Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-11
Examining Blunted Initial Response to Reward and Recent Suicidal Ideation in Children and Adolescents Using Event-Related Potentials: Failure to Conceptually Replicate Across Two Independent Samples
A previous study found that children with recent suicidal ideation had blunted neural reward processing (as measured by the reward positivity), compared with matched controls, and that this difference was driven by reduced neural responses to monetary loss rather than to reward. Here, we aimed to conceptually replicate and extend these findings in two samples (n = 264, 27 with suicidal ideation; n = 314, 49 with suicidal ideation at baseline) of children and adolescents (11–15 years old and 8–15 years old, respectively). Results from both samples showed no evidence that children and adolescents with suicidal ideation have abnormal reward or loss processing nor that reward processing predicts suicidal ideation 2 years later. The results highlight the need for greater statistical power as well as continued research examining the neural underpinnings of suicidal thoughts and behaviors.
AlbaneseB. J.HajcakG. (2021). Reward processing abnormalities and promising new directions for understanding suicide vulnerability. Biological psychiatry: Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 6(1), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.11.002
2.
AuerbachR. P.PagliaccioD.AllisonG. O.AlquezaK. L.AlonsoM. F. (2021). Neural correlates associated with suicide and nonsuicidal self-injury in youth. Biological Psychiatry, 89(2), 119−133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.06.002
3.
BerridgeK. C. (2012). From prediction error to incentive salience: Mesolimbic computation of reward motivation: From prediction error to incentive salience. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35(7), 1124−1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.07990.x
4.
BerridgeK. C.RobinsonT. E. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?Brain Research Reviews, 28(3), 309−369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00019-8
BressJ. N.HajcakG. (2013). Self-report and behavioral measures of reward sensitivity predict the feedback negativity: Feedback negativity, self-report, and behavior. Psychophysiology, 50(7), 610−616. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12053
8.
BressJ. N.SmithE.FotiD.KleinD. N.HajcakG. (2012). Neural response to reward and depressive symptoms in late childhood to early adolescence. Biological Psychology, 89(1), 156−162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.004
9.
BuraniK.MulliganE. M.KlawohnJ.LukingK. R.NelsonB. D.HajcakG. (2019). Longitudinal increases in reward-related neural activity in early adolescence: Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs). Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 36, Article 100620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100620
10.
ButtonK. S.IoannidisJ. P. A.MokryszC.NosekB. A.FlintJ.RobinsonE. S. J.MunafòM. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365−376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475
11.
CarlsonJ. M.FotiD.Mujica-ParodiL. R.Harmon-JonesE.HajcakG. (2011). Ventral striatal and medial prefrontal BOLD activation is correlated with reward-related electrocortical activity: A combined ERP and fMRI study. NeuroImage, 57(4), 1608−1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.037
12.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). WISQARS: Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System [Database]. www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars
13.
ChuC.KleinK. M.Buchman-SchmittJ. M.HomM. A.HaganC. R.JoinerT. E. (2015). Routinized assessment of suicide risk in clinical practice: An empirically informed update. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(12), 1186−1200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22210
14.
ClaysonP. E.CarbineK. A.BaldwinS. A.LarsonM. J. (2019). Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability. Psychophysiology, 56(11), Article e13437. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13437
DemingC. A.HarrisJ. A.Castro-RamirezF.GlennJ. J.ChaC. B.MillnerA. J.NockM. K. (2021). Inconsistencies in self-reports of suicidal ideation and attempts across assessment methods. Psychological Assessment, 33(3), 218−229. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000976
17.
DiamondA.SekhonJ. S. (2013). Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: A general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 932−945.
18.
DienJ. (2010a). The ERP PCA Toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187(1), 138−145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.12.009
19.
DienJ. (2010b). Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 170−183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00885.x
20.
DienJ.BealD. J.BergP. (2005). Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: Matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(8), 1808−1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.11.025
21.
DucasseD.LoasG.DassaD.GramagliaC.ZeppegnoP.GuillaumeS.OliéE.CourtetP. (2018). Anhedonia is associated with suicidal ideation independently of depression: A meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 35(5), 382−392. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22709
22.
ElliottM. L.KnodtA. R.IrelandD.MorrisM. L.PoultonR.RamrakhaS.SisonM. L.MoffittT. E.CaspiA.HaririA. R. (2020). What is the test-retest reliability of common task-functional MRI measures? New empirical evidence and a meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 31(7), 792−806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916786
23.
EvansC. M.SimmsL. J. (2019). The latent structure of self-harm. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(1), 12−24. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000398
24.
FoxK. R.HuangX.GuzmánE. M.FunschK. M.ChaC. B.RibeiroJ. D.FranklinJ. C. (2020). Interventions for suicide and self-injury: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials across nearly 50 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 146(12), 1117−1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000305
25.
