Translating Structured Expert Judgment into Order-of-Magnitude Cost Estimates: A Framework for Early-Stage Space Mission Feasibility Assessment

Abstract

Cost-feasibility assessment remains a persistent challenge in the New Space economy, where early-stage missions must be evaluated under profound technological, operational, and financial uncertainty and where reliable historical cost data are often unavailable. Conventional parametric and regression-based cost models offer limited support in these settings, as critical architectural decisions are taken before technologies, interfaces, and operational concepts have stabilized. This study proposes a hybrid, expert-based framework for structuring early-stage cost-feasibility reasoning in frontier space missions by integrating systematic literature review, structured expert elicitation, and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. The framework is demonstrated through a case study of lunar oxygen production via regolith sublimation. Implemented across three phases, the approach identifies and refines mission-relevant cost drivers through Delphi-based expert judgment and synthesizes these assessments into a coherent quantitative structure. The resulting model explains approximately 57% of the variance in expert cost assessments, indicating stable and interpretable patterns in expert judgment under conditions of high uncertainty. Within this structure, technological readiness and operational efficiency emerge as the most influential dimensions shaping perceptions of overall project magnitude. Rather than aiming to predict realized mission costs, the framework is designed to support relative comparison, early-stage architectural decision-making, and the disciplined organization of uncertainty. Anchored to an equipment-cost proxy and expert-derived driver weights, the framework produces an illustrative, order-of-magnitude project-scale estimate of approximately USD 30.7 billion for the reference mission configuration, consistent with expectations for large-scale space-resource initiatives. The principal contribution of the study lies in providing a transparent process for translating dispersed expert knowledge into structured cost-feasibility reasoning, with implications for early mission planning, derisking strategies, and stakeholder alignment in high-uncertainty space ventures.

Keywords

cost-feasibility expert judgment frontier space missions technological readiness uncertainty management New Space economy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Deudney

. Dark skies: space expansionism, planetary geopolitics and the ends of humanity. Oxford University Press; 2020.

2. Bordacchini

. Space policies, Issues and Trends in 2017–2018. European Space Policy Institute; 2018; Report 65.

3. Prince

. Why NASA’s management doesn’t believe the cost estimates. Eng Manag J 2002.

4. Bloomfield

, Ahern

. Long-term infrastructure partnerships: Contracting risks and risk-reduction strategies. State Local Government Rev 2011;43(1):49–59; doi: 10.1177/0160323X11400435

5. Flyvbjerg

. Policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects: Problems, causes, cures. Environ Plann B Plann Des 2007;34(4):578–597; doi: 10.1068/b32111

6. Makovsek

. Private sector participation in infrastructure: Can the price of risk transfer be efficient? Int Transport Forum Discuss Paper 2016; doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1214.8083

7. Keller

, Collopy

, Componation

. What is wrong with space system cost models? A survey and assessment of cost estimating approaches. Acta Astronaut 2014;93:345–351.

8. Smart

. Process based cost modeling. In: International Society of Parametric Analysts. Science Application International Corporation (SAIC); 2006.

9. Drury

. Management and cost accounting, 10th ed. Annabel Ainscow: Andover, Hampshire; 2018.

10.

10. Roy

. Cost engineering: why, what and how? Decision Engineering Report Series. Cranfield University; 2003.

11.

11. Hamaker

. Do more details imply better accuracy in cost estimates? Parametric World 2010;13:22.

12.

12. Wertz

. Reducing space mission cost. Microcosm Press: El Segundo; 1996.

13.

13. Collopy

. The challenge of modeling cost – steps toward a solution. In: 1st International Conference on Innovation and Integration in Aerospace Sciences. Queen’s University Belfast. CEIAT: Northern Ireland, UK; 2005.

14.

14. Peeters

, Madauss

. A proposed strategy against cost overruns in the space sector: The 5C approach. Space Policy 2008;24(2):80–89.

15.

15. Peterson

. Rapid cost assessment of space mission concepts through application of complexity indices. Jet Propulsion Laboratory; 2005.

16.

16. Vergaaij

, McInnes

, Ceriotti

. Economic assessment of high-thrust and solar-sail propulsion for near-earth asteroid mining. Space Research 2021;67(9):3045–3058.

17.

17. Sonter

. The technical and economic feasibility of mining the near-earth asteroids. Acta Astronaut 1997;41(4–10):637–647.

18.

18. Rush

, Roy

. Expert judgement in cost estimating: Modelling the reasoning process. Concurrent Eng 2001;9(4):271–284.

19.

19. Rosenbloom

. Technological discontinuities, organizational capabilities, and strategic commitments. Industrial Corporate Change. Oxford Academic 1994;3(3):655–685.

20.

20. Probst

, Nitzl

, Kraus

, Förstner

. Cost estimation of an asteroid mining mission using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Acta Astronaut 2020;167:440–454.

21.

21. Dai

. Product cost estimation: Technique classification and methodology review. J Manuf Sci Eng 2006;128:563–573.

22.

