Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Beginning with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.; DSM-III), depressive episodes following the loss of a loved one were considered to represent normal grief if they did not include certain severe symptoms or if they lasted less than 2 months. This was called the bereavement exclusion rule. A debate about whether to eliminate the bereavement exclusion became a hotly contested issue during the DSM-5 revision process. The debate involved disagreements about which research studies were most relevant to assessing the validity of the bereavement exclusion rule, different value commitments regarding the distinction between normal and abnormal, and contrasting philosophical assumptions about the nature of psychiatric disorder. Based on a review of the arguments offered in academic journals, the blogosphere, and in the mass media, and on interviews with active participants in the debate, this article narrates a consensus history that reflects the diversity of viewpoints promoted during the debate and the diversity of views on the outcome.

Keywords

grief major depressive disorder normality psychiatric disorder psychopathology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., revision). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Boyd

(1991). Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philosophical Studies, 61, 127–148.

British Psychological Society. (2011). Response to the American Psychiatric Association DSM-5 development. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20110626015643/http://apps.bps.org.uk/_publicationfiles/consultation-responses/DSM-5%202011%20-%20BPS%20response.pdf

Cacciatore

(2012). DSM-5 and ethical relativism. Retrieved from http://drjoanne.blogspot.com/2012/03/relativity-applies-to-physics-not.html

Carey

(2012). Grief could join list of disorders. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/25/health/depressions-criteria-may-be-changed-to-include-grieving.html?_r=0&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1355666808-MnmILeo7U94cUfSE8Fqitw

Clayton

Desmarais

Winokur

(1968). A study of normal bereavement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125(2), 64–74.

10.

Clayton

P. J.

Halikas

J. A.

Maurice

W. L.

(1972). The depression of widowhood. British Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 71–78.

11.

Clayton

Herjanic

Murphy

G. E.

Woodruff

R. A. J.

(1974). Mourning and depression: Their similarities and differences. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 19, 309–312.

12.

Corruble

Chouinard

V.- A.

Letierce

Gorwood

P. A. P. M.

Chouinard

(2009). Is DSM-IV bereavement exclusion for major depressive episode relevant to severity and patterns of symptoms? A case-control, cross sectional study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 70, 1091–1097.

13.

Elkins

(2011). Message from David Elkins. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwRwqhhWh3o

14.

Feighner

J. P.

Robins

Guze

S. B.

Woodruff

R. A.

Winokur

Munoz

(1972). Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 57–63.

15.

First

M. B.

Kendler

K. S.

Leibenluft

(2017). The future of DSM: Implementing a continuous improvement model. JAMA Psychiatry, 74, 115–116.

16.

First

M. B.

Pies

R. W.

Zisook

(2011). Depression or bereavement? Defining the distinction. Medscape News: Psychiatry and Mental Health. Retrieved from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/740333

17.

Frances

(2009). A warning sign on the road to DSM-V: Beware of its unintended consequences. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/1425378

18.

Frances

(2010a, August 14). Good grief. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/opinion/15frances.html

19.

Frances

(2010b, March 16). Good grief vs major depressive disorder. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/how-avoid-medicalizing-normal-grief-dsm5

20.

Frances

(2010c). Grief v depression—One last word. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/dsm5-in-distress/201004/grief-vs-depression-one-last-word

21.

Frances

(2010d). How to avoid medicalizing normal grief in DSM5. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/how-avoid-medicalizing-normal-grief-dsm5

22.

Frances

(2010e). Opening Pandora’s box: The 19 worst suggestions for DSM-5. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.janusonline.it/sites/default/files/allegati_news/FrancesA_PsychiatricTimes110210.pdf

23.

Frances

(2011a). The British Psychological Society condemns DSM-5. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/dsm-5-0/british-psychological-society-condemns-dsm-5

24.

Frances

(2011b). Counselor’s turn again DSM-5: Can the APA ignore 120,000 users? Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/dsm-5-0/counselors-turn-against-dsm-5-can-apa-ignore-120000-users

25.

Frances

(2011c). The user’s revolt against DSM-5: Will it work? Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/blog/dsm-5/content/article/10168/1988483

26.

Frances

(2012). DSM 5 to the barricades on grief. Psychology Today. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/dsm5-in-distress/201202/dsm-5-the-barricades-grief

27.

Frances

(2013). Saving normal. New York, NY: William Morrow.

28.

