Basic learning theorists developed the response-disequilibrium model to resolve the long-standing psychological puzzle of how to specify in advance the circumstances that will yield reinforcement effects. The model explains the behavioral changes in reinforcement effects as predictable adaptations to external constraints on the free-baseline levels of those behaviors. Here we introduce response-disequilibrium therapy (RDx), a clinical intervention based on this model. We present a series of clinical case studies using RDx to treat obsessive-compulsive disorders, report highly favorable results in comparison with the standard therapy, and discuss the implications.
AbramowitzJ. S. (2017). Exposure and response prevention in OCD. In PrittengerC. (Ed.), Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Phenomenology, pathophysiology, and treatment (pp. 411–419). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AbramowitzJ. S.BlakeyS. M.ReumanL.BuchholzJ. L. (2018). New directions in the cognitive-behavioral treatment of OCD: Theory, research, and practice. Behavior Therapy, 49, 311–322.
3.
AllisonJ. (1983). Behavioral economics. New York, NY: Praeger.
4.
AllisonJ.BuxtonA.MooreK. E. (1987). Bliss points, stop lines, and performance under schedule constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 331–340.
5.
AllisonJ.TimberlakeW. (1974). Instrumental and contingent saccharin-licking in rats: Response deprivation and reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 5, 231–247.
6.
AstinA. W. (1961). The functional autonomy of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 16, 75–78.
7.
BalsamP. D.BondyA. S. (1983). The negative side effects of reward. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 283–296.
8.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
9.
BelkeT. W.PierceW. D.MageeJ. H. G. L.LaffoleyE. V. (2016). Motivational shift: Effects of unrestricted and restricted feeding on wheel running as an operant and reinforcing consequence on a multiple schedule of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 55, 1–12.
10.
CraskeM. G.TreanorM.ConwayC.ZbozinekT.VervlietB. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, 10–23.
11.
DerogatisL. R.RickelsK.RockA. F. (1976). The SCL-90 and the MMPI. A step in the validation of a new self-report scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 280–289.
12.
DougherM. J. (1983). Clinical effects of response deprivation and response satiation procedures. Behavior Therapy, 14, 286–298.
13.
EisenbergerR.KarpmanM.TrattnerJ. (1967). What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 342–350.
14.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London, England: Hodder & Stoughton.
15.
FoaE. B.McCleanC. P. (2016). The efficacy of exposure therapy for anxiety-related disorders and its underlying mechanisms: The case of OCD and PTSD. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 1–28.
16.
GoodmanW. K.PriceL. H.RasmussenS. A.MazureC.FleischmannR. L.HillC. L.. . .CharneyD. S. (1989). Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 1006–1011.
17.
HaggeM.Van HoutenR. (2016). Review of the application of the response deprivation model to organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 36, 5–22.
18.
HerbertE. W.PinkstonE. M.HaydenM. L.SajwajT. E.PinkstonS.CorduraG.JacksonC. (1973). Adverse effects of differential parental attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 15–30.
19.
JacobsK. W.MorfordA. H.KingJ. E. (2019). Disequilibrium in behavior analysis: A disequilibrium theory redux. Behavioural Processes, 162, 197–204.
20.
JohnsonJ. W.MunkD. D.Van LaarhovenT.ReppA. C.DahlquistC. M. (2003). Classroom applications of the disequilibrium model of reinforcement. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 63–85.
21.
KazdinA. E. (1980). Behavior modification in applied settings. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
22.
KazdinA. E. (2018). Innovations in psychosocial interventions and their delivery: Leveraging cutting-edge science to improve the world’s mental health. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23.
KazdinA. E.BlaseS. L. (2011). Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 21–37.
24.
KazdinA. E.RabbittS. M. (2013). Novel models for delivering mental health services and reducing the burdens of mental illness. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 70–91.
25.
KonarskiE. A.Jr.CrowellC. R.DugganL. M. (1985). The use of response deprivation to increase the academic performance of EMR students. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 6, 15–31.
