Neuroticism has been associated with depression and anxiety both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Interpretive bias has been associated with depression and anxiety, primarily in cross-sectional and bias induction studies. The purpose of the current study was to examine the role of interpretive bias as a prospective risk factor and a mediator of the relation between neuroticism and depressive and anxious symptoms in young adults assessed longitudinally. Neuroticism significantly predicted a broad general-distress dimension but not intermediate fears and anhedonia-apprehension dimensions or a narrow social-fears dimension. Neuroticism also significantly predicted negative interpretive bias for social scenarios. Negative interpretive bias for social scenarios did not significantly predict dimension scores, nor did it mediate the relation between neuroticism and general distress or social fears. These results suggest that although neuroticism relates to negative interpretive bias, its risk for symptoms of depression and anxiety is at most weakly conferred through negative interpretive bias.
AlloyL. B.AbramsonL. Y.HoganM. E.WhitehouseW. G.RoseD. T.RobinsonM. S.. . . LapkinJ. B. (2000). The Temple-Wisconsin Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression Project: Lifetime history of Axis I psychopathology in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 403–418.
2.
AminN.FoaE. B.ColesM. E. (1998). Negative interpretation bias in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 945–957.
3.
BeckA. T.HaighE. A. (2014). Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 1–24.
4.
BollenK. A. (1996). An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations. Psychometrika, 61, 109–121.
5.
BowerG. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.
6.
BrosanL.HoppittL.ShelferL.SillenceA.MackintoshB. (2011). Cognitive bias modification for attention and interpretation reduces trait and state anxiety in anxious patients referred to an out-patient service: Results from a pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 258–264.
7.
ByrneA.EysenckM. W. (1993). Individual differences in positive and negative interpretive biases. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 849–851.
8.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
9.
ClaridgeG.DavisC. (2001). What’s the use of neuroticism?Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 383–400.
10.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD.MinekaS. (1994). Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 103–116.
11.
ConstansJ. I.PennD. L.IhenG. H.HopeD. A. (1999). Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 643–651.
12.
DearingK. F.GotlibI. H. (2009). Interpretation of ambiguous information in girls at risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 79–91.
13.
DunmoreE.ClarkD. M.EhlersA. (2001). A prospective investigation of the role of cognitive factors in persistent Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after physical or sexual assault. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 1063–1084.
14.
EveraertJ.PodinaI. R.KosterE. H. (2017). A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 33–48.
15.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (adult and junior). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
16.
EysenckM. W. (2000). A cognitive approach to trait anxiety. European Journal of Personality, 14, 463–476.
17.
FinnC.MitteK.NeyerF. J. (2013). The relation-specific interpretation bias mediates the link between neuroticism and satisfaction in couples. European Journal of Personality, 27, 200–212.
18.
GeerJ. H. (1965). The development of a scale to measure fear. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 3, 45–53.
19.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In MervieldeI.DearyI.De FruytF.OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
20.
GoldstonD. B.O’HaraM. W.SchartzH. A. (1990). Reliability, validity, and preliminary normative data for the Inventory to Diagnose Depression in a college population. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 212–215.
21.
GreyS.MathewsA. (2000). Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 53, 1143–1162.
22.
GriffithJ. W.ZinbargR. E.CraskeM. G.MinekaS.RoseR. D.WatersA. M.SuttonJ. M. (2010). Neuroticism as a common dimension in the internalizing disorders. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1125–1136.
23.
GunthertK. C.CohenL. H.ArmeliS. (1999). The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1087–1100.
24.
HaeffelG. J.GibbB. E.MetalskyG. I.AlloyL. B.AbramsonL. Y.HankinB. L.. . . SwendsenJ. D. (2008). Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression: Development and validation of the cognitive style questionnaire. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 824–836.
25.
HirschC. R.MeetenF.KrahéC.ReederC. (2016). Resolving ambiguity in emotional disorders: The nature and role of interpretation biases. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 281–305.
26.
HollonS. D.DeRubeisR. J.EvansM. D. (1987). Causal mediation of change in treatment for depression: Discriminating between nonspecificity and noncausality. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 139–149.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
29.
