Many college students reduce hazardous drinking (HD) following graduation without treatment. Identifying cognitive mechanisms facilitating this “natural” reduction in HD during this transition is crucial. We evaluated drinking identity as a potential mechanism and tested whether within-persons changes in one’s social network’s drinking were linked to within-persons changes in drinking identity and subsequent within-persons changes in HD. A sample of 422 undergraduates reporting HD was followed from 6 months before graduation until 2 years after graduation. Their drinking, drinking identity, and social networks were assessed online. Within-persons changes in drinking identity did not mediate the relationship between within-persons changes in social-network drinking and personal HD, although significant positive between-persons associations among all constructs were found. Instead, there was some evidence that within-persons changes in drinking identity followed changes in HD, which suggests that drinking identity may function as a marker versus mechanism of “natural” HD reduction during transition out of college.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469
2.
AtkinsD. C.BaldwinS. A.ZhengC.GallopR. J.NeighborsC. (2013). A tutorial on count regression and zero-altered count models for longitudinal substance use data. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029508
3.
BaborT. F.Higgins-BiddleJ. C.SaundersJ. B.MonteiroM. G. (2001). The Alcohol-use disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Guidelines for use in primary care (2nd ed.). Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence, World Health Organization.
4.
BachmanJ. G. (Ed.). (2002). The decline of substance use in young adulthood: Changes in social activities, roles, and beliefs. Erlbaum.
5.
BarnettN. P.OttM. Q.RogersM. L.LoxleyM.LinkletterC.ClarkM. A. (2014). Peer associations for substance use and exercise in a college student social network. Health Psychology, 33(10), 1134–1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034687
6.
BeckwithM.BestD.DingleG.PerrymanC.LubmanD. (2015). Predictors of flexibility in social identity among people entering a therapeutic community for substance abuse. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2015.982465
7.
BorsariB.CareyK. B. (2001). Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13(4), 391–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00098-0
8.
BrownJ. D. (1998). The self. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
9.
BullersS.CooperM. L.RussellM. (2001). Social network drinking and adult alcohol involvement: A longitudinal exploration of the direction of influence. Addictive Behaviors, 26(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00099-x
10.
ChanK. K.NeighborsC.GilsonM.LarimerM. E.Alan MarlattG. (2007). Epidemiological trends in drinking by age and gender: Providing normative feedback to adults. Addictive Behaviors, 32(5), 967–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.07.003
11.
CollinsR. L.ParksG. A.MarlattG. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.2.189
12.
CorteC.SteinK. F. (2007). Self-cognitions in antisocial alcohol dependence and recovery. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 29(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945906295480
13.
CunninghamW. A.ZelazoP. D.PackerD. J.Van BavelJ. J. (2007). The iterative reprocessing model: A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation. Social Cognition, 25(5), 736–760. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.736
14.
DawsonD. A.GrantB. F.StinsonF. S.ChouP. S. (2004). Another look at heavy episodic drinking and alcohol use disorders among college and noncollege youth. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65(4), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2004.65.477
15.
FosterD. W.YeungN.NeighborsC. (2014). I think I can’t: Drink refusal self-efficacy as a mediator of the relationship between self-reported drinking identity and alcohol use. Addictive Behaviors, 39(2), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.009
16.
GothamH. J.SherK. J.WoodP. K. (1997). Predicting stability and change in frequency of intoxication from the college years to beyond: Individual-difference and role transition variables. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(4), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.106.4.619
17.
GrantB. F.ChouS. P.SahaT. D.PickeringR. P.KerridgeB. T.RuanW. J.HuangB.JungJ.ZhangH.FanA.HasinD. S. (2017). Prevalence of 12-month alcohol use, high-risk drinking, and DSM-IV alcohol use disorder in the United States, 2001-2002 to 2012-2013: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and related conditions. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(9), 911–923. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2161
18.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.
19.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
20.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
21.
GreenwaldA. G.PoehlmanT. A.UhlmannE. L.BanajiM. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575
22.
