pediatric oncology. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 62(S5), S750–S804. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25821

Guest

Macqueen

K. M.

Namey

E. E.

(2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.

10.

Harris

P. A.

Taylor

Minor

B. L.

Elliott

Fernandez

O’Neal

McLeod

Delacqua

Kirby

Duda

S. N.

(2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95(1), Article 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208

11.

Harris

P. A.

Taylor

Thielke

Payne

Gonzalez

Conde

J. G.

(2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

12.

Hovén

Lindahl Norberg

Toft

Forinder

(2021). Siblings of children diagnosed with cancer: Being faced with a moral dilemma. Journal of Family Studies, 29(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2021.2021273

13.

Irwin

D. E.

Varni

J. W.

Yeatts

DeWalt

D. A.

(2009). Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: A patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-3

14.

Kelada

Jaaniste

Cuganesan

Chin

W. L.

Caellainn Tan

Ilin

Robertson

Drew

Wakefield

C. E.

(2024). Illness-related communication between siblings and parents of children with chronic illness and life-limiting conditions: A qualitative analysis. Palliative & Supportive Care, 22(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001056

15.

Lahteenmaki

P. M.

(2004). The siblings of childhood cancer patients need early support: A follow up study over the first year. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89(11), 1008–1013. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2002.012088

16.

Litzelman

Barker

Catrine

Puccetti

Possin

Witt

W. P.

(2012). Socioeconomic disparities in the quality of life in children with cancer or brain tumors: The mediating role of family factors. Psycho-Oncology, 22(5), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3113

17.

Liu

S. Y.

Amato

S. S.

Lahey

T. P.

Malhotra

A. K.

(2024). Association of COVID-19 visitor limitations and goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit. Journal of Surgical Research, 295, 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.020

18.

Long

K. A.

Lehmann

Gerhardt

C. A.

Carpenter

A. L.

Marsland

A. L.

Alderfer

M. A.

(2018). Psychosocial functioning and risk factors among siblings of children with cancer: An updated systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 27(6), 1467–1479. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4669

19.

Lövgren

Bylund-Grenklo

Jalmsell

Wallin

A. E.

Kreicbergs

(2016). Bereaved siblings’ advice to health care professionals working with children with cancer and their families. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 33(4), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454215616605

20.

Mooney-Doyle

Franklin

Q. M.

Burley

S. R.

Root

M. C.

Akard

T. F.

(2022). National survey of sibling support services in children’s hospitals. Progress in Palliative Care, 30(6), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2022.2094173

21.

Morse

J. M.

(1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239500500201

22.

Morse

J. M.

Barrett

Mayan

Olson

Spiers

(2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202

23.

Oberoi

A. R.

Cardona

N. D.

Davis

K. A.

Pariseau

E. M.

Berk

Muriel

A. C.

Long

K. A.

(2020). Parent decision-making about support for siblings of children with cancer: Sociodemographic influences. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 8(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpp0000324

24.

O’Brien

B. C.

Harris

I. B.

Beckman

T. J.

Reed

D. A.

Cook

D. A.

(2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388

25.

Pariseau

E. M.

Chevalier

Muriel

A. C.

Long

K. A.

(2019). Parental awareness of sibling adjustment: Perspectives of parents and siblings of children with cancer. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(6), 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000615

26.

Pariseau

E. M.

Hall

P. B.

Davis

K. A.

Alderfer

M. A.

Muriel

A. C.

Long

K. A.

(2025). Siblings’ cancer-related post-traumatic stress symptoms and involvement in pediatric cancer treatment. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology.

27.

Pelletier

Bona

(2015). Assessment of financial burden as a standard of care in pediatric oncology. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 62(S5), S619–S631. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25714

28.

QSR . (2018). NVivo qualitative data analysis software, Version 12. QSR International Pty Ltd.

29.

Roberts

S. O.

Bareket-Shavit

Dollins

F. A.

Goldie

P. D.

Mortenson

(2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709

30.

Sexton

T. L.

Stanton

(2016). Systems theories. In APA handbook of clinical psychology: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 213–239). American Psychological Association.

31.

Tasker

S. L.

Stonebridge

G. G. S.

(2016). Siblings, you matter: Exploring the needs of adolescent siblings of children and youth with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 31(6), 712–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2016.06.005

32.

Toft

Alfonsson

Hovén

Carlsson

(2019). Feeling excluded and not having anyone to talk to: Qualitative study of interpersonal relationships following a cancer diagnosis in a sibling. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 42(Special Issue 4), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2019.07.010

33.

Van Schoors

Sels

Goubert

Verhofstadt

L. L.

(2021). Siblings dealing with pediatric cancer: A family- and context-oriented approach. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 38(3), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454221992303

34.

Wakefield

C. E.

McLoone

J. K.

Fleming

C. A. K.

Peate

Thomas

E. J.

Sansom-Daly

Butow

Cohn

R. J.

(2011). Adolescent cancer and health-related decision-making: An Australian multi-perspective family analysis of appointment attendance and involvement in medical and lifestyle choices. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, 1(4), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2011.0030

35.

Wiener

Kupst

M. J.

Pelletier

Kazak

A. E.

Thompson

A. L.

(2020). Tools to guide the identification and implementation of care consistent with the psychosocial Standards of care. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 67(9), Article e28586. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.28586

36.

(2009). Cultural influences on the survivorship of families affected by childhood cancer: A case for using family systems theories. Families, Systems & Health, 27(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017150

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB

Sibling Involvement in Childhood Cancer Treatment: Exploring Family Decision-Making Processes

Abstract

Implications for Impact Statement

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material