22. Trivailo

, Sippel

, Şekercioğlu

. Review of hardware cost estimation methods, models and tools applied to early phases of space mission planning. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 2012;53:1–17.

23.

23. Saaty

. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource. McGraw-Hill: New York; 1980.

24.

24. Christensen

. The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business School Press; Boston; 1997.

25.

25. Crawford

. The long-term scientific benefits of a space economy. Space Policy 2016;37:58–61.

26.

26. Lewis

. Mining the sky: untold riches from the asteroids, comets and planets. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA; 1996.

27.

27. Diederen

. Global resource depletion: metal minerals scarcity and the elements of hope. Peak Summit: Alcatraz, Italy; 2009.

28.

28. Greene

, Caracelli

, Graham

. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal 1989;11(3):255–274.

29.

29. Pelech

, Roesler

, Saydam

. Technical evaluation of off-Earth ice mining scenarios through an opportunity cost approach. Acta Astronaut 2019;162:388–404.

30.

30. Berger

. NASA’s full Artemis plan revealed: 37 launches and a lunar outpost. Ars Technica; 2019.

31.

31.ASIME. Abstract book. In: Asteroid Science Intersections with In-Space Mine Engineering; Outcome from the ASIME 2018: Asteroid Intersections with Mine Engineering. ASIME: Luxembourg; 2018.

32.

32. McLeod

, Krekeler

. Sources of extraterrestrial rare Earth elements: To the moon and beyond. Resources 2017;6(3):40.

33.

33. Sowers

. Commercial lunar propellant architecture: A collaborative study of lunar propellant production. REACH 2018;13:100026.

34.

34. Lefeber

. Relaunching the Moon Agreement. AILA 2016;41(1):41–48.

35.

35. Hill

. Lunar simulants as feedstocks for ISRU processing: Mineralogy and chemistry. In: Earth & Space 2006: Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments. 2006; pp. 1–8.

36.

36. Mueller

. A review of lunar regolith excavation robotic device prototypes. In: Proceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition. AIAA; 2011; p. 7234.

37.

37. Agui

. Granular flow and dynamics of lunar simulants in excavating implements. In: Earth Space: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments. 2010; pp. 84–94.

38.

38. Skonieczny

. Considering the effects of gravity when developing and field testing planetary excavator robots. In: Field and Service Robotics: Results of the 10th International Conference. ( Wettergreen

, Barefoot

., eds.) Springer; 2016, pp. 299–594.

39.

39. Just

. Parametric review of existing regolith excavation techniques for lunar in-situ resource utilisation and recommendations for future excavation experiments. Planet Space Science 2020;180

40.

40. Gustafson

, White

, Fidler

. Oxygen production via carbothermal reduction of lunar regolith. SAE Int J Aerosp 2009;04(1):311–316.

41.

41. Schwandt

, Hamilton

, Fray

, Crawford

. The production of oxygen and metal from lunar regolith. Planet Space Science 2012;74(1):49–56.

42.

42. Jones

. Should oxygen, hydrogen, and water on the Moon be provided by Earth supply, life support recycling, or regolith mining? In: 50th International Conference on Environmental Systems. NASA Ames Research Center: Moffett Field, CA; 2021.

43.

43. Park

, Liu

, Kihm

, Taylor

. Characterization of lunar dust for toxicological studies. I: Particle size distribution. J Aerosp Eng 2008;21(4):266–271.

44.

44. Schreiner

, Dominguez

, Sibille

, Hoffman

. Thermophysical property models for lunar regolith. Advances in Space Research 2016;57(5):1209–1222.

45.

45. Anand

, Crawford

, Balat-Pichelin

, et al. A brief review of chemical and mineralogical resources on the Moon and likely initial in situ resource utilization (ISRU) applications. Planet Space Sci 2012;74(1):42–48.

46.

46. Cilliers

. Estimating the scale of space resource utilisation (SRU) operations to satisfy lunar oxygen demand. Planet Space Sci 2020;180.

47.

47. Shishko

. Business case analysis of lunar thermal mining. In: NASA Cost and Schedule Symposium – Johnson Space Center. California Institute of Technology; 2019.

48.

48. Colvin

, Crane

, Lal

. Assessing the economics of asteroid-derived water for propellant. Acta Astronaut 2020;176:298–305.

49.

49. Ehresmann

. Lunar based massdriver application. Acta Astronaut 2017;134:189–196.

50.

50. Nicholas

. Selection procedure. In: Mining engineering handbook. ( Nicholas

., ed.) Hartman H SME: New York; 1993; pp. 2090–2105.

51.

51. Miller-Tait

. UBC mining method selection. In: Mine Planning and Equipment Selection Symposium. MPES; 1995; pp. 163–168.

52.

52. Sarsfield

. The cosmos on a shoestring: small spacecraft for space and Earth science. RAND Critical Technologies Institute; 1998.

53.

53. Pelech

, Sibille

, Dempster

, Saydam

. A framework for off-Earth mining method selection. Acta Astronaut 2021;181:552–568.

54.

54. Oxnevad

. An investment analysis model for space mining ventures. In: International Astronautical Federation Conference. AACR; 1991.

