Laboratory executive function (EF) constructs, such as response inhibition, are often conceptually linked with self-report measures of impulsivity, yet their empirical correlations are low. We examined, in two twin studies (ns = 749 and 761 individuals with EF data), the phenotypic and genetic overlap of three EF latent variables (a Common EF factor predicting response inhibition, working memory updating, and mental set-shifting tasks and Updating- and Shifting-Specific factors) with five impulsivity dimensions (negative and positive urgency, lack of premeditation and perseverance, and sensation seeking). In both samples, impulsivity dimensions were only modestly correlated phenotypically (rs = −.20–.11) and genetically (rAs = −.44–.04) with Common EF. In both samples, Common EF and multiple impulsivity dimensions, particularly negative urgency, independently predicted Externalizing psychopathology, and multiple impulsivity dimensions but not Common EF predicted Internalizing psychopathology. These results suggest that EFs and self-reported impulsivity tap different aspects of control that are both relevant for psychopathology.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BarkleyR. A.FischerM. (2011). Predicting impairment in major life activities and occupational functioning in hyperactive children as adults: Self-reported executive function (EF) deficits versus EF tests. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36, 137–161.
4.
BergJ. M.LatzmanR. D.BliwiseN. G.LilienfeldS. O. (2015). Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1129–1146.
5.
BezdjianS.BakerL. A.TuvbladC. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on impulsivity: A meta-analysis of twin, family and adoption studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 1209–1223.
6.
BickelW. K.JarmolowiczD. P.MuellerE. T.GatchalianK. M.McClureS. M. (2012). Are executive function and impulsivity antipodes? A conceptual reconstruction with special reference to addiction. Psychopharmacology, 221, 361–387.
7.
CaspiA.HoutsR. M.BelskyD. W.Goldman-MellorS. J.HarringtonH.IsraelS.. . . MoffittT. E. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders?Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119–137.
8.
CottlerL. B.RobinsL. N.HelzerJ. E. (1989). The reliability of the CIDI-SAM: A comprehensive substance abuse interview. Addiction, 84, 801–814.
9.
CuthbertB. N. (2014). The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 13, 28–35.
10.
CydersM. A.CoskunpinarA. (2011). Measurement of constructs using self-report and behavioral lab tasks: Is there overlap in nomothetic span and construct representation for impulsivity?Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 965–982.
11.
DerksE. M.DolanC. V.BoomsmaD. I. (2004). Effects of censoring on parameter estimates and power in genetic modeling. Twin Research, 7, 659–669.
12.
DickD. M.SmithG.OlaussonP.MitchellS. H.LeemanR. F.O’MalleyS. S.SherK. (2010). Understanding the construct of impulsivity and its relationship to alcohol use disorders. Addiction Biology, 15, 217–226.
13.
DuckworthA. L.KernM. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 259–268.
14.
EngelhardtL. E.BrileyD. A.MannF. D.HardenK. P.Tucker-DrobE. M. (2015). Genes unite executive functions in childhood. Psychological Science, 26, 1151–1163.
15.
EnkaviA. Z.EisenbergI. W.BissettP. G.MazzaG. L.MacKinnonD. P.MarschL. A.PoldrackR. A. (2019). Large-scale analysis of test-retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 5472–5477.
16.
EvendenJ. L. (1999). Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology, 146, 348–361.
17.
FriedmanN. P.du PontA.CorleyR. P.HewittJ. K. (2018). Longitudinal relations between depressive symptoms and executive functions from adolescence to early adulthood: A twin study. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 543–560.
18.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186–204.
19.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA.AltamiranoL. J.CorleyR. P.YoungS. E.RheaS.-A.HewittJ. K. (2016). Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study. Developmental Psychology, 52, 326–340.
20.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA.YoungS. E.DeFriesJ. C.CorleyR. P.HewittJ. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 201–225.
21.
GustavsonD. E.du PontA.HatoumA. S.RheeS. H.KremenW. S.HewittJ. K.FriedmanN. P. (2017). Genetic and environmental associations between procrastination and internalizing/externalizing psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 798–815.
22.
GustavsonD. E.FranzC. E.KremenW. S.CarverC. S.CorleyR. P.HewittJ. K.FriedmanN. P. (2019). Common genetic influences on impulsivity facets are related to goal management, psychopathology, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 161–175.
23.
GustavsonD. E.StallingsM. C.CorleyR. P.MiyakeA.HewittJ. K.FriedmanN. P. (2017). Executive functions and substance use: Relations in late adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 257–270.