HallerM.HandleyE.ChassinL.BountressK. (2010). Developmental cascades: Linking adolescent substance use, affiliation with substance use promoting peers, and academic achievement to adult substance use disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 22(4), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000532
23.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
24.
HingsonR. W.ZhaW.WeitzmanE. R. (2009). Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Supplement, (s16), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.12
25.
HingsonR. W.ZhaW.WhiteA. M. (2017). Drinking beyond the binge threshold: Predictors, consequences, and changes in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(6), 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.014
26.
HommelB.WiersR. W. (2017). Towards a unitary approach to human action control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(12), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.009
27.
LaBrieJ. W.HummerJ. F.NeighborsC.LarimerM. E. (2010). Whose opinion matters? The relationship between injunctive norms and alcohol consequences in college students. Addictive Behaviors, 35(4), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.003
28.
LeeC-K.CorteC.SteinK. F. (2018). Drinker identity: Key risk factor for adolescent alcohol use. Journal of School Health, 88(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12603
29.
LewisM. A.NeighborsC.GeisnerI. M.LeeC. M.KilmerJ. R.AtkinsD. C. (2010). Examining the associations among severity of injunctive drinking norms, alcohol consumption, and alcohol-related negative consequences: The moderating roles of alcohol consumption and identity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018302
30.
LindgrenK. P.BaldwinS. A.OlinC. C.WiersR. W.TeachmanB. A.NorrisJ.KaysenD.NeighborsC. (2018). Evaluating within-person change in implicit measures of alcohol associations: Increases in alcohol associations predict increases in drinking risk and vice versa. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 53(4), 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agy012
31.
LindgrenK. P.HendershotC. S.RamirezJ. J.BernatE.Rangel-GomezM.PetersonK. P.MurphyJ. G. (2019). A dual process perspective on advances in cognitive science and alcohol use disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 69, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.04.002
32.
LindgrenK. P.NeighborsC.GasserM. L.RamirezJ. J.CvencekD. (2017). A review of implicit and explicit substance self-concept as a predictor of alcohol and tobacco use and misuse. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 43(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2016.1229324
33.
LindgrenK. P.NeighborsC.TeachmanB. A.BaldwinS. A.NorrisJ.KaysenD.GasserM. L.WiersR. W. (2016). Implicit alcohol associations, especially drinking identity, predict drinking over time. Health Psychology, 35(8), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000396
34.
LindgrenK. P.NeighborsC.TeachmanB. A.WiersR. W.WestgateE.GreenwaldA. G. (2013). I drink therefore I am: Validating alcohol-related implicit association tests. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027640
35.
LindgrenK. P.RamirezJ. J.OlinC. C.NeighborsC. (2016). Not the same old thing: Establishing the unique contribution of drinking identity as a predictor of alcohol consumption and problems over time. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(6), 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000195
36.
LindgrenK. P.RamirezJ. J.WiersR. W.TeachmanB. A.NorrisJ.OlinC. C.GasserM. L.KaysenD.NeighborsC. (2018). Mood selectively moderates the implicit alcohol association–drinking relation in college student heavy episodic drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 32(3), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000360
37.
LittlefieldA. K.KingK. M.AcuffS. F.FosterK. T.MurphyJ. G.WitkiewitzK. (2021). Limitations of cross-lagged panel models in addiction research and alternative models: An empirical example using project MATCH. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000750
38.
LittlefieldA. K.SherK. J.WoodP. K. (2009). Is “Maturing out” of problematic alcohol involvement related to personality change?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(2), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015125
39.
LittlefieldA. K.SherK. J.WoodP. K. (2010). Do changes in drinking motives mediate the relation between personality change and “Maturing Out” of problem drinking?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017512
40.
LongabaughR.ZywiakW. (1999). Manual for the administration of the Important People Instrument adapted for use by Project COMBINE. Brown University.
41.
MarheR.WatersA. J.van de WeteringB. J. M.FrankenI. H. A. (2013). Implicit and explicit drug-related cognitions during detoxification treatment are associated with drug relapse: An ecological momentary assessment study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030754
42.
