Previous research suggests that depression is related to difficulties with revising established negative expectations. However, it is not yet clear how precisely these difficulties transpire. We addressed this question by adapting a well-established experimental paradigm into a trial-by-trial learning task in a nonclinical sample (N = 391; 50.6% with elevated depressive symptoms). Negative versus positive performance expectations were initially established before they were confirmed versus disconfirmed. Multilevel analysis revealed that participants formed and subsequently revised performance expectations along decelerating trajectories. Increased levels of depressive symptoms were significantly associated with a reduced revision of initially established negative expectations when the feedback’s valence turned positive such that participants’ expectations were disconfirmed. Conversely, depressive symptoms were not significantly related to an increased revision of positive expectations in response to disconfirming negative feedback. Our results align with the view that lower responsiveness to positive expectation-disconfirming information is a critical feature of depressive symptoms.
ArendM. G.SchäferT. (2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195
2.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
3.
BeckA. T.AlfordB. A. (2009). Depression: Causes and treatment (2nd ed.). University of Pennsylvania Press.
4.
BeckA. T.BredemeierK. (2016). A unified model of depression: Integrating clinical, cognitive, biological, and evolutionary perspectives. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(4), 596–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616628523
BeckA. T.RushA.ShawB.EmeryG. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. The Guilford Press.
7.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed.). Psychological Corporation.
8.
BlickleG.MommT.LiuY.WitzkiA.SteinmayrR. (2011). Construct validation of the Test of Emotional Intelligence (TEMINT). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000075
9.
CraskeM. G.TreanorM.ConwayC. C.ZbozinekT.VervlietB. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006
10.
CraskeM. G.TreanorM.ZbozinekT. D.VervlietB. (2022). Optimizing exposure therapy with an inhibitory retrieval approach and the OptEx Nexus. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 152, Article 104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2022.104069
11.
CuijpersP.MiguelC.HarrerM.PlessenC. Y.CiharovaM.EbertD.KaryotakiE. (2023). Cognitive behavior therapy vs. control conditions, other psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and combined treatment for depression: A comprehensive meta-analysis including 409 trials with 52,702 patients. World Psychiatry, 22(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21069
12.
CulverN. C.StoyanovaM.CraskeM. G. (2011). Clinical relevance of retrieval cues for attenuating context renewal of fear. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(2), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.10.002
de MartinoB.Bobadilla-SuarezS.NouguchiT.SharotT.LoveB. C. (2017). Social information is integrated into value and confidence judgments according to its reliability. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(25), 6066–6074. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3880-16.2017
15.
DisnerS. G.BeeversC. G.HaighE. A.BeckA. T. (2011). Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(8), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3027
16.
EveraertJ.BronsteinM. V.CannonT. D.JoormannJ. (2018). Looking through tinted glasses: Depression and social anxiety are related to both interpretation biases and inflexible negative interpretations. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(4), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617747968
17.
EveraertJ.BronsteinM. V.CastroA. A.CannonT. D.JoormannJ. (2020). When negative interpretations persist, positive emotions don’t! Inflexible negative interpretations encourage depression and social anxiety by dampening positive emotions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 124, Article 103510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103510
18.
EveraertJ.PodinaI. R.KosterE. H. (2017). A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.005
19.
FeldmannM.KubeT.RiefW.BrakemeierE. L. (2023). Testing Bayesian models of belief updating in the context of depressive symptomatology. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 32(2), Article 1946. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1946
20.
GarrettN.SharotT.FaulknerP.KornC. W.RoiserJ. P.DolanR. J. (2014). Losing the rose tinted glasses: Neural substrates of unbiased belief updating in depression. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00639
21.
GrothR. M.RiefW. (2022a). Response to unexpected social inclusion: A study using the cyberball paradigm. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 911950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.911950
22.
GrothR. M.RiefW. (2022b). You were better than expected: An experimental study to examine expectation change in a non-clinical sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 862946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862946
23.
HobbsC.VozarovaP.SabharwalA.ShahP.ButtonK. (2022). Is depression associated with reduced optimistic belief updating?Royal Society Open Science, 9, Article 190814. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190814
HoffmannJ. A.HobbsC.MoutoussisM.ButtonK. S. (2024). Lack of optimistic bias during social evaluation learning reflects reduced positive self-beliefs in depression and social anxiety, but via distinct mechanisms. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Article 22471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72749-6
26.
