A self-report survey of first-year college students (n = 421; 46% female) included measures of perceived prototype, attitude and injunctive norm accessibility, past drinking behavior, and future drinking intention. Both norm accessibility and prototype perception were significant predictors of intention to drink in the future among first-year college students. The effect of prototypes on drinking diminished as pro-drinking norms became more accessible, indicating greater automaticity of drinking decision-making. Theoretical models of drinking intention should include both normative constructs and prototypes. Implications for interventions to reduce college student drinking are discussed.
AndrewsJAHampsonSEBarckleyMet al. (2008) The effect of early cognitions on cigarette and alcohol use during adolescence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors22(1): 96.
2.
ArmentaBEWhitbeckLBGentzlerKC (2016) Interactive effects within the prototype willingness model: Predicting the drinking behavior of indigenous early adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors30(2): 194–202.
3.
BlantonHGibbonsFXGerrardMet al. (1997) Role of family and peers in the development of prototypes associated with substance use. Journal of Family Psychology11(3): 271–288.
4.
ChangFMiaoNLeeCet al. (2016) The association of media exposure and media literacy with adolescent alcohol and tobacco use. Journal of Health Psychology21: 513–525.
5.
CialdiniRBRenoRRKallgrenCA (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58(6): 1015–1026.
6.
EwoldsenDRRhodesNFazioRH (2015) The MODE model and its implications for studying the media. Media Psychology18(3): 312–337.
7.
FazioRH (1990a) A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In: HendrickCClarkMS (eds) Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp. 74–97.
8.
FazioRH (1990b) Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In: ZannaM (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 23. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 75–109.
9.
FishbeinMAjzenI (2010) Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
10.
FurtwänglerNAFDe VisserRO (2017) University students beliefs about unit-based guidelines: A qualitative study. Journal of Health Psychology22(13): 1701–1711.
11.
GerrardMGibbonsFXHoulihanAEet al. (2008) A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Developmental Review28(1): 29–61.
12.
GibbonsFXGerrardM (1995) Predicting young adults’ health risk behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology69(3): 505–517.
13.
GibbonsFXGerrardMBlantonHet al. (1998) Reasoned action and social reaction: Willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(5): 1164–1180.
14.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
15.
LapinskiMKRimalRN (2005) An explication of social norms. Communication Theory15(2): 127–147.
NormanPArmitageCJQuigleyC (2007) The theory of planned behavior and binge drinking: Assessing the impact of binge drinker prototypes. Addictive Behaviors32(9): 1753–1768.
18.
PerkinsHWWechslerH (1996) Variation in perceived college drinking norms and its impact on alcohol abuse: A nationwide study. Journal of Drug Issues26(4): 961–974.
19.
PrenticeDAMillerDT (1993) Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64(2): 243–256.
20.
RhodesNEwoldsenDR (2009) Attitude and norm accessibility and cigarette smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology39(10): 2355–2372.
21.
RhodesNEwoldsenDRShenLet al. (2014) The accessibility of family and peer norms in young adolescent risk behavior. Communication Research41(1): 3–26.
22.
RhodesNRoskos-EwoldsenDREdisonAet al. (2008) Attitude and norm accessibility affect processing of anti-smoking messages. Health Psychology27(3): 224–S232.
23.
RimalRN (2008) Modeling the relationship between descriptive norms and behaviors: A test and extension of the theory of normative social behavior (TNSB). Health Communication23(2): 103–116.
24.
RivisASheeranP (2003) Social influences and the theory of planned behaviour: Evidence for a direct relationship between prototypes and young people’s exercise behaviour. Psychology and Health18(5): 567–583.
25.
SpijkermanRVan den EijndenRJOverbeekGet al. (2007) The impact of peer and parental norms and behavior on adolescent drinking: The role of drinker prototypes. Psychology and Health22(1): 7–29.
26.
TalbottLLWilkinsonLLMooreCGet al. (2014) The role of injunctive norms and alcohol use during the first-semester of college. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education58(1): 60–81.
27.
TeunissenHASpijkermanRCohenGLet al. (2014) An experimental study on the effects of peer drinking norms on adolescents’ drinker prototypes. Addictive Behaviors39(1): 85–93.
28.
TeunissenHASpijkermanRLarsenHet al. (2012) Stereotypic information about drinkers and students’ observed alcohol intake: An experimental study on prototype-behavior relations in males and females in a naturalistic drinking context. Drug and Alcohol Dependence125(3): 301–306.
29.
TuckerMHarrisGE (2016) Alcohol use among university students: Considering a positive deviance approach. Journal of Health Psychology21(9): 1918–1927.
30.
US Department of Health and Human Services (2007) The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking. Rockville, MD: Office of the Surgeon General. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44360/