HuppertJ. D.FoaE. B.FurrJ. M.FilipJ. C.MathewsA. (2003). Interpretation bias in social anxiety: A dimensional perspective. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 569–577.
30.
JeronimusB. F.KotovR.RieseH.OrmelJ. (2016). Neuroticism’s prospective association with mental disorders halves after adjustment baseline symptoms and psychiatric history, but the adjusted association hardly decays with time: A meta-analysis on 59 longitudinal/prospective studies with 443,313 participants. Psychological Medicine, 46, 2883–2906.
31.
JylhäP.IsometsäE. (2006). The relation of neuroticism and extraversion to symptoms of anxiety and depression in the general population. Depression and Anxiety, 23, 281–289.
32.
KendlerK. S.GatzM.GardnerC. O.PedersenN. L. (2006). Personality and major depression: A Swedish longitudinal, population-based twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 1113–1120.
33.
KendlerK. S.KuhnJ.PrescottC. A. (2004). The interrelationship of neuroticism, sex, and stressful life events in the prediction of episodes of major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 631–636.
34.
KesslerR. C.PetukhovaM.SampsonN. A.ZaslavskyA. M.WittchenH. U. (2012). Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 21, 169–184.
35.
KotovR.GamezW.SchmidtF.WatsonD. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821.
36.
LambM. E.ChuangS. S.WesselsH.BrobergA. G.HwangC. P. (2002). Emergence and construct validation of the Big Five factors in early childhood: A longitudinal analysis of their ontogeny in Sweden. Child Development, 73, 1517–1524.
37.
LawsonC.MacLeodC.HammondG. (2002). Interpretation revealed in the blink of an eye: Depressive bias in the resolution of ambiguity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 321–328.
38.
LeeJ. S.MathewsA.ShergillS.YiendJ. (2016). Magnitude of negative interpretation bias depends on severity of depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 83, 26–34.
39.
LiW.ZinbargR. E. (2007). Anxiety sensitivity and panic attacks: A 1-year longitudinal study. Behavior Modification, 31, 145–161
40.
MacKinnonD. P.FairchildA. J.FritzM. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
41.
MalouffJ. M.ThorsteinssonE. B.SchutteN. S. (2005). The relationship between the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 101–114.
42.
MathewsA.MackintoshB. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 602–615.
43.
MathewsA.MacLeodC. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 331–354.
44.
MathewsA.MacLeodC. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167–195.
45.
MathewsA.RidgewayV.CookE.YiendJ. (2007). Inducing a benign interpretational bias reduces trait anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 225–236.
46.
MattickR. P.PetersL. (1988). Treatment of severe social phobia: Effects of guided exposure with and without cognitive restructuring. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 251–260.
47.
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48.
McKnightP. E.KashdanT. B. (2009). The importance of functional impairment to mental health outcomes: A case for reassessing our goals in depression treatment research. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 243–259.
49.
McKnightP. E.MonfortS. S.KashdanT. B.BlalockD. V.CaltonJ. M. (2016). Anxiety symptoms and functional impairment: A systematic review of the correlation between the two measures. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 115–130.
50.
MoggK.BradburyK. E.BradleyB. P. (2006). Interpretation of ambiguous information in clinical depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1411–1419.
51.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
52.
Naragon-GaineyK.PrenoveauJ. M.BrownT. A.ZinbargR. E. (2016). A comparison and integration of structural models of depression and anxiety in a clinical sample: Support for and validation of the tri-level model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 853–867.
53.
OrmelJ.BastiaansenA.RieseH.BosE. H.ServaasM.EllenbogenM.. . . AlemanA. (2013). The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: Current status and future directions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 59–72.
54.
OrmelJ.JeronimusB. F.KotovR.RieseH.BosE. H.HankinB.. . . OldehinkelA. J. (2013). Neuroticism and common mental disorders: Meaning and utility of a complex relationship. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 686–697.
55.