HorwitzA. G.BeronaJ.CzyzE. K.YeguezC. E.KingC. A. (2017). Positive and negative expectations of hopelessness as longitudinal predictors of depression, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior in high-risk adolescents. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 47(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12273
JepmaM.KobanL.van DoornJ.JonesM.WagerT. D. (2018). Behavioural and neural evidence for self-reinforcing expectancy effects on pain. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(11), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0455-8
29.
JepmaM.SchaafJ. V.VisserI.HuizengaH. M. (2020). Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(9), Article 1008276. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008276
30.
JinJ.JonasK.MohantyA. (2023). Linking the past to the future by predictive processing: Implications for psychopathology. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 132(3), 249–262. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/abn0000730
31.
KanaiR.KomuraY.ShippS.FristonK. (2015). Cerebral hierarchies: Predictive processing, precision and the pulvinar. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668), Article 20140169. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0169
32.
KirchnerL.EckertA. L.BergM.EndresD.StraubeB.RiefW. (2024). An active inference approach to interpersonal differences in depression. New Ideas in Psychology, 74, Article 101092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101092
33.
KirchnerL.KubeT.BergM.EckertA.-L.StraubeB.EndresD.RiefW. (2024). Social expectations in depression. Nature Reviews Psychology, 4, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00386-x
34.
KirchnerL.KubeT.D‘AstolfoL.StrahlerJ.HerbstreitR.RiefW. (2023). How to modify expectations of social rejection? An experimental study using a false-feedback paradigm. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 81, Article 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101859
35.
KirchnerL.SchummerS. E.KrugH.KubeT.RiefW. (2022). How social rejection expectations and depressive symptoms bi-directionally predict each other: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 95(2), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12383
36.
KirschI.KongJ.SadlerP.SpaethR.CookA.KaptchukT. J.GollubR. (2014). Expectancy and conditioning in placebo analgesia: Separate or connected processes?Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000007
37.
KornC. W.SharotT.WalterH.HeekerenH. R.DolanR. J. (2014). Depression is related to an absence of optimistically biased belief updating about future life events. Psychological Medicine, 44(3), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001074
38.
KrachS.Muöller-PinzlerL.CzekallaN.SchröderA.Wilhelm-GrochI.LuebberF.RademacherL.StolzD. S.PaulusF. M.MayerA. V. (2024). Examining self-belief formation through artificial beliefs. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2y5tv
KubeT.GlombiewskiJ. A. (2021). How depressive symptoms hinder positive information processing: An experimental study on the interplay of cognitive immunisation and negative mood in the context of expectation adjustment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 45, 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10191-4
41.
KubeT.GlombiewskiJ. A. (2022). No evidence for the involvement of cognitive immunisation in updating beliefs about the self in three non-clinical samples. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 46, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10256-y
42.
KubeT.GlombiewskiJ. A.GallJ.TouissantL.GärtnerT.RiefW. (2019). How to modify persisting negative expectations in major depression? An experimental study comparing three strategies to inhibit cognitive immunization against novel positive experiences. Journal of Affective Disorders, 250, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.027
43.
KubeT.GlombiewskiJ. A.RiefW. (2018). Situational expectations mediate the effect of global beliefs on depressive symptoms: A 1-year prospective study using a student sample. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 31(5), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000443
44.
KubeT.KirchnerL.GärtnerT.GlombiewskiJ. A. (2023). How negative mood hinders belief updating in depression: Results from two experimental studies. Psychological Medicine, 53(4), 1288–1301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721002798
45.
KubeT.KirchnerL.LemmerG.GlombiewskiJ. A. (2022). How the discrepancy between prior expectations and new information influences expectation updating in depression: The greater, the better?Clinical Psychological Science, 10(3), 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026211024644
46.
KubeT.KirchnerL.RiefW.GärtnerT.GlombiewskiJ. A. (2019). Belief updating in depression is not related to increased sensitivity to unexpectedly negative information. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 123, Article 103509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103509
47.
KubeT.RiefW.GollwitzerM.GärtnerT.GlombiewskiJ. A. (2019). Why dysfunctional expectations in depression persist: Results from two experimental studies investigating cognitive immunization. Psychological Medicine, 49(9), 1532–1544. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718002106
48.
KubeT.RiefW.GollwitzerM.GlombiewskiJ. A. (2018). Introducing an experimental paradigm to investigate expectation change (EXPEC). Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 59, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.12.002
49.