26.
KonarskiE. A.CrowellC. RJohnsonM. R.WhitmanT. L. (1981). Response deprivation, reinforcement, and instrumental academic performance in an EMR classroom. Behavior Therapy, 13, 94–102.
27.
KonarskiE. A.JohnsonC. R.CrowellM. R.WhitmanT. L. (1981). An alternative approach to reinforcement for applied researchers: Response deprivation. Behavior Therapy, 12, 653–666.
28.
LilienfeldS. O.LynnS. J.LohrJ. M. (2014). Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology: Initial thoughts, reflections, and considerations. In LilienfeldS. O.LynnS. J.LohrJ. M. (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Guilford.
29.
McFallR. M. (1970). Effects of self-monitoring on normal smoking behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 135–142.
30.
McFallR. M.HammenC. L. (1971). Motivation, structure, and self-monitoring: The role of nonspecific factors in smoking reduction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 37, 80–86.
31.
McFallR. M.TracyJ. A.GhoseS. S.SteinmetzJ. E. (2000). Can eyeblink classical conditioning provide a foundation for integrating clinical science and cognitive-neuroscience in the study of psychopathology? In Woodruff-PakD. S.SteinmetzJ. E. (Eds.), Eyeblink classical conditioning: Volume I. Applications in humans (pp. 253–274). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32.
MeehlP. E. (1950). On the circularity of the law of effect. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 52–75.
33.
MortimerA. R.TracyJ.McFallR. M.SteinmetzJ. E. (2001). Discrimination classical conditioning in a non-clinical obsessive-compulsive population. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Pavlovian Society, New Brunswick, NJ.
34.
PodsakoffP. M. (1982). Effects of schedule changes on human performance: An empirical test of the contrasting predictions of the law of effect, the probability-differential model, and the response-deprivation approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 322–351.
PremackD. (1965). Reinforcement theory. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 123–188). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
37.
SaelensB. E.EpsteinL. H. (1999). The rate of sedentary activities determines the reinforcing value of physical activity. Health Psychology, 18, 655–659.
38.
SalvyS. J.NiteckiB. A.EpsteinL. H. (2009). Do social activities substitute for food in youth?Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 205–212.
39.
SanavioE. (1988). Obsessions and compulsions: The Padua Inventory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 169–177.
40.
SieckW. A.McFallR. M. (1976). Some determinants of self-monitoring effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 958–965.
41.
TimberlakeW. (1993). Behavior systems and reinforcement: An integrative approach. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 105–128.
42.
TimberlakeW. (1995). Reconceptualizing reinforcement: A causal-system approach to reinforcement and behavior change. In O’DonohueW. T.KrasnerL. (Eds.), Theories of behavior therapy: Exploring behavior change (pp. 59–96). Washington, DC: APA.
43.
TimberlakeW.AllisonJ. (1974). Response deprivation: An empirical approach to instrumental performance. Psychological Review, 81, 146–164.
44.
TimberlakeW.Farmer-DouganV. A. (1991). Reinforcement in applied settings: Figuring out ahead of time what will work. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 397–391.
45.
TimberlakeW.WoznyM. (1979). Reversibility of reinforcement between eating and running by schedule changes: A comparison of hypotheses and models. Animal Learning and Behavior, 7, 461–469.
46.
TracyJ. A.GhoseS. S.StechlerT.McFallR. M.SteinmetzJ. E. (1999). Classical conditioning in a nonclinical obsessive-compulsive population. Psychological Science, 10, 9–13.
47.
TracyJ. A.McFallR. M.SteinmetzJ. E. (2005). Effects of emotional valence and arousal manipulation of eyeblink classical conditioning and autonomic measures. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 40, 45–54.
48.
VikenR. J.McFallR. M. (1994). Paradox lost: Implications of contemporary reinforcement theory for behavior therapy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 121–125.
49.
WahlerR. G. (1969). Oppositional children: A quest for parental reinforcement control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 159–170.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