Freud

(1917). Mourning and melancholia (J. Strachey, Trans.). In Strachey

(Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud Volume XIV (1914-1916) (pp. 243–258). London: The Hogarth Press.

29.

Friedman

R. A.

(2012). Grief, depression, and the DSM-5. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(20), 1855–1857.

30.

Greenberg

(2012, January 20). Not diseases, but categories of suffering. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/30/opinion/the-dsms-troubled-revision.html

31.

Haslam

(2016). Concept creep: Psychology’s expanding concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 1–17.

32.

Horwitz

A. V.

Wakefield

J. C.

(2007). The loss of sadness: How psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

33.

Karam

E. G.

(1994). The nosological status of bereavement-related depressions. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 48–52.

34.

Karam

E. G.

Tabet

C. C.

Alam

Shamseddeen

Chatila

Mneimneh

. . . Hamalian

(2009). Bereavement related and non-bereavement related depressions: A comparative field study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 112(1–3), 102–110.

35.

Keil

Keuck

Hauswald

(2017). Vagueness in psychiatry: An overview. In Keil

Keuck

Hauswald

(Eds.), Vagueness in psychiatry (pp. 3–23). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

36.

Keller

M. C.

Neale

M. C.

Kendler

K. S.

(2007). Association of different adverse life events with distinct patterns of depressive symptoms. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(10), 1521–1529.

37.

Kendler

K. S.

(1980). The nosologic validity of paranoia (simple delusional disorder). Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 699–706.

38.

Kendler

K. S.

(2010). A statement from Kenneth S. Kender, M.D. on the proposal to eliminate the bereavement exclusion for major depression. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org/about/Documents/grief%20exclusion_Kendler.pdf

39.

Kendler

K. S.

(2013). A history of the DSM-5 scientific review committee. Psychological Medicine, 43, 1793–1800.

40.

Kendler

K. S.

(2016). The nature of psychiatric disorders. World Psychiatry, 15, 5–12.

41.

Kendler

K. S.

Gardner

C. O.

Prescott

C. A.

(2002). Toward a comprehensive developmental model for major depression in women. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(7), 1133–1145.

42.

Kendler

K. S.

Gardner

C. O.

Prescott

C. A.

(2006). Toward a comprehensive developmental model for major depression in men. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(1), 115–124.

43.

Kendler

K. S.

Karkowski

L. M.

Prescott

C. A.

(1998). Stressful life events and major depression: Risk period, long-term contextual threat, and diagnostic specificity. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 186(11), 661–669.

44.

Kendler

K. S.

Karkowski

L. M.

Prescott

C. A.

(1999). Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(6), 837–841.

45.

Kendler

K. S.

Kupfer

D. J.

Narrow

Phillips

K. A.

Fawcett

(2009). Guidelines for making changes to DSM-5 revised 10/21/09. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org/ProgressReports/Documents/Guidelines-for-Making-Changes-to-DSM_1.pdf

46.

Kendler

K. S.

Myers

Zisook

(2008). Does bereavement-related major depression differ from major depression associated with other stressful life events? The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(11), 1449–1455.

47.

Kendler

K. S.

Zachar

Craver

(2011). What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders. Psychological Medicine, 41, 1143–1150.

48.

Kendler

K. S.

Zisook

(2009). Drs. Kendler and Zisook reply. American Journal of Psychiatry, 4, 492–493.

49.

Kessing

L. V.

Bukh

J. D.

Bock

Vinberg

Gether

(2010). Does bereavement-related first episode depression differ from other kinds of first depressions? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45(8), 801–808.

50.

Keuck

Frances

(2017). Reflections on what is normal, what is not, and fuzzy boundaries in psychiatric classification. In Keil

Keuck

Hauswald

(Eds.), Vagueness in psychiatry (pp. 152–168). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

51.

Kleinman

(2012). Culture, bereavement, and psychiatry. The Lancet, 379, 608–609.

52.

Lamb

Pies

Zisook

(2010). The bereavement exclusion for the diagnosis of major depression: To be, or not to be. Psychiatry, 7(7), 19–25.

53.

Lewis

(1938). States of depression: Their clinical and aetiological differentiation. The British Medical Journal, 2, 875–878.

54.

Lilienfeld

S. O.

Marino

(1999). Essentialism revisited: Evolutionary theory and the concept of mental disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(3), 400–411.

55.

Living with grief. (2012). Lancet, 379(9816), 589–589.