KubeT.SchwartingR.RozenkrantzL.GlombiewskiJ. A.RiefW. (2020). Distorted cognitive processes in major depression: A predictive processing perspective. Biological Psychiatry, 87(5), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.07.017
50.
KubeT.SiebersV. H. A.HerzogP.GlombiewskiJ. A.DoeringB. K.RiefW. (2018). Integrating situation-specific dysfunctional expectations and dispositional optimism into the cognitive model of depression: A path-analytic approach. Journal of Affective Disorders, 229, 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.082
51.
KühnerC.BürgerC.KellerF.HautzingerM. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Der Nervenarzt, 78(6), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-006-2098-7
52.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
53.
LeBeauB.SongY. A.LiuW. C. (2018). Model misspecification and assumption violations with the linear mixed model: A meta-analysis. Sage Open, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018820380
LiknaitzkyP.SmillieL. D.AllenN. B. (2017). Out-of-the-blue: Depressive symptoms are associated with deficits in processing inferential expectancy-violations using a novel cognitive rigidity task. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41, 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-017-9853-x
57.
MarenS.PhanK. L.LiberzonI. (2013). The contextual brain: Implications for fear conditioning, extinction and psychopathology. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(6), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3492
Müller-PinzlerL.CzekallaN.MayerA. V.StolzD. S.GazzolaV.KeysersC.PaulusF. M.KrachS. (2019). Negativity-bias in forming beliefs about own abilities. Scientific Reports, 9(1), Article 14416. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50821-w
62.
PanitzC.EndresD.BuchholzM.KhosrowtajZ.SperlM. F.MuellerE. M.SchuböA.SchützA. C.Teige-MocigembaS.PinquartM. (2021). A revised framework for the investigation of expectation update versus maintenance in the context of expectation violations: The ViolEx 2.0 model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 726432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726432
63.
ParsonsS.McCormickE. M. (2024). Limitations of two time point data for understanding individual differences in longitudinal modeling: What can difference reveal about change?Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 66, Article 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101353
64.
Posit Team. (2023). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Posit Software, PBC. http://www.posit.co/
65.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
66.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
67.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II. Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
68.
RiefW.GlombiewskiJ. A.GollwitzerM.SchuböA.SchwartingR.ThorwartA. (2015). Expectancies as core features of mental disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28(5), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000184
69.
RiefW.JoormannJ. (2019). Revisiting the cognitive model of depression: The role of expectations. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 1(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.v1i1.32605
70.
RiefW.SperlM. F.Braun-KochK.KhosrowtajZ.KirchnerL.SchäferL.SchwartingR. K. W.Teige-MocigembaS.PanitzC. (2022). Using expectation violation models to improve the outcome of psychological treatments. Clinical Psychology Review, 98, Article 102212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102212
71.
RoeseN. J.ShermanJ. W. (2007). Expectancy. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 91–115). The Guilford Press.
72.
RozenkrantzL.LaskorunskiyA.Zilcha-ManoS.DattnerI. (2023). Expectation-updating: Understanding the dynamics of expectancy in psychotherapy for depression. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/am749
73.
Schmidt-AtzertL.BühnerM. (2002, September 22–26). Development of a performance measure of emotional intelligence [Paper presentation]. 43rd Congress of the German Psychological Society, Berlin, Germany.
74.
SchröderA.CzekallaN.MayerA. V.ZhangL.StolzD. S.KornC. W.DiekelmannS.PaulusF. M.Muöller-PinzlerL.KrachS. (2024). Computational modeling shows confirmation bias during formation and revision of self-beliefs. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.30.610443
75.
SchwarzK. A.PfisterR.BüchelC. (2016). Rethinking explicit expectations: Connecting placebos, social cognition, and contextual perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.001
76.
SmithR.AlkozeiA.KillgoreW. D.LaneR. D. (2018). Nested positive feedback loops in the maintenance of major depression: An integration and extension of previous models. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 67, 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2017.09.011
77.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
78.
WürtzF.KubeT.WoudM. L.MargrafJ.BlackwellS. E. (2024). Reduced belief updating in the context of depressive symptoms: An investigation of the associations with interpretation biases and self-evaluation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 48, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10454-w
79.
ZhangL.LengersdorffL.MikusN.GläscherJ.LammC. (2020). Using reinforcement learning models in social neuroscience: Frameworks, pitfalls and suggestions of best practices. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(6), 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa089
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