24.
HardenK. P.KretschN.MannF. D.HerzhoffK.TackettJ. L.SteinbergL.Tucker-DrobE. M. (2017). Beyond dual systems: A genetically-informed, latent factor model of behavioral and self-report measures related to adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 221–234.
25.
HatoumA. S.RheeS. H.CorleyR. P.HewittJ. K.FriedmanN. P. (2018). Do executive functions explain the covariance between internalizing and externalizing behaviors?Development and Psychopathology, 30, 1371–1387.
26.
HerdS. A.O’ReillyR. C.HazyT. E.ChathamC. H.BrantA. M.FriedmanN. P. (2014). A neural network model of individual differences in task switching abilities. Neuropsychologia, 62, 375–389.
27.
HofmannW.SchmeichelB. J.BaddeleyA. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 174–180.
28.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
29.
ItoT. A.FriedmanN. P.BartholowB. D.CorrellJ.LoerschC.AltamiranoL. J.MiyakeA. (2015). Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 187–218.
30.
LynamD. R.WhitesideS. P.SmithG. T.CydersM. A. (2006). The UPPS-P: Assessing five personality pathways to impulsive behavior. Unpublished report, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
31.
MacKillopJ.WeaferJ.GrayJ.OshriA.PalmerA.WitH. (2016). The latent structure of impulsivity: Impulsive choice, Impulsive action, and impulsive personality traits. Psychopharmacology, 233, 3361–3370.
32.
MalanchiniM.EngelhardtL. E.GrotzingerA. D.HardenK. P.Tucker-DrobE. M. (2019). “Same but different”: Associations between multiple aspects of self-regulation, cognition, and academic abilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 1164–1188.
33.
MoffittT. E.ArseneaultL.BelskyD.DicksonN.HancoxR. J.HarringtonH.. . . CaspiA. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2693–2698.
34.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
35.
NealeM. C.HeathA. C.HewittJ. K.EavesL. J.FulkerD. W. (1989). Fitting genetic models with LISREL: Hypothesis testing. Behavior Genetics, 19, 37–49.
36.
NeckaE.GruszkaA.OrzechowskiJ.NowakM.WójcikN. (2018). The (in)significance of executive functions for the trait of self-control: A psychometric study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1139. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01139
37.
NeckaE.LechB.SobczykN.ŚmiejaM. (2012). How much do we know about our own cognitive control?European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 240–247.
38.
NiggJ. T. (2017). On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 361–383.
39.
RebolloI.De MoorM. H. M.DolanC. V.BoomsmaD. I. (2006). Phenotypic factor analysis of family data: Correction of the bias due to dependency. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 367–376.
40.
RheaS.-A.GrossA. A.HaberstickB. C.CorleyR. P. (2006). Colorado Twin Registry. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 941–949.
41.
RileyE. N.CombsJ. L.JordanC. E.SmithG. T. (2015). Negative urgency and lack of perseverance: Identification of differential pathways of onset and maintenance risk in the longitudinal prediction of nonsuicidal self-injury. Behavior Therapy, 46, 439–448.
42.
RobinsL. N.CottlerL. B.BucholzK. K.ComptonW. M.NorthC. S.RourkeK. M. (2000). The diagnostic interview schedule for DSM-IV (DIS-IV). St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine.
43.
SharmaL.MarkonK. E.ClarkL. A. (2014). Toward a theory of distinct types of “impulsive” behaviors: A meta-analysis of self-report and behavioral measures. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 374–408.
44.
ShulmanE. P.SmithA. R.SilvaK.IcenogleG.DuellN.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 103–117.
45.
SnyderH. R.MiyakeA.HankinB. L. (2015). Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: Bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 328. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00328
46.
StahlC.VossA.SchmitzF.NuszbaumM.TüscherO.LiebK.KlauerK. C. (2014). Behavioral components of impulsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 850–886.
47.
ToplakM. E.WestR. F.StanovichK. E. (2013). Practitioner Review: Do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 131–143.
48.
VenablesN. C.FoellJ.YanceyJ. R.KaneM. J.EngleR. W.PatrickC. J. (2018). Quantifying inhibitory control as externalizing proneness: A cross-domain model. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 561–580. doi:10.1177/216770261875769
49.
WilcoxR. R.KeselmanH. J. (2003). Modern robust data analysis methods: Measures of central tendency. Psychological Methods, 8, 254–274.
50.
ZelazoP. D.CarlsonS. M. (2012). Hot and cool executive function in childhood and adolescence: Development and plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 354–360.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