55.

55. Andrews

, Bonner

, Butterworth

, et al. Defining a successful commercial asteroid mining program. Acta Astronaut 2015;108:106–118.

56.

56. Hein

, Matheson

, Fries

. A techno-economic analysis of asteroid mining. Acta Astronaut 2020;168:104–115.

57.

57. Sommariva

. Space resource utilisation by solely private markets. Acta Astronaut 2020;170:712–718.

58.

58. Metzger

. Economic modeling of the competitiveness of lunar water over Earth-launched water, including Wright’s law, optimization of reliability, and economies of scale. University of Central Florida; 2022.

59.

59. Dinner

. NASA squeezed oxygen from mock moon dust. It could help astronauts breathe easy one day. Space.com; 2023.

60.

60. Adler

. Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London; 1996.

61.

61. Dalkey

, Helmer

. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci 1963;9(3):458–467.

62.

62. Aitchison

. The lognormal distribution. University of Cambridge Press: Cambridge; 1957.

63.

63. Garson

. Partial least squares: regression & structural equation models. Statistical Associates Blue Book Series: Asheboro, NC; 2016.

64.

64. Hartman

, Baldwin

. Using technology to improve Delphi method. J Comput Civ Eng 1995;9(4):244–249.

65.

65. Brockhoff

. The performance of forecasting groups in computer dialogue and face-to-face discussions. In: The Delphi method: techniques and applications. ( Linstone

, Turoff

., eds.) Addison-Wesley: London; 1975.

66.

66. Rohrbaugh

. Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the Delphi technique. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1979;24(1):73–92.

67.

67. Likert

. Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol J 1932;140:1–55.

68.

68. Taherdoost

. What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design; review of different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/Likert scale. Int J Acad Res Manag 2019;8(1):1–10.

69.

69. Cronbach

. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16(3):297–334.

70.

70. Barua

. Methods for decision-making in survey questionnaires based on Likert scale. J Asian Sci Res 2013;3(1):35–38.

71.

71. Nitzl

. The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting LIterature 2016;37(1):19–35.

72.

72. Dash

, Paul

. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2021;173:121092.

73.

73. Becker

J-M

, Ringle

, Sarstedt

. Estimating moderating effects in PLS-SEM and PLSc-SEM: Interaction term generation × data treatment. JASEM 2018;2(2):1–21.

74.

74. Hair

. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA; 2017.

75.

75. Fornell

, Larcker

. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res 1981;18(1):39–50.

76.

76. Hair

, Risher

, Sarstedt

, Ringle

. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. EBR 2019;31(1):2–24.

77.

77. Sarstedt

, Hair

Jr , Cheah

J-H

, et al. How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing J 2019;27(3):197–211.

78.

78. Moores

, Chang

JCJ

. Ethical decision making in software piracy: Initial development and test of a four-component model. MIS Quarterly 2006;30(1):167–180.

79.

79. Cohen

. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ; 1988.

80.

80. Chin

. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research 1998;295(2):295–336.

81.

81. Barnston

. Correspondence among the correlation, RMSE, and Heidke verification measures; refinement of the Heidke score. Wea Forecasting 1992;7(4):699–709.

82.

82. Liengaard

, Sharma

, Hult

GTM

, et al. Prediction: Coveted, yet forsaken? Introducing a cross-validated predictive ability test in partial least squares path modeling. Decision Sciences 2021;52(2):362–392.

83.

83. Sanders

, Klein

. Systems engineering framework for integrated product and industrial design including trade study optimization. Procedia Comput Sci 2012;8:413–419.

84.

84. Govreau

. 2025 global mining project spending outlook. Eng Mining J 2025;226(Fasc. 1):30–33.

85.

85. Fofana

, Sanchez

. Mining boom and economic growth: A case study of the Simandou project in Guinea using a new CGE model. In: Global Trade Analysis Project. Presented during the 28th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis. Kigali, Rwanda; 2025.

86.

86.NASA. Project Pre-Phase A: Concept Studies. 2023. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/reference/3-3-project-pre-phase-a-concept-studies/

87.

87. Shokri

, Haas

, G. Haas

, Lee

. Interface-management process for managing risks in complex capital projects. J Constr Eng Manage 2016;142(2).

88.

88. Ho

, Chen

, Kim

. Value of Bootstrapping Staged Deployment of Infrastructure: Case Study in Space Infrastructure Deployment. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. 2017.

89.

89.CFBL Consulting. Change and Cost Management on Infrastructure Projects. 2024. Available from: https://www.cfbusinesslinks.com/change-and-cost-management-on-infrastructure-projects/

90.

90. Bissing

. An analysis of effects of technology readiness on cost growth. Air University, Air Force Institute of Technology, Department of the Air Force: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH; 2021.

91.

91.NASA. NASA’s Management of The Artemis Mission. NASA Office of Inspector General. Report No. IG-22-003. 2021.

92.

92. Sharma

. A comparison of PLS and ML bootstrapping techniques in SEM: a Monte Carlo study. In: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics (PROMS), vol. 56. Springer; 2013.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.84 MB