FranklinJ. C.HuangX.FoxK. R.RibeiroJ. D. (2018). What suicide interventions should target. Current Opinion in Psychology, 22, 50−53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.002
26.
FranklinJ. C.RibeiroJ. D.FoxK. R.BentleyK. H.KleimanE. M.HuangX.MusacchioK. M.JaroszewskiA. C.ChangB. P.NockM. K. (2017). Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 187−232. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000084
27.
GallyerA. J.ChuC.KleinK. M.QuintanaJ.CarltonC.DoughertyS. P.JoinerT. E. (2020). Routinized categorization of suicide risk into actionable strata: Establishing the validity of an existing suicide risk assessment framework in an outpatient sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(12), 2264−2282. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22994
28.
GallyerA. J.DoughertyS. P.BuraniK.AlbaneseB. J.JoinerT. E.HajcakG. (2021). Suicidal thoughts, behaviors, and event-related potentials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychophysiology, 58(12), Article e13939. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13939
GalvanA.HareT. A.ParraC. E.PennJ.VossH.GloverG.CaseyB. J. (2006). Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(25), 6885−6892. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1062-06.2006
31.
GibbB. E.TsypesA.IsraelE.OwensM. (2022). Age differences in neural response to reward and loss in children. Psychophysiology, 59(8), Article e14039. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14039
32.
GlennC. R.ChaC. B.KleimanE. M.NockM. K. (2017). Understanding suicide risk within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework: Insights, challenges, and future research considerations. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(3), 568−592.
33.
GratchI.FernandesS. N.BellK.-A.PollakO. H.FoxK. R.TezanosK.EboT.ChaC. B. (2022). Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview−Revised (SITBI-R): Reliability, validity, and inter-informant agreement in an adolescent sample. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 51(4), 484−494. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2021.1901229
34.
GrattonG.ColesM. G. H.DonchinE. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468−484.
35.
HaberS. N.KnutsonB. (2010). The reward circuit: Linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 4−26. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.129
36.
HarmsM. B.CasementM. D.TeohJ. Y.RuizS.ScottH.WedanR.QuevedoK. (2019). Adolescent suicide attempts and ideation are linked to brain function during peer interactions. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 289, 1−9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.05.001
37.
HomM. A.JoinerT. E.BernertR. A. (2016). Limitations of a single-item assessment of suicide attempt history: Implications for standardized suicide risk assessment. Psychological Assessment, 28(8), 1026−1030. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000241
38.
InselT.CuthbertB.GarveyM.HeinssenR.PineD. S.QuinnK.SanislowC.WangP. (2010). Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748−751.
39.
Ivey-StephensonA. Z.DemissieZ.CrosbyA. E.StoneD. M.GaylorE.WilkinsN.LowryR.BrownM. (2020). Suicidal ideation and behaviors among high school students—Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Supplements, 69(1), 47−55. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su6901a6
JoinerT. E. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Harvard University Press.
42.
JoinerT. E.WalkerR. L.RuddM. D.JobesD. A. (1999). Scientizing and routinizing the assessment of suicidality in outpatient practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30(5), 447−453.
43.
KaiserH. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141−151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
44.
KaufmanJ.BirmaherB.BrentD.RaoU.FlynnC.MoreciP.WilliamsonD.RyanN. (1997). Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(7), 980−988.
45.
KlawohnJ.BuraniK.BruchnakA.SantopetroN.HajcakG. (2021). Reduced neural response to reward and pleasant pictures independently relate to depression. Psychological Medicine, 51(5), 741−749. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719003659
46.
KlonskyE. D.SafferB. Y.BryanC. J. (2018). Ideation-to-action theories of suicide: A conceptual and empirical update. Current Opinion in Psychology, 22, 38−43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.020
LakensD. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355−362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
49.
LenthR. (2019). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means [Computer software]. Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
50.
MayA. M.KlonskyE. D. (2016). What distinguishes suicide attempters from suicide ideators? A meta-analysis of potential factors. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(1), 5−20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12136
51.
MillerG. E.WhiteS. F.ChenE.NusslockR. (2021). Association of inflammatory activity with larger neural responses to threat and reward among children living in poverty. American Journal of Psychiatry, 178(4), 313−320. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20050635
52.
MillnerA. J.LeeM. D.NockM. K. (2015). Single-item measurement of suicidal behaviors: Validity and consequences of misclassification. PLOS ONE, 10(10), Article e0141606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141606
NockM. K.HolmbergE. B.PhotosV. I.MichelB. D. (2007). Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors interview: Development, reliability and validity in an adolescent sample. Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 309−317. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.309
55.
NordC. L.ValtonV.WoodJ.RoiserJ. P. (2017). Power-up: A reanalysis of “power failure” in neuroscience using mixture modeling. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(34), 8051−8061. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3592-16.2017
56.
