The human fear-conditioning paradigm is a widely used procedure to study anxiety. However, merely thinking about the aversive outcome is typically not measured in this procedure. This is surprising because thinking of an aversive event is of clinical relevance (e.g., in the form of intrusions) and theoretical interest. We present two preregistered studies that (a) included thinking of an aversive outcome as an additional dependent variable and (b) compared several interventions to reduce it. We found that mere thinking of an aversive outcome could be successfully conditioned. Among the participants who showed successful acquisition, extinction training was less successful in reducing it than counterconditioning. Presenting new additional outcomes also proved effective to reduce thoughts about the initial outcome when the new outcomes were positive stimuli. Including thinking of the aversive outcome as an additional dependent variable may serve to enhance the understanding of anxiety-related disorders and inform their treatment.
AndersonJ. R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451–474. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90021-8
2.
BaeyensF.DíazE.RuizG. (2005). Resistance to extinction of human evaluative conditioning using a between-subjects design. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 245–268. doi:10.1080/02699930441000300
3.
BaeyensF.EelenP.van den BerghO.CrombezG. (1989). Acquired affective-evaluative value: Conservative but not unchangeable. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 279–287. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(89)90047-8
4.
BaeyensF.VansteenwegenD.HermansD.EelenP. (2001). Chilled white wine, when all of a sudden the doorbell rings: Mere reference and evaluation versus expectancy and preparation in human Pavlovian learning. In ColumbusF. (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (pp. 241–277). Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
5.
BeckersT.KrypotosA.-M.BoddezY.EfftingM.KindtM. (2013). What’s wrong with fear conditioning?Biological Psychology, 92, 90–96. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.015
6.
BoddezY. (2018). The presence of your absence: A conditioning theory of grief. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 106, 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.04.006
7.
BoddezY.BaeyensF.LuytenL.VansteenwegenD.HermansD.BeckersT. (2013). Rating data are underrated: Validity of US expectancy in human fear conditioning. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44, 201–206. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.08.003
8.
BoddezY.BennettM. P.van EschS.BeckersT. (2017). Bending rules: The shape of the perceptual generalisation gradient is sensitive to inference rules. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 1444–1452. doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1230541
9.
BoddezY.HaesenK.BaeyensF.BeckersT. (2014). Selectivity in associative learning: A cognitive stage framework for blocking and cue competition phenomena. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1305. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01305
10.
BoddezY.MoorsA.MertensG.De HouwerJ. (2020). Tackling fear : Beyond associative memory activation as the only determinant of fear responding. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 410–419. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.009
11.
BoutonM. E. (1988). Context and ambiguity in the extinction of emotional learning: Implications for exposure therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 137–149. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(88)90113-1
12.
BoutonM. E. (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 976–986. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01546-9
13.
ClarkD. A. (2005). Intrusive thoughts in clinical disorders: Theory, research, and treatment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
15.
CraskeM. G.MystkowskiJ. L. (2006). Exposure therapy and extinction: Clinical studies. In CraskeM. G.HermansD.VansteenwegenD. (Eds.), Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications (pp. 217–33). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
16.
CraskeM. G.RauchS. L.UrsanoR.PrenoveauJ.PineD. S.ZinbargR. E. (2009). What is an anxiety disorder?Depression and Anxiety, 26, 1066–1085. doi:10.1002/da.20633
17.
DeaconB. J.AbramowitzJ. S. (2004). Cognitive and behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders: A review of meta-analytic findings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 429–441. doi:10.1002/jclp.10255
18.
De HouwerJ. (2011). Evaluative conditioning: A review of procedure knowledge and mental process theories. In SchachtmanT. R.ReillyS. (Eds.), Associative learning and conditioning theory (pp. 399–416). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
19.
De HouwerJ. (2020). Conditioning is more than association formation: On the different ways in which conditioning research is valuable for clinical psychology. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), Article 2. doi:10.1525/collabra.239
20.
EelenP.HermansD.BaeyensF. (2001). Learning perspectives on anxiety disorders. In GriezE. J. L.FaravelliC.NuttD.ZoharJ. (Eds.), Anxiety disorders: An introduction to clinical management and research (pp. 249–264). London, England: John Wiley and Sons.
21.
EhlersA.ClarkD. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 319–345.
22.
EhringT.ZetscheU.WeidackerK.WahlK.SchönfeldS.EhlersA. (2011). The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ): Validation of a content-independent measure of repetitive negative thinking. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 225–232. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.12.003
23.