56.

Locke

D. W.

(2011). Open letter of behalf of the American Counseling Association. Retrieved from https://www.counseling.org/Resources/pdfs/ACA_DSM-5_letter_11-11.pdf

57.

McNally

R. J.

(2009). Can we fix PTSD in DSM-V? Depression and Anxiety, 26(7), 597–600.

58.

Mojtabai

(2011). Bereavement-related depressive episodes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(9), 920–928.

59.

NBC Nightly News. (2012). Grief may be characterized as a disorder. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/46139462#58115162

60.

Paykel

E. S.

Myers

J. K.

Dienelt

M. N.

Klerman

G. L.

Lindenthal

J. J.

Pepper

M. P.

(1969). Life events and depression: A controlled study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 21(6), 753–760.

61.

Pies

R. W.

(2008a). Major depression after recent loss is major depression—Until proved otherwise. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/major-depressive-disorder/major-depression-after-recent-loss-major-depression-%E2%80%94-until-proved-otherwise/page/0/2?pageNumber=1

62.

Pies

R. W.

(2008b). Redefining depression as mere sadness. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/health/views/16mind.html

63.

Pies

R. W.

(2009). Depression and the pitfalls of causality: Implications for DSM-V. Journal of Affective Disorders, 116(1–2), 1–3.

64.

Pies

R. W.

Zisook

(2010a). Disentangling grief and depression: Rejoinder to Dr. Frances. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/how-avoid-medicalizing-normal-grief-dsm5

65.

Pies

R. W.

Zisook

(2010b). DSM5 criteria won’t “medicalize” grief, if clinicians understand grief. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/dsm5-criteria-won%E2%80%99t-%E2%80%9Cmedicalize%E2%80%9D-grief-if-clinicians-understand-grief

66.

Pies

R. W.

Zisook

(2010c). Grief and depression redux: Response to Dr. Frances’s “compromise.” Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/grief-and-depression-redux-response-dr-frances%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Ccompromise%E2%80%9D

67.

Pincus

H. A.

Frances

Davis

W. W.

First

M. B.

(1992). DSM-IV and new diagnostic categories: Holding the line on proliferation. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(1), 112–117.

68.

Prigerson

H. G.

Horowitz

M. J.

Jacobs

S. C.

Parkes

C. M.

Aslan

Goodkin

. . . Maciejewski

P. K.

(2009). Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. Plos Medicine, 6(8), e1000121.

69.

Robins

Guze

S. B.

(1970). Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: Its application to schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126(7), 983–986.

70.

Roth

Kroll

(1986). The reality of mental illness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

71.

Shear

M. K.

Mulhare

(2008). Complicated grief. Psychiatric Annals, 38(10), 662–670.

72.

Society for Humanistic Psychology. (2011). Open letter to the DSM-5 task force and the American Psychiatric Association [press release]. Retrieved from http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dsm5/

73.

Speigel

(2010, August 2). Is emotional pain necessary. National Public Radio. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128874986

74.

van de Leemput

I. A.

Wichers

Cramer

A. O. J.

Borsboom

Tuerlinckx

Kuppens

. . . Scheffer

(2014). Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(1), 87–92.

75.

Wakefield

J. C.

(1992a). The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47(3), 373–388.

76.

Wakefield

J. C.

(1992b). Disorder as harmful dysfunction: A conceptual critique of DSM-III-R’s definition of mental disorder. Psychological Review, 99(2), 232–247.

77.

Wakefield

J. C.

(2004). The myth of open concepts: Meehl’s analysis of construct meaning versus black box essentialism. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 11, 77–82.

78.

Wakefield

J. C.

(2010). Misdiagnosing normality: Psychiatry’s failure to address the problem of false positive diagnoses of mental disorder in a changing professional environment. Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England), 19(4), 337–351.

79.

Wakefield

J. C.

(2011). Should uncomplicated bereavement-related depression be reclassified as a disorder in the DSM-5? Response to Kenneth S. Kendler’s statement defending the proposal to eliminate the bereavement exclusion. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(3), 203–208.

80.

Wakefield

J. C.

(2013). The DSM-5 debate over the bereavement exclusion: Psychiatric diagnosis and the future of empirically supported treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 825–845.

81.

Wakefield

J. C.

First

M. B.

(2012). Validity of the bereavement exclusion to major depression: Does the empirical evidence support the proposal to eliminate the exclusion in DSM-5. World Psychiatry, 11, 3–10.