O’ConnorR. C. (2011). Towards an integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior. In O’ConnorR. C.PlattS.GordonJ. (Eds.), International handbook of suicide prevention: Research, policy and practice (pp. 181−198). John Wiley.
57.
PeggS.DickeyL.GreenH.KujawaA. (2020). Differentiating clinically depressed adolescents with and without active suicidality: An examination of neurophysiological and self-report measures of reward responsiveness. Depression and Anxiety, 37(9), 876−884. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23012
58.
PizzagalliD. A.JahnA. L.O’SheaJ. P. (2005). Toward an objective characterization of an anhedonic phenotype: A signal-detection approach. Biological Psychiatry, 57(4), 319−327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.026
59.
ProudfitG. H. (2015). The reward positivity: From basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression. Psychophysiology, 52(4), 449−459. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12370
60.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
61.
RevelleW. (2018). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research [Computer software]. Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
62.
RogersM. L.StanleyI. H.HomM. A.ChiurlizaB.PodlogarM. C.JoinerT. E. (2018). Conceptual and empirical scrutiny of covarying depression out of suicidal ideation. Assessment, 25(2), 159−172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116645907
63.
Santamarina-PerezP.RomeroS.MendezI.LeslieS. M.PackerM. M.SugranyesG.PicadoM.FontE.MorenoE.MartinezE.MorerA.RomeroM.SinghM. K. (2019). Fronto-limbic connectivity as a predictor of improvement in nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents following psychotherapy. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 29(6), 456−465. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2018.0152
64.
SauderC. L.DerbidgeC. M.BeauchaineT. P. (2016). Neural responses to monetary incentives among self-injuring adolescent girls. Development and Psychopathology, 28(1), 277−291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000449
65.
SchmaalL.van HarmelenA.-L.ChatziV.LippardE. T. C.ToendersY. J.AverillL. A.MazureC. M.BlumbergH. P. (2020). Imaging suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A comprehensive review of 2 decades of neuroimaging studies. Molecular Psychiatry, 25, 408−427. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0587-x
SekhonJ. S. (2011). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: The matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(7). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i07
68.
SingmannH.BolkerB.WestfallJ.AustF. (2019). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments [Computer software]. Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
69.
TaraziF. I.TomasiniE. C.BaldessariniR. J. (1998). Postnatal development of dopamine D4-like receptors in rat forebrain regions: Comparison with D2-like receptors. Developmental Brain Research, 110(2), 227−233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(98)00111-4
70.
TaraziF. I.TomasiniE. C.BaldessariniR. J. (1999). Postnatal development of dopamine D1-like receptors in rat cortical and striatolimbic brain regions: An autoradiographic study. Developmental Neuroscience, 21(1), 43−49. https://doi.org/10.1159/000017365
71.
TeicherM. H.BarberN. I.GelbardH. A.GallitanoA. L.CampbellA.MarshE.BaldessariniR. J. (1993). Developmental differences in acute nigrostriatal and mesocorticolimbic system response to haloperidol. Neuropsychopharmacology, 9(2), 147−156. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.1993.53
72.
TsypesA.OwensM.GibbB. E. (2019). Blunted neural reward responsiveness in children with recent suicidal ideation. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(5), 958−968. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619856341
73.
TsypesA.OwensM.GibbB. E. (2021). Reward responsiveness in suicide attempters: An electroencephalography/event-related potential study. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 6(1), 99−106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.04.003
74.
Van LeijenhorstL.ZanolieK.Van MeelC. S.WestenbergP. M.RomboutsS.CroneE. A. (2010). What motivates the adolescent? Brain regions mediating reward sensitivity across adolescence. Cerebral Cortex, 20(1), 61−69. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp078
75.
Van OrdenK. A.WitteT. K.CukrowiczK. C.BraithwaiteS. R.SelbyE. A.JoinerT. E. (2010). The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychological Review, 117(2), 575−600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018697
76.
Vidal-RibasP.JaniriD.DoucetG. E.PornpattananangkulN.NielsonD. M.FrangouS.StringarisA. (2021). Multimodal neuroimaging of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in a U.S. population-based sample of school-age children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 178(4), 321−332. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20020120
77.
WickhamH.AverickM.BryanJ.ChangW.McGowanL. D.FrançoisR.GrolemundG.HayesA.HenryL.HesterJ.KuhnM.PedersenT. L.MillerE.BacheS. M.MüllerK.OomsJ.RobinsonD.SeidelD. P.SpinuV.. . . YutaniH. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), Article 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
78.
WickhamH.MillerE. (2019). haven: Import and export ‘SPSS’, ‘stata’ and ‘SAS’ files [Computer software]. Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=haven
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