MarkusH. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63
MeijerE.Van den PutteB.GebhardtW. A.Van LaarC.BakkZ.DijkstraA.FongG. T.WestR.WillemsenM. C. (2018). A longitudinal study into the reciprocal effects of identities and smoking behaviour: Findings from the ITC Netherlands Survey. Social Science & Medicine, 200, 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.006
45.
MeijerE.van LaarC.GebhardtW. A.FokkemaM.van den PutteB.DijkstraA.FongG. T.WillemsenM. C. (2017). Identity change among smokers and ex-smokers: Findings from the ITC Netherlands Survey. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000281
46.
MeiselS. N.ReadJ. P.MullinS.ShyhallaK.ColderC. R.EidenR. D.HawkL. W.WieczorekW. F. (2018). Changes in implicit alcohol attitudes across adolescence, and associations with emerging alcohol use: Testing the reciprocal determinism hypothesis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 32(7), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000400
MerrillJ. E.CareyK. B. (2016). Drinking over the lifespan. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 38(1), 103–114.
49.
MulderJ. D.HamakerE. L. (2021). Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(4), 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1784738
50.
MuthénB.AsparouhovT. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026802
NeighborsC.LaBrieJ. W.HummerJ. F.LewisM. A.LeeC. M.DesaiS.KilmerJ. R.LarimerM. E. (2010). Group identification as a moderator of the relationship between perceived social norms and alcohol consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(3), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019944
53.
NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (2007). The implicit association test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In BarghJ. A. (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265–292). Psychology Press.
54.
O’MalleyP. M. (2004). Maturing out of problematic alcohol use. Alcohol Research & Health, 28(4), 202–204.
55.
PrinceM. A.ReadJ. P.ColderC. R. (2019). Trajectories of college alcohol involvement and their associations with later alcohol use disorder symptoms. Prevention Science, 20(5), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0974-6
56.
ReadJ. P.WoodM. D.CaponeC. (2005). A prospective investigation of relations between social influences and alcohol involvement during the transition into college. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66(1), 23–34.
57.
ReedM. B.LangeJ. E.KetchieJ. M.ClappJ. D. (2007). The relationship between social identity, normative information, and college student drinking. Social Influence, 2(4), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510701476617
58.
SaundersJ. B.AaslandO. G.BaborT. F.De La FuenteJ. R.GrantM. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88(6), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x
59.
SchulenbergJ. E.JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.MiechR. A.PatrickM. E. (2020). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2019: Volume II, College students and adults ages 19–60. Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-vol2_2017.pdf
60.
SchulenbergJ. E.MaggsJ. L. (2002). A developmental perspective on alcohol use and heavy drinking during adolescence and the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement, (s14), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.54
61.
ShadelW. G.MermelsteinR. (1996). Individual differences in self-concept among smokers attempting to quit: Validation and predictive utility of measures of the smoker self-concept and abstainer self-concept. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02883391
62.
ShonoY.BaldwinS. A.PetersonK. P.NeighborsC.LindgrenK. P. (2022). Disentangling the within- and between-person aspects of implicit alcohol associations on hazardous drinking. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000552
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
65.
TeachmanB. A.ClerkinE. M.CunninghamW.Dreyer-OrenS.WerntzA. (2019). Implicit cognition and psychopathology: Looking back and looking forward. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095718
66.
VangeliE.WestR. (2012). Transition towards a ‘non-smoker’ identity following smoking cessation: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 17(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02031.x
67.
VergésA.JacksonK. M.BucholzK. K.GrantJ. D.TrullT. J.WoodP. K.SherK. J. (2012). Deconstructing the age-prevalence curve of alcohol dependence: Why “maturing out” is only a small piece of the puzzle. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(2), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026027
68.
WatersA. J.LiY. (2008). Evaluating the utility of administering a reaction time task in an ecological momentary assessment study. Psychopharmacology, 197(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-1006-6
69.
WhiteH. R.LabouvieE. W. (1989). Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1989.50.30
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