PreacherK. J.ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J. (2016). Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis. Psychological Methods, 21, 189–205.
56.
PrenoveauJ. M.ZinbargR. E.CraskeM. G.MinekaS.GriffithJ. W.EpsteinA. M. (2010). Testing a hierarchical model of anxiety and depression in adolescents: A tri-level model. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24(3), 334–344.
57.
RapeeR. M.CraskeM. G.BarlowD. H. (1994). Assessment instrument for panic disorder that includes fear of sensation-producing activities: The Albany panic and phobia questionnaire. Anxiety, 1, 114–122.
58.
ReissS.PetersonR. A.GurskyD. M.McNallyR. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency, and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8.
59.
RobinsC. J.BagbyR. M.RectorN. A.LynchT. R.KennedyS. H. (1997). Sociotropy, autonomy, and patterns of symptoms in patients with major depression: A comparison of dimensional and categorical approaches. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 285–300.
60.
RobinsC. J.LaddJ.WelkowitzJ.BlaneyP. H.DiazR.KutcherG. (1994). The Personal Style Inventory: Preliminary validation studies of new measures of sociotropy and autonomy. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 277–300.
61.
RobinsonM. D.OdeS.MoellerS. K.GoetzP. W. (2007). Neuroticism and affective priming: Evidence for a neuroticism-linked negative schema. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1221–1231.
62.
RoelofsJ.HuibersM.PeetersF.ArntzA.van OsJ. (2008). Rumination and worrying as possible mediators in the relation between neuroticism and symptoms of depression and anxiety in clinically depressed individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1283–1289.
RustingC. L. (1998). Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 165–196.
66.
RustingC. L. (1999). Interactive effects of personality and mood on emotion-congruent memory and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1073–1086.
67.
SaklofskeD. H.KellyI. W.JanzenB. L. (1995). Neuroticism, depression, and depression proneness. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 27–31.
68.
SaleminkE.van den HoutM. (2010). Validation of the “recognition task” used in the training of interpretation biases. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 140–144.
69.
SaucierG. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516.
70.
StopaL.ClarkD. M. (2000). Social phobia and interpretation of social events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 273–283.
71.
SulsJ.MartinR. (2005). The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73, 1485–1510.
72.
UliaszekA. A.HaunerK. K.ZinbargR. E.CraskeM. G.MinekaS.GriffithJ. W.RoseR. D. (2009). An examination of content overlap and disorder-specific predictions in the associations of neuroticism with anxiety and depression. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 785–794.
73.
WatsonD.WeberK.AssenheimerJ. S.ClarkL. A.StraussM. E.McCormickR. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 3–14.
74.
WeissmanA. N.BeckA. T. (1978). Development and validation of the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago.
75.
WilliamsA. L.CraskeM. G.MinekaS.ZinbargR. E. (2019). Reciprocal effects of neuroticism and general distress: Vulnerability is stronger than scarring. Manuscript in preparation.
76.
WilsonE. J.MacLeodC.MathewsA.RutherfordE. M. (2006). The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 103–111.
77.
WoudM. L.ZhangX. C.BeckerE. S.McNallyR. J.MargrafJ. (2014). Don’t panic: Interpretation bias is predictive of new onsets of panic disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28, 83–87.
78.
YuanK. H.ChanW. (2002). Fitting structural equation models using estimating equations: A model segregation approach. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 55, 41–62.
79.
ZimmermanM.CoryellW.CorenthalC.WilsonS. (1986). A self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 1076–1081.
80.
ZinbargR. E.BarlowD. H. (1996). Structure of anxiety and the anxiety disorders: A hierarchical model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 181–193.
81.
ZinbargR. E.MinekaS.BobovaL.CraskeM. G.Vrshek-SchallhornS.GriffithJ. W.. . . AnandD. (2016). Testing a hierarchical model of neuroticism and its cognitive facets: Latent structure and prospective prediction of first onsets of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders during 3 years in late adolescence. Clinical Psychological Science, 4, 805–824.
82.
ZinbargR. E.RevelleW.YovelI.LiW. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
