Technology Readiness Level as the Foundation of Human Readiness Level

Abstract

Communication of the maturity of technology through the program/product life cycles helps enhance risk management from the beginning and support decision-making strategies for research, development, and allocation of resources. Currently, many organizations use the technology readiness level (TRL) as a simple metric to indicate the maturity of the technology. This article will discuss the TRL history, define the TRL levels, show how the TRL relates to the technology life cycle, and how the TRL framework contributes to the human readiness level (HRL) structure. Through the TRL advantages and disadvantages, this article will show how the TRL falls short in numerous areas of engineering, including the integration readiness of system/subsystem components and assessment of the readiness of the technology to operate within the human capabilities and limitations. Yet the article also shows how the TRL serves as the foundation for HRL.

Keywords

technology readiness level human readiness level human systems integration technology maturity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarenga

M. A. B.

Frutuoso

Melo

P. F.

Fonseca

R. A.

(2014). A critical review of methods and models for evaluating organizational factors in human reliability analysis. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 75, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.04.004

Carter

(2017). The 9 technology readiness levels of the DoD. https://techlinkcenter.org/news/technology-readiness-level-dod

CISOMAG. (2020). What is the “cyberchology of human error” in cybersecurity? https://cisomag.eccouncil.org/human-error-in-cybersecurity/

Department of Defense. (2002). Mandatory procedures for Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPS) and Major Automated Information System (MAIS) acquisition programs (DoD 500.2-R). Appendix 6: Technology readiness levels and their definitions. https://www.acqnotes.com/Attachments/DoD%20Directive%205000-2-R-new.pdf

Dunbar

(2017). National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Technology readiness level. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/engineering/technology/txt_accordion1.html

Garcia

Ganey

Wilbert

(2017). Human readiness assessment: A multivariate approach. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601495

Guastello

S. J.

(2014). Human factors engineering and ergonomics: A systems approach. In Chapter 2: Elements of human factors analysis (pp. 16–17). Taylor & Francis.

Karthick

Robert

T. P.

Kumar

C. S.

(2020). HFACS-based FAHP implementation to identify critical factors influencing human error occurrence in nuclear plant control room. Soft Computing, 24, 16577–16591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04961-1

Malone

T. B.

Kirkpatrick

Johnson

J. H.

(1979). Human factors evaluation of control room design and operator performance at Three Mike Island-2. https://tmi2kml.inl.gov/Documents/2c-L2-NUREG/NUREGCR-1270,%20Vol.%201,%20Human%20Factors%20Evaluation%20of%20Control%20Room%20Design%20and%20Operator%20Performance%20at%20TMI-2%20(1980-01).pdf

10.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2015). Human Systems Integration (HSI) practitioner’s guide (Report No. NASA/SP–2015-3709).

11.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2017). NASA Systems Engineering handbook (SP-2016-6105), Rev 2. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search?q=SP-2016-6105,%20Rev%202

12.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2020). 7123.1c NASA Systems Engineering processes and requirements. https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/npg_img/N_PR_7123_001C_/N_PR_7123_001C_.pdf

13.

O’Driscoll

(2020). The role of human error in cybersecurity: what the stats tell us. Comparitech. https://www.comparitech.com/blog/information-security/human-error-cybersecurity-stats/

14.

Olechowski

Eppinger

S. D.

Joglekar

(2015). Technology readiness levels at 40: A study of state-of-the-art use, challenges and opportunities. 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), pp. 2084–2094. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2015.7273196

15.

Phillips

E. L.

(2010). The development and initial evaluation of the human readiness level framework [Doctoral dissertation, Naval Postgraduate School].

16.

Sadin

S. R.

Frederick

P. P.

Rosen

(1989). The NASA technology push towards future space mission systems. Acta Astronautics, 20, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(89)90054-4

17.

See

J. E.

Craft

Morris

J. D.

(2019). Human readiness levels in the systems engineering process at Sandia National Laboratories (Report No: SAND2019-3123). https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1761924

18.

See

J. E.

Handley , (2019). History and current status of human readiness levels. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1645947