82.

Wakefield

J. C.

Horwitz

A. Y.

(2016). Psychiatry’s continuing expansion of depressive disorder. In Wakefield

J. C.

Demazeux

Wakefield

J. C.

Demazeux

(Eds.), Sadness or depression? International perspectives on the depression epidemic and its meaning (Vol. 15, pp. 173–203). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.

83.

Wakefield

J. C.

Schmitz

M. F.

(2012). Recurrence of depression after bereavement-related depression. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 200, 480–485.

84.

Wakefield

J. C.

Schmitz

M. F.

(2013a). Can the DSM’s major depression bereavement exclusion b validly extended to other stressors? Evidence from the NCS. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 128, 294–305.

85.

Wakefield

J. C.

Schmitz

M. F.

(2013b). Normal vs. disordered bereavement-related depression: Are the differences real or tautological. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 127, 159–168.

86.

Wakefield

J. C.

Schmitz

M. F.

(2013c). When does depression become a disorder? Using recurrence rates to evaluate the validity of proposed changes in major depression diagnostic thresholds. World Psychiatry, 12, 44–52.

87.

Wakefield

J. C.

Schmitz

M. F.

Baer

J. C.

(2010). Does the DSM-IV clinical significance criterion for major depression reduce false positives? Evidence from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(3), 298-304.

88.

Wakefield

J. C.

Schmitz

M. F.

Baer

J. C.

(2011). Did narrowing the major depression bereavement exclusion from DSM-III-R to DSM-IV increase validity? Evidence from the National Comorbidity Survey. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(2), 66–73.

89.

Wakefield

J. C.

Schmitz

M. F.

First

M. B.

Horwitz

A. V.

(2007). Extending the bereavement exclusion for major depression to other losses. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 433–440.

90.

Wakefield

J. C.

Schmitz

M. F.

First

M. B.

Horwitz

A. V.

(2009). The importance of the main effect even within an interaction model: Elimination vs. expansion of the bereavement exclusion in the diagnostic criteria for depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(4), 491–492.

91.

Whoriskey

(2012). Antidepressants to treat grief? Psychiatry panelists with ties to drug industry say yes. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/antidepressants-to-treat-grief-psychiatry-panelists-with-ties-to-drug-industry-say-yes/2012/12/26/ca09cde6-3d60-11e2-ae43-cf491b837f7b_story.html

92.

Zachar

(2000). Folk taxonomies should not have essences either: A response to the commentary. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 7(3), 191–194.

93.

Zachar

Kendler

K. S.

(2014). A diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders history of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 202(4), 346–352.

94.

Zachar

Kendler

K. S.

(2017). The philosophy of nosology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 49–71.

95.

Zachar

Krueger

R. F.

Kendler

K. S.

(2016). Personality disorder in the DSM-5: An oral history. Psychological Medicine, 46, 1–10.

96.

Zachar

McNally

R. J.

(2017). Vagueness, the sorites paradox, and posttraumatic stress disorder. In Keil

Keuck

Hauswald

(Eds.), Vagueness in psychiatry (pp. 169–188). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

97.

Zisook

Corruble

Duan

Iglewicz

Karam

E. G.

Lanuoette

. . . Young

I. T.

(2012). The bereavement exclusion and DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 29(5), 425–443.

98.

Zisook

Kendler

K. S.

(2007). Is bereavement-related depression different than non-bereavement-related depression. Psychological Medicine, 37, 779–794.

99.

Zisook

Reynolds

Pies

R. W.

Simon

Lebowitz

Madowitz

. . . Shear

(2010). Bereavement, complicated grief, and DSM, Part 1: Depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 71, 955–956.

100.

Zisook

Shear

(2009). Grief and bereavement: What psychiatrists need to know. World Psychiatry, 8(2), 67–74.

101.

Zisook

Shear

Kendler

K. S.

(2007). Validity of the bereavement exclusion criterion for the diagnosis of major depressive episode. World Psychiatry, 6, 102–107.

102.

Zisook

Shuchter

S. R.

(1991). Depression through the first year after the death of a spouse. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(10), 1346–1352.

103.

Zisook

Shuchter

S. R.

(1993). Major depression associated with widowhood. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 1(4), 316–326.

The Bereavement Exclusion Debate in the DSM-5 : A History

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References