EngelhardI. M.LeerA.LangeE.OlatunjiB. O. (2014). Shaking that icky feeling: Effects of extinction and counterconditioning on disgust-related evaluative learning. Behavior Therapy, 45, 708–719. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2014.04.003
24.
HarveyA. G.WatkinsE.MansellW.ShafranR. (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc. doi:10.1002/erv.647
25.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, Article 29. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
26.
HermansD.BaeyensF. (2012). Expectancy learning and evaluative learning. In SeelN. M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1203–1205). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
27.
HermansD.CraskeM. G.MinekaS.LovibondP. F. (2006). Extinction in human fear conditioning. Biological Psychiatry, 60, 361–368. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.006
28.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
29.
JelinekL.HauschildtM.HottenrottB.KellnerM.MoritzS. (2014). Further evidence for biased semantic networks in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): When knives are no longer associated with buttering bread but only with stabbing people. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 427–434. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.05.002
30.
JelinekL.HauschildtM.HottenrottB.KellnerM.MoritzS. (2018). “Association splitting” versus cognitive remediation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 56, 17–25. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.03.012
31.
JozefowiezJ. (2018). Associative versus predictive processes in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioural Processes, 154, 21–26. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.016
32.
KaczkurkinA. N.FoaE. B. (2015). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: An update on the empirical evidence. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17, 337–346. doi:10.4088/JCP.12r07757
33.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-6. Gainesville: University of Florida.
34.
LenaertB.BoddezY.GriffithJ. W.VervlietB.SchruersK.HermansD. (2014). Aversive learning and generalization predict subclinical levels of anxiety: A six-month longitudinal study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28, 747–753. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.09.006
35.
LonsdorfT. B.MenzM. M.AndreattaM.FullanaM. A.GolkarA.HaakerJ.. . . MerzC. J. (2017). Don’t fear ‘fear conditioning’: Methodological considerations for the design and analysis of studies on human fear acquisition, extinction, and return of fear. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 247–285. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026
36.
LovibondP. F.LovibondS. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states : Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Depression, 33, 335–343.
37.
MichaelT.EhlersA.HalliganS. L. (2005). Enhanced priming for trauma-related material in posttraumatic stress disorder. Emotion, 5, 103–112. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.103
38.
MiladM. R.QuirkG. J. (2012). Fear extinction as a model for translational neuroscience : Ten years of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 129–151. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131631
MinekaS.OehlbergK. (2008). The relevance of recent developments in classical conditioning to understanding the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders. Acta Psychologica, 127, 567–580. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.11.007
41.
MoritzS.JelinekL. (2011). Further evidence for the efficacy of association splitting as a self-help technique for reducing obsessive thoughts. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 574–581. doi:10.1002/da.20843
42.
MoritzS.JelinekL.KlingeR.NaberD. (2007). Fight fire with fireflies! Association splitting: A novel cognitive technique to reduce obsessive thoughts. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 631–635. doi:10.1017/S1352465807003931
43.
OlatunjiB. O.CislerJ. M.TolinD. F. (2007). Quality of life in the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 572–581. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.015
44.
PearceJ. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–73. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.61
45.
PearceJ. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination : A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587–607.
46.
QuirkG. J.MuellerD. (2008). Neural mechanisms of extinction learning and retrieval. Neuropsychopharmacology, 33, 56–72. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301555
47.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
48.
ScheveneelsS.BoddezY.HermansD. (2019). Learning mechanisms in fear and anxiety: It is still not what you think it is. In OlatunjiB. O. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of anxiety and related disorders (pp. 13–40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49.
SmithsonM. (2001). Correct confidence intervals for various regression effect sizes and parameters: The importance of noncentral distributions in computing intervals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 605–632.
50.
SpruytA.ClarysseJ.VansteenwegenD.BaeyensF.HermansD. (2009). Affect 4.0: A free software package for implementing psychological and psychophysiological experiments. Experimental Psychology, 57, 36–45. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000005
51.
VansteenwegenD.FranckenG.VervlietB.De ClercqA.EelenP. (2006). Resistance to extinction in evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 71–79. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.71
52.
VervlietB.CraskeM. G.HermansD. (2013). Fear extinction and relapse: State of the art. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 215–248. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185542
53.
WegnerD. M.ZanakosS. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615–640. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00311.x
54.
WittchenH. U.JacobiF.RehmJ.GustavssonA.SvenssonM.JönssonB.. . . Salvador-carullaL. (2011). The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 21, 655–679. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.